ライフサイエンスコーパス: quality of life

1 history, or a generic response to paternal 'quality of life'.

2 ores indicate less symptom burden and better quality of life).

3 Q, range 0-100, higher scores reflect better quality of life).

4 s of concern regarding items associated with quality of life.

5 oped with years of disease activity and poor quality of life.

6 action with intervention, and health-related quality of life.

7 its prevalence, morbidity, and impact on the quality of life.

8 eatment, to facilitate adherence and improve quality of life.

9 ho reached adulthood and the effect on their quality of life.

10 nction and refers significant improvement in quality of life.

11 rol, thus ultimately improving the amputees' quality of life.

12 urinary tract infection, urethral injury and quality of life.

13 etal muscle mass is essential for health and quality of life.

14 ed palliative treatments and their effect on quality of life.

15 , healthcare expenditures, and lower patient quality of life.

16 al symptom relief and substantially improved quality of life.

17 prolactin release, overall functioning, and quality of life.

18 nced significant improvement of symptoms and quality of life.

19 ging and the condition has a major impact on quality of life.

20 tory outcomes included exercise duration and quality of life.

21 ond progression or death, toxic effects, and quality of life.

22 om a focus on material consumption to one on quality of life.

23 tric disorder affecting their health-related quality of life.

24 affect physical and cognitive capacities and quality of life.

25 toms, sleep impairment and poorer PD-related quality of life.

26 nce a deterioration in mental health-related quality of life.

27 with psychological comorbidity and impaired quality of life.

28 eat anemic patients, greatly improving their quality of life.

29 s an indicator for diminished vision-related quality of life.

30 n satiety, body weight, and gastrointestinal quality of life.

31 festation that adversely affects a patient's quality of life.

32 ssion, and crying was associated with poorer quality of life.

33 a lifelong condition associated with reduced quality of life.

34 cholecystectomies, side-effects of UDCA and quality of life.

35 point scale indicating better health-related quality of life.

36 e-survival, fewer toxic effects, or improved quality of life.

37 ing of physical activities without affecting quality of life.

38 ld suppurative lesions with a high impact on quality of life.

39 rally incurable, and associated with reduced quality of life.

40 chronic surgical morbidities, and impact on quality of life.

41 exual dysfunction that can negatively affect quality of life.

42 tings of depression, global functioning, and quality of life.

43 depression, poorer sleep quality and reduced quality of life.

44 l moderate to severe scores for symptoms and quality of life.

45 ear, with no differences on most measures of quality of life.

46 a common health condition that may decrease quality of life.

47 lead to decreased lung function and reduced quality of life.

48 , interrupts treatment, and lowers patients' quality of life.

49 ting toxicities and adverse events affecting quality of life.

50 ted systemic sting reactions and/or impaired quality of life.

51 s could improve cancer survivors' health and quality of life.

52 with nonprogressive liver disease but a poor quality of life.

53 Driving is an important factor affecting quality of life.

54 g memory impairments that contribute to poor quality of life.

55 sed program alone in mobility, function, and quality of life.

56 reactions and in improving disease-specific quality of life.

57 % CI, -0.02 to 0.16) or child health-related quality of life (0.89 units; 95% CI, -0.56 to 2.33).

58 e, in-hospital death, functional status, and quality of life (12-Item Short Form Health Survey, rangi

59 function (5 of 5 fair-quality studies), and quality of life (3 of 3 fair-quality studies).

60 tient-reported outcome surveys (symptoms and quality of life) 3 to 7 days before surgery, during hosp

61 vity (CRM+) and other pathological outcomes, quality of life (36-Item Short Form Survey and 20-item M

62 ed quality of life measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life 4.0, and parental resource empowerment.

63 RTC QLQ-H&N35), and the three-level European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire.

64 ship Scale) and health-related QoL (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions [EQ-5D]) for the caregiver.

65 ed with utilities determined by the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions health survey at baseline a

66 ement in general health (77% vs 71%; NS) and quality of life (75.3 vs 74.7; NS).

67 uploidies are lethal or associated with poor quality of life, a view that is now being challenged.

68 Quality-of-life adjustment factors were obtained from ex

69 ional PFS, distant metastasis-free survival, quality of life, adverse events, and safety.

70 INTERPRETATION: No differences in quality of life after surgery for chronic pancreatitis w

71 sychiatric symptoms, cognitive function, and quality of life) after 4 months of follow-up.

