ライフサイエンスコーパス: radiocarbon dating

1 ving patterns, dyes/mordant, style, and even radiocarbon dating.

2 60 years, far more rapidly than indicated by radiocarbon dating.

3 r of fossils from the latest Pleistocene for radiocarbon dating.

4 ntial alternative to the use of charcoal for radiocarbon dating analyses.

5 everal cranial fragments from the site using radiocarbon dating, ancient DNA, ZooMS and isotope analy

6 oring possible applications in the fields of radiocarbon dating and atmospheric monitoring.

7 Direct accelerator mass spectometry radiocarbon dating and Bayesian modeling confirm that th

8 Radiocarbon dating and DNA analysis show that the rib is

9 e damage of collagen, and screen samples for radiocarbon dating and DNA analysis.

10 s morphometrics, taphonomy, stable isotopes, radiocarbon dating and genetic analyses.

11 servations of Siberian permafrost exposures, radiocarbon dating and spatial analyses to quantify Holo

12 te change at the last glacial termination by radiocarbon dating benthic and planktonic foraminiferal

13 The conventional approach of radiocarbon dating bulk organic carbon in lake sediments

14 te only to about +/-100 years, a figure that radiocarbon dating cannot at present improve.

15 Archaeological, osteological and radiocarbon dating data were consistent with these being

16 Radiocarbon dating estimated the specimen to be approxim

17 Andes Mountain region of South America, and radiocarbon dating estimates that the mummies date from

18 Recent excavations and high-precision radiocarbon dating from the largest Iron Age (IA, ca. 12

19 Radiocarbon dating has been fundamental to the study of

20 locene epoch and previous attempts at direct radiocarbon dating have failed.

21 One means of testing this is by radiocarbon dating; however, until recently, our ability

22 Direct radiocarbon dating indicated that these plants grew betw

23 Radiocarbon dating indicates that 30 to 50% of the carbo

24 Radiocarbon dating indicates that the three burial event

25 Therefore, radiocarbon dating is ideally performed on organic compo

26 arbon in various fields, and it implies that radiocarbon dating may no longer provide definitive ages

27 he accuracy of accelerator mass spectrometry radiocarbon dating of 29 herbivore and plant tissues col

28 biochemistry (delta(13)C and delta(15)N) and radiocarbon dating of ancient human and animal bone docu

29 ess values and accelerator mass spectrometer radiocarbon dating of archaeological specimens indicate

30 Radiocarbon dating of both individuals (A120 to 533 AD [

31 Radiocarbon dating of eye lens nuclei from 28 female Gre

32 face waters in a boreal peat catchment using radiocarbon dating of particulate and dissolved organic

33 his C loss was from soil organic matter, and radiocarbon dating of residual soil layers revealed that

34 nt (kyr B.P.) has limited the application of radiocarbon dating of samples from the Last Glacial peri

35 It could be responsible for biasing radiocarbon dating of sedimentary organic carbon, and al

36 sis and direct accelerator mass spectrometry radiocarbon dating of the cucurbit assemblage from Coxca

37 As part of a large radiocarbon dating project of Alaskan mammoth fossils, I

38 To overcome this problem, a radiocarbon dating protocol has been developed to date e

39 Subsequent radiocarbon dating revealed the bone to be >50,000 years

40 wo recent developments in the methodology of radiocarbon dating show that the speed of colonization o

41 14.6-10 kyr before present, as determined by radiocarbon dating--show varying degrees of correlation

42 Accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) radiocarbon dating showed fruits to be 31,800 +/- 300 y

43 c and geomorphic data, physical volcanology, radiocarbon dating, tephra geochemistry, and chronicles,

44 Much as radiocarbon dating that half a century ago moved archaeo

45 ninvasive procedure presented here relies on radiocarbon dating the so-called angel's share: the trac

46 eport an extensive program of high-precision radiocarbon dating to establish the best date for a floa

47 Measurements included radiocarbon dating (to determine peat accumulation rates

48 5%) and amounts (>200 microg) sufficient for radiocarbon dating using accelerator mass spectrometry (

49 Here, by radiocarbon dating various terrestrial OC components in

50 through changes in DOC concentration alone: Radiocarbon dating was essential to show that leaching o

51 ration to purify faunal bone collagen before radiocarbon dating, we obtain ages at least 10 ka (14)C

52 We sampled 281 moa individuals and combined radiocarbon dating with ancient DNA analyses to help res