ライフサイエンスコーパス: provocation

1 CM (LVOTG < 30 at rest but >/= 30 mm Hg with provocation).

2 the brain in the resting condition (without provocation).

3 (pulmonary function, bronchial methacholine provocation).

4 14.6 mug/mL Fel d1, and matched diluent-only provocation.

5 al and amygdala reactivity when triggered by provocation.

6 cellular activation following a local nasal provocation.

7 nce was observed in change in pain after ice provocation.

8 ic responses after laboratory-based allergen provocation.

9 s likely have in the lung following allergen provocation.

10 ivity was evaluated by means of cold dry air provocation.

11 r these cells in the lung following allergen provocation.

12 ial exhaled nitric oxide, and a methacholine provocation.

13 e in triggering T cell responses upon immune provocation.

14 f mice and people with asthma after allergen provocation.

15 he steady state and after local aeroallergen provocation.

16 e DC differed in response to allergic immune provocation.

17 len (n = 12) before and after birch allergen provocation.

18 ntal elicitation of eczematous lesions after provocation.

19 BALF exosomes from before and after allergen provocation.

20 ng, exercise tolerance testing, and ajmaline provocation.

21 s the host response following an immunologic provocation.

22 alated perpetrated aggression more following provocation.

23 nduced eosinophilia associated with allergen provocation.

24 mast cell-deficient mice after aeroallergen provocation.

25 breathing (n = 5) before a 2-minute carbogen provocation.

26 lbumin level in nasal-lavage fluid) to nasal provocation.

27 y to attack, particularly following physical provocation.

28 nt of an ongoing airway response to allergen provocation.

29 enously and retinal DeltaPo2 during carbogen provocation.

30 en autoimmune pathogenesis and environmental provocation.

31 ne tolerance in the face of constant antigen provocation.

32 57BL/6J) mice displayed an EPR following OVA provocation.

33 ed mast cell-deficient mice following an OVA provocation.

34 ar G-stress, but without the motion sickness provocation.

35 ess, was observed 5-30 minutes after antigen provocation.

36 circumstances, even during maximal bronchial provocation.

37 n their wild-type littermates after allergen provocation.

38 tralateral histamine, hours after unilateral provocation.

39 saline or BDP for 3 d before albuterol nasal provocation.

40 e responses to both allergic and nonallergic provocation.

41 pontaneous panic during the year after panic provocation.

42 outflow tract gradient >=50 mm Hg at rest or provocation.

43 is associated with higher experienced anger provocation.

44 th atopy and healthy subjects after allergen provocation.

45 es aggressive behavior in response to social provocation.

46 cellular protection after UVB carcinogenesis provocation.

47 also reported higher levels of anger-related provocation.

48 e indeed potentiates aggressive responses to provocation.

49 accumulated after several days of continued provocation.

50 l prefrontal cortex connectivity during high provocation.

51 timuli resulting in cessation of the symptom provocation.

52 2 methods of conducting controlled allergen provocations.

53 Exercise testing, drug provocation, advanced cardiac imaging, and genetic testi

54 Recommendations on oral provocation and desensitization procedures have been mad

55 Previous studies have used symptom provocation and positron emission tomography to delineat

56 y controls were subjected to topical cowhage provocation and skin prick testing with histamine and as

57 sion is increased in asthmatics following Ag provocation and suggest that modulation of TRAIL and TRA

58 Mouse models of allergen provocation and/or transgenic gene expression have provi

59 ructive (LVOTG >/= 30 mm Hg at rest and with provocation), and latent HCM (LVOTG < 30 at rest but >/=

60 ulted in the loss of a main source of immune provocation, and a consequent increase in pathogenic imm

61 Although calcium provocation-angiography is highly effective in the ident

62 challenged with OVA also received a late OVA provocation at a higher concentration and were then expo

63 dually tailored to achieve effective symptom provocation at neutral, intermediate and strong intensit

64 ts occurring in the lungs following allergen provocation at several key moments: (i) the initiating p

65 Bronchial allergen provocations (BAP) were repeated at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8

66 During the symptom provocation block, the participant could choose to rejec

67 t aggressive behaviors, such as responses to provocation, but that it also promotes nonaggressive beh

68 nd sudden cardiac death on catecholaminergic provocation by caffeine/epinephrine or programmed electr

69 Provocation by chronic immunosuppression, histology, and

70 aintains immune homeostasis despite constant provocation by environmental Ags.

71 in the intestinal mucosa, despite continuous provocation by environmental antigens, are jeopardized i

72 Aeroallergen provocation caused a 3-fold increase in the frequency of

73 In the second part, cold dry air provocation (CDA) was performed as a hyper-reactivity me

74 The diagnostic properties of a graded provocation challenge (PC) among children presenting wit

75 20 kD fraction (CPE w/o 20 kD) for allergic provocation challenge and immunotherapy.

