コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 of the hypoxic area were transferred to the radiation oncologist.
2 ith radiation is of utmost importance to the radiation oncologist.
3 sing standard lung windows and reviewed by a radiation oncologist.
4 ons from the patient's primary physician and radiation oncologist.
5 hared discussion between the patient and her radiation oncologist.
6 mains a therapeutic challenge to medical and radiation oncologists.
7 ians to medical oncologists, urologists, and radiation oncologists.
8 come invaluable to medical, gynecologic, and radiation oncologists.
9 ons (2.01; 95% CI, 1.28-2.73; P < .001), and radiation oncologists (0.68; 95% CI, 0.59-0.77; P < .001
10 were medical oncologists; 29%, surgeons; 14% radiation oncologists; 37%, women; and 83%, research pri
11 diologists in 1995, 14% were women; 12% were radiation oncologists, 62% diagnostic generalists, and 2
12 1%; n = 239), hematologists (14.5%; n = 96), radiation oncologists (7.4%; n = 49), surgeons (33.8%; n
13 standard error) diagnostic radiologists and radiation oncologists; 788 +/- 105 of these positions we
14 %, n = 371), hematologists (16.4%, n = 158), radiation oncologists (9.0%, n = 87), surgeons (30.3%, n
16 ican Board of Radiology inclusive of current radiation oncologists and active residents, accounting f
17 archers, nuclear medicine technologists, and radiation oncologists and aims to identify possible barr
21 atients, time commitment, involvement of the radiation oncologist, and ideas for overcoming hurdles.
22 medical oncologists/hematologists, 50% were radiation oncologists, and 12% were surgical oncologists
23 of 35% among medical oncologists, 38% among radiation oncologists, and 28% to 36% among surgical onc
24 Medical Oncologists, Canadian Association of Radiation Oncologists, and Canadian Society of Surgical
25 ts (equally divided among otolaryngologists, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists) to solic
28 pidly gained acceptance among neurosurgeons, radiation oncologists, and neuro-oncologists as a valuab
29 dom sample of 3,024 diagnostic radiologists, radiation oncologists, and nuclear medicine specialists
30 dom sample of 3,024 diagnostic radiologists, radiation oncologists, and nuclear medicine specialists;
31 arcity of medical oncologists, pathologists, radiation oncologists, and other health-care workers who
32 lose collaboration between cardiologists and radiation oncologists at various levels is required to e
33 the preferred treatment option, while 72% of radiation oncologists believed surgery and external beam
34 cer treated with curative intent by a single radiation oncologist between July 1, 1993, and December
35 edures were performed per week; 75% of these radiation oncologists did not see the patient prior to t
36 Based on this study, while urologists and radiation oncologists do agree on a variety of issues re
39 g framework integrates these factors to help radiation oncologists formulate strategic treatment reco
41 care physicians, and medical, surgical, and radiation oncologists, from both academic and community
42 re providers (including medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, gynecologic oncologists, urologis
43 uld be sensitized to the special need of the radiation oncologist in terms of quantification and repr
44 d demand for radiation therapy and supply of radiation oncologists in 2010 and 2020 to determine whet
46 The purpose of this study is to survey how radiation oncologists in North America (NA) and Europe d
47 ond survey was sent to 500 randomly selected radiation oncologists in the United States to assess whe
48 nication between diagnostic radiologists and radiation oncologists is essential, particularly given t
49 constant, the number of full-time equivalent radiation oncologists is expected to increase by only 2%
50 evaluation, including a consultation with a radiation oncologist, is recommended to assess benefits
51 sts, nurse practitioners, a urologist, and a radiation oncologist, is responsible for updating the CO
54 cologists, neuroradiologists, neurosurgeons, radiation oncologists, neuropsychologists, and experts i
55 , 1.9 to 45.0), at least one board-certified radiation oncologist (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.2 to 9.0), use
56 .58; 95% CI, 1.05 to 2.38), lower density of radiation oncologists (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.11 to 2.86),
57 s who continued to see a medical oncologist, radiation oncologist, or surgeon were most likely to hav
58 included leading hematologists, oncologists, radiation oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, and n
59 f gastroenterologists, general surgeons, and radiation oncologists per 100,000 people in each county
60 f gastroenterologists, general surgeons, and radiation oncologists per 100,000 people in urban vs rur
63 epatologists, surgeons, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, interventional radi
64 as urologists (response rate 64%, n=504) and radiation oncologists (response rate 76%, n=559) in the
66 nary approach including medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, surgeons, interventionalists, and
69 ng techniques and powerful computers allow a radiation oncologist to design treatments delivering hig
70 rgery decision, the patient consulted with a radiation oncologist to discuss the effect radiation may
71 ts per year in order for growth in supply of radiation oncologists to equal expected growth in demand
72 modality of proton beam therapy have enabled radiation oncologists to target tumors more successfully
75 w records from the many surgeons and medical/radiation oncologists who administer cancer therapies in
76 f gastroenterologists, general surgeons, and radiation oncologists who traditionally provide colorect
77 iologists, nuclear medicine specialists, and radiation oncologists will be called on to perform a num
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語（用法）は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。