ライフサイエンスコーパス: radiological

1 wo response criteria were used, clinical and radiological.

2 logical biomarker load and high frequency of radiological abnormalities (n = 34, 7.9%) and (iii) low

3 are related to fixed airflow obstruction and radiological abnormalities in moderate to severe asthma.

4 th fixed airflow obstruction and a number of radiological abnormalities in moderate to severe asthma.

5 Fixed airflow obstruction and radiological abnormalities were then mapped to these imm

6 CT scans were scored for the presence of radiological abnormalities.

7 ng, is a serious health threat to victims of radiological accidents or patients receiving radiotherap

8 ns, including charged particle radiotherapy, radiological accidents, and space travel.

9 mitigation in patients after radiotherapy or radiological accidents.

10 The clinical and radiological activity preceding the DMF treatment might

11 ted with poor response with some clinical or radiological activity.

12 We presented a radiological algorithm for diagnosing the various causes

13 the bone mineral content and density in the radiological analyses in comparison to the other experim

14 Clinical and radiological analysis was done of a cohort of 691 patien

15 The purpose of this study is to investigate radiological and clinical characteristics of cerebral ve

16 ence, it must be taken into consideration in radiological and clinical diagnostics.

17 mor, it can be misdiagnosed as the clinical, radiological and histological examinations can mimic a s

18 Diagnosis is based on clinical, radiological and histological features.

19 ther interstitial lung diseases have similar radiological and histopathological characteristics.

20 Reports on PPBS do not highlight the radiological and imaging characteristics of this syndrom

21 The aim of this study was to compare radiological and pathological changes and test the adjun

22 ortive psychophysical, electrophysiological, radiological and pathological data that point to the ana

23 isease, with extent of resection dictated by radiological and pathological estimates of tumour dimens

24 Clinical, radiological and pathological feature define CLIPPERS sy

25 We evaluated clinical, radiological and pathological features of patients refer

26 clinical, electrophysiological, serological, radiological and pathological findings of patients with

27 are characteristic for CVT and studied their radiological and pathological properties.

28 3 from July to November 2012 were matched to radiological and surgical records to determine diagnosti

29 However, the clinical, radiological and therapeutic overlap between SUNCT, SUNA

30 ceptors and their correlation with clinical, radiological, and edema markers in NP.

31 tified (but unmasked) demographic, clinical, radiological, and genetic data were collected at Massach

32 All available medical notes and clinical, radiological, and genetic investigations were reviewed.

33 ioeconomic/geographic, clinical, laboratory, radiological, and genomic data from patient cases of dru

34 There were clinical, radiological, and neurophysiological signs of myelopathy

35 The frequent clinical, radiological, and pathological aortic involvement in pat

36 s into two subtypes with distinct molecular, radiological, and pathological characteristics.

37 olves considering a combination of clinical, radiological, and pathological information in multidisci

38 ysiology and discuss clinical, pathological, radiological, and therapeutic factors associated with th

39 Only patients whose baseline clinical, radiological, and, if biopsy was taken, pathological dat

40 pears to be a strong female influence on the radiological appearance as well as clinical development

41 r, it has its limitations due in part to the radiological appearance of changes of a very rare condit

42 represents acute injury often evolving to a radiological appearance of HS after 1 year.

43 The radiological appearances of a vaginal metastasis from co

44 However, radiological assessment alone could not accurately ident

45 cularization of the callus with a subjective radiological assessment of the bone union quality.

46 nce, pathophysiology, laboratory evaluation, radiological assessment, and treatment of hypothyroidism

47 n in any haematological, serum chemistry, or radiological assessments between the ebselen groups and

48 ollow-up included clinical, biochemical, and radiological assessments.