76 A expression signatures for ME/CFS through a provocation challenge is essential for the elucidation o

77 NERD using blinded, placebo-controlled oral provocation challenge tests (OPCTs) or by self-reported

78 We therefore performed spirometry, bronchial provocation challenge, and fiberoptic bronchoscopy with

79 The results indicate that a CO(2) provocation challenge, in combination with ASL-MRI, is a

80 nt egg allergy need not be subject to an egg provocation challenge, reducing both costs and risks to

81 The patient refused an oral provocation challenge.

82 ypersensitivity, whereas in other cases oral provocation challenges are necessary to confirm the diag

83 or pepsinized cashew proteins and subsequent provocation challenges.

84 cs were performed (skin biopsy, subcutaneous provocation, clinical/laboratory assessment for thrombos

85 dy was to evaluate the colonoscopic allergen provocation (COLAP) test using the recombinant birch pol

86 y analysis, we defined AHR by a methacholine provocation concentration of 4 mg/mL or less, which led

87 d with the occurrence of aggression in a low provocation condition, but significantly predicts such b

88 ntradermal" skin testing, "oral challenge or provocation," "cross-reactivity," and "antimicrobial ste

89 retinal oxygenation response to a hyperoxic provocation (DeltaPo2) is strongly associated with subse

90 el individualized ecologically valid symptom provocation design: a live provocation functional magnet

91 nges of R5, R20, R5-R20, X5, Fres, ALX after provocations for ACh or Hist in all patients with asthma

92 treatments following individualized symptom provocation, for 6 weeks.

93 lly valid symptom provocation design: a live provocation functional magnetic resonance imaging paradi

94 HTS nasal provocations identified significant, unique patterns of

95 Mood provocation in both depressed groups resulted in regiona

96 and early asthmatic responses after allergen provocation in patients with allergic asthma.

97 +) waves evoked by high extracellular Ca(2+) provocation in S2814D(+/+) mice into non-propagated Ca(2

98 mation resolved 48 h after a single allergen provocation in sensitized control mice, but not in anima

99 ype synthesis and is unusual in the apparent provocation in the reaction of an increase in core size.

100 er, the rapid release of IL-33 upon allergen provocation in vivo supports its role as a mediator of i

101 ated whether IL-33 is released upon allergen provocation in vivo.

102 inhibitory control of emotional reactions to provocations in antisocial individuals.

103 Ten healthy subjects underwent provocations in which single doses of methacholine, prev

104 This increased generosity in the absence of provocation indicates that testosterone can also cause p

105 During arrhythmia provocation induced by catecholamine injections, TG anim

106 tro-derived signatures to show that allergen provocation induces distinct M2 state transcriptional pa

107 Aeroallergen provocation induces the rapid accumulation of CD11c(+)MH

108 25 mg/ml) underwent single-dose methacholine provocations inducing at least 20% reduction in FEV1 aft

109 ot reactive (provoked) aggression (alcohol x provocation interaction).

110 curs with greater intensity and frequency as provocation is experimentally manipulated upwards, espec

111 Implementing control over these provocations is essential to healthy functioning; howeve

112 d flow in psoriatic plaques before and after provocations known to alter cutaneous vascular resistanc

113 herein depressive episodes occur with little provocation, may be reached by two pathways: many previo

114 rms by visual analog scale scores before ice provocation (median, 0.00; range, -3.30 to 0.70 for botu

115 rovocation, median MRC, 5; range, 3-5; after provocation, median MRC, 3; range, 1-4) and increased SI

116 n reduced muscle strength in HyperPP (before provocation, median MRC, 5; range, 3-5; after provocatio

117 ir home cage, both with and without physical provocation (mild tail pinch).

118 In this study, we used a defined OVA provocation model and mice deficient for specific leukoc

119 rrect diagnosis is crucial, but no validated provocation model exists, and other diagnostic tests hav

120 l mechanisms were evaluated in a human nasal provocation model.

121 oth spontaneously and in a resident/intruder provocation model.

122 d not to the sensitization phase of allergen provocation models.

123 for associations with findings from ajmaline provocation (n=332), exercise ECG (n=304), and signal-av

124 ously shown to be critical for the bacterial provocation of a pathogenesis-promoting host innate immu

125 alone, are probably important factors in the provocation of a relapse of vivax malaria.

126 wn function of human sebaceous glands is the provocation of acne.

