1 itutional ethics committee review board, and the volunteers
provided written consent before the study.
2 oved by local institutional review boards, and all patients
provided written consent.
3 pproved by the institutional review board, and all subjects
provided written consent.
4 Participants were
provided written information regarding fatty liver and advise
5 and Methods Ethical approval was obtained, and participants
provided written informe consent.
6 ltiple sclerosis ( SPMS secondary progressive MS ) patients
provided written informed consent and underwent 3-T MR imagin
7 hemical failure after radiation therapy for prostate cancer
provided written informed consent and were enrolled in a pros
8 l institutional review boards approved the study and donors
provided written informed consent before death.
9 All patients
provided written informed consent before the study; the need
10 med a retrospective data review of stem cell donors who had
provided written informed consent for stem cell donation and
11 All patients
provided written informed consent for study participation, th
12 Between Jan 14, 2008, and July 31, 2012, 4512 women
provided written informed consent of whom 3977 (88%) were eli
13 lished labour or active labour, aged 15 years or older, and
provided written informed consent on behalf of themselves and
14 principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, and all patients
provided written informed consent prior to enrollment.
15 All patients
provided written informed consent prior to undergoing any stu
16 Participants
provided written informed consent to a protocol that was appr
17 in the HERA trial, three patients had no evidence of having
provided written informed consent to participate.
18 7 (17.1%) were diagnosed as having dementia, and 634 (9.3%)
provided written informed consent to participate.
19 lation (all participants randomly assigned to treatment who
provided written informed consent).
20 All subjects
provided written informed consent, and the local institutiona
21 osture, and muscle tone, Materials and Methods All subjects
provided written informed consent, and the protocol was appro
22 Patients
provided written informed consent, or, at select sites, there
23 Women aged 18-60 years who
provided written informed consent, resided in the participati
24 view board-approved prospective study in which all subjects
provided written informed consent, six patients with relapsin
25 onal board approved multicenter study, and all participants
provided written informed consent.
26 r this institutional review board-approved study after they
provided written informed consent.
27 All subjects
provided written informed consent.
28 tional review board approved the study and all participants
provided written informed consent.
29 All participants
provided written informed consent.
30 L-12-02/1/2/3/4) and all the patients and the control group
provided written informed consent.
31 etween 2011 and 2013 were included in this study after they
provided written informed consent.
32 Participants
provided written informed consent.
33 iew board approval was obtained, and all recruited subjects
provided written informed consent.
34 dy approval by the local ethics committee, all participants
provided written informed consent.
35 All ethics were approved, and participants
provided written informed consent.
36 institutional review board of each center and participants
provided written informed consent.
37 pitalization were monitored over 5 years in 91 subjects who
provided written informed consent.
38 rmed about the investigational nature of the procedures and
provided written informed consent.
39 nt in the dyad spoke English, and all participating parents
provided written informed consent.
40 pproved by the institutional review board, and all patients
provided written informed consent.
41 tional review board approval was obtained, and all subjects
provided written informed consent.
42 local review board approved the protocol, and all patients
provided written informed consent.
43 tional review board approval was obtained, and all patients
provided written informed consent.
44 l was approved by local ethical committee; each participant
provided written informed consent.
45 d institutional review board approval, and all participants
provided written informed consent.
46 eview board of all four participating centers, and patients
provided written informed consent.
47 All patients
provided written informed consent.
48 All subjects
provided written informed consent; the study protocol was app
49 al of the institutional review boards, and all participants
provided written,
informed consent.
50 , collaborated with patients to identify specific problems,
provided written materials and delivered individualised exerc