ライフサイエンスコーパス: radiography

1 ovide a microbiological diagnosis (eg, chest radiography).

2 isk probe) or interproximal bone loss (using radiography).

3 fter an inversion injury and underwent plain radiography.

4 nd ACE levels determined and underwent chest radiography.

5 ication of calcifications when compared with radiography.

6 lly, knee OA is diagnosed using conventional radiography.

7 Inc.), tuberculin skin test (TST), and chest radiography.

8 nsitive than conventional absorption-based x-radiography.

9 nation is much wider than in plain abdominal radiography.

10 18 weeks, stone formation was visualized by radiography.

11 han is possible with conventional absorption radiography.

12 th high-speed, high-energy synchrotron X-ray radiography.

13 f a single or multilobar infiltrate on chest radiography.

14 pelvis, and calyces, could be depicted with radiography.

15 to follow-up with either PET/CT or US/chest radiography.

16 graphy (LDCT) versus those assigned to chest radiography.

17 e of antibiotics or oral steroids, and chest radiography.

18 nt of yearly follow-up posteroanterior chest radiography.

19 ed with that diagnosed with routine US/chest radiography.

20 with a right lower lobe infiltrate on chest radiography.

21 aphic air bronchograms undetectable by chest radiography.

22 e of osteolytic bone lesions on conventional radiography.

23 heter tip determined by postprocedural chest radiography.

24 tive predictive value was lower than that of radiography.

25 probed using state of the art dynamic X-ray radiography.

26 rocessing without destroying it using proton radiography.

27 xclusion of pneumothorax compared with chest radiography.

28 n effective imaging alternative to abdominal radiography.

29 tion is not detectable with absorption-based radiography.

30 uence interpretation of results at abdominal radiography.

31 ysis than mice receiving placebo assessed by radiography.

32 r evaluating clinical image quality in chest radiography.

33 e osteophytes and subchondral cysts than did radiography.

34 tomography of the chest compared with chest radiography.

35 underwent nonfluoroscopic fixed-flexion knee radiography.

36 endoscopy or dedicated small bowel contrast radiography.

37 osed using clinical questionnaires and chest radiography.

38 leg-length inequality, measured by full-limb radiography.

39 r during 2007 underwent PA and lateral chest radiography.

40 1 (10.4%) subjects with positive findings at radiography.

41 lesions overlooked by human readers at chest radiography.

42 adionuclide uptake that are not addressed by radiography.

43 fractures that were diagnosed by outpatient radiography.

44 vely as an adjunct to two-dimensional dental radiography.

45 fy four out of every five earlier than chest radiography.

46 chest radiography and plain abdominal erect radiography.

47 rcuit boards has been studied by synchrotron radiography.

48 to increase diagnostic accuracy compared to radiography.

49 ify small calcifications that were missed at radiography.

50 t much more versatile as compared with X-ray radiography.

51 logical changes not depicted by conventional radiography.

52 in multiple myeloma (MM) patients was plain radiography.

53 p (26,715 to low-dose CT and 26,724 to chest radiography); 26,309 participants (98.5%) and 26,035 (97

54 tion methods were computed tomography (61%), radiography (35%), and ultrasound (34%).

55 Chest radiography (38%) and abdominal computed tomography (CT)

56 Although mean SMT for the three-dimensional radiography (3DR) group was 1.33 mm (95% CI = 1.06 to 1.

57 ndard deviation for SWI, 7.6 mm +/- 5.4; for radiography, 5.3 mm +/- 5.1).

58 round times were significantly increased for radiography (52 minutes [IQR, 26-73 minutes] vs annual m

59 ltrasound = 59%, 81%, 0.78 (n = 4); specimen radiography = 53%, 84%, 0.73 (n = 9); optical spectrosco

60 of 40 relapses were identified with US/chest radiography (97.5%; P = .0001 for the equivalence test).