49 evaluate management implications related to radiological categorization of the estimated probability

50 challenges associated with the assessment of radiological changes in response to immunotherapy reflec

51 f septic arthritis and histopathological and radiological changes of joints were compared among the g

52 Typical radiological changes were observed in 27 patients.

53 Clinical and radiological characteristics identified in this study ma

54 ected and non-HIV-infected recipients in the radiological characteristics of HCC at enlisting or in t

55 of this study is to investigate the clinico-radiological characteristics of intrahepatic biliary muc

56 dy, we assessed the clinical, molecular, and radiological characteristics of patients with geneticall

57 Demographic, clinical, and radiological characteristics of subjects with RIS that e

58 Delay to diagnosis in months, clinical and radiological characteristics, and disability measured by

59 ns in the corpus callosum (CC) are important radiological clues to the diagnosis of multiple sclerosi

60 servational, clinicoelectrophysiological and radiological cohort study was performed.

61 ome of the understudied radionuclides are of radiological concern, others are promising tracers for e

62 SCIWORA is a clinical-radiological condition that mostly affects children.

63 ioactive strontium is one of the most common radiological contaminants in groundwater and soil.

64 Routine radiological contrast swallow following total gastrectom

65 ormer smokers with and without COPD, and its radiological correlates and clinical implications.

66 We aimed to determine the radiological correlates of the earliest tissue changes a

67 Marked clinical and radiological corticosteroid responsiveness was observed

68 tive is to describe the natural clinical and radiological course of LMNB1-related ADLD.

69 We determined the long-term clinical and radiological course of persons undergoing PE episodes.

70 ifying patients by AFP status in addition to radiological criteria may improve the selection process

71 Radiological criteria suggestive of malignant ovarian ma

72 Type 1 (classical) iSS, defined using simple radiological criteria, is associated with a characterist

73 ring 2004-2016 using predefined standardized radiological criteria.

74 Efficacy was explored for clinical/radiological cVSP, delayed cerebral ischaemia (DCI), and

75 HLA-DRB1 had the strongest association with radiological damage (OR, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.51-2.05], P = 4

76 We retrospectively examined clinical and radiological data from 333 consecutive patients with acu

77 in most cases, clinical, physiological, and radiological data obviate the need for the increased ris

78 Clinical and radiological data of 42 Italian patients with PML were a

79 r clinical characteristics, pathological and radiological data, and therapies used pre- and postibrut

80 The results were compared with radiological data.

81 A clinical and radiological database of patients with final diagnosis o

82 ting are studied in forensic applications of radiological debris analysis.

83 We reviewed clinical and radiological details of patients with iSS assessed at a

84 ting miRNAs may identify recurrence prior to radiological detectability while providing insight into

85 ent of Fukushima or deliberate explosions of radiological devices.

86 MR images of 92 patients with a clinical and radiological diagnosis of PRES.

87 Radiological diagnosis of the Eagle syndrome that is man

88 rticle may be helpful in making preoperative radiological diagnosis of XGC.

89 ng of anatomical variants is thus crucial to radiological diagnosis.

90 Biochemical markers will confirm the radiological diagnosis.

91 Radiological diagnostic imaging allows for visualization

92 te use of microbiological, histological, and radiological diagnostic methods for diagnosis of invasiv

93 he recommendations focus on pathological and radiological diagnostics, and the main treatment modalit

94 No clinical or radiological differences were evident between individual

95 During the radiological differential diagnosis of abnormalities of

96 ip between salt consumption and clinical and radiological disease activity in MS.

97 ke is associated with increased clinical and radiological disease activity in patients with MS.

98 are likely good surrogates for clinical and radiological disease progression in Alzheimer disease (A

99 Continuation of gefitinib after radiological disease progression on first-line gefitinib

100 Three primary components of potential radiological dispersal devices (RDDs), cobalt, cesium, a

101 We reconstructed the radiological dose for birds observed at 300 census sites

102 two of the most important radionuclides for radiological dose from the ingestion pathway.

103 Thus, selective radiological embolization of the left hepatic artery bra

104 the critical role of a detailed preoperative radiological evaluation in complex spine surgery.

105 reached regarding appropriate laboratory and radiological evaluation of patients as well as nonsurgic

106 ailed long-term clinical, physiological, and radiological evaluation pre-, early post- (median, 0.8 y

107 at is usually discovered incidentally during radiological evaluation.

108 east the last 3 months, and no endoscopic or radiological evidence of active (erosive) disease anywhe

109 ed ORs separately for cases with and without radiological evidence of brain abnormalities.

