ライフサイエンスコーパス: pulsed-field gel electrophoresis

1 erythromycin (for isolates not available for pulsed-field gel electrophoresis).

2 erized (mecA confirmation, SCCmec typing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis).

3 Double-strand DNA damage was detected by pulsed field gel electrophoresis.

4 n artefact of preparation of genomic DNA for pulsed field gel electrophoresis.

5 Isolates were typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

6 IV-negative patients; isolates were typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

7 ant, as determined by infectivity assays and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

8 -induced chromosomal DNA damage monitored by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

9 dom amplification of polymorphic DNA PCR and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

10 llected from 2000 to 2008 were identified by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

11 and clonal relationships were determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

12 eus isolates were unrelated as determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

13 e the strains by standard techniques such as pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

14 were identical by biochemical profiling and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

15 ns lacking the mre11 gene was observed using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

16 paced breaks yield DSBs that are observed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

17 ominissuisisolates is easier and faster than pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

18 andom-amplified polymorphic DNA analysis and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

19 , IL, between 2004 and 2007 were analyzed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

20 82 isolates, which were indistinguishable by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

21 striction enzyme and size-fractionated using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

22 hat of multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

23 treatment daptomycin-susceptible isolates by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

24 A from PBCV-1-infected cells was examined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

25 Isolates were compared using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

26 olonized subjects were initially compared by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

27 gth from the ALT cell lines as determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

28 lomeric DNA was confirmed by two-dimensional pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

29 sequencing for genospecies and genotyped by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

30 oquinolone resistance-determining loci), and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

31 yping of the E. coli isolates was done using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

32 and clonal relatedness was established using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

33 able to more arduous typing systems, such as pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

34 elonged to 1 of 7 clonal types as defined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

35 The isolates were subtyped by ribotyping and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

36 nly to MRSA isolates that were available for pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, 91% (159 of 175 isolat

37 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis allows the number of DN

38 These results reveal why pulsed field gel electrophoresis analysis of SmaI-digest

39 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis confirmed that

40 Standardized pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis facilitates st

41 Using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis in eight Sos p

42 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis indicated that

43 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis indicated that

44 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis suggested that

45 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis using probes a

46 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis yielded multip

47 genetically distant rectal isolate (based on pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis) with a profil

48 confirmed by multilocus sequence typing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis.

49 the analysis of DSB rejoining kinetics using pulsed field gel electrophoresis and assessment of host

50 Using quantitative pulsed field gel electrophoresis and sensitive DNA synth

51 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and antimicrobial susce

52 Genomic analysis using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and array based genomic

53 olates were closely related to each other by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and contained a common

54 mosomal damage was directly visualized using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and demonstrated repair

55 rUTI strains were characterized by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and genomic virulence p

56 he formation of DNA DSBs, as demonstrated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and H2AX phosphorylatio

57 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and hybridization analy

58 mpared with those from the United Kingdom by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and integron analysis.

59 racterize possible transmission routes using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and multi-locus variabl

60 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and multilocus sequence

61 Genotyping by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and multilocus sequence

62 ed both environmental and clinical ESBLEC by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and multilocus sequence

63 to the maximum parsimony trees inferred from pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and multilocus variable

64 sequence type 94, were indistinguishable by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and optical mapping, an

65 University Hospital (SUH) were genotyped by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and PCR for SCCmec and

66 ir proficiency in G0/G1 phase as measured by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and repair focus resolu

67 performed two band-based typing techniques (pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and repetitive extragen

68 We used pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and restriction fragmen

69 al isolates were characterized as CA-MRSA by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and susceptibility test

70 solates from seven patients were analyzed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and VNTR typing.