61 Apart from abdominal radiography, abdominal ultrasound with bowel assessment

62 changes in the sacroiliac joints observed in radiography according to the modNY criteria (false posit

63 the 26,554 participants who underwent chest radiography, according to the quintile of 5-year risk of

64 .8 readers per center)-186 radiologists, 143 radiography advanced practitioners, and 31 breast clinic

65 industrial inspections and large FOV medical radiography - all with the inherent advantages of the XP

66 docyanine green-enhanced optical imaging and radiography allowed for anatomic coregistration of the i

67 s, whereas the organ doses from PA localizer radiography alone are lower.

68 antum of disease may be difficult with plain radiography alone.

69 g electron microscopy with energy-dispersive radiography analysis and infrared spectrometry, were mos

70 tive normal control cohort and examined with radiography and 3-T MR imaging.

71 sci were imaged with high-spatial-resolution radiography and 3.0-T MR imaging by using morphologic (T

72 y combined experiments using time-resolved x-radiography and a novel simulation method to reveal the

73 All patients underwent plain radiography and an ultrasound study.

74 and those without knee OA, as classified by radiography and by severity of knee pain.

75 The review focuses on radiography and computed tomography (CT) for diagnosing

76 sing ultrasound and MRI has increased, chest radiography and computed tomography still play important

77 ulated as the sum of the dose from localizer radiography and CT.

78 By combining (a) radiography and DXA and (b) quantitative CT and DXA, cor

79 .001) and 0.84 (P < .001), respectively, for radiography and DXA and to 0.80 (P < .001) and 0.86 (P <

80 echnique for elemental imaging that combines radiography and fluorescence spectroscopy has been devel

81 ssing vector alone, as determined by digital radiography and histological analysis.

82 (1.5 cm) in a rabbit model was evaluated by radiography and histology.

83 oral health examination, including panoramic radiography and laboratory analyses.

84 sted drug packets underwent supine abdominal radiography and low-dose CT.

85 s143383 was associated with LDD, using plain radiography and magnetic resonance imaging to identify d

86 irmed by the consulting rheumatologist using radiography and magnetic resonance imaging where require

87 f this study was a comparative evaluation of radiography and MRI in the diagnostics of sacroiliitis i

88 nitial radiologic examination included chest radiography and plain abdominal erect radiography.

89 7 y, from either sex, who had undergone oral radiography and presented with no orofacial syndromes or

90 he ionized foam was retrieved by using x-ray radiography and proton radiography was used to verify th

91 Combined chest radiography and serum ACE levels at the standard cutoff

92 Chest radiography and serum angiotensin-converting enzyme find

93 dose, including both the dose from localizer radiography and that from subsequent chest computed tomo

94 Radiography and ultrasonography are of crucial importanc

95 absorptiometry at the hip and spine and hand radiography, and completed a questionnaire.

96 piric food avoidance, upper gastrointestinal radiography, and gastrointestinal scintigraphy.

97 hematology, clinical microbiology, thoracic radiography, and gross and microscopic pathology.

98 ographs, had undergone CT within 24 hours of radiography, and had received a clinical diagnosis other

99 diography, metabolic exercise testing, chest radiography, and hemodynamics before intervention were c

100 immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization, radiography, and micro-computed tomography.

101 : screening with low-dose CT, screening with radiography, and no screening.

102 ed that APCs ordered antibiotics, CT or MRI, radiography, and referrals as often as physicians in bot

103 cancer screening (basic blood testing, chest radiography, and screening for breast, cervical, and pro

104 icacy of low-dose computed tomography, chest radiography, and sputum cytologic evaluation for lung ca

105 ties, such as the barium enema, conventional radiography, and ultrasound, play a much more limited ro

106 rocedure to catheter utilization after chest radiography approval was 2.4 hours.

