ライフサイエンスコーパス: quality improvement

1 s in the IMPACT Registry as a foundation for quality improvement.

2 ment of hospital and surgeon performance for quality improvement.

3 proaches of the VA health system to surgical quality improvement.

4 for oncological evidence-based research and quality improvement.

5 ave financial incentives to promote surgical quality improvement.

6 ve complication) is a challenging target for quality improvement.

7 ibed, which may represent an opportunity for quality improvement.

8 sions and may provide actionable targets for quality improvement.

9 model for rapid and sustainable system-wide quality improvement.

10 the original input long reads can result in quality improvement.

11 risons across units and hospitals to support quality improvement.

12 y assessment, anticipation of penalties, and quality improvement.

13 s and would therefore represent a target for quality improvement.

14 ystem does not provide a clear mechanism for quality improvement.

15 mong different hospitals as a foundation for quality improvement.

16 ify trends in practice and opportunities for quality improvement.

17 costs--is essential to justify investment in quality improvement.

18 ment of hospital and surgeon performance for quality improvement.

19 mark development and help identify areas for quality improvement.

20 earch is required to find methods to enhance quality improvements across large distributed pediatric

21 Monitoring these complications as part of quality improvement activities would provide an opportun

22 ality conference is a common educational and quality improvement activity performed in cardiac cathet

23 standardized screening tools, and continuous quality improvement, aided by cultural improvement.

24 he best quartile or decile as benchmarks for quality improvement aims, but to what extent these aims

25 l care, 2) research, 3) surveillance, and 4) quality improvement and audit.

26 ciated with mortality, and may be useful for quality improvement and benchmarking.

27 ys merit investigation as unique targets for quality improvement and benchmarking.

28 Both quality improvement and clinical research efforts over t

29 ocess to be used effectively for both biogas quality improvement and conversion of the available CO2

30 of a procedure-targeted approach to surgical quality improvement and describe a practical method for

31 A standardized methodological approach to quality improvement and electronic medical record integr

32 a major complication) is an emerging tool in quality improvement and may underlie this variation.

33 tions (SSIs) feature prominently in surgical quality improvement and pay-for-performance measures.

34 Quality improvement and statistical process control anal

35 ratings aim to encourage transparency, spur quality improvement, and empower patient choice.

36 Administrative data are used for research, quality improvement, and health policy in severe sepsis.

37 luable adjunct for patient counseling, local quality improvement, and national monitoring for appropr

38 cations, behavioral interventions, exercise, quality improvement, and some condition-specific treatme

39 The major complications in fruit juice quality improvement are the presence of polysaccharides

40 s Education: A Bridge to Quality', advocated quality improvement as a core competency for all healthc

41 protocol which targeted variables in need of quality improvement, as identified by prior work: 1) lun

42 As a foundation for quality improvement, assessing clinical outcomes across

43 Targeting quality improvement at QMs that demonstrate substantial

44 A Quality Improvement bundle was implemented with the goal

45 participants were beneficiaries of a nursing quality improvement campaign in infant safe sleep practi

46 th heart failure is a national priority, and quality improvement campaigns are targeting reductions o

47 research communities emerged: epidemiology, quality improvement, cognitive systems engineering (CSE)

48 data from the National Pediatric Cardiology Quality Improvement Collaborative from 2008 to 2012.

49 Bariatric Surgery Collaborative, a statewide quality improvement collaborative that uses a prospectiv

50 We nested a multicenter quality improvement collaborative within a prospective s

51 lture on patient outcomes, methodologies for quality improvement commonly used in healthcare, and pat

52 Clarity regarding which quality improvement competencies are priority for this p

53 st case to examine the utility of continuous quality improvement (CQI) approaches to increase echocar

54 the overall efficacy of multiple continuous quality improvement (CQI) projects aimed at reducing ver

55 eon is important, as it has implications for quality improvement, criteria for referral and reimburse

56 eon is important, as it has implications for quality improvement, criteria for referral and reimburse

57 National Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement data on inpatient general, vascular,

58 , linking these scores to administrative and quality improvement data to calculate the RAI-A and the

59 Tracheal intubation quality improvement data were prospectively collected fo

60 tic shock patients captured in a prospective quality improvement database suspected or confirmed infe

61 y (RAI-A), using variables from the surgical quality improvement databases (Veterans Affairs or Ameri

62 mparison between studies of this widely used quality improvement dataset.