71 terization of the 66 isolates was done using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and whole-genome sequen

72 zed by antimicrobial-susceptibility testing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and detection of toxin

73 es: multilocus sequence typing, spaA typing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and determination of t

74 Isolates were compared by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and most belonged to a

75 chain reaction (PCR) for 31 virulence genes, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and multilocus sequenc

76 erwent antimicrobial susceptibility testing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and multiplex PCR for

77 rRNA gene sequence analysis, genotyped using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and phenotyped for a r

78 lates utilized multilocus sequence typing or pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, but high-resolution ex

79 ere tested for antimicrobial susceptibility, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis clonal type, toxin gene

80 he induction of cellular DNA breaks based on pulsed field gel electrophoresis, comet analysis, and ga

81 ion of YAC DNA from yeast chromosomal DNA by pulsed field gel electrophoresis, concentration to a ran

82 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, custom array comparati

83 clinical isolates labeled according to their pulsed-field gel electrophoresis data for strain differe

84 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis demonstrated the epidem

85 Pulsed field gel electrophoresis determined that 91% of

86 determined by polymerase chain reaction and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis differed from that of B

87 itional PCR analyses, sequencing studies and pulsed field gel electrophoresis experiments determined

88 T131 and its ESBL-associated H30Rx subclone, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, extended virulence gen

89 ts in less than 5 h and, in conjunction with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, forms a very robust te

90 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis genotyping indicated th

91 tularensis isolates by DISA correlated with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis genotyping utilizing tw

92 Multilocus sequence typing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis identified 2 genotypes-

93 identify irregular clusters of illness, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis in conjunction with who

94 Although pulsed-field gel electrophoresis indicated that multiple

95 Molecular analyses included strain typing by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, mec and accessory gene

96 Forty CR-Kp were genotyped by pulsed field gel electrophoresis, multilocus sequence ty

97 to a single genetic clone, as determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, multilocus sequence ty

98 hicillin susceptible) using a combination of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, multilocus sequence ty

99 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, multilocus sequence ty

100 testing, sequencing of beta-lactamase genes, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, multilocus sequence ty

101 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of the CTX-M-positive i

102 tococcus pneumoniae serogroup 35 isolates by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of the genome and pbp2b

103 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis on 63 of the 70 isolate

104 We performed pulsed-field gel electrophoresis on Escherichia coli O15

105 m 6 confirmed cases had an indistinguishable pulsed-field gel electrophoresis pattern and belonged to

106 s Typhimurium and Newport that had different pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns and in identif

107 Epidemiologic investigation and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns indicated a cl

108 ed PCR strategy was used to analyze the AscI pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns of Listeria mo

109 Isolates that differed in their pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns showed polymor

110 d to specific outbreaks and showed identical pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns were indisting

111 zed FQ(R) C. coli isolates had similar PFGE (pulsed field gel electrophoresis) patterns and the same

112 Isolates underwent pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, PCR for 33 putative vi

113 Pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) offers a high-re

114 on-Valentine leucocidin (PVL) screening, and pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) were performed t

115 olated in the United States were analyzed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) after digestion

116 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis reveale

117 li isolates were compared using phylotyping, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis, sequen

118 ersity of 248 strains was investigated using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis.

119 Outbreak-related cases were identified by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and confirmed by

120 minatory power than the more labor-intensive pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and costly genom

121 Isolates were further characterized by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and emm typing.

122 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multi-locus

123 -multiplex PCR) typing (SMT) with respect to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus s

124 udy compared the discriminatory abilities of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus s

125 exists: the two most widely used methods are pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus s

126 d during the same period were compared using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus s

127 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus v

128 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multiple-loc

129 le nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) than with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and other method

130 gically evaluable patients were genotyped by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and PCR for pvl

131 cordance of MLVA were compared with those of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and phage typing

132 ological and molecular techniques, including pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and plasmid prof

133 In this study, we combined pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and Southern hyb

134 ironmental cultures was analyzed by means of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and typing for r

135 robust molecular genetic approaches, such as pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and whole-genome

136 For evaluating the genotypic diversity, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and/or enterobac

137 Isolates characterized as USA300 by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) are the predomin

138 properties, neurotoxin characterization, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) banding patterns

139 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) clonal type USA2

140 detection, toxinotyping, DNA sequencing, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) DNA fingerprinti

141 ntification of Salmonella serotypes based on pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) fingerprints.

