ライフサイエンスコーパス: radiographic finding

1 d tomography (CT) was performed based on the radiographic findings.

2 wise nonspecific clinical symptoms and chest radiographic findings.

3 equires the appropriate clinical picture and radiographic findings.

4 short stature and a unique constellation of radiographic findings.

5 gressive periodontitis based on clinical and radiographic findings.

6 ogic records were reviewed and compared with radiographic findings.

7 ata were also reviewed and compared with the radiographic findings.

8 sive periodontitis based on the clinical and radiographic findings.

9 racteristics and pathologic, laboratory, and radiographic findings.

10 iring treatment was diagnosed as a result of radiographic findings.

11 er these represented true- or false-positive radiographic findings.

12 Osteoarthritis was confirmed by symptoms and radiographic findings.

13 racteristics and pathologic, laboratory, and radiographic findings.

14 ritis that is associated with characteristic radiographic findings.

15 were compared with concurrent bedside chest radiographic findings.

16 sue, diagnoses among various age groups, and radiographic findings.

17 y screen and subsequent corroboration of the radiographic findings.

18 does not substantially affect the subsequent radiographic findings.

19 Of the 232 chest radiographic findings, 199 (86%) were confirmed at CT; w

20 +/-13 ng per milliliter) but not with normal radiographic findings (21+/-5 ng per milliliter), plaque

21 e matter hyperintensities (WMH) are a common radiographic finding and may be a useful endophenotype f

22 Indeterminate pulmonary nodules are a common radiographic finding and require further evaluation beca

23 277 [78.7%]) had IA diagnosis established by radiographic findings and maximum galactomannan positivi

24 le records were retrospectively reviewed for radiographic findings and outcome.

25 tively between NEC and IP based on abdominal radiographic findings and the patient's age at operation

26 noscopy; five were found to be true-positive radiographic findings, and one was found to be a false-p

27 hocardiography enabled confirmation of these radiographic findings, and pericardiocentesis was perfor

28 ations, subcutaneous nodules, laboratory and radiographic findings, and treatment received.

29 ndings, subcutaneous nodules, laboratory and radiographic findings, and treatment.

30 If radiographic findings are equivocal, however, manometry

31 adiographic files were reviewed to determine radiographic findings at follow-up examinations.

32 Presence of radiographic findings, changes in management because of

33 in 1st-, 2nd-, 3rd-, 4th-, 6th-, or 8th-year radiographic findings compared with baseline).

34 The radiographic findings consisted of extrinsic mass effect

35 To determine if chest radiographic findings differ in adult tuberculosis patie

36 We also compare clinical and radiographic findings for the defect at 7 and 30 months

37 Radiographic findings from cone beam computed tomography

38 lymphadenopathy, which was the only positive radiographic finding in two patients.

39 Pathology findings correlated with radiographic findings in 90.0% of patients who received

40 We conclude that: (1) chest radiographic findings in adults with tuberculosis of rec

41 remote infection; (2) the distinctive chest radiographic findings in HIV-infected patients with tube

42 Aspergillus infection, were the most common radiographic findings in invasive aspergillosis.

43 ground-glass opacities, are the predominant radiographic findings in pediatric patients with a more

44 ICU clinicians were conducted to assess the radiographic findings in the routine radiographs and act

45 Characteristic radiographic findings include bilateral regions of subco

46 Radiographic findings, including sclerosis, invasion, pe

47 ion included an increase in summary grade of radiographic findings, increase in total osteophyte scor

48 ted tomography demonstrated several cardinal radiographic findings known to correlate with chronic re

49 lusive features on MRI, but subtle important radiographic findings led to a specific diagnosis.

50 marrow cavity at MR imaging and normal plain radiographic findings may suggest primary muscle lymphom

51 The radiographic finding of abdominal aortic calcific deposi

52 70, 95% CI 1.03-2.88, P = 0.04), and any new radiographic finding of hip OA or total hip arthroplasty

53 All 21 patients with radiographic findings of achalasia had aperistalsis at m

54 e data suggest that in patients with typical radiographic findings of achalasia, the barium study can

55 Other radiographic findings of antral gastritis were present i

56 Radiographic findings of AVN were seen in 14 of 205 pati

57 This review is presented to describe the radiographic findings of axial carpal disruptions in hop

58 Radiographic findings of Cytomegalovirus pneumonia consi

59 New radiographic findings of hip OA were defined as the deve

60 mine the association of nitrate use with new radiographic findings of hip OA, adjusting for age, weig

61 may have an increased risk of developing new radiographic findings of hip OA.

62 ity for carbon monoxide (DLco), and/or chest radiographic findings of interstitial infiltrates.

63 ctors for osteoarthritis or mild to moderate radiographic findings of osteoarthritis, categorized int

64 There was no relationship between the radiographic findings of sarcoidosis and the CD4 cell co

65 s possible to predict IT accurately based on radiographic findings of the patient.

66 Familiarity with subtle radiographic findings of these conditions may lead to ea

67 However, no single MRI or radiographic finding performed well in discriminating be

68 4 pneumonia was not associated with specific radiographic findings, pneumonia severity score, intensi

69 igns, electrocardiographic abnormalities and radiographic findings seen in patients with LV pseudoane

70 n abnormality that corresponded to the chest radiographic finding that prompted the recommendation.

71 e most common pathogen, causes a spectrum of radiographic findings that includes normal findings.

72 The authors assessed the radiographic findings, the histologic findings at core-n

73 Although radiographic findings were also usually nonspecific, the

74 hic factors, comorbidities, and preoperative radiographic findings were analyzed as possible indicato

75 Serum levels of sIL-2R and ACE and chest radiographic findings were assessed.

76 Radiographic findings were categorized for RSV-infected

77 MR and radiographic findings were compared.

78 CT and chest radiographic findings were negative in 99 (55%) patients

79 Radiographic findings were non-contributory for hard tis

80 While chest radiographic findings were nonspecific, results of compu

81 The radiographic findings were reviewed retrospectively.

82 Radiographic findings, when present, were seen almost ex

83 ion of PCP occurring based on characteristic radiographic findings with elevated lactate dehydrogenas