戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 hthonic dissimilatory As-reducing community (quantitative polymerase chain reaction).
2  were assessed in spleen (flow cytometry and quantitative polymerase chain reaction).
3           Fecal methanogens were measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
4 ta were analyzed using Gut Low-Density Array quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
5 ere subjected to gene expression analyses by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
6 y number were measured from leukocyte DNA by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
7 ing flow cytometry and reverse-transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
8 mmunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
9 yzed by histology, immunohistochemistry, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
10 in the amygdala was measured using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
11 age functions was quantified using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
12 rial-to-nuclear DNA ratio (mtDNA/nDNA) using quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
13 oprecipitation followed by promotor-specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
14        The parasitemia level was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
15 oscopy, histology, immunohistochemistry, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
16 irus (CMV), HHV-6A, HHV-6B, and HHV-8, using quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
17  swabs and oral fluid samples were tested by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
18 ion of 50 mRNA gene products was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
19 leatum status in tumor tissue, determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
20 d to carry TBK1 copy number variations using quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
21 oarthritic synovial fibroblast (OASFs) using quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
22 ory protein) were also measured by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
23 e, AZ) and analyzed by mass spectrometry and quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
24 tched control patients, with confirmation by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
25 were tested for HBoV mRNA and genomic DNA by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
26  metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) was evaluated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
27 sequential sputum samples from 9 patients by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
28 LIMK pathway messenger RNAs were measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
29  TBK1 copy number variations using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
30                Channel mRNAs were assayed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
31  B mRNA levels were analyzed using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
32 ion was measured using reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
33 rgic and GABAergic pathways was monitored by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
34 3 mRNA compared with nonneoplastic tissue by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
35 ot hybridization and HPV16 copy number using quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
36  to a single-copy gene copy number (S) using quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
37 n vitro 24-hour hypoxic culture system using quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
38         Viral load was measured by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
39 ed via microarray analysis and confirmed via quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
40 3 messenger RNA levels from leukocytes using quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
41 ed mRNA could be cleaved, as demonstrated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
42  found to contain high levels of t(14;18) by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
43 ophagy were measured with immunoblotting and quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
44 d TF were evaluated by reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
45 ma (PPARgamma) gene expression, confirmed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
46 e, and spirochete densities were assessed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
47  admission, and var gene transcription using quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
48 patterns were measured by flow cytometry and quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
49 tion and function were analyzed by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
50 hybridization, transcriptional analyses, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
51 1), and 16S rRNA genes were quantified using quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
52 iota was analyzed by 16S rRNA sequencing and quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
53 rmance was found using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
54 ccult HCV infection by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
55 ys and high-throughput reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
56 ed in ileal tissues by reverse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
57                          LTL was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
58 y chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
59 ents; cells were analyzed by immunoblots and quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
60 maternal-infant pair, and MMc was assayed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
61 or allele-specific oligonucleotide real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
62 ial load was quantified by solid culture and quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
63                              RNA sequencing, quantitative polymerase chain reaction,(13)C-nuclear mag
64  of MIR122 and chromatin immunoprecipitation quantitative polymerase chain reaction analyses in Huh-7
65                                              Quantitative polymerase chain reaction analyses of CB119
66 validated in real-time reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction analyses of recta
67                                 We performed quantitative polymerase chain reaction analyses of the e
68                      Immunohistochemical and quantitative polymerase chain reaction analyses show exp
69 al cell-specific messenger RNA isolation and quantitative polymerase chain reaction analyses to confi
70              We used immunohistochemical and quantitative polymerase chain reaction analyses to exami
71                                           In quantitative polymerase chain reaction analyses, ChAd63-
72 blot, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction analyses.
73 responses were measured using microarray and quantitative polymerase chain reaction analyses.
74 ted for immunoblot, immunohistochemical, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction analyses.
75 mmunofluorescence, and reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction analyses.
76 a, using 16S ribosomal (rRNA) RNA gene-based quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis and sequ
77                                              Quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis demonstr
78                                              Quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis identify
79     Colonization density was calculated with quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis of nasop
80                                    Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis revealed
81                                              Quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis revealed
82                                              Quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis showed t
83                               We performed a quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis to measu
84 on, using comparative genomic hybridization, quantitative polymerase-chain-reaction analysis, and DNA
85      Transcripts were validated by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction and a candidate l
86          Expression of TREM2 was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and compared in s
87 itric oxide synthase interacting protein) by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and confirmation
88 ells from inflamed intestine was assessed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and cytofluoromet