142 80 isolates), were compared by phage typing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) following SmaI m

143 d H. haemolyticus isolates were genotyped by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) following SmaI o

144 tandard method of SmaI restriction digestion pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) for typing S. au

145 CR analysis for the spvA virulence gene, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) genotyping were

146 Among the CA-MRSA isolates, the pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) groups detected

147 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) has been the gol

148 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) has been the sta

149 In contrast, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) identified 20 di

150 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is a common meth

151 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is a standard ty

152 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is considered th

153 Among the several molecular typing methods, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is currently con

154 Although pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is the current "

155 Although pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is the current "

156 AC) lung disease, but the "gold standard" of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is time-consumin

157 S. pneumoniae isolates by using two methods: pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of SmaI-digested

158 strain is often determined by comparing its pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) or multilocus se

159 solution, and it can be directly analyzed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) or used in appli

160 tered to the patients, grew P. putida with a pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) pattern identica

161 All isolates had the same pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) pattern, suggest

162 Control and Prevention in 1996, consists of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns obtaine

163 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns of the

164 y serotype 1/2a isolates with highly similar pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns.

165 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) played a key rol

166 lla serovar Typhimurium DT104 with different pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) profiles were an

167 They had indistinguishable plasmid and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) profiles.

168 n of 55 virulence-associated genes, and XbaI pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) profiling.

169 Comparison of raccoon pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) pulse type data

170 tically distinct despite having the outbreak pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) pulsotype.

171 patient was positive and molecular typing by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) revealed clonal

172 eparating XbaI-restricted chromosomal DNA by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) separation.

173 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) subtyping of foo

174 coli cases with an indistinguishable, novel pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) subtyping patter

175 cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) typing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) subtyping.

176 These isolates were evaluated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) to determine pos

177 ns, multilocus sequencing typing (MLST), and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) to molecularly c

178 nfection in the United States and to compare pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) to the combinati

179 ts were used to investigate L. monocytogenes pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) type diversity.

180 The pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) type was determi

181 LVA) for Staphylococcus aureus could predict pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) types (i.e., USA

182 Strain typing using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed on

183 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed to

184 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was used to dete

185 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was used to type

186 ction analysis of genomic DNA using SmaI and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) were both used t

187 Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) were performed f

188 Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) were performed o

189 stigated the use of whole-genome mapping and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) with isolates fr

190 e United States and Canada were analyzed via pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) with XbaI.

191 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) yielded six majo

192 By pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), 8 of 10 environ

193 This protocol describes pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), a method develo

194 Whole-genome-sequencing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and a mouse inf

195 hat can be performed within a clinical lab), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and an antibiot

196 in, using multilocus sequence typing (MLST), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and array-based

197 dom amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and DNA-DNA hyb

198 otyped by repetitive-sequence PCR (rep-PCR), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and multilocus

199 sing surface protein profile identification, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and multilocus

200 Susceptibility testing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and multilocus

201 acterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and public arra

202 Typing was performed by PCR-ribotyping, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and restriction

203 tine leukocidin (PVL) screening, and SCCmec, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and spa typing.

204 by restriction-endonuclease analysis (REA), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and toxinotypin

205 d thus further characterized by MLST typing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and whole genom

206 We also performed DNA sequencing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), cultures of the

207 Currently, the standard typing technique, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), is laborious an

208 nrelated to prevalent MRSA, as determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), multilocus sequ

209 -producing isolates were determined by using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), multilocus sequ

210 acter databases at the CDC and the FDA using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), multilocus sequ

211 The typing methods included pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), multilocus vari

212 late characterisation included toxinotyping, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), PCR ribotyping,

213 March 2014) included Western blot analysis, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), polymerase chai

214 rived food products were characterized using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), repetitive elem

215 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), ribotyping, and

216 isolate and all MRSA isolates were typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), screened for mu

217 pneumonia, we analyzed 24 paired isolates by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), serotyping, and

218 cal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) typing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), spa typing, and

219 MRSA isolates were characterized by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), staphylococcal

220 relatedness of isolates was determined using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), Staphylococcus

221 Using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), the number of p

222 Using biochemical identification and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), we sought to id

223 revious molecular subtyping methods, such as pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), were critical i

224 h were indistinguishable from one another by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), were obtained f

225 ew techniques have been able to compete with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), which is capabl

226 repetitive-sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), which showed th

227 Salmonella serotype Typhi, as determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), with onset duri

228 uded multiple representatives of a number of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)-defined types.