127 Allergen provocation of allergic asthma patients is often charact

128 Provocation of an angerlike state results in T-wave alte

129 Provocation of an autoimmune response against NaV1.5 ind

130 n confirmed and expanded upon using allergen provocation of an inducible eosinophil-deficient strain

131 only in apoptotic processes but also in the provocation of angiogenic and proinflammatory responses.

132 Despite the frequent provocation of chest pain and electrocardiographic abnor

133 olves direct tissue toxic effects as well as provocation of destructive bystander immune responses.

134 second primate species with and without the provocation of increased peripheral homeostatic T-cell a

135 brogated regulatory cytokine production with provocation of inflammatory T-cell responses to apoptoti

136 ickness' procedure immersion was preceded by provocation of motion sickness in a human centrifuge.

137 The experimental provocation of panic in nonclinical subjects appears to

138 were compared with those of dexamethasone in provocation of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonitis in virus

139 5)O]H(2)O positron emission tomography after provocation of sadness with autobiographical memory scri

140 Sensorineural deafness in MWS, and provocation of symptoms by cold in FCU, are distinctive

141 if CNS substance P concentrations change on provocation of symptoms in PTSD patients.

142 of concordant functional change accompanying provocation of transient sadness in healthy volunteers a

143 The authors examined the effect of panic provocation on the subsequent development of panic attac

144 NOS2 protein was noted within 6 hours of LPS provocation only in the hearts of wild-type mice.

145 n the rate of positive responses to mannitol provocation or Feno measurements.

146 and visual analog scale before and after ice provocation over a 4-week period.

147 Predosing FEV1 dropped 10% over 4 wk of provocation (p = 0.001) and 7 of 9 returned to prestudy

148 specific lung resistance 4 to 8 h following provocation, p < 0.05 versus vehicle treatment) and airw

149 rs (0.53+/-0.06 before and 0.54+/-0.06 after provocation, P=.3).

150 32 healthy controls (HC) underwent a symptom provocation paradigm during which subjects watched video

151 esponsive to a script-driven imagery symptom provocation paradigm, were exposed sequentially to audio

152 increased subjective anxiety during symptom provocation (patients significantly more so) and activat

153 In the three conditions with pollen provocation, patients were pretreated with either cetiri

154 Following provocation, PCPA and TP+PCPA significantly increased ag

155 t when JNJ28307474 was only given during the provocation phase of the allergic reaction.

156 The pathogenic mechanism of provocation poliomyelitis may differ from that of polio

157 This phenomenon, labeled "provocation poliomyelitis," continues to cause numerous

158 chanism linking intramuscular injections and provocation poliomyelitis.

159 minal hyperactivity during patients' symptom provocation preceded subsequent deactivation during avoi

160 In the remitted group, mood provocation produced a unique rCBF decrease in pregenual

161 Provocation reduced muscle strength in HyperPP (before p

162 rtex helps ensure that irrelevant affordance provocations remain below the threshold for actual movem

163 , bronchodilator test, FeNO, or methacholine provocation, respectively, for asthma diagnosis in adult

164 CDA provocation resulted in a significant increase in rhinit

165 At every step of the provocation, scanning was performed at approximately the

166 utflow tract (LVOT) gradient at rest or with provocation, septal thickness, and baseline exercise dur

167 ine from 16 atopic asthmatics under allergen provocation, showing increases in metabolites of prostag

168 nged subjects reported immediate itch at the provocation site (short lasting, for 2-6 min).

169 gnificantly predicts such behavior in a high provocation situation.

170 NSAIDs hypersensitivity (which include drug provocations, skin testing and in vitro testing) and pro

171 During methacholine provocation, small airway dysfunction was more severe in

172 onse of ER subtypes to exercise and ajmaline provocation suggests underlying mechanisms of both abnor

173 lcholine leading to a positive acetylcholine provocation test (ACH test).

174 Conjunctival allergen provocation test (CAPT) reproduces the events occurring

175 icacy was assessed by comparing conjunctival provocation test (CPT) reactions at baseline, after 4 we

176 Conjunctival provocation test (CPT) response thresholds improved from

177 e diagnostic value of a skin test (ST), drug provocation test (DPT) and basophil activation test (BAT

178 ants of PG (PPL/MDM), AX and CLV and by drug provocation test (DPT) if required.

