ライフサイエンスコーパス: protein intake

1 01, 0.12 mL .min(-1) .1.73 m(-2) per gram of protein intake).

2 . min(-1) . 1.73 m(-2) per gram of vegetable protein intake).

3 al, with lower values reflecting evenness of protein intake.

4 +/- 0.2 to 13.9 +/- 0.2 mg/dL] but not plant protein intake.

5 0.0001; -0.826 (-1.114, -0.538), P < 0.0001] protein intake.

6 affected by the quantity and distribution of protein intake.

7 few studies have examined prenatal maternal protein intake.

8 -up, study quality, and method of expressing protein intake.

9 ake, and the interaction between calcium and protein intake.

10 to improve and more evenly distribute daily protein intake.

11 a terrestrial diet with intervals of reduced protein intake.

12 and between sleep duration and rs6858749 on protein intake.

13 erweight/obesity was increased with a higher protein intake.

14 positively correlated (P < 0.001) with fish protein intake.

15 abolism and growth during periods of reduced protein intake.

16 ion was increased within 24 hours of reduced protein intake.

17 e good iron status have less impact on total protein intake.

18 n was independent of the amount of energy or protein intake.

19 ntake but not of total carbohydrate, fat, or protein intake.

20 n Cancer Society, is to increase calorie and protein intake.

21 erate evidence to support benefits of higher protein intake.

22 dairy protein intakes but not with vegetable protein intake.

23 ge of contribution of food intake to overall protein intake.

24 t kidney-damaging effects of long-term, high-protein intake.

25 considered before and during long-term, high-protein intake.

26 Nausea was a predictor of protein intake.

27 regard for the documented benefits of higher protein intakes.

28 objective recovery biomarkers of energy and protein intakes.

29 calibrated by using biomarkers of energy and protein intakes.

30 ongly predicts under-reporting of energy and protein intakes.

31 evidence shows no adverse effects of higher protein intakes.

32 s association was mainly driven by vegetable protein intake (0.22 mL x min(-1) x 1.73 m(-2); 95% CI:

33 compared with the effects of normal dietary protein intake (0.8-1.0 g .

34 talline amino acid mixture containing 1 of 7 protein intakes (0.1, 0.3, 0.6, 0.9, 1.2, 1.5, or 1.8 g

35 at intake (2.02%; 95% CI: 0.23%, 4.01%), and protein intake (2.09%; 95% CI: 0.70%, 3.62%) were higher

36 Glutamic acid contributed most to protein intake (21% of protein), whereas lysine provided

37 A dietary protein intake above the recommended dietary allowance d

38 ith lean mass, an even distribution of daily protein intake across meals is independently associated

39 lity and determined variables that predicted protein intake adequacy.

40 ditioned by the quantity and distribution of protein intake, adjusted for potential covariates.

41 Little is known about optimal protein intake after transplantation.

42 a-analysis evaluating the effects of dietary protein intake alone and with calcium with or without vi

43 Together with a restricted protein intake ammonia and glutamine plasma levels decre

44 We examined the association between protein intake and 60-d mortality in mechanically ventil

45 ght into potential link between FTO, dietary protein intake and adiposity.

46 orted an inverse association between dietary protein intake and blood pressure (BP).

47 hazards regression, and the relation between protein intake and BMD was estimated by using linear reg

48 Independent of habitual protein intake and despite increased MuRF1 and atrogin-1

49 Associations between protein intake and fracture were estimated by using Cox

50 Associations between source-specific protein intake and health outcomes were determined with

51 on, population growth plus higher per capita protein intake and increased connectivity to the sewer s

52 A longer-term investigation of the role of protein intake and its distribution on physical performa

53 assessed by using a nonlinear mixed model of protein intake and L-[1-(1)(3)C]phenylalanine oxidation.

54 ates the positive association between animal protein intake and long-term body weight change in middl

55 Within these acutely altered protein intake and nitrogen balance boundaries, a reduct

56 ing allele of FTO variant and higher dietary protein intake and offer insight into potential link bet

57 ere overall no associations between maternal protein intake and offspring fasting insulin and homeost

58 inverse association between energy-adjusted protein intake and recurrence.