107 US and chest radiography are diagnostic tools that enable effective,

108 such as computed tomography and conventional radiography are of no significance in the diagnostics of

109 d small- and wide-angle X-ray scattering and radiography are used for strain evaluation across the sc

110 Measurements of leg length, including radiography, are subject to measurement error, which cou

111 6-y lung cancer incidence in the PLCO chest radiography arm, with sensitivities >79.8% and specifici

112 th calcific tendonitis by using conventional radiography as a reference and offers better sensitivity

113 agnose pneumonia were determined using chest radiography as a reference standard.

114 of 147 subjects was performed by using spine radiography as the reference standard to determine total

115 oplastic enamel and reduced density in X-ray radiography as well as shortened enamel rods under scann

116 ors grown in mice was measured using ex vivo radiography as well as static and dynamic PET imaging.

117 h tomosynthesis than with conventional chest radiography, as given by the area under the receiver ope

118 Bedside ultrasound is faster than radiography at identifying pneumothorax after central ve

119 went several imaging studies-including chest radiography; bone scanning; contrast material-enhanced c

120 r improvements can be achieved by use of DES radiography but with the requirement for special equipme

121 ve bronchiolitis had normal results on chest radiography, but about one quarter were found to have mo

122 alpha radiography by a solid-state nuclear track detector indi

123 actures that cannot be shown by conventional radiography can be clearly imaged by high-resolution bon

124 stematic but unselective daily routine chest radiography can likely be eliminated without increasing

125 In opaque organisms or structures, X-ray radiography captures sequences of 2D projections to visu

126 We show X-ray radiography captures the bulk flow properties, in contra

127 On radiography cherubic lesions appear as cystic multilocul

128 Chest radiography (chest x-ray [CXR] and chest computed tomogr

129 Chest radiography combined with sIL-2R at a cutoff of 6000 pg/

130 Imaging included plain film radiography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic reso

131 These imaging modalities include chest radiography, computed tomography, lung magnetic resonanc

132 field of hip imaging, covering the roles of radiography, computed tomography, sonography and magneti

133 imodality imaging, including single-snapshot radiography, cone-beam computed tomography (CT), multide

134 Rabbits were imaged with single-snapshot radiography, cone-beam CT, and multidetector CT.

135 tween 1 month and 15 years of age with chest radiography-confirmed pneumonia.

136 The patient underwent erect abdominal radiography, contrast material-enhanced multidetector ro

137 ment by using images from conventional chest radiography, conventional chest radiography plus DE imag

138 uted tomography (CT), as compared with chest radiography, could reduce mortality from lung cancer.

139 ality for several screen-film (SF), computed radiography (CR), and fully digital (DR) mammography sys

140 ree specific scenarios: performance of chest radiography (CXR) as the first radiation-associated proc

141 ormer heavy smokers to receive LDCT or chest radiography (CXR) for three annual screens.

142 n tests, Doppler echocardiography, and chest radiography (CXR).

143 However, radiography-depicted osteophytes were more strongly asso

144 that the elimination of daily routine chest radiography did not affect either hospital or ICU mortal

145 eld was 20 (30%) with capsule vs 5 (7%) with radiography (difference = 23%; 95% CI: 11%-36%).

146 te the performance of three imaging methods (radiography, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry [DXA], and

147 ated empiric treatment based on clinical and radiography findings (32/53 [60%] vs 28/73 [38%]; p=0.01

148 ore likely to present with gasless abdominal radiography findings (6.3% vs 0.9%; P = .009) compared w

149 h weight z score, and clinical and abdominal radiography findings as candidate variables in a logisti

150 osis of NEC, especially when plain abdominal radiography findings do not correlate with clinical symp

151 h tomosynthesis than with conventional chest radiography for all nodules (1.49-fold, P < .001; 95% CI

152 cy of bedside ultrasound compared with chest radiography for confirmation of central venous catheters

153 Sensitivity of abdominal radiography for depiction of packets was 0.77 (41 of 53)

154 In addition, evidence suggests that plain radiography for evaluation of blunt thoracic trauma may

155 omosynthesis outperformed conventional chest radiography for lung nodule detection and determination

156 -energy (DE) imaging, and conventional chest radiography for pulmonary nodule detection and managemen

157 Here we use high energy proton radiography for the first time to image a large metal vo

158 guideline-discordant antibiotics (for URIs), radiography (for URIs and back pain), computed tomograph

159 with the use of either low-dose CT or chest radiography, for 3 years.