110 remission for 3 months with no endoscopic or radiological evidence of intestinal inflammation) in pat

111 nsive to conservative treatments and showing radiological evidence of osteoarthritis into 2 groups of

112 d distinct conditions, emerging clinical and radiological evidence supports a broader nosological con

113 Radiological evidence supports the loss in thymic volume

114 These data, combined with archaeological and radiological evidence, deepen our understanding of the c

115 sis places emphasis on specific but temporal radiological evidence.

116 Radiological examination revealed a large, purely cystic

117 Radiological examination showed a heterogeneous lesion t

118 Radiological examination showed a necrotic and cystic ma

119 t is necessary to require quick execution of radiological examinations (computer tomography and/or nu

120 We also perform radiological examinations of all main joints, including

121 an important clinical benefit by increasing radiological experience during the diagnostics of this r

122 % predicted (r = -0.33; P < 0.0001), and the radiological extent of bronchiectasis (r = 0.29; P < 0.0

123 The associations with clinical-radiological factors are consistent with the hypothesis

124 Demographic, clinical and radiological factors associated with lower EQ-5D utility

125 Although several clinical and radiological factors increase the risk of rtPA-related I

126 In this case report we want to present radiological features and assessment of a patient with f

127 clerosing adenosis does not have distinctive radiological features and can mimic a malignant growth p

128 lyzed demographic, clinical, biological, and radiological features in all patients with M. ulcerans i

129 Therefore, the radiological features of childhood tumors of the nasopha

130 ificant correlation between LOP and reliable radiological features of IIH.

131 icle we explained clinical, histological and radiological features of IPEH involving the scalp, local

132 In this article, we discuss the radiological features of lesions within the CC in MS and

133 We would like to describe characteristic radiological features of MELAS syndrome in CT, MRI and M

134 a positive smear most likely presented with radiological features of post primary tuberculosis, whil

135 Additionally, we debate the clinic-radiological features of the intracranial lesions that c

136 on recent discoveries, and provide detailed radiological features of the most common and important M

137 In this paper the clinical and radiological features of three cases with paratesticular

138 We assessed physical and radiological features, thyroid function, physiological a

139 a rare cause of IVC obstruction with typical radiological features.

140 Mesenteric panniculitis (MP) is a radiological finding and its relation to clinical SM is

141 ion was detected between LOP and each of the radiological findings (partial empty sella [p=0.137], pe

142 r any correlation could be found between the radiological findings and the clinical disease course.

143 om tuberculosis on the basis of clinical and radiological findings and tuberculin skin testing.

144 Advances in knowledge: Being aware of the radiological findings described in this article may be h

145 in gastric cancer and its relationship with radiological findings from dual-energy spectral CT(DEsCT

146 a consensus on the presence or absence of 6 radiological findings identified in the literature as ch

147 The aim of this study was to present radiological findings in patients with diaphragmatic inj

148 uses of dystonia and parkinsonism as well as radiological findings in the context of movement disorde

149 allograft, the need for Px for symptoms and radiological findings is not rare (39/246, 15.8%).

150 The current report aimed at presenting the radiological findings of a case of extraluminal biliary

151 ial fibrous dysplasia (FD), the clinical and radiological findings of CT and MR scan were analyzed.

152 patients (pathological recurrence in all and radiological findings suggesting recurrence in 1 patient

153 Moreover, studies exploring radiological findings supported the hypothesis of common

154 milial histories, genetic data, clinical and radiological findings), we have diagnosed the families w

155 Main outcome measures were clinical and radiological findings, and DNA sequence data.

156 cteristics, acute neurologic status, initial radiological findings, aneurysm treatment, clinical vaso

157 Radiological findings, especially magnetic resonance ima

158 this diagnosis has classically been based on radiological findings, we established a diagnosis after

159 al of this report was to assess evolution of radiological findings.

160 antile hemangioma (IH) based on clinical and radiological findings.

161 reflect these new wide-ranging clinical and radiological findings.

162 countered systemic complication, we analyzed radiological, gas exchange, and ventilator data in conse

163 consumed by humans or livestock, can pose a radiological hazard.