59 tion of this circuit simultaneously promoted protein intake and restricted sugar consumption, via sig

60 An inverse association between plant protein intake and T2D was observed in women (RR: 0.93;

61 Associations between animal protein intake and T2D were similar across sex, geograph

62 itional intakes, allowing the maintenance of protein intake and the protein:energy ratio in the range

63 SD increase, respectively], whereas maternal protein intake and vitamin B-12 concentrations most stro

64 Our results suggest that greater protein intakes and a more even distribution across meal

65 tributed to the positive association between protein intakes and bone strength.

66 Yet men and women with evenly distributed protein intakes and men with high protein intakes showed

67 Systematic underreporting of energy and protein intakes and overreporting of protein density wer

68 ble regression analysis assessed whether low protein intakes and the MST score were predictive of LOS

69 iews the relationship between energy status, protein intake, and muscle protein turnover, and explore

70 hydrate quality, quantity; and distribution; protein intake; and fiber intake.

71 y was to determine whether 4 wk of increased protein intake ( approximately 25% compared with approxi

72 We showed that fruit, vegetable, and protein intakes are moderately heritable and that fruit

73 ed urinary recovery biomarkers of energy and protein intake as benchmarks.

74 derive a similar benefit from a maternal low protein intake as did GDM-exposed offspring.Overall, our

75 f food-frequency questionnaires and analyzed protein intake as grams per kilogram prepregnancy weight

76 usted linear regression models with maternal protein intake as the main predictor.

77 ed with lowest quintiles of total and animal protein intakes as percentages of energy were 1.23 (95%

78 h loss independently predicts low energy and protein intake, as well as serum albumin levels, biomark

79 In an enamel protein intake assay, enamel cells transfected with miR-

80 Total protein intake at 9 mo of age and baseline WAZ were impo

81 acid transporter expression correlated with protein intake at day 19.

82 evidence documenting the benefits of higher protein intakes at amounts approximating twice the RDA,

83 Increased protein intake, at the expense of maltodextrin, lowers B

84 Acute deviations in protein intake before the quantification of protein kine

85 riant (rs1421085) was associated with higher protein intake (beta +/- SE: 0.10 +/- 0.02%; P = 9.96 x

86 The difference in protein intake between breastfed and formula-fed infants

87 An average difference in protein intake between diets of 19 +/- 6 g/d was achieve

88 No significant differences in total fat or protein intake between the groups were found.

89 econd pattern was positively correlated with protein intake but negatively correlated with intakes of

90 ely associated with total, animal, and dairy protein intakes but not with vegetable protein intake.

91 Both groups were matched for protein intake, but the high-egg group reported less hun

92 up) (P = .70), despite an increase in actual protein intake by 0.6 g/kg/d (0.4-0.7 g/kg/d) (P < .001)

93 An increase in protein intake by 0.6 g/kg/d to a mean intake of 4.3 g/k

94 (AREE) by doubly labeled water; and dietary protein intake by self-report.

95 effect of permissive underfeeding with full protein intake compared with standard feeding on 90-day

96 Regarding total protein intake, compared with the lowest quartile, the t

97 g(-1) . d(-1)) increment in second-trimester protein intake corresponded to a -0.10 (95% CI: -0.18, -

98 dance of infant foods that provide excessive protein intakes could contribute to a reduction in child

99 Total energy, carbohydrate, fat, and protein intakes decreased markedly during the initial 1-

100 Adjustments for current energy and protein intakes did not attenuate the growth differences

101 Protein intakes did not modify FTO genotype effects on o

102 ake (particularly in caloric intake, dietary protein intake, dietary fiber intake, and micronutrient

103 Studies have shown that an even protein intake distribution across meals increased 24-h

104 e sought to assess the effects of within-day protein intake distribution on changes in body compositi

105 wn.We examined the relation between mealtime protein-intake distribution and physical performance and