89               IFN production was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and ELISA.
90  at low shear stress regions as evidenced by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and en face stain
91                                              Quantitative polymerase chain reaction and enzyme-linked
92 othelial growth factor (VEGF), quantified by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and enzyme-linked
93 appa B-p65 and cytokine expression levels by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and flow cytometr
94 d in peripheral blood and bone marrow, using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and flow cytometr
95                                              Quantitative polymerase chain reaction and histologic qu
96 on and protein expression were analyzed with quantitative polymerase chain reaction and immunoblottin
97                                 We performed quantitative polymerase chain reaction and immunofluores
98 is patients were evaluated for MC markers by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and immunohistoch
99  of a subset of these genes are validated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and immunohistoch
100                      Islets were analyzed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and immunohistoch
101 fected C57BL/6 mouse corneas was assessed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and immunohistoch
102 thin the graft's collecting duct cells using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and immunohistoch
103                                              Quantitative polymerase chain reaction and in situ hybri
104                                              Quantitative polymerase chain reaction and in situ hybri
105 g immunohistochemical staining of pSHF, ChIP-quantitative polymerase chain reaction and luciferase re
106                                              Quantitative polymerase chain reaction and metagenomic s
107                                        Using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and microarray te
108 h throughput stem-loop reverse-transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction and mRNA microarr
109  abundance of 16S rRNA genes was measured by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction and no apparent d
110                                              Quantitative polymerase chain reaction and northern blot
111 h quantitatively by 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) quantitative polymerase chain reaction and qualitatively
112 olated and analyzed by reverse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction and RNA sequencin
113 ollected and analyzed by immunohistochemical quantitative polymerase chain reaction and sphingosine k
114 with control and validated these findings by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and the nCounter
115 ction were detected by reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction and Western blot
116            Gene expression was determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and Western blot.
117  lipid biosynthesis genes was ascertained by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and Western blot.
118 ion receptors and microRNAs was evaluated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and Western blott
119 n potential duration and ionic currents, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction and Western blott
120 1 messenger RNAs and protein using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction and Western immun
121 heart significantly upregulated at the gene (quantitative polymerase chain reaction) and protein (enz
122 IPF, BAL bacterial burden (determined by 16S quantitative polymerase chain reaction), and specific mi
123                       LTL was assessed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and CRF assessed
124   Cells were analyzed by immunofluorescence, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and flow cytomet
125 ge, lung antimicrobial peptide expression by quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and flow cytomet
126 substantiate the radiogenomic signature with quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and functional a
127 ed cells using immunofluorescence, real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and immunoblot a
128 d in soft tissue using immunohistochemistry, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and immunoblotti
129   Tissues were collected for immunoblotting, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and immunohistoc
130                            RNA-seq analysis, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and liquid chrom
131 ectrometry, ARG were quantified via targeted quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and microbial co
132                   RNA sequencing, transcript quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and reporter ass
133 NA was quantified with reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and statistical
134 tes were determined by reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and tumor biopsi
135                        Reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction array profiling w
136    We used a real-time reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction array to analyze
137                          METHODS AND Using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction array, we found t
138 ured in DNA using the multiplexed monochrome quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay.
139              We used a reverse-transcriptase quantitative polymerase-chain-reaction assay to detect m
140 A-DPB1 expression was assessed by means of a quantitative polymerase-chain-reaction assay.
141 ing sequencing, fluorescent microsphere, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays at loci as
142 is study developed and applied type-specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays to samples
143                             High-throughput, quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays were used
144 l carriage and density were determined using quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays.
145 al disease (MRD) assessments for BCR-ABL1 by quantitative polymerase chain reaction at complete remis
146   To address these questions, we developed a quantitative polymerase chain reaction-based approach to
147                  In addition, a simultaneous quantitative polymerase chain reaction-based assessment
148            Chromatin immunoprecipitation and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (ChIP-qPCR) revea
149                                Here, we used quantitative polymerase chain reaction combined with in
150 An assay combining DNase I digestion and CMV quantitative polymerase chain reaction (DNase-CMV-qPCR)
151 es and plasma was determined using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, dual-labeling im
152                                 We performed quantitative polymerase chain reaction experiments demon
153 -CMs were confirmed by immunohistochemistry, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, fluorescence-act
154  experimental groups by semiquantitative and quantitative polymerase chain reaction followed by immun
155 Counter miRNA expression assay and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, followed by cons
156 rollment and follow-up stools were tested by quantitative polymerase chain reaction for 32 enteropath
157 ted by sirius red/fast green staining and by quantitative polymerase chain reaction for alpha-smooth
158 ponse to B10.A hearts was investigated using quantitative polymerase chain reaction for CD3+, CD4+, C
159 ongitudinal cohort of infants were tested by quantitative polymerase chain reaction for HBoV-1 DNA.
160 l subsets; DNA templates were prepared using quantitative polymerase chain reaction for JCV DNA ident
161 osis was assessed by Sirius Red staining and quantitative polymerase chain reaction for markers of he
162                                 We performed quantitative polymerase chain reaction for multiple ente
163            Nasal washes were evaluated using quantitative polymerase chain reaction for RV to judge v
164 RNA) levels were quantified in PFC area 9 by quantitative polymerase chain reaction from 62 subjects
165        This mutation was further analyzed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction genotyping in a n
166 s were measured in peripheral blood cells by quantitative polymerase chain reaction: hypoxia inducibl
167 nd quantification of JCV from the tissues by quantitative polymerase chain reaction illuminated sites
168 le and analyzed by RNA-seq, metabolomic, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction, immunoblot, and
169 liver tissues were collected and analyzed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction, immunohistochemi
170 2 in stenotic aortic valves was confirmed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction, immunohistochemi
171 d HER2-CAR T cells 3 hours after infusion by quantitative polymerase chain reaction in 14 of 16 patie
172 ecific oligonucleotide reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction in 43 patients an
173                           We measured LTL by quantitative polymerase chain reaction in 566 outpatient
174               METHODS AND We measured LTL by quantitative polymerase chain reaction in 566 outpatient
175 2S-induced miR-21 expression was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction in adult primary
176 8-5p) was validated by reverse-transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction in an independent
177 ns: The study evaluated CRX messenger RNA by quantitative polymerase chain reaction in BM and CSF at
178 evels were measured by reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction in healthy contro
179 ycobacterium leprae DNA was detected through quantitative polymerase chain reaction in nasal vestibul
180               We compared xenodiagnosis with quantitative polymerase chain reaction in skin biopsies
181  of the FAIM3:PLAC8 ratio was ascertained by quantitative polymerase chain reaction in the validation
182              HSC activation was evaluated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction in total liver an
183 then validated this signature with real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction in tracheal and a
184         The geometric mean of viral loads by quantitative polymerase chain reaction in washes from wh
185                                              Quantitative polymerase chain reaction is the current "g
186                                              Quantitative polymerase chain reaction JCPyV was used pr
187                                              Quantitative polymerase chain reaction measurements of s
188         We quantified Oxt messenger RNA with quantitative polymerase chain reaction (n = 5-9).
189 s, measurement of C. difficile toxin titers, quantitative polymerase chain reaction of fecal samples
190          We performed 16S ribosomal RNA gene quantitative polymerase chain reaction of intestinal muc
191 genital infection was assessed using CMV DNA quantitative polymerase chain reaction on amniotic fluid
192 single nucleotide polymorphism by performing quantitative polymerase chain reaction on the affected e
193 lected and analyzed by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction or confocal micro
194 t the test can also be performed with use of quantitative polymerase chain reaction or immunohistoche
195 iral load area under the curve (days 2-7) by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (P = .09) compare
196 fections were quantified by highly sensitive quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis, a
197                                              Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and 454 pyr
198                                              Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and reverse
199                                    Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Western
200                                            A quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and western
201 y other month and tested for bacteria, using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays targ
202                                              Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) revealed th
203           Her spleen was not palpable, and a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for JA
204 ssection combined with reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) we observed
205 mples were analyzed by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR), in situ PC
206             Microbiology was evaluated using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR), pyrosequen
207  from isolated blood leukocytes was used for quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR), RNA sequen
208     Viral nucleic acid in plasma by NGMS and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
209 men provided data and blood for serology and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
210 l error and analysis procedures in real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
211 matched community controls were tested using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
212 aboratory test results, that is, BK viremia (quantitative polymerase chain reaction [PCR]) and BK vir
213 at Vanderbilt University were performed with quantitative polymerase chain reaction performed on peri
214 ted with MLD were identified, confirmed on a quantitative polymerase chain reaction platform, and rep
215  from cell lines and tissues was analyzed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction, protein levels w
216 ased over time, standard-curve based simplex quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analyses a
217                               Microarray and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analyses o
218                                              Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis i
219            DNA was extracted and analyzed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and high-t
220                                              Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and quanti
221                              High-throughput quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) approaches
222     The results led us to develop a specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay for
223                             We show that the quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay prev
224 ococcus 23S rRNA gene region as the existing quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays of
225 n achievable in patient plasma samples using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays wit
226                                    Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) data are f
227         Most methods for analyzing real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) data for s
228 ther Southern blot hybridization analyses or quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) experiment
229 to cDNA, preamplification and then real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for 21 can
230                             JCV detection by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) in cerebro
231 rvalbumin, and calretinin were quantified by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) in each la
232              Gene expression was assessed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) in OC mode
233 he fluorescence cell staining method and the quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) method.
234 otential measurements (acetylene block), and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) of functio
235 ovel, more affordable, and widely applicable quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) protocol a
236 ve promised the future of portable real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) sensors.
237                                      We used quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to detect
238 n which we used (15)N tracing techniques and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to investi
239                                Histology and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) were perfo
240 raditional bacterial and fungal culture, 16S quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), and a rep
241          The purified DNA is compatible with quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), and prote
242                                              Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), the curre
243  is widely used for calibration in real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), to estima
244  impact and effectiveness study as well as a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)-based etio
245 ource material samples analyzed by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).
246 rs were analyzed by immunohistochemistry and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).
247 lenge and BCG load quantified by culture and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).
248 nger RNA (mRNA) at the GCF were evaluated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).
249 ic lipid accumulation, and we also performed quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)and western
250 microscopic and histologic examination and a quantitative polymerase-chain-reaction (qPCR) assay, as
251 me hypoxic samples), the absolute abundance (quantitative polymerase chain reaction; qPCR) of Thaumar
252 -glucan, ergosterol, and bacterial or fungal quantitative polymerase chain reactions (qPCRs) were ana
253 uctive statuses were determined by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (real-time qPCR).
254 ome microarrays and multiplexed microfluidic quantitative polymerase chain reaction, respectively.
255                                 Taqman-based quantitative polymerase chain reaction revealed a 45-gen
256 al residual disease (MRD) by using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) provides
257 tivity of </=10(-5), comparable to real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR)-based MR
258 lthy skin specimens by reverse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysi
259 asurement results with reverse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) as the
260 ples using a real-time reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assay f
261 mma receptor 3 (FCGR3) genes using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assays
262 ssion was evaluated by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) in 22 p
263                        Reverse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) is a re
264 RNA-seq/exon-array and reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) platfor
265  Single-cell multiplex reverse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was use
266 quencing and real-time reverse-transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), the pr
267 ith luciferase reporter assays and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR).
268 r RNA (mRNA) levels by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RTqPCR), cytokin
269                                              Quantitative polymerase chain reaction showed a signific
270                                              Quantitative polymerase chain reaction showed that genes
271 ients, positive at baseline for influenza by quantitative polymerase chain reaction, showed a median
272 thritis treated with azithromycin 1.5g using quantitative polymerase chain reaction specific for M. g
273 NA extracted from wastewater was analyzed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction targeting human-s
274 s used to measure the telomere length with a quantitative polymerase chain reaction technique.
275      Norovirus infection was confirmed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction testing of stool
276             Using Western immunoblotting and quantitative polymerase chain reaction, the authors iden
277  next used laser-capture microdissection and quantitative polymerase chain reaction to assess cell-le
278  isolated from tumor tissues and analyzed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction to detect mutatio
279 oenzymatic labeling, proximity ligation, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction to detect O-GlcNA
280                       We used immunoblot and quantitative polymerase chain reaction to evaluate the m
281                                      We used quantitative polymerase chain reaction to measure telome
282 for a set of 3164 samples; and we use TaqMan quantitative polymerase chain reaction to validate CNVs
283 rt) were reanalyzed by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction, to check for con
284     RNA sequencing and reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction transcriptomic an
285  next-generation sequencing and validated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction using a discovery
286 was isolated from plasma and quantified by a quantitative polymerase chain reaction using human telom
287 e gene expression profiles were generated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction using RNA extract
288 he associations of TL, which was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction using saliva DNA,
289 and in vitro assays included RNA sequencing, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, very-low-density
290                                              Quantitative polymerase chain reaction was employed to m
291                                              Quantitative polymerase chain reaction was performed on
292                                              Quantitative polymerase chain reaction was used to locat
293                                              Quantitative polymerase chain reaction was used to measu
294  array comparative genomic hybridization and quantitative polymerase chain reaction, we identified co
295                         Using gene array and quantitative polymerase chain reaction, we identified Sl
296 and chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled to quantitative polymerase chain reaction, we show that MYB
297 tion was comprehensively characterized using quantitative polymerase chain reaction weekly for >/=9 m
298 t-derived bacterial products was analyzed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction, Western blotting
299 cells; data analysis was inspired by that in quantitative polymerase chain reactions, where the delay
300 re validated by quantification using digital quantitative polymerase chain reaction with an independe

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top