72 cognitive [ADAS-Cog]) and self-reported QoL (Quality of Life Alzheimer's Disease [QoL-AD]) for the pe

73 c remodeling, thereby improving survival and quality of life among patients with MI.

74 reatment, in numeric rating scales to assess quality of life: an increase of 1.8 points for parents (

75 benefit from interventions to enhance their quality of life and care.

76 pressure (PCWP), fewer symptoms, and greater quality of life and exercise capacity in patients with h

77 ncreatic cancer, which contributes to poorer quality of life and heightened metastatic progression in

78 modifications provides promise for increased quality of life and improved safety for patients with ep

79 with disease characteristics including poor quality of life and inadequate asthma control.

80 iginous skin locations that can lead to poor quality of life and increased morbidities.

81 correlated with a deterioration in patients' quality of life and increased prevalence of depression.

82 is capable of producing symptoms that impact quality of life and is associated with risk for embolic

83 iotherapy will significantly improve patient quality of life and may allow for higher and more regula

84 d suicides and has been associated with poor quality of life and poor adherence with antiretroviral t

85 c patients with glioma range from increasing quality of life and preventing long-term sequelae in wha

86 eurological disease with negative effects on quality of life and productivity.

87 tions for social activities affect patients' quality of life and psychological well-being.

88 atment of post-MI angina may improve patient quality of life and quality of care and help to lower ra

89 dures have contributed to the improvement in quality of life and survival in PH/PHVD.

90 nt of complications, with adverse effects on quality of life and unfavourable effects on long-term ou

91 pacts not only on the ocular surface, but on quality of life and visual functioning.

92 Communication, health-related quality-of-life and satisfaction measures and a manualis

93 We summarize treatment efficacy, quality of life, and adherence of the cohort of women yo

94 st exacerbation and subsequent exacerbation, quality of life, and change in weight.

95 n small fiber deficits, pain, health-related quality of life, and clinical data.

96 dy composition were measured, and tolerance, quality of life, and cognitive function were assessed vi

97 To assess disability, quality of life, and complications in patients with disp

98 ere compared for weight loss, comorbidities, quality of life, and complications.

99 cause considerable morbidity, decrements in quality of life, and costs to the health care system.

100 ation is vital for American competitiveness, quality of life, and national security.

101 Rate of adverse events, quality of life, and patient satisfaction were not signi

102 ures were functional outcome, health-related quality of life, and patient satisfaction.

103 on, anxiety and depression, (valve-specific) quality of life, and regret.

104 prescription precision, improving patients' quality of life, and relieve the economic and societal b

105 and composition, adipokines, health-related quality of life, and safety data before and after the in

106 osis, with a major effect on daily activity, quality of life, and societal participation.

107 els of anxiety and depression, IBS symptoms, quality of life, and somatization using validated questi

108 d on these emerging concepts, the prognosis, quality of life, and survival of patients with advanced

109 h might negatively affect functional status, quality of life, and survival.

110 ic limitations in activities, health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression, employment stat

111 ents showed consistently greater benefits in quality of life, anxiety, depression, and spiritual well

112 isodes of AF, often responsible for impaired quality of life, are unpredictable in frequency and timi

113 ed by the treating dermatologist, subjective quality of life as reported by the patient, and recorded

114 Quality of life, as assessed by using Functional Assessm

115 es to averting disaster, however, can impair quality of life, as in anxiety and paranoia.

116 Quality of life, as measured by the EuroQol 5 Dimensions

117 mproved child BMI z score and health-related quality of life, as well as parental resource empowermen

118 behavior with respect to itching (P < .001), quality of life assessed by using the Skindex-29 questio

119 The FULFIL (Lung Function and Quality of Life Assessment in Chronic Obstructive Pulmon

120 Research gaps include quality of life assessments outside of tertiary care cen

121 Functional status and physical quality of life at 6 months were not significantly diffe

122 d hrQoL, but not in patients with acceptable quality of life at the time of LVAD implantation.

123 Patients use PAD for reasons related to quality of life, autonomy, and dignity, and rarely for u

124 edication, with the possibility of increased quality of life because of the elimination of adverse ev

125 This study compared the long-term quality-of-life benefits of DES-PCI versus CABG for pati

126 Quality of life, blood pressure, and polysomnography wer

127 It not only significantly affects patients' quality of life but also poses a major economic burden t

128 mon angina equivalent that adversely affects quality of life, but its prevalence in patients with chr

129 y variably decrease tumor burden and improve quality of life, but offer limited effects on survival;

130 erent backgrounds work together to boost the quality of life by addressing critical health issues.