63 Surgical quality improvement depends on hospitals having accurate

64 nents and contextual factors associated with quality improvement education in practice.

65 Evaluating quality improvement education is complex.

66 REVIEW Publications where quality improvement education was delivered to pre-regis

67 Clusters were randomised (1:1) to receive a quality improvement educational intervention (interventi

68 g readmission has been the focus of numerous quality improvement efforts across many conditions.

69 These findings should inform quality improvement efforts and future revisions of the

70 Quality improvement efforts focused on recognizing the a

71 Quality improvement efforts have been shown to be more e

72 luation of key studies assessing large-scale quality improvement efforts in the ICU, impact of safety

73 nship is observed across hospitals, surgical quality improvement efforts may benefit by shifting focu

74 Multicenter collaborative quality improvement efforts may benefit patients with TG

75 Quality improvement efforts should focus on iAE preventi

76 Quality improvement efforts should shift focus from indi

77 Local quality improvement efforts suggest that antibiotic misu

78 opy telephone calls, patient registries, and quality improvement efforts).

79 criteria can be used to improve care, inform quality improvement efforts, and advance the safety of m

80 r "relative" benchmarking, and for targeting quality improvement efforts, but does not permit evaluat

81 ogists' diagnostic performance into targeted quality improvement efforts.

82 reduce cardiac complications is important to quality improvement efforts.

83 cal complications are an increasing focus of quality improvement efforts.

84 kage of real-time data could further support quality improvement efforts.

85 the financial incentives are misaligned with quality improvement efforts.

86 cations are necessary for directing surgical quality improvement efforts.

87 readmissions should be specially targeted by quality improvement efforts.

88 , help inform patient choices, and assist in quality-improvement efforts.

89 Valve surgery quality improvement endeavors should focus on a more com

90 Modern approaches to quality improvement focus on using and enhancing interpe

91 be used to identify high-priority areas for quality improvement from a population perspective.

92 be valuable for clinical care, research, and quality improvement if that information could be extract

93 ber 2016 through the Acute Coronary Syndrome Quality Improvement in Kerala randomized trial.

94 sed health programming, and drive continuous quality improvement in laboratories.

95 and their teams and implement strategies for quality improvement in paediatric anaesthesia.

96 metabolomics usage as a tool to assist fruit quality improvement in peach.

97 opriate criteria for continuous learning and quality improvement in practicing physicians.

98 Absence of outcome data is a barrier to quality improvement in resource poor settings.

99 Readmission is a target area of quality improvement in surgery.

100 Different methodologies exist for quality improvement in the ICU; a thoughtful approach to

101 activity in assisting ophthalmologists with quality improvement in their practices.

102 There is significant scope for yield and quality improvement in these largely undomesticated spec

103 ease in poor cartilage areas, with cartilage quality improvements in MSC-treated patients.

104 Efforts to implement quality improvements in surgery are notoriously problema

105 We suggest approaches for quality improvement, including better patient education,

106 The magnitude of quality improvement increases with time in the program.

107 ICU Liberation Collaborative is a real-world quality improvement initiative being implemented across

108 The continuous quality improvement initiative focused on the resuscitat

109 To investigate the impact of a quality improvement initiative for severe sepsis and sep

110 We aimed to assess the results of a quality improvement initiative in sepsis in an emerging

111 This quality improvement initiative in sepsis in an emerging

112 A prospective cohort quality improvement initiative involving ICU patients.

113 The National Cancer Database (NCDB), a joint quality improvement initiative of the American College o

114 of the American Heart Association's national quality improvement initiative to accelerate door-to-nee

115 The quality improvement initiative was based on a multifacet

116 We undertook a quality improvement initiative with respect to the molec

117 We used a Pre-Post Quality Improvement initiative with the following aims:

118 department (ED) through a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative.