179 ablish the role of skin testing and the drug provocation test (DPT) in the diagnosis of nonimmediate

180 ions of skin test (ST) reagents, ST and drug provocation test (DPT) protocols, and diagnostic algorit

181 ions of skin test (ST) reagents, ST and drug provocation test (DPT) protocols, as well as diagnostic

182 A positive patch test or drug provocation test (DPT) was used to define positive drug

183 Patients confirmed as NIUA by positive drug provocation test (DPT) with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) d

184 Evidence regarding drug provocation test (DPT) with antineoplastic and biologica

185 erum specific IgE (sIgE), and nasal allergen provocation test (NAPT) into the LAR, allergic rhinitis

186 and a positive response to a nasal allergen provocation test (NAPT) without evidence of systemic ato

187 serum specific IgE and IgG4, nasal allergen provocation test (NAPT), and adverse events.

188 of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ), nasal allergen provocation test (NAPT), skin testing, serum levels of s

189 display nasal reactivity upon nasal allergen provocation test (NAPT).

190 in symptom scores following a titrated nasal provocation test (TNPT) at baseline and after 5 months o

191 oconjunctivitis (ARC) using a titrated nasal provocation test (TNPT).

192 he summer, and she reacted positively to the provocation test at the work place, but not in the house

193 with optical coherence tomography during the provocation test for coronary spasm.

194 t past medical history underwent an ajmaline provocation test for investigation of suspected Brugada

195 scores at baseline and during a methacholine provocation test in 15 subjects with asymptomatic BHR, 1

196 The intracoronary acetylcholine provocation test is a safe technique to assess coronary

197 owder mannitol for inhalation as a bronchial provocation test is FDA approved however not currently a

198 E antibodies is useful, and a nasal allergen provocation test is needed to identify the culprit aller

199 Drug provocation test is vital to validate diagnostic tools;

200 traction Aggression Paradigm (a computerized provocation test of aggression), the Aggression Question

201 Drug provocation test protocols for NSAID are empirical, driv

202 aeroallergens, and a positive nasal allergen provocation test response with release of inflammatory m

203 No change in provocation test results was found.

204 not found at her grandmother's house, and a provocation test there was negative.

205 olved in the reaction, and (4) negative oral provocation test to the culprit NSAID.

206 The food-exercise provocation test using heated black tiger shrimp with ad

207 A provocation test using jellyfish samples was not perform

208 osis, a single-blind placebo-controlled drug provocation test was performed with aspirin or diclofena

209 The provocation test was positive in 95% of bronchial and 90

210 tructive (LVOTG < 30 mm Hg at rest and after provocation test with amyl nitrite), obstructive (LVOTG

211 od and pollen allergy symptoms, conjunctival provocation test with birch pollen and Bet v 1, and in v

212 1) and 24 hours after (Visit 3) a bronchial provocation test with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (BP

213 A bronchial provocation test with dry air was conducted in 42 player

214 measures design, patients underwent a nasal provocation test with either pollen or inactive control

215 A nasal allergen provocation test with multiple aeroallergens (NAPT-M), i

216 re diagnosed by a wheat ingestion + exercise provocation test.

217 and exercise electrocardiograms and ajmaline provocation test.

218 nea was rated with the Borg score during the provocation test.

219 d had a positive bronchodilator or bronchial provocation test.

220 rgen-specific IgE test (ImmunoCAP((R))), and provocation test.

221 nd, severe symptoms might be provoked by the provocation test.

222 omplete CFT consisted of acetylcholine spasm provocation testing and assessment of microcirculatory f

223 e a review of published data for the role of provocation testing in the diagnosis of coronary spasm.

224 s, and safety of intracoronary acetylcholine provocation testing in white patients with unobstructed

225 B, UV-A, and visible radiation and broadband provocation testing showing similar results.

226 The intracoronary acetylcholine provocation testing was performed directly after angiogr

227 Drug provocation testing was undertaken by 87% of respondents

228 es with airway hyperresponsiveness (mannitol provocation testing) or inflammation (Feno).

229 tional exhaled nitric oxide (Feno), mannitol provocation testing, and (3)He gas magnetic resonance im

230 ame specificity as that detected in skin and provocation testing, and to explore T-cell activation pa

231 Conjunctival provocation tests (CPT) were performed before, during an

232 Conjunctival provocation tests (CPT), skin prick tests (SPT), BAT, an

233 ST), 12 by positive IgE and 42 by controlled provocation tests (CPT)].

234 Drug provocation tests (DPT) are commonly performed as part o

235 Drug provocation tests (DPTs) are particularly needed for NSA

236 Nasal allergen provocation tests (NAPT) with Dermatophagoides pteronyss

237 Immediate responses to nasal allergen provocation tests (NAPTs) with Art v 3, Pru p 3, and mug

238 Single-blind, placebo-controlled oral provocation tests (OPTs) with the PPIs other than the cu

239 with a confirmed NSAID-H were found by oral provocation tests (OPTs).