229 bial susceptibility testing and subtyping by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

230 hin ureaplasma serovars were investigated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

231 All isolates were subjected to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

232 ically relevant level remains intangible for pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

233 istance genes, and plasmids and genotyped by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

234 genes were compared to the data generated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

235 ab system (DL) to the results obtained using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

236 at were previously characterized by MLST and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

237 ing region of GyrA and ParC (ASLGP) and (ii) pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

238 s to identify genetically similar strains is pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

239 ral different clonal types, as determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

240 REA), multilocus sequence typing (MLST), and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

241 sence of 31 virulence genes and subjected to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

242 hosphoglucose isomerase (pgi) genotyping and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

243 cus sequence typing (CRISPR-MVLST), and (iv) pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

244 mplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

245 well as SmaI macrorestriction patterns after pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

246 ose used for the interpretation of data from pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

247 ping, antibiotic susceptibility testing, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

248 aches: multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

249 nic consensus (ERIC2) PCR, serogrouping, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

250 fragment length polymorphism analysis using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

251 th the SmaI macrorestriction enzyme prior to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

252 isolates were typed by SmaI-macrorestricted pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

253 ret manner and had technical advantages over pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

254 the current gold standard subtyping method, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

255 vailable Serratia isolates was determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

256 Isolates were typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

257 tested for antimicrobial susceptibility and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

258 ental isolate relatedness was evaluated with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

259 er a 5-year period by using CRISPR-MVLST and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

260 ied fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

261 yping (MLST), spa typing, SCCmec typing, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

262 h limited resolution, especially compared to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

263 m infections, or endocarditis, were typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

264 using multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

265 dvantages over length-based methods, such as pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE); however, conven

266 Isolates were characterized by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE); SCCmec typing;

267 enes) and four groups of clonally linked (by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis [PFGE]) isolates.

268 ethod for determining bacterial relatedness (pulsed-field gel electrophoresis [PFGE]) remains essenti

269 f four molecular typing methods (ribotyping, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis [PFGE], random amplific

270 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, polymerase chain react

271 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis profiles of a sample of

272 ic resistance patterns and indistinguishable pulsed-field gel electrophoresis profiles.

273 ilution, and selected isolates were typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, repetitive sequence-ba

274 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis revealed the expected g

275 Results of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis showed 17 strain types.

276 ates were evaluated for the MRSA genotype by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, staphylococcal protein

277 ST-1 (which corresponds to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis strain type NAP1/riboty

278 reased age and infection with North American pulsed-field gel electrophoresis strains were associated

279 (n = 92) were characterized by toxinotyping, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, tcdC and cdtB PCR, and

280 essus strains that were indistinguishable by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis testing.

281 Montevideo infections with a rare pattern on pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (the outbreak strain) w

282 icile isolates (n = 31) was also analyzed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis to determine the circul

283 leukocidin (PVL) cytotoxin genes, belongs to pulsed field gel electrophoresis type USA300 and multilo

284 the fluoroquinolone-resistant North American pulsed-field gel electrophoresis type 1 (NAP1) strain in

285 The North American pulsed-field gel electrophoresis type 1 (NAP1) strain wa

286 table strain of Staphylococcus aureus with a pulsed-field gel electrophoresis type of USA300 and mult

287 ST-1-positive strains isolated, 6 (50%) were pulsed-field gel electrophoresis type USA200, multilocus

288 s, repetitive-element-based PCR patterns, or pulsed-field gel electrophoresis types.

289 by multilocus sequence typing [MLST]) and 79 pulsed-field gel electrophoresis types.

290 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing showed wide gene

291 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was conducted to strain

292 release of monomeric genomes as assessed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was greatly diminished,

293 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was performed on all av

294 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was used to determine c

295 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was used to determine g

296 Using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, we determined chromoso

297 Patterns on pulsed-field gel electrophoresis were highly related acr

298 Serotyping and molecular typing by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis were performed for 202

299 ee strains appeared to be clonal by standard pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, whole-genome sequencin

300 a single strain by Automated RiboPrinter and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis with ApaI or SmaI diges