119 ed a systematic review of studies evaluating quality improvement initiatives aimed at reducing inappr

120 optimal care environment will better inform quality improvement initiatives and accreditation standa

121 These data support strengthening current quality improvement initiatives and colon cancer treatme

122 and efficient processes, so as to facilitate quality improvement initiatives and enhance standardized

123 represent an immediate opportunity for local quality improvement initiatives and potential impetus fo

124 and therapeutic research, surveillance, and quality improvement initiatives are hindered by variatio

125 Quality improvement initiatives focused on systems to im

126 patient and family engagement in successful quality improvement initiatives in the ICU.

127 Potential targets for future imaging quality improvement initiatives include head CT and lumb

128 the impact of appropriate use criteria-based quality improvement initiatives on inappropriate testing

129 d strive to minimize delays in fixation, and quality improvement initiatives should emphasize this re

130 gencies, physician accreditation groups, and quality improvement initiatives should ensure that their

131 Future quality improvement initiatives should highlight the imp

132 There is a scarcity of well-developed quality improvement initiatives targeting patient satisf

133 tertiary pediatric centers that implemented quality improvement initiatives to improve early septic

134 ts, reliably predict financing needs, inform quality improvement initiatives, and maximise efficiency

135 p and local champions play in the success of quality improvement initiatives, especially in resource-

136 e was a notable lack of blends incorporating quality improvement initiatives.

137 itoring local and regional outcomes to guide quality improvement initiatives.

138 nmedical units may be high-yield targets for quality improvement initiatives.

139 n serve as evidence-based targets for future quality-improvement initiatives on antimicrobial timing.

140 ng elective colectomies, a focus of surgical quality-improvement initiatives, interpretable evidence

141 y for their total care and should be part of quality-improvement initiatives.

142 to understand the potential cost savings of quality-improvement initiatives.

143 eedback on quality measurements is used as a quality improvement instrument in healthcare organizatio

144 Implementation of a checklist-based quality improvement intervention did not affect rates of

145 que the feasibility of this methodology as a quality improvement intervention in complex healthcare s

146 The independent effect of the nursing quality improvement intervention was not significant for

147 in Brazil, implementation of a multifaceted quality improvement intervention with daily checklists,

148 obile health intervention, but not a nursing quality improvement intervention, improved adherence to

149 Intensive care units were randomized to a quality improvement intervention, including a daily chec

150 imary healthcare settings, a computer-guided quality improvement intervention, requiring minimal supp

151 more common represent potential targets for quality improvement intervention.

152 t, local champions) versus additional active quality improvement interventions (nurse specialist prov

153 Active quality improvement interventions conferred no additiona

154 y goal assessments, and clinician prompts as quality improvement interventions in intensive care unit

155 This framework for quality improvement interventions may be adapted to simi

156 Simple quality improvement interventions significantly increase

157 transplant recipients in the ED may lead to quality improvement interventions that reduce unnecessar

158 eness, and sustainability of incentive-based quality improvement interventions.

159 ago in quarter 1 of 2013 that included (1) a quality improvement leader, (2) stroke content expert, (

160 that integrates components of several proven quality improvement methodologies to enhance safety cult

161 Applying quality improvement methodology at the institutional lev

162 mber 31, 2015, a multidisciplinary team used quality-improvement methods and the chronic care model t

163 rtality following emergency surgery is a key quality improvement metric in both the United States and

164 system to facilitate quality maintenance and quality improvement of cancer pathology.