160 All patients underwent plain abdominal radiography, gray-scale and color Doppler sonography.

161 e low-dose CT group versus 190 (0.7%) in the radiography group (stage 1 in 158 vs. 70 participants an

162 the low-dose CT group and 2387 (9.2%) in the radiography group had a positive screening result; in th

163 or IV in the low-dose CT group at T1; in the radiography group, 31 (23.5%) were stage IA and 78 (59.1

164 the CT-screening group, as compared with the radiography group, increased according to risk quintile

165 and in 6.2% and 5.0% of participants in the radiography group, respectively.

166 In the radiography group, the sensitivity was 59.6%, the specif

167 Model validation in the chest radiography groups of the PLCO and the National Lung Scr

168 amination and 4% with a false-positive chest radiography had a resulting invasive procedure.

169 Classical radiography has been used for this purpose for over a hu

170 Synchrotron x-ray radiography has enabled real-time glimpses into metal so

171 h effects on disease activity assessed using radiography, histology, in vivo imaging, and quantitativ

172 Chest radiography (images not shown) revealed bronchiectatic c

173 hat tuberculosis screening by (mobile) chest radiography improved screening coverage and tuberculosis

174 Fifty-six calcifications were detected with radiography in 27 patients.

175 Universal chest radiography in a large pre-employment TB screening progr

176 the effect of abandoning daily routine chest radiography in adults in intensive care units (ICUs).

177 assessment, tuberculin skin test, and chest radiography in all eligible children irrespective of sym

178 or tomosynthesis than for conventional chest radiography in all nodule size categories (3.55-fold for

179 variables and to compare sonograhy and chest radiography in detecting early stages of NEC in suspecte

180 had higher sensitivity and specificity than radiography in diagnosing sacroiliitis (sensitivity: 71%

181 y 10 and 20 kVp, respectively, for abdominal radiography in the male phantom.

182 helical computed tomography (CT) with chest radiography in the screening of older current and former

183 ients older than 14 years who received chest radiography in this prospective, observational, diagnost

184 ed synchrotron X-ray computed tomography and radiography, in conjunction with thermal imaging, to tra

185 increased sensitivity of CT, as compared to radiography, in detecting lytic foci obscured by other s

186 The current role of radiography, including advances in the technology for jo

187 ne green-enhanced optical imaging scans with radiography increases anatomic resolution.

188 is result shows that systematic use of chest radiography is a useful tool for active TB screening amo

189 on in osteoarthritis remains challenging, as radiography is an insensitive reflection of molecular ch

190 Plain abdominal radiography is currently the modality of choice for init

191 Plain radiography is key in diagnosing bone diseases.

192 Abdominal radiography is mainly limited by low sensitivity when co

193 However, abdominal radiography is still considered the modality of choice.

194 Plain radiography is the first-line, essential screening or di

195 Although abdominal radiography is usually the initial imaging study perform

196 in 993 822 women were included (37 computed radiography mammography systems and 55 DR systems).

197 d as a complementary imaging tool along with radiography may enable more accurate and cost-effective

198 n 3.42 +/- 0.68 versus 1.96 +/- 0.34 mm) and radiography (mean 3.35 +/- 0.62 versus 2.27 +/- 0.33 mm)

199 order of magnitude as those for conventional radiography (median: 0.012 mSv [95% CI confidence interv

200 High-resolution radiography, microcomputed tomography, and SEM revealed

201 -referral, symptom screening, mass miniature radiography (MMR), and sputum PCR with probes for rifamp

202 ials that compared immediate lumbar imaging (radiography, MRI, or CT) versus usual clinical care with

203 numbers of follow-up examinations were chest radiography (n=431), chest CT (n=410), abdominal CT (n=2

204 Despite an extensive microscopy and radiography network at middle levels of the health syste

205 ly with standard anteroposterior and lateral radiography, nuclear medicine scanning, MR imaging, and

206 Further bleeding with capsule versus radiography occurred in 20 (30%) versus 17 (24%) (differ

207 me conditions, material science studies, and radiography of biological systems.