106 bility rates of decline were not affected by protein-intake distribution in either sex.In addition to

107 We modeled protein intake distributions within countries using Gini

108 rial to test whether manipulation of dietary protein intake during a marked energy deficit in additio

109 We assessed the effect of protein intake during dietary energy restriction on inde

110 High protein intake during infancy may contribute to obesity

111 amined the relation between maternal dietary protein intake during pregnancy and offspring anthropome

112 Results suggest that higher protein intake during pregnancy does not increase fetal

113 s suggest that specifically maternal dietary protein intake during pregnancy influences childhood kid

114 ons of total, animal, and vegetable maternal protein intake during pregnancy with kidney volume and f

115 tive was to examine associations of maternal protein intake during pregnancy with offspring linear gr

116 In a population with relatively high protein intake during pregnancy, higher protein intake w

117 There is emerging evidence that high protein intake during the first 2 y of life is a risk fa

118 It therefore seems prudent to avoid a high protein intake during the first 2 y of life.

119 was to summarize selected health aspects of protein intake during the first 2 y of life.

120 otal and vegetable, but not animal, maternal protein intake during the first trimester of pregnancy i

121 High dietary protein intake during weight loss has no clinically sign

122 muscle protein metabolic responses to varied protein intakes during ED, RDA served as the study contr

123 In the assessment of UPS responses to varied protein intakes, ED, and feeding, the RDA, WM, and faste

124 significant association with higher dietary protein intake (effect per allele = 0.08 [0.06, 0.10] %,

125 some system (UPS) response to varied dietary protein intake, energy deficit (ED), and consumption of

126 However, the implications of higher protein intake, especially during developmentally sensit

127 The practice of acutely controlling protein intake, even at intakes lower than habitual inta

128 Factors other than protein intake explain lower muscle protein synthesis ra

129 research suggests that redistributing total protein intake from 1 high-protein meal/d to multiple mo

130 ng this period there is a marked increase in protein intake from an intake of approximately 5% of ene

131 Reported associations between protein intake from different sources and type 2 diabete

132 investigated whether a higher proportion of protein intake from energy beyond weaning is associated

133 nitrogen balance boundaries, a reduction in protein intake from habitual intake and induction of neg

134 r lower muscle FSR, and an acute increase in protein intake from habitual intake and induction of pos

135 Protein intake from meat and cheese were significantly r

136 In breastfed infants, higher protein intake from meats was associated with greater li

137 We hypothesized that an acute decrease in protein intake from the habitual intake is associated wi

138 teolysis rates, whereas an acute increase in protein intake from the habitual intake is associated wi

139 Uncalibrated and calibrated energy and protein intakes from FFQs were assessed for associations

140 librated and uncalibrated dietary energy and protein intakes from food-frequency questionnaires (FFQs

141 stiffness, bone microstructure, and dietary protein intakes from various origins (animal, divided in

142 used to 1) estimate the association between protein intake (grams per day) and BMD, ALM, appendicula

143 lly effective in older men who consume daily protein intakes greater than or equal to the RDA.

144 Purpose Greater protein intake has been associated with better breast ca

145 A high dietary protein intake has been shown to blunt the deposition of

146 Self-report of dietary energy and protein intakes has been shown to be systematically and

147 models, lower values of albumin, creatinine, protein intake, hemoglobin, and dialysis dose and a high

148 either low protein intake (LOW PRO) or high protein intake (HIGH PRO) on the postprandial muscle pro

149 A dietary protein intake higher than the Recommended Dietary Allow

150 For protein intake, higher body mass index, older age, nonsm

151 lta(1)(5)N may reflect broader animal-source protein intake in a European population.

152 To model per capita protein intake in countries around the world under eCO2,

153 These associations were not explained by protein intake in early childhood.

154 s are needed to investigate whether maternal protein intake in early pregnancy also affects the risk

155 es have investigated the role of postweaning protein intake in excess weight and adiposity of young c

156 long-term developmental consequences of low protein intake in free-living populations remains limite

157 To fully understand the role of dietary protein intake in healthy aging, greater efforts are nee

158 play an important role in the regulation of protein intake in humans.