165 tion of the allergy specialty as well as the quality improvement of healthcare system for allergic an

166 l months to expand training in areas such as quality improvement or time for "mini-fellowships" to al

167 rican College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Pancreatectomy Demonstration Project

168 Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership and National Institute f

169 The Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership commissions the Mental H

170 The Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership.

171 search as part of a larger project on trauma quality improvement practices in Peru.

172 These may be used to guide quality improvement practices.

173 the study successfully identified quality improvement priorities leading to changes in Eme

174 ecommended components, including a pediatric quality improvement process (adjusted relative risk, 4.1

175 gional Office for Africa Stepwise Laboratory Quality Improvement Process Towards Accreditation (SLIPT

176 client service charter and a facility-based, quality-improvement process aimed to redefine norms and

177 re intended to provide practical guidance to quality improvement professionals, information technolog

178 atients within the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2000-2014) who underwent a

179 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2006-2012) were used to ide

180 14 data) and from the U.S. National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2013 data).

181 he The American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP database).

182 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) between January

183 om the American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database from 20

184 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) provides feedbac

185 rican College of Surgeons, National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) surgical quality

186 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP), in addition to

187 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP), thus only hospi

188 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Database, a tota

189 geted American College of Surgeons' National Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database.

190 the Veterans Affairs (VA) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (now called the VA Surgical

191 hageal varices (EV) in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) formed the portal hy

192 College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP).

193 he American College of Surgeons (ACS) Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) and measured the resu

194 merican College of Surgeon National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2012 Participant Use File.

195 as conducted using data from the VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program among veterans who underwent

196 The Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program and Central Cancer Registry

197 nters participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the Vanderbilt Patient A

198 study using the Pediatric National Surgical Quality Improvement Program appendectomy pilot database,

199 The Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program assessments from October 1,

200 rospective analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program colectomy cohort from 2011 t

201 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Colectomy Targeted Participa

202 rican College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data (2008-2012) to define h

203 rican College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data from 2014 to 2015, oper

204 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data from 3 academic centers

205 National Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program data on inpatient general, v

206 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set, 2005 to 2012.

207 m 2000 to 2010 were matched with VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program data to identify noncardiac

208 to April 2015, the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program database and the Decision Su

209 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database paired with institu

210 merican College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program database to capture all gene

211 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was conducted on al

212 merican College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program database, to which participa

213 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

214 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program databases.

215 erican College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset (N = 20,575).

216 We describe the effect of a multifaceted quality improvement program designed to decrease the avo

217 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program from 2005 to 2011.

218 in the Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure quality improvement program from October 2009 to March 2

219 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Geriatric Surgery Pilot Proj

220 pleting a voluntary checklist-based surgical quality improvement program had a reduction in deaths af

221 indings were similar among National Surgical Quality Improvement Program hospitals.

222 Implementation of a multifaceted quality improvement program including financial incentiv

223 A multifaceted quality improvement program including provider education

224 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program institutions.

225 erican College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program investigated elective surgic

226 ion of a voluntary, checklist-based surgical quality improvement program is associated with reduced 3

227 plain how this patient- and family-centered, quality improvement program is novel, generalizable, and

228 National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program outcome data were linked to

229 Implementation of a quality improvement program over 7.5 years.

230 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program over a 10-year period were i

231 151,700 patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use File identif

232 merican College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program preoperative risk factors, w

233 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program records were linked to Medic

234 enter, prospective, observational study of a quality improvement program studied 2420 patients 20 yea

235 Creation of an integrated, regional quality improvement program that linked the 35 spoke hea

236 ns Affairs Cancer Registry with the Surgical Quality Improvement Program to identify veterans having

237 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program were analyzed.

238 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program were assessed for the develo

239 n 18 years included in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program who underwent inpatient or o

240 rican College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program who underwent pancreaticoduo

241 ications as defined by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program within 30 days of the operat

242 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program's (ACS-NSQIP) surgical risk

243 rovement Program (now called the VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program).

244 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, we conducted a retrospectiv

245 erican College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, we identified 91,963 patien

246 itals participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, which focuses on 30-day mor

247 5, and 10371 patients from National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Hepatopancreaticobiliary (NS

248 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric database to evalua

249 itals participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

250 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

251 ollege of Surgeons adult or pediatric Trauma Quality Improvement Program.

252 d 4) Institutional support for comprehensive quality improvement programs as well as tele-ICU program

253 is an essential step for the development of quality improvement programs in electrophysiology labora

254 be incorporated into comprehensive surgical quality improvement programs to improve patient safety.

255 The integration of this QI in trauma quality improvement programs will facilitate the identif

256 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (2005-2013 Participant Use D

257 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS NSQIP) hospitals.

258 al surgery procedures with National Surgical Quality Improvement Project data from 2013 to 2014 were

259 This quality improvement project had a positive effect on new

260 ngle-site, facility-wide, prospective cohort quality improvement project studied all 9153 patients fr

261 As part of a quality improvement project to promote sleep in the ICU,

262 national collaborative database as part of a quality improvement project.

263 tal during a three-phase implementation of a quality improvement project.

264 Veterans Affairs Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Projects data and calculated the C s

265 erican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Projects).

266 Quality improvement (QI) initiatives have become an inte

267 Diabetes-focused quality improvement (QI) is effective but remains untest

268 ncluded, papers had to either be research or quality improvement (QI) projects focusing on the patien

269 asic and clinical research, surveillance, or quality improvement [QI] and audit).

270 30, 2013, according to the guidelines of the Quality Improvement Registry in CT Scans in Children wer

271 In a large quality improvement registry of outpatients with AF, pre

272 We used the AQuIRE (ACCP Quality Improvement Registry, Evaluation, and Education)

273 AQuIRE (American College of Chest Physicians Quality Improvement Registry, Evaluation, and Education)

274 e care hospitals participating in a national quality improvement registry, we identified 3 resuscitat

275 The ACTION Registry-GWTG is the largest quality-improvement registry of patients with MI in the

276 esses of care, ICU structure, and the use of quality improvement science methodologies can beneficial

277 estigated in other health-care settings, and quality improvement should focus on reducing temporal va

278 tions for patient outcomes, and education in quality improvement skills are ways in which globalizati

279 ems redesign and standardization (SOP), Lean quality improvement, SOP + TT combination, or Lean + TT

280 -2.04 to -0.35]); and combined clinic-level quality improvement strategies (eg, case management), mu

281 n between combined clinic- and patient-level quality improvement strategies and multifactorial assess

282 fficient set of shared encounters may inform quality improvement strategies such as optimizing team s

283 integrated laboratory systems, services, and quality improvement strategies, with an emphasis on stre

284 (2) workforce development and diversity; (3) quality improvement strategies; (4) policy solutions; an

285 ay for performance is an increasingly common quality improvement strategy despite the absence of robu

286 cords can help identify additional areas for quality improvement, such as in the 18.3% of eyes in the

287 ents owing to PHS are costly and represent a quality improvement target.

288 Each unit established a multidisciplinary quality improvement team.

289 Demonstrating a business case for quality improvement--that is, that fewer complications t

290 ssed the impact of regulatory actions on air quality improvement through a comprehensive monitoring e

291 be used in clinical practice, research, and quality improvement to incorporate cosmetic patients' pe

292 analyse educational approaches used to teach quality improvement to pre-registration healthcare profe

293 tudy indicates that FTR may provide a useful quality improvement tool for the field of transplantatio

294 Public reporting is seen as a powerful quality improvement tool, but data to support its effica

295 anization (WHO) Safe Childbirth Checklist, a quality-improvement tool, promotes systematic adherence

296 Computerized quality improvement tools offer an important, albeit par

297 lness of the activity in assisting them with quality improvement were also analyzed.

298 and staff should enhance the impact of local quality improvement work but has not been widely impleme

299 de patients and families in the processes of quality improvement work in the ICU should be expanded.

300 ypically may not be invited to contribute to quality improvement work.