ライフサイエンスコーパス: radical nephrectomy

1 ence interval [95% CI], 0.26 to 0.43, versus radical nephrectomy).

2 itutions, with similar oncologic outcomes to radical nephrectomy.

3 the treatment of suspicious renal masses was radical nephrectomy.

4 as equivalent oncologic outcomes compared to radical nephrectomy.

5 ctomy and 5213 patients (73.0%) treated with radical nephrectomy.

6 risk of renal insufficiency associated with radical nephrectomy.

7 ectomy, and 222 patients (4.3%) treated with radical nephrectomy.

8 ons with cohorts of patients undergoing open radical nephrectomy.

9 renal cell carcinoma consists of partial or radical nephrectomy.

10 partial nephrectomy, but only 64% following radical nephrectomy.

11 er partial nephrectomy equals the results of radical nephrectomy.

12 therapy for most renal cancers involved open radical nephrectomy.

13 ll carcinoma from patients who had undergone radical nephrectomy.

14 improved renal function outcomes compared to radical nephrectomy.

15 ts (84%) had known metastases at the time of radical nephrectomy (67% had lung metastases and 40% had

16 lth benefits of nephron sparing surgery over radical nephrectomy and its oncologic equivalency confir

17 ositive disease were randomly assigned after radical nephrectomy and lymphadenectomy to observation o

18 recent long-term oncological equivalence to radical nephrectomy and renal functional benefit, partia

19 Patients undergoing radical nephrectomy are at an increased risk of noncance

20 Concurrent with the rise of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy as the gold standard for managing re

21 Partial nephrectomy may be as effective as radical nephrectomy as treatment for localized disease,

22 matched group of 125 patients who underwent radical nephrectomy at the same institution between 1986

23 Early-stage kidney cancer is treated with a radical nephrectomy, but under certain circumstances a p

24 Nowadays, laparoscopic radical nephrectomy can be performed for pT2 tumors (up

25 nephrectomy and 35% (28-43; p<0.0001) after radical nephrectomy; corresponding values for GFRs lower

26 Use of radical nephrectomy decreased over time (from 69.0% to 4

27 ptable candidates for nephrectomy to undergo radical nephrectomy followed by therapy with interferon

28 Survival rates of partial and radical nephrectomies for patients with unilateral T1 RC

29 althy kidneys undergoing elective partial or radical nephrectomy for a solitary, renal cortical tumou

30 ible adult patients had undergone partial or radical nephrectomy for histologically confirmed ccRCC a

31 e, partial nephrectomy for small tumours and radical nephrectomy for large tumours continue to be the

32 ical equations for estimating survival after radical nephrectomy for RCC.

33 In patients electing radical nephrectomy for small renal masses, the kidney,

34 In circumstances, where patients elect for radical nephrectomy for small tumours, these kidneys sho

35 Radical nephrectomy for SRMs should only be reserved for

36 as an oncologically equivalent operation to radical nephrectomy for T1a tumors (<4 cm) with the adde

37 f laparoscopic radical nephrectomy over open radical nephrectomy for the majority of renal cell cance

38 The overzealous use of radical nephrectomy for the T1 renal mass, by whatever s

39 A recent clinical trial of partial and radical nephrectomy found minimal differences in surviva

40 ge T1a kidney cancer treated with partial or radical nephrectomy from 1992 through 2007.

41 The first case underwent a radical nephrectomy given the central location of the tu

42 chronic kidney disease in patients receiving radical nephrectomy have been associated with more nonca

43 sity of completing all the components of the radical nephrectomy have been questioned.

44 te better survival for patients treated with radical nephrectomy, have generated new uncertainty rega

45 The use of nephron-sparing surgery exceeds radical nephrectomy in patients who receive surgery.

46 nce and renal functional benefit compared to radical nephrectomy in select patients.

47 excellent long-term outcomes of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in the form of retrospective compari

48 rectomy is becoming an alternate standard to radical nephrectomy in the management of T1b tumors.

49 The choice to either perform a partial or radical nephrectomy in these situations can be a challen

50 rd ratio, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.19, versus radical nephrectomy) in propensity score-matched cohorts

51 Radical nephrectomy is a significant risk factor for the

52 cent data support the prevailing notion that radical nephrectomy is associated with higher rates of c

53 rectomy has lagged behind while laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is widely practiced and has become a

54 risk (pT1Nx-0) after partial (LR-partial) or radical nephrectomy (LR-radical) or as moderate/high ris

55 edly support the superiority of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy over open radical nephrectomy for th

56 tic surgery has been successfully applied to radical nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy and pyeloplasty

57 In conclusion, compared with radical nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy was associated

58 Adjunctive radical nephrectomy, performed either before or after th

59 oved patient recovery for such procedures as radical nephrectomy, radical nephroureterectomy and dono

60 Multivariable analysis showed that radical nephrectomy remained an independent risk factor

61 omes and recent developments in laparoscopic radical nephrectomy reported over the past year.

62 4 (41.5%) patients died following partial or radical nephrectomy, respectively.

63 urgical procedures (radical cystectomy [RC], radical nephrectomy [RN], and radical prostatectomy [RP]

64 ement of small renal tumors is changing from radical nephrectomy to nephron-conserving surgery.

65 ence standard treatment of SRMs evolved from radical nephrectomy to nephron-sparing approaches.

66 effectiveness of partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy to preserve kidney function has not

67 surgery, treatment with partial rather than radical nephrectomy was associated with improved surviva

68 Therefore, whereas fewer radical nephrectomies will be performed for T1a tumors,

69 ides equivalent oncological tumor control to radical nephrectomy with maximum preservation of long-te