240 Ts) and single-blind placebo-controlled drug provocation tests (SBPCDPTs) were performed with both dr

241 Single-blind, placebo-controlled provocation tests (SBPCPTs) with aspirin were performed

242 The results of exercise provocation tests and patients' characteristics were ret

243 tation and in severe reactions in which drug provocation tests are contraindicated.

244 eristics of the symptoms induced by exercise provocation tests following allergen consumption in pati

245 Patients who were positive for exercise provocation tests in Miyagi Children's Hospital from Apr

246 inical benefit of cowhage and histamine skin provocation tests should be investigated in further stud

247 Following OIT, the assessment using exercise provocation tests should be performed prior to terminati

248 ated the efficacy and the safety of exercise provocation tests to assess exercise tolerance after con

249 specific immunoglobulins and skin and nasal provocation tests to grass pollen.

250 Many patients therefore require provocation tests to make a definitive diagnosis; these

251 However, provocation tests using intracoronary acetylcholine admi

252 Aspirin-supplemented provocation tests were performed to 4 cases who had nega

253 Conjunctival and bronchial provocation tests were performed with purified profilin

254 on data from patients who underwent exercise provocation tests with consumption of their allergen aft

255 Nasal allergen provocation tests with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, A

256 iable tools (eg, questionnaires or bronchial provocation tests with small-particle stimuli) to assess

257 least two different NSAIDs or positive drug provocation tests), (ii) patients with more than two epi

258 Among pain provocation tests, a positive painful arc test result wa

259 s available in only half of the cases, while provocation tests, allergen quantification in homes, and

260 ng time-consuming and potentially risky oral provocation tests.

261 ut of 91 patients were positive for exercise provocation tests.

262 index and normal growth-hormone responses to provocation tests.

263 oup by a combination of diurnal profiles and provocation tests.

264 ns concerning allergy tests, especially drug provocation tests.

265 relies-as in humans-on elimination diet and provocation tests.

266 nsive and potentially risky, especially drug provocation tests.

267 lls) and (vii) In vivo biomarkers (including provocation tests?).

268 I intend this article to be a provocation that can help clarify our disciplinary inten

269 ly analysed the neural correlates of symptom provocation, the urge to avoid, rejection and relief.

270 llergen challenge and endobronchial allergen provocation through a bronchoscope.

271 ergen challenges, and endobronchial allergen provocations through a bronchoscope.

272 itching and whealing after standardized skin provocation to elicit Darier's sign.

273 lprit lesion (n = 76) but with acetylcholine provocation (total n = 346).

274 s (mean age, 38 years+/-12) before and after provocation (unilateral cooling, one calf).

275 ficient recipient mice subjected to allergen provocation using established models of respiratory infl

276 hat included postural (tandem gait), symptom provocation (Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening), and ocu

277 small airway dysfunction during methacholine provocation was associated with a higher increase in Bor

278 lesion, in whom intracoronary acetylcholine provocation was performed, had coronary spasm.

279 increase in dyspnea during the methacholine provocation was strongly and independently correlated wi

280 es to intracoronary acetylcholine (vasospasm provocation) was performed in 151 INOCA subjects.

281 VA-specific IgG, but not IgE, before the OVA provocation, was capable of inducing the EPR in both str

282 interleukin (IL)-6 cytokine responses to LPS provocation were determined.

283 rways for several weeks in response to brief provocation with A. alternata in wild-type, Gm-csf- and

284 alculated the percent decrease in FEV1 after provocation with ACh or Hist.

285 methacholine chloride and after reversal of provocation with albuterol.

286 Nasal provocation with allergen significantly increased NGF pr

287 Before provocation with allergen, administration of anti-IL-5 a

288 ) and markedly longer itch persistence after provocation with cowhage (P < 0.01).

289 Provocation with des-Arg10-lysylbradykinin did not cause

290 d 1), and cockroach (Bla g 2) allergens; and provocation with histamine to test for bronchial hyperre

291 Noncarina PV triggers more commonly require provocation with isoproterenol infusion.

292 cumented with ictal video-EEG studies during provocation with language related tasks.

293 control subjects before and after bronchial provocation with methacholine chloride and after reversa

294 Bronchial provocation with methacholine was also performed in five

295 d to an increase in dyspnea during bronchial provocation with methacholine.

296 OVA-induced airway hyperresponsiveness after provocation with methacholine.

297 By pairing symptom provocation with online avoidance responses on a trial-b

298 cases developed positive responses after re-provocation with PG/PV.

299 in nasal lavage fluids were not affected by provocation with the vehicle for allergen or with histam

300 es with >2 different NSAIDs or positive drug provocation) with either cutaneous (MNSAID-UA, n = 25) o