159 and experimental evidence demonstrates that protein intake in infancy programs linear growth.

160 , which have led to recommendations to limit protein intake in later infancy.

161 otein catabolic rate (nPCR), an indicator of protein intake in MHD patients.

162 enefits and challenges of optimizing dietary protein intake in older adults continues to evolve.

163 Only in those children with high protein intake in our population (i.e., >42 g/d), a 1-un

164 are needed to determine whether low maternal protein intake in pregnancy may improve glucose homeosta

165 Animal studies have shown that protein intake in pregnancy may influence offspring fat

166 of carbohydrates for protein.The mean +/- SD protein intake in pregnancy was 93 +/- 15 g/d (16% +/- 3

167 ittle support for an association of maternal protein intake in pregnancy with measures of offspring m

168 mains limited.We examined the association of protein intake in pregnancy with offspring metabolic hea

169 Logistic regression investigated protein intake in relation to the odds of overweight or

170 eudicots, regularly comprising >60% of their protein intake in spring and fall.

171 eferences for savory food cues and increased protein intake in the ad libitum phase as compared with

172 The Recommended Daily Allowance (RDA) for protein intake in the adult population is widely promote

173 GDM-exposed offspring of mothers with a protein intake in the lowest decile (</=12.5% of energy

174 or up to 14 days while maintaining a similar protein intake in the two groups.

175 ein from cow milk constitutes a main part of protein intake in toddlers and seems to have a specific

176 Overall, calcium and protein intakes in accord with Dietary Reference Intakes

177 e metabolic or clinical effects of different protein intakes in adult critical illness and comprehens

178 o determine trends in carbohydrate, fat, and protein intakes in adults and their association with ene

179 create varied eating plans that provide for protein intakes in excess of the RDA but within the AMDR

180 ysine, tyrosine, or cysteine intake (as % of protein intake) in determining population BP or risk of

181 rticularly severe at 1 mo after surgery, and protein intake increased gradually after 3-6 mo after su

182 More-evenly distributed protein intake, independent of the total quantity, was a

183 Biomarkers of protein intake indicated interference of cereal fibers w

184 At this age, mean protein intake is approximately 3 times as high as the p

185 ectional analyses suggest that low vegetable protein intake is associated with lower BMD.

186 Delivery of >60% of the prescribed protein intake is associated with lower odds of mortalit

187 maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients, low protein intake is associated with protein-energy wasting

188 Dietary protein intake is linked to an increased incidence of ty

189 These data suggest higher protein intake is not detrimental to bone health in post

190 e hypothesis requires specific evidence that protein intake is regulated more strongly than energy in

191 e hypothesis requires specific evidence that protein intake is regulated more strongly than energy in

192 After adjusting for potential confounders, protein intake less than the RENI (odds ratio [OR], 1.48

193 However, the effects of dietary protein intake level and the food sources of dietary pro

194 ated the impact of habituation to either low protein intake (LOW PRO) or high protein intake (HIGH PR

195 In relation to mean enteral protein intake <20%, intake >/=60% of the prescribed goa

196 Abdominal fat was highest with low protein intakes (<16% of energy), and midthigh fat was h

197 ity, suggesting that potential risks of high protein intake may differ between breastfed and formula-

198 Moderate evidence suggested that higher protein intake may have a protective effect on lumbar sp

199 Dietary protein intake may help to manage blood pressure (BP) an

200 ggest that interventions to optimize dietary protein intake may improve vaccine efficacy in malnouris

201 efore, it has been suggested that additional protein intake may improve weight maintenance (WM) after

202 ional human studies have suggested that high-protein intake may increase CKD progression and even cau

203 However, increased protein intake may lead to hyperphosphatemia and hyperka

204 High-protein intake may positively impact bone health by seve

205 observational studies were inconsistent for protein intake (n = 29) and carbohydrate intake (n = 18)

206 ne mineral density (BMD) compared with lower protein intake (net percentage change: 0.52%; 95% CI: 0.

207 Biomarkers confirmed a difference in protein intake of 16 and 13.1 g at 12 and 24 mo, respect

208 consumed until 60 months, with median peanut protein intake of 7.5 g/wk (interquartile range, 6.0-9.0

209 The protein intake of first males also negatively affected f

210 Effects of protein intake on appetite-regulating hormones and their

211 comparing the effects of different levels of protein intake on clinically relevant outcomes and evide

212 present study evaluated the effects of whey protein intake on HSP70 expression.

213 h findings exist about the effect of dietary protein intake on indexes of sleep.

214 The impact of protein intake on outcomes in pediatric critical illness

215 ned the interaction between FTO genotype and protein intake on the long-term changes in appetite in a

216 e is a beneficial effect of animal and dairy protein intakes on bone strength and microstructure.

217 xamining 1) the effects of "high versus low" protein intake or 2) dietary protein's synergistic effec

218 whether such an association is modulated by protein intake or by the glycemic index (GI).

219 th a history of breast cancer in restricting protein intake or protein-containing foods.

220 BMD was not different across quartiles of protein intake (P-trend range = 0.32-0.82); but signific

221 (P-trend = 0.003), higher calibrated dietary protein intakes (P-trend = 0.03), higher aMED scores (P-

222 eal bone mineral density (aBMD), and dietary protein intakes, particularly from specific dietary sour

223 Per 20% increase in calibrated protein intake (percentage of energy), there was no sign

224 er, anti-diabetic medication, energy intake, protein intake, physical activity, and visceral fat area

225 AREE, but not protein intake, predicted preservation of FFM during CR

226 the renal medulla as the result of increased protein intake promote the water retention that is neede

227 Individuals in the lowest quartile of total protein intake (quartile 1) had significantly lower ALM,

228 th 24EE and SleepEE increased in relation to protein intake (r = 0.50, P = 0.02).

229 ver 8 wk in all 3 groups was correlated with protein intake (r = 0.60, P = 0.004) but not energy inta

230 nts consuming an amount of protein above the protein intake recommended by the American Diabetes Asso

231 rolled trial indicate that both soy and milk protein intake reduce systolic BP compared with a high-g

232 The role of sensory attributes of foods in protein intake regulation is far from clear.

233 However, total protein intake remained inadequate to meet recommendatio

234 Protein intakes remained consistent between groups.

235 tigations of the response to exercise, total protein intake requirements, and interaction with protei

236 A higher protein intake results in less growth faltering in human

237 istributed protein intakes and men with high protein intakes showed higher LM or aLM throughout the e

238 intake of whey, compared with casein and soy protein intakes, stimulates a greater acute response of

239 increased risks of T2D, whereas higher plant protein intake tended to be associated with lower risk o

240 typical 3-meal-a-day dietary plan results in protein intakes that are well within the guidelines of t

241 ween the groups, despite controlled research protein intakes that were lower (-0.2 to -0.3 g . kg(-1)

242 truth for protein density than for absolute protein intake, that the use of multiple 24-hour recalls

243 For animal protein intake, the RRs were 0.88 (95% CI, 0.73 to 1.06)

244 ions improved parental reports of children's protein intake.The results from this trial suggest that

245 phosphorus, potassium, and protein, and as a protein intake to potassium intake ratio (Pro:K) at 1 y

246 ived biomarker-calibrated dietary energy and protein intakes to address dietary self-report error.

247 We then estimated per-country protein intake under current and anticipated future eCO2

248 hese and other data demonstrate that reduced protein intake underlies the increase in circulating FGF

249 Protein intake varied directly according to the amount o

250 During the trial, protein intake was 1.11 +/- 0.28 g . kg body weight(-1)

251 Mean (range) second-trimester protein intake was 1.4 g . kg(-1) . d(-1) (0.3-3.1 g . k

252 We showed that in the ad libitum phase protein intake was 13% higher after the low-protein diet

253 Median biomarker-calibrated protein intake was 15% of energy intake.

254 Mean +/- SE total protein intake was 82.3 +/- 0.8 g/d (animal: 37.4 +/- 0.

255 Protein intake was 87 +/- 4 g/d at baseline and +/- 2 g/

256 Protein intake was assessed via food-frequency questionn

257 First-trimester energy-adjusted maternal protein intake was assessed with a food-frequency questi

258 First-trimester maternal total protein intake was associated with a higher childhood cr

259 Each 20% increase in calibrated protein intake was associated with a significantly highe

260 We found that maternal total protein intake was associated with a tendency for a high

261 Protein intake was associated with a trend in increased

262 Protein intake was associated with more rapid weight gai

263 high protein intake during pregnancy, higher protein intake was associated with shorter offspring bir

264 Compared with carbohydrate, dietary protein intake was associated with significant changes i

265 onal risk, permissive underfeeding with full protein intake was associated with similar outcomes as s

266 the Framingham Third Generation Study.Total protein intake was estimated by food-frequency questionn

267 The mean (+/- SD) protein intake was greater in the RT+Meat group than in

268 Plant protein intake was inversely associated with incident T2

269 This group difference in protein intake was maintained in a multivariable model t

270 First-trimester maternal protein intake was not significantly associated with chi

271 The reduction in protein intake was particularly severe at 1 mo after sur

272 The adequacy of enteral protein intake was significantly associated with 60-d mo

273 Protein intake was similar in the two groups (57+/-24 g

274 low-protein diet may stem from the fact that protein intake was sufficient to maintain nitrogen balan

275 ted by 25.3% (men, 21.8%; women, 27.3%), and protein intake was underestimated by 18.5% (men, 14.7%;

276 Urinary urea excretion, a marker for protein intake, was inversely related to graft failure i

277 Mean prescribed goals for daily energy and protein intake were 64 kcals/kg and 1.7 g/kg respectivel

278 Total, nondairy animal, dairy, and plant protein intake were estimated with the use of 24-h recal

279 nd urinary recovery biomarkers of energy and protein intakes were 0.27, 0.53, and 0.43, respectively.

280 owest categories of total, animal, and plant protein intakes were 1.09 (95% CI: 1.06, 1.13), 1.19 (95

281 Mean dietary calcium and protein intakes were greater than recommended amounts fo

282 Carbohydrate, fat, and protein intakes were obtained by dietary recall.

283 d the MST score were predictive of LOS.Total protein intakes were significantly higher in the ERAS gr

284 glycine and alanine (the percentage of total protein intake) were considered singly related directly

285 The Meat group had significantly higher protein intake, whereas energy, carbohydrate, and fat in

286 y both serve as potential biomarkers of fish protein intake, whereas only delta(1)(5)N may reflect br

287 fness of the peripheral skeleton and dietary protein intake, which is mainly related to changes in th

288 (BMD) are positively correlated with dietary protein intakes, which account for 1-8% of BMC and BMD v

289 owed that weight gain becomes independent of protein intake with an increasing number of HapA alleles

290 rials to evaluate the association of dietary protein intake with blood pressure.

291 itudinal models investigated associations of protein intake with BMI, weight, and height, with adjust

292 We examined the relation between protein intake with fracture and bone mineral density (B

293 might point to a ceiling effect for enteral protein intake with respect to its influence on growth.

294 mparing the women in the highest quintile of protein intake with those in the lowest quintile, the mu

295 ed the relations of total, animal, and plant protein intakes with incident T2D.

296 ions of urinary urea excretion, a marker for protein intake, with graft failure and mortality in rena

297 d atmospheric CO2 may widen the disparity in protein intake within countries, with plant-based diets

298 Higher biomarker-calibrated protein intake within the range of usual intake was inve

299 genic CO2 emissions threaten the adequacy of protein intake worldwide.

300 remains to be shown whether a relatively low protein intake would cause overeating or would be the ef