164 om spent nuclear fuel solution to reduce the radiological hazard.

165 d Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health has recently introduced the Early Fe

166 itivity, reliability and diagnostic value of radiological image interpretation.

167 icrobiome/metabolome reconstruction map on a radiological image of a human lung and forms an interact

168 Noninvasive, radiological image-based detection and stratification of

169 Due to the lack of pathognomonic radiological images for toxic lung injury, information o

170 Radiological images taken before starting sorafenib, at

171 (b) image registration and correlation with radiological images.

172 sets that can identify distinct patterns in radiological images.

173 ensional (3D) organ reconstruction built off radiological images.

174 tomography (MDCT), the most frequently used radiological imaging method for these variations, become

175 Radiological imaging methods are important for accurate

176 aging (MRI) has come to be known as a unique radiological imaging modality because of its ability to

177 Radiological imaging plays a fundamental role in the dia

178 Cerebral radiological imaging showed a left frontal lesion.

179 n non-CLIPPERS [clinical improvement (8/12); radiological improvement (2/12); clinical worsening on d

180 indings correlated with evident clinical and radiological improvement in both patients, warranting ex

181 aneously and patients show both clinical and radiological improvements.

182 These radiological indicators identify a fibre orientation-dep

183 Clinical worsening was associated with radiological infarction (P = .001) and worse functional

184 s very valuable in improving the accuracy of radiological interpretation.

185 sions based on clinical findings rather than radiological interpretations.

186 Radiological investigations play a pivotal role in diagn

187 as observed in each component of clinical or radiological involvement.

188 ss influences the laterality of clinical and radiological joint involvement in RA.

189 onance imaging confirmed lacunar stroke with radiological leukoaraiosis were recruited and completed

190 should be suspected when some of the common radiological manifestations are found, including CNS inv

191 study is to find a relationship between the radiological manifestations of childhood tuberculosis on

192 is not sufficient to depict the evolution of radiological manifestations.

193 ganglia and these have various clinical and radiological manifestations.

194 and are closely associated with clinical and radiological markers of lung tissue destruction.

195 injury when combined with other clinical and radiological measures.

196 The development of radiological methods and use of clinical indices to pred

197 ntification of novel biomarkers and improved radiological methods may complement our understanding of

198 e anatomic regions evaluated by conventional radiological modalities, i.e. brain parenchyma, bones an

199 ion with the surgeon was designed to further radiological observation.

200 flammatory disease activity (clinical and/or radiological) of RRMS.

201 of acute flaccid paralysis in patients with radiological or neurophysiological findings suggestive o

202 Radiological outcome using the Larsen score (range: 0 [n

203 Neurological and radiological outcomes did not differ between the tenecte

204 inical study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of the combination of Open flap de

205 logy, risk factors, clinical manifestations, radiological, pathological and prognostic features.

206 This study investigated the radiological-pathological correlation between these imag

207 utaneous form of the disease and its various radiological patterns while evaluating any subcutaneous

208 histological analysis confirmed the positive radiological performance with larger size, increasing pr

209 found that the control group showed negative radiological performance with successful implantation.

210 nd may be considered one explanation for the radiological phenomenon of SWEDD (scans without evidence

211 geted sequencing, with detailed clinical and radiological phenotyping.

212 In the 12-23 month age group, radiological pneumonia decreased from 15.3 to 10.9 cases

213 children aged 2-11 months, the incidence of radiological pneumonia fell from 21.0 cases per 1000 per

214 ffectiveness of three doses of PCV13 against radiological pneumonia was an adjusted odds ratio of 0.5

215 The primary endpoint was WHO-defined radiological pneumonia with pulmonary consolidation.

216 d with a moderate impact on the incidence of radiological pneumonia, a small reduction in cases of ho

217 nical pneumonia and identified 2156 cases of radiological pneumonia.

218 eria with the addition of having WHO-defined radiological pneumonia.

219 To prospectively study clinical and radiological PPCs and respiratory insufficiency therapie

220 Radiological practice includes classification of illness

221 ing the most common of all are seen in daily radiological practice.