131 Although diverse pathologies reduce quality of life by impacting such spectrally directed au

132 utcomes were mortality, functional measures, quality of life, cardiopulmonary morbidity (e.g., hypote

133 Quality of life, caregiver burden, behavioral and psycho

134 Global quality-of-life change after three cycles was worse in t

135 Paired-samples t tests evaluated quality of life changes.

136 th type 2 diabetes reduce costs and increase quality of life compared with uniform intensive control.

137 owledge, satisfaction, psychological status, quality of life, cost, death.

138 inusitis has a significant impact on patient quality of life, creates billions of dollars of annual h

139 served with respect to changes in angina and quality of life, cumulative diagnostic costs, and applie

140 This study showed that quality-of-life data (EQ-5D visual analogue scale and WP

141 Secondary outcomes included health-related quality of life, depression, anxiety, and functioning.

142 Probiotics may improve quality of life during allergy season by increasing the

143 Work disability affects quality of life, earnings, and opportunities to contribu

144 of follow-up data that capture financial and quality-of-life end points.

145 difference, 2.06; 95% CI, -0.59 to 4.71), or quality of life (EQ-5D visual analog scale mean differen

146 Semi-structured conversation about quality of life, expectations, and planning for setbacks

147 demographic, clinical, decision-making, and quality-of-life factors that are associated with treatme

148 iabetes leads to premature death and reduced quality of life for 8% of Americans.

149 In fact, deficits in voice impair the quality of life for a large and diverse population of pa

150 to be safe and efficacious without impairing quality of life for elderly patients with good performan

151 Colour blindness can significantly impact quality of life for health, emotions, and especially car

152 control significantly improves survival and quality of life for patients with diabetes.

153 d the importance of maintaining or improving quality of life for patients with recurrent or metastati

154 Thematic analyses demonstrated: 1) poor quality of life for patients; 2) surrogate stress and an

155 ffect of a cancer diagnosis and treatment on quality of life have gained momentum in the past 10 year

156 ellitus have more signs of congestion, worse quality of life, higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriureti

157 study was to assess long-term health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients after thoracoscopic a

158 UND AND Limited data exist on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after intracerebral haemorrhage

159 tors influence the changes of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among asthmatic children, especi

160 Purpose To compare pre-agreed health-related quality of life (HRQOL) domains in patients with esophag

161 Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measurement has become a valuabl

162 Whether baseline health-related quality of life (hrQoL) resulted in a heterogeneity of t

163 le depression, education, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) were measured.

164 pulations compare in terms of health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

165 ma by examining its effect on health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

166 ion of response), safety, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

167 uated their health status and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

168 nitive, neuropsychiatric, and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) outcome measures.

169 rrelated with urticaria activity (P < .001), quality of life impairment (P = .026), and inflammatory

170 Food allergy-related quality of life improved from baseline to 1 month after

171 low-up is needed to assess the durability of quality-of-life improvement with TAVR vs SAVR in this po

172 l morbidity but also experienced longer-term quality-of-life improvements associated with weight loss

173 ive prospective assessment of health-related quality of life in a patient population confined to peop

174 ith more atypical symptoms, and report worse quality of life in comparison with men.

175 ing the progression of disease and improving quality of life in IPF patients.

176 bile reflux and impact on dyspepsia related quality of life in long-term survivors.

177 To evaluate the changes in quality of life in noninfectious uveitis patients treate

178 beneficial effects on depression scores and quality of life in patients with inflammatory bowel dise

179 icial effects on disease activity, mood, and quality of life in patients with inflammatory bowel dise

180 (MRQLQ) is a validated tool used to measure quality of life in people experiencing allergies (0 = no

181 ability, and reduced physical health-related quality of life in the SF-36.

182 Quality of life increased significantly in both groups a

183 The quality of life index did not differ between the LC and

184 h techniques improve aspects of survival and quality of life influenced by lung compliance, albeit wh

185 ational Eye Institute (NEI) Refractive Error Quality of Life Instrument (NEI-RQL-42), NEI Visual Func

186 CI, 10.7 to 15.6; P<0.001), on the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (difference, 21.9; 95% CI, 16.

187 n (IVI-C), and (3) HR QoL with the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) version 4.0.

188 At latest follow-up, a lower Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory physical summary score was ass

189 e Child Behavior Checklist and the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory.

190 Rhinoconjunctivitis-specific quality of life is often reduced during seasonal allergi

191 Health-related quality of life is substantially lower for people with C

192 increased distress and lower health-related quality of life is unknown.

193 testing, including additional dimensions of quality of life, is indicated.

194 es true patient-centered outcomes, including quality of life, knowledge and satisfaction, caregiver b

195 the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised, a quality-of-life measure, also significantly favored the

196 x-specific BMI z score, child health-related quality of life measured by the Pediatric Quality of Lif

197 Primary endpoints were 2 quality-of-life measurements, the Kansas City Cardiomyop

198 , use of insulin (-35%, -34%, and -13%), and quality-of-life measures (general health score increases

199 ths or in in other domains of health-related quality-of-life measures.

200 0-point scale; higher scores indicate better quality of life), Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (

201 mes resulting from nutritional deficiencies, quality of life, mortality, and harms of screening.

202 of comorbidities, and lower vision-specific quality-of-life (NEI VFQ-25) scores were associated with

203 s to alleviate the suffering and improve the quality of life of children with serious illnesses and t

204 s to enhance the survival and health-related quality of life of individuals with this disease.

205 to verify changes in the oral health-related quality of life of patients 180 days after treatment of

206 ted to improve the clinical presentation and quality of life of some patients with the recessive dyst

207 ces to curb the HIV epidemic and improve the quality of life of transwomen in Brazil.

208 ongoing research on the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in children with cleft and care

209 ngival bleeding (GB) and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL).

210 , symptoms, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life on a 0- to 100-point scale; higher score

211 The primary outcome was quality of life on the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questi

212 ect of individual physiological therapies on quality of life, only cognitive behavioural therapy had

213 gram did not impact patients' health-related quality-of-life or the likelihood that their health info

214 ed cannabis preparations that reported pain, quality of life, or adverse effect outcomes.

215 xicity (severely compromises organ function, quality of life, or both).

216 tients' outcomes and would improve toxicity, quality of life, or both.

217 for age and sex), cardiometabolic outcomes, quality of life, other health outcomes, harms.

218 d hemodynamics, and excellent functional and quality-of-life outcomes at 1 year.

219 meaningfully in CGM-measured hypoglycemia or quality-of-life outcomes.

220 SYM), and Patient Assessment of Constipation-Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) in adults diagnosed with funct

221 core >/= 8), numeric rating scales assessing quality of life (parent and child; scale, 1-10), and the

222 No significant differences were observed in quality of life, physical activity, or cognitive functio

223 ood without having a major effect on donors' quality of life, physical activity, or cognitive functio

224 loss and catabolism, and negatively impacts quality of life (QL).

225 r endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) upon asthma quality of life (QOL) and asthma control using validated

226 ation between prognostic awareness and worse quality of life (QOL) and mood among patients with advan

227 We assessed quality of life (QoL) and psychological well-being in pa

228 e and validate a questionnaire measuring the quality of life (QoL) impact of being colour blind.

229 to the well-known significant impairment of quality of life (QoL) in allergic rhinitis (AR), the deg

230 vision-related (VR) and health-related (HR) quality of life (QoL) in children up to 16 years of age.

231 To evaluate the quality of life (QoL) in patients with quiescent herpes

232 l immunoreconstitution, donor chimerism, and quality of life (QoL) of IL2RG/JAK3 SCID patients >2 yea

233 rom the patient's perspective, a prospective quality of life (QoL) substudy was performed alongside t

234 levels, hunger and satiety assessments, and quality of life (QOL) surveys, reported up to 3 months.

235 a multivariable model to predict changes in quality of life (QoL) with and without CRT.

236 y meaningful worsening in menopause-specific quality of life (QOL) with treatment discontinuation at

237 inks between patient-centered communication, quality of life (QOL), and aggressive treatments in adva

238 Overall survival (OS), quality of life (QoL), and safety.

239 anced pancreatic cancer and (b) evaluate the quality of life (QOL), pain perception, and efficacy in

240 a chronic disease that compromises patients' quality of life (QoL).

241 eatments, prior optic neuritis episodes, and quality of life (QOL; based on the 54-item Multiple Scle

242 , left ventricular stroke volume [LVSV]) and quality-of-life (QoL) measurements (NYHA functional clas

243 ange in papilledema grade, ETDRS scores, and quality-of-life (QoL) measures.

244 ge in the QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS)/quality-of-life (QOL) score and time to deterioration of

245 Second, we performed a quality-of-life (QoL) study in nAMD patients.

246 articipants completed the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) at entry and at 6

247 s' state of health, Mini Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (MiniRQLQ) results and saf

248 The Mini Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (MRQLQ) is a validated too

249 Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ), nasal allergen pro

250 ogy Life Quality Index and Chronic Urticaria Quality of Life Questionnaire scores were 9.1 (6.62) and

251 isation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and -Oes

252 for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30), the EOR

253 sults on the Graves' ophthalmopathy-specific quality-of-life questionnaire.

254 Gynecologic examinations and sexual quality-of-life questionnaires were completed at baselin

255 ration (for CPAP indication), health-related quality-of-life questionnaires, 24-hour blood pressure m

256 symptom severity (r = 0.326; P = 0.037) and quality of life (r = 0.379; P = 0.015) were positively a

257 QOL; based on the 54-item Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life Scale score).

258 ients in the BL group had a mean increase in quality of life score compared with the placebo group.

259 o had a lower Atrial Fibrillation Effects on Quality of Life score of 80 (interquartile range [IQR]:

260 were associated with a slightly worse child quality of life (score of 90.2 for broad-spectrum antibi

261 Quality of life scores improved significantly (p < 0.01)

262 Quality of life scores improved significantly by 12 mont

263 Pain and quality of life scores were significantly improved after

264 ew York Heart Association class, HF-specific quality of life scores, 6-minute walk distance, and NT-p

265 rain placement, reoperation, readmission, or quality of life scores.

266 Mean prolapse-related quality-of-life scores also did not differ between group

267 Quality-of-life scores did not differ between treatment

268 , anxiety, depression, perceived stress, and quality-of-life scores in patients dichotomised into tho

269 s C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A and quality-of-life scores were significantly reduced in can

270 , and being diabetic) and major decreases in quality-of-life scores.

271 ogression and palliative measures to improve quality of life should both be prioritised.

272 Functional Rating Scale-Revised, and McGill Quality of Life Single-Item Scale were measured at scree

273 hensively reviewed the literature related to quality of life, social, economic, academic, and occupat

274 Better annual physical and quality of life status, but not psychiatric status, were

275 ndrome survivors, better annual physical and quality of life status, but not psychiatric status, were

276 eported overall health on the Kidney Disease Quality of Life Survey (median score, 0 in the sertralin

277 amblyopia, school performance, functioning, quality of life, test accuracy, testability, and harms.

278 up, triage patients had lower health-related quality of life than an age- and sex-matched control gro

279 triage patients showed lower health-related quality of life than an age- and sex-matched control pop

280 d better scores with respect to behavior and quality of life than did those who continued medical the

281 BS-C reported more severe symptoms and worse quality of life than FC and NRC.

282 ted in significantly less anxiety and better quality of life than placebo.

283 more important predictors of vision-related quality of life than thickness measures, with diffuse RG

284 nt therapeutic options can improve patient's quality of life, they barely modify disease evolution.

285 omy (LC) concerning costs and health-related quality of life using data from an expertise-based rando

286 luation of adverse events, changes in sexual quality of life using the Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluati

287 Quality of life using the validated instrument Prostate

288 Survival on original therapy with acceptable quality of life was also more likely with LVAD versus op

289 Quality of life was assessed by visual analogue scale.

290 Quality of life was assessed using the National Eye Inst

291 No difference in quality of life was seen between the groups within 24 mo

292 Quality of life was similar between arms at baseline and

293 Quality of life was worse for the treated group.

294 If quality of life was worse with DRV/r- than DTG-based ART

295 Activity of Daily Living Questionnaire, and quality of life were assessed using one-way analysis of

296 ankle-brachial index, Rutherford class, and quality of life were comparable, but the PTA cohort requ

297 ventricular function, functional status, and quality of life were observed in patients treated with U

298 therapy on lung function and health-related quality of life with twice-daily ICS/LABA therapy in pat

299 ll 3 patients had substantial improvement in quality of life, with one patient reporting improvement

300 repeated sneezing, with profound effects on quality of life, work productivity, and school performan