ライフサイエンスコーパス: radical resection

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します

1 y that precludes the possibility of safe and radical resection.

2 ting of a total of 386 patients who received radical resection.

3 acterized by a high risk of recurrence after radical resection.

4 with respect to the potential advantages of radical resection.

5 ons as to the indications for reoperation or radical resection.

6 focused on the impact of conservative versus radical resections.

7 nderwent resection, 685 underwent definitive radical resection and 407 underwent reresection after un

8 often experience high rates of re-excision, radical resections, and overtreatment.

9 cers treated by either transanal excision or radical resection at our institution to assess patient s

10 For treatment, 11 (57.9 %) patients received radical resection by either enucleation or hepatic resec

11 Radical resection can provide long-term survival, even f

12 l data on patients undergoing limited versus radical resection for cancer and HGD was compared.

13 All individuals underwent radical resection for rectal cancer with or without neoa

14 the standard resection group and 83% for the radical resection group.

15 Patients undergoing radical resection had a higher incidence of early delaye

16 cancer after cholecystectomy, and results of radical resection in patients with advanced disease.

17 ith gallbladder cancer and determine whether radical resection in patients with gallbladder cancer is

18 uggest that multimodality regimens including radical resection increase survival selectively in MPM p

19 th locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing radical resection is an early surrogate marker and corre

20 Radical resection is the more definitive surgical treatm

21 82 cancerous and noncancerous specimens from radical resection of 241 patients with HCC.

22 ross-sectional images who were scheduled for radical resection of the primary tumor and extended pelv

23 um VEGF levels decreased significantly after radical resection of the primary tumor and increased in

24 concentration decreases significantly after radical resection of the primary tumor and is an indepen

25 ances now enable the surgeon to achieve more radical resections of these neoplasms and to reconstruct

26 50 patients (47%) who underwent some form of radical resection (P < 0.001).

27 Radical resection provided a significantly better clinic

28 In a cohort of 66 patients who underwent radical resection (R0), survival was significantly short

29 verge) by either transanal excision (TAE) or radical resection (RAD) between January 1987 and January

30 Radical resection required sacrectomy in 170 patients (3

31 tumor response and disease control following radical resection should be established before tumor res

32 local recurrence develops can be salvaged by radical resection, the long-term outcome remains unknown

33 is study, we utilized 120 PDAC tissues after radical resection to detect cancer-FOXP3 and Treg cells

34 alignancies has shifted from the traditional radical resection to more conservative procedures that a

35 For patients with RT-associated breast AS, radical resection was associated with reduced recurrence

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語（用法）は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。