208 Radiography of both hands was performed to assess for ac

209 The patient underwent routine weight-bearing radiography of her left foot and weight-bearing computed

210 Plain radiography of the abdomen showed normal air-fluid level

211 tients were examined clinically, followed by radiography of the affected shoulder.

212 cal examination and subsequently recommended radiography of the lower extremities ( Fig 3 ).

213 Radiography of the right and left hands was performed.

214 use of the suspected diagnosis, conventional radiography of the skeleton was performed.

215 tion axillary lymph node dissection and used radiography of the specimen to confirm removal of the cl

216 Of the 249 patients who underwent chest radiography on admission, 100 (40%) had findings consist

217 he hemithorax occupied by effusion, on chest radiography on day 7 as compared with day 1.

218 gnosis, of 6897 patients who had had a chest radiography, only 2296 (33%) also had spirometry.

219 c images were acquired using either computed radiography or flat panel digital radiography systems.

220 nificant differences over conventional chest radiography or tomosynthesis alone.

221 n when paired with either conventional chest radiography or tomosynthesis.

222 Chest radiography or Xpert RIF/MTB, delivered through maternal

223 ging approach including bone scanning, chest radiography, or dedicated CT and abdominopelvic sonograp

224 re higher when using PA projection localizer radiography owing to higher TCM values, whereas the orga

225 ted with false-negative results at abdominal radiography (P = .004 and P = .016, respectively).

226 localizer radiography than with AP localizer radiography (P = .03).

227 Group S had a faster decline than group M (radiography, P = .005; FVC, P = .011; FEV(1), P = .529).

228 Abdominal radiography performed to investigate clinical concerns.

229 ed, and diagnostic performance statistics of radiography, physical examination results, and serum inf

230 MATERIAL/METHODS: Eight different plain radiography pictures of ribs were performed with the pat

231 tional chest radiography, conventional chest radiography plus DE imaging, tomosynthesis, and tomosynt

232 phy (CT) and imaging with conventional chest radiography (posteroanterior and lateral), DE imaging, a

233 Purpose To calculate the effect of localizer radiography projections to the total radiation dose, inc

234 Functional radiography provides the maximum stress to the pelvic fl

235 onstrated a high correlation between SWI and radiography (R(2) = 0.90), with overestimation of lesion

236 puted tomography (CT) as compared with chest radiography reduced lung-cancer mortality.

237 puted tomography (CT) rather than with chest radiography reduced mortality from lung cancer.

238 scertained by self-report and confirmed with radiography reports during an average of 5.4 years of fo

239 or low-dose CT and 73.5% and 91.3% for chest radiography, respectively.

240 ere analysed and qualitatively compared with radiography results.

241 Radiography revealed profound skeletal defects in cKO mi

242 Chest radiography reveals diffuse bilateral infiltrates, and h

243 the pregnant patient has been performed with radiography, scintigraphy, computed tomography, magnetic

244 A complete radiography series was available for 561 of the original

245 cal measures and bi-annually for subtraction radiography, serum and plaque biofilm assessments.

246 Thus, PA localizer radiography should be used in combination with reduced r

247 cted influenza and lung infiltrates on chest radiography should receive early and aggressive treatmen

248 Initial chest radiography showed an enlarged heart with bilateral pleu

249 US/chest radiography showed significantly higher specificity and

250 ) and measured the Cobb angle in whole-spine radiography (standing) and scout images from low-dose CT

251 Radiography still has a role in clinical trials in light

252 screening by means of low-dose CT and chest radiography, suggesting that a reduction in mortality fr

253 was done with an integrated optical imaging/radiography system before and up to 24 hours following i

254 r computed radiography or flat panel digital radiography systems.