222 lysis revealed the two strongest independent radiological predictors for IPA to be the VOS and the ha

223 determining the clinical, immunological, and radiological presentation of the disease, and importantl

224 alopathy with often overlapping clinical and radiological presentations.

225 increasing number of contrast media-enhanced radiological procedures being performed.

226 icates that a man is at higher likelihood of radiological progression than men with a negative MRI at

227 points, mean 10.9) before HSCT, clinical and radiological progression was observed (MRI severity scor

228 arcinoid tumours of the lung or thymus, with radiological progression within 12 months before randomi

229 s, and after HSCT they showed no clinical or radiological progression.

230 d criteria for radiological significance and radiological progression.

231 nosis until disease progression (clinical or radiological progressive disease, relapse, or death from

232 published by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) and the MIRD Committee bu

233 of the standard International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) whole lung deposition mod

234 on system of the International Commission on Radiological Protection and other authorities.

235 re estimated by using software from National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB).

236 organs from the International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 106 and the dynamic

237 Appropriate radiological protection requires that the content of tho

238 Education in the field of radiological protection should be a subject of periodic

239 values (from the International Commission on Radiological Protection).

240 ogical samples for environmental monitoring, radiological protection, and nuclear forensic reasons.

241 cer at low doses is assumed, for purposes of radiological protection, to be linear without a threshol

242 endations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, was used to develop the dose es

243 odels to identify patients for CT screening; radiological protocols that use volumetric analysis for

244 ir of large hiatus hernia is associated with radiological recurrence rates of up to 30%, and to impro

245 There was full concordance between radiological report and intraoperative report In 33 case

246 Radiological reporting has generated large quantities of

247 ith hepatocellular carcinoma with a complete radiological response after surgical resection (n=900) o

248 5 weeks after randomisation and according to radiological response and patient tolerance thereafter.

249 1.08; 95% CI, 0.50-2.35; P = .85; n = 378), radiological response rate (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.92-2.07;

250 .69; 95% CI, 1.36-2.10; P < .001; n = 1352), radiological response rate (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.18-1.89;

251 hway inhibitors was associated with a higher radiological response rate (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.04-2.43;

252 The overall radiological response rate was 54% (8 of 15) (all partia

253 is she achieved an excellent serological and radiological response that was maintained for 24 months.

254 The role of radiological response to loco-regional therapies, alpha-

255 lpha-fetoprotein, Milan-Criteria status, and radiological response) displayed a high effect in terms

256 For radiological response, the following categories were use

257 treatment and he achieved an almost complete radiological response.

258 l the 3 patients had a clinical and complete radiological response; a biochemical response was seen i

259 The proposed Time-Radiological-response-Alpha-fetoprotein-INflammation (TR

260 riod of 6 months, assessed by an independent radiological review committee (IRRC).

261 d on imaging studies assessed by independent radiological review committee.

262 ost-treatment scan (CT or MRI), with central radiological review of individuals with brain metastases

263 Response was established by independent radiological review.

264 y apparent and were not assessed by periodic radiological review.

265 Future radiological risk models should consider the flux of (12

266 The National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS) Chiba, Japan, has been trea

267 The radiological score was obtained by giving 1 point for th

268 s no significant correlation between LOP and radiological scores (r=0.095; p=0.525, Spearman's rank c

269 The correlation between the calculated radiological scores and LOP was evaluated.

270 on between lumbar opening pressure (LOP) and radiological scores based on cranial MRI and contrast-en

271 ective reviews the knowledge on clinical and radiological scores, host- and pathogen disease-related

272 ase susceptibility, was also associated with radiological severity, mortality, and treatment response

273 patic portal venous gas (HPVG) is an ominous radiological sign suggestive of underlying intestinal se

274 er-term studies with predefined criteria for radiological significance and radiological progression.

275 cer in selected patients without clinical or radiological signs of anastomotic leakage.

276 mL, C-reactive protein less than 30 mg/L, no radiological signs of perforation, and appendix diameter

277 stic performance of CTPA-detected VOS and of radiological signs that do not require contrast-media we

278 Of 12 evaluable radiological signs, five were found to be significantly

279 tive grading assessment is not achieved, the radiