ライフサイエンスコーパス: pure water

1 ing at higher mole fractions of DOPE than in pure water.

2 sis for understanding acid/base catalysis by pure water.

3 eories that describe density fluctuations in pure water.

4 e, tetrahydrofuran, and acetonitrile) and in pure water.

5 nonbound ions from the PCCA by washing with pure water.

6 um ascorbate/ascorbic acid electron donor in pure water.

7 pecies, whereas the second layer consists of pure water.

8 -polymeric carbon source in presence of only pure water.

9 ization was achieved by intense rinsing with pure water.

10 rst reported example of iron(V)oxo formed in pure water.

11 the fact that the suppressed IC effluent is pure water.

12 the bis-(acetylguanidinium)ferrocene salt in pure water.

13 O)k = 0.81 in 50 mM HCl, and (D2O)k = 4.2 in pure water.

14 s for the efficient recognition of anions in pure water.

15 observed with respect to the conformation in pure water.

16 rates nearly as fast as they would penetrate pure water.

17 a critical concentration when solubilized in pure water.

18 found at room temperature is greater than in pure water.

19 rmations, followed by ethanol, methanol, and pure water.

20 emperatures well below the freezing point of pure water.

21 hich otherwise adopts a compact structure in pure water.

22 identical to that previously determined for pure water.

23 nly 12-fold lower than the same particles in pure water.

24 ride ions below the EPA contaminant level in pure water.

25 the gas phase but occur much more rapidly in pure water.

26 0 ns simulation of the lattice solvated with pure water.

27 ed drastically by 98% (from 200 to 4 ppb) in pure water.

28 curs at shorter interplate distances than in pure water.

29 s in the perception of strong sweetness from pure water.

30 ,2-diol (7.06x10(-2) at 298 K) and lowest in pure water (1.25x10(-3) at 298 K) over the entire temper

31 microM) and water concentration relative to pure water (10.9 %, 15.3 %, and 27.3 %) for postmenopaus

32 Between pure water and 40% ethanol the diffraction shifts across

33 hy women tasted an aversive saline solution, pure water and chocolate while rCBF was measured with PE

34 The use of pure water and compressed air as the DESI spray solution

35 he highest anthocyanin extraction yield, but pure water and different proportions of acetone/water or

36 ocannabinol (delta 9-THC), and cannabinol in pure water and human saliva.

37 hylformamide (DMF) were compared to those in pure water and in 6 M urea in water systems.

38 s, Passerini reactions, and Ugi reactions in pure water and in aqueous solutions are dependent on the

39 replica exchange molecular dynamics in both pure water and in HFIP/water cosolvent.

40 entative of a different structural class, in pure water and in two different effluents and reports ne

41 orbed layer shows abnormally high density as pure water and likely includes metal species, whereas th

42 hosphatidylcholine bilayer systems: one with pure water and one with added NaCl.

43 cept under highly controlled conditions with pure water and only hydrophilic surfaces present.

44 midazolium-2-carboxylate 1 is stable in both pure water and pure acetonitrile.

45 rmeable membranes separating compartments of pure water and salt solution.

46 uch as 90% of HBQs (0.25 nmol L(-1)) in both pure water and tap water were transformed to other produ

47 glycerol was still some one-third of that in pure water, and one-half of that was regained even in 99

48 O4 > NaI > NaNO3 approximately NaBr > NaCl > pure water approximately NaF approximately Na2SO4.

49 olved the removal of high voltage and use of pure water as a spray solvent instead of the organic sol

50 paration of ions or ionizable compounds with pure water as eluent and detecting them in a simple fash

51 tions, with advantages over methods that use pure water as solvent (e.g., inhomogeneous fluid solvati

52 In addition, using pure water as the mobile phase, five phenols were separa

53 ophilic gas, was considerably slower than in pure water, as expected from rate-limiting membrane perm

54 mochirality in either THF/H2O mixtures or in pure water at 65 degrees C leads to disassembly into ste

55 eneration of high-valent iron derivatives in pure water at any pH.

56 s water soluble, complexes cyanide anions in pure water at pH 7.

57 approximately a factor of 10 slower than in pure water because of water binding and restriction to t

58 A single sample, in this case a sample of pure water both with and without an (insoluble) AgI crys

59 brational and intermolecular spectroscopy in pure water but not optimized for solvation, is used to d

60 Replacing pure water by electrolyte aqueous solutions enables to i

61 One distinct aquaporin subfamily contains pure water channels, whereas a second subfamily contains

62 First, we examine the dynamics of confined pure water clusters with Nw < 100 at temperatures of 200

63 At long times, the pure-water compartment is drained, and the net flow of w

64 IBCF was rapidly injected into 2 mL of ultra-pure water containing 150 muL of pyridine to induce form

65 double dagger)(OH)) both in aqueous DMSO and pure water correlate with their binding constants to 4-n

66 Pure water could be used as the spray solution for DESI,

67 Cl, (D)k = 0.77 in 50 mM HCl, (D)k = 0.75 in pure water, (D)k = 0.88 in 50 mM NaOH, and (D)(V/K) = 0.

68 y structure better than the simulation using pure water, even though the protein molecules display co

69 In pure water, exchange was too fast to observe a CEST effe

70 ssolving the original synthesized peptide in pure water) exists in a beta-sheet conformation, where t

71 ation percentages and rates were measured in pure water exposed to simulated natural sunlight at a co

72 s of 32-34 LMH and up to 57-65 LMH against a pure water feed using 2 M NaCl as the draw solution test

73 water fluxes of 30.6 and 82.0 LMH against a pure water feed using 2.0 M NaCl as the draw solution te

74 membrane by at least a 48% and increase the pure water flux by 39.4% compared to the control membran

75 the fundamental of triple proton transfer in pure water for azaindoles as well as pave a new avenue f

76 pesticides increased approximately 3-fold in pure water for each 25 degrees C temperature increment.

77 res appropriate to seafloor crust, plumes of pure water form naturally at approximately 400 degrees C

78 tion of the nanodroplets lead to demixing of pure water from the solutions.

79 The mechanism of aldol reactions in pure water has been studied with density functional calc

80 se functions observed during supercooling of pure water have been the source of much interest and con

81 adial variation is consistent with initially pure water ice bombarded by meteors, but smaller radial

82 eladus' surface is composed mostly of nearly pure water ice except near its south pole, where there a

83 tched if the buried layer consists of nearly pure water ice.

84 e signal, suggesting a composition of nearly pure water ice.

85 s indicates the presence of millimetre-sized pure water-ice grains, considerably larger than in all p

86 Pure water in a highly (1)H spin-polarized state is prop

87 (derived from PrP(C) simulated at low pH in pure water) in 1 M TMAO, similar structural reorganizati

88 icantly improved the homogeneity compared to pure water (increase of excitation flip angle within the

89 The vitrification of pure water is compared with that of molecular solutions

90 the rate of hydrolysis of methyl formate in pure water is consistent with mechanisms involving coope

91 t extraction behavior of the cannabinoids in pure water is evaluated along with optimization of the m

92 e potential of the vapor-liquid interface of pure water is relevant to electrochemistry, solvation th

93 ultrasonic treatment of PuO2 suspensions in pure water is reported.

94 unts of Pd(II) and excess magnesium metal in pure water leads to symmetrical/unsymmetrical biaryls, i

95 h use of a probe aerosol, composed of either pure water or a sodium chloride solution of known concen

96 oxidation products in higher yields than in pure water or many common organic solvents.

97 ight cutoff of 255 Da, and a reasonably high pure water permeability (A) of 2.4 LMH/bar.

98 (MWCO) of 1000-2000 Da but also have a high pure water permeability (PWP) of 82.5-117.6 L m(-2) h(-1

99 NF hollow fiber membrane exhibits an average pure water permeability of 3.2 L m(-2) h(-1) bar(-1) and

100 he newly developed membrane exhibited a high pure water permeability of 5.01 L m(-2) h(-1) bar(-1) an

101 le to obtain high performance membranes with pure water permeation flux substantially higher than tho

102 reactions through surface modification allow pure water (pH 6.8) splitting with a solar-to-hydrogen e

103 this method, recoveries relative to SPME in pure water ranged from 21 to 47% depending on the cannab

104 ins leave the surface when in contact with a pure water solution.

105 reduced by approximately 200 mV relative to pure water splitting to achieve 100 mA cm(-2), while the

106 oltage at least 200 mV smaller compared with pure water splitting to achieve the same current density

107 ation (MD), which generates concentrated and pure water streams by thermal separation, and pressure r

108 ximal surface pressure attained by P188 on a pure water subphase.

109 rved only in wastewater effluents and not in pure water, suggesting that complex secondary reactions

110 between the mineral brucite [Mg(OH)(2)] and pure water systematically increases by 12.4 per mil as p

111 On pure water, the area is 30 +/- 3 A(2)/molecule, and it i

112 In pure water, the association constant of 1-F is estimated

113 tructure in apolar organic solvent, while in pure water, the peptide adopts collapsed coil conformati

114 ps as the NaBr concentration increases from pure water to approximately 6 M NaBr.

115 the effect being equivalent to pressurizing pure water to pressures of order 2 GPa or more.

116 The osmotic force drives water flow from the pure-water to the salt-solution compartment.

117 entational relaxation increases from 2.6 ps (pure water) to 6.7 ps (approximately equal to 6 M NaBr).

118 CoO nanoparticles that result can decompose pure water under visible-light irradiation without any c

119 ivity coefficient compared with its value in pure water (up to approximately 1.5 higher at low sugar

120 on (S) after the electrode was calibrated in pure water (W)).

121 tuations calculated from the simulation with pure water were less accurate, particularly for two of t

122 for the cannabinoids in saliva, relative to pure water, were dramatically improved by a method devel

123 ction peak to smaller angle as compared with pure water, whereas solutions of hydrophilic solutes do

124 The chow and HF mice had free access to pure water, whereas the HFHC group received water with 5

125 6 spheroids was only 24 +/- 4% lower than in pure water, which can be accounted for fully by volume e

126 Reactions proceeded in pure water without any additives or cosolvents, in a sho

127 This probe had a linewidth of 1.1 Hz for pure water without susceptibility matching.

128 Here we exfoliate 2D materials directly in pure water without using any chemicals or surfactants.