255 e a non-electronic fast neutron differential radiography technique using superheated emulsion detecto

256 ise in CT images was lower with PA localizer radiography than with AP localizer radiography (P = .03)

257 For radiography, the strongest correlation with mechanical f

258 For Monte Carlo simulations of localizer radiography, the tube position was fixed at 0 degrees an

259 As compared with radiography, the two annual incidence screenings with lo

260 Compared with chest radiography, there was also a trend favoring reduced lat

261 ilateral weight-bearing anteroposterior knee radiography to define radiographic knee osteoarthritis.

262 Using x-radiography to identify shell layers, faunal counts, she

263 w experimental technique using dynamic X-ray radiography to make such measurements possible.

264 [standard deviation]) were examined with (a) radiography to measure geometric parameters (lengths, an

265 The application of functional radiography to the assessment of defecatory disorders an

266 Knees were imaged with radiography, tomosynthesis, and MR imaging.

267 s consensus statement regarding the roles of radiography, ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (

268 trategies for hip imaging modalities such as radiography, ultrasonography, computed tomography, and m

269 In comparison to radiography, ultrasound performed better or at least equ

270 that clinical criteria (National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study [NEXUS] Head CT decision i

271 ut clinically using the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study low-risk criteria because

272 ociated with alveolar consolidation at chest radiography, very severe pneumonia, oxygen saturation <9

273 y of tomosynthesis was 0.14-1.00 and that of radiography was 0.00-0.56.

274 Sensitivity for radiography was 0.13 (70 of 119); physical examination,

275 le, and the prevalence of pneumonia by chest radiography was 18.0%.

276 The median diameter of the largest tumor by radiography was 6.0 cm in resected, 3.0 cm in transplant

277 mean score for patients who underwent early radiography was 8.54 vs 8.74 among the control group (di

278 C arm radiography was available in 3% (95% CI 0.5-5.5) of dist

279 roup in which performing daily routine chest radiography was beneficial.

280 Chest radiography was estimated to have a sensitivity of 64% (

281 Radiography was more sensitive for identifying differenc

282 Radiography was performed in the emergency department, a

283 Abdominal radiography was performed in the emergency department, a

284 presence or absence of packets at abdominal radiography was reported, with low-dose CT as the refere

285 To this end, neutron radiography was used to trace the transport of deuterate

286 rieved by using x-ray radiography and proton radiography was used to verify the uniformity of the pla

287 Using picosecond-time-resolved X-ray radiography, we show that we can achieve areal densities

288 sensitivity and specificity of conventional radiography were 22% and 94% and of MRI were 71% and 90%

289 The rates for chest radiography were 9% (CI, 8% to 11%) and 15% (CI, 13% to

290 Radiation doses for CT and radiography were assessed for adults (>18 years) and chi

291 Results Organ doses from localizer radiography were lower when using a PA instead of an AP

292 Findings in plain abdominal radiography were normal or nonspecific.

293 ed lung ultrasonography, and evaluated chest radiography when available.

294 lity was high for all grading systems except radiography, which was moderate (alpha = 0.565-0.895).

295 th DCNNs can accurately classify TB at chest radiography with an AUC of 0.99.

296 Random assignment to low-dose CT or chest radiography with baseline and 1 repeated annual screenin

297 Admission chest radiography with interstitial infiltrates was more frequ

298 tients with US and in 10 (23%) patients with radiography, with 90% sensitivity for US.

299 skeleton of Alpl(+/A116T) mice was normal by radiography, with no differences in femur length, cortic

300 %) specificity alone but combined with chest radiography yielded 92% sensitivity and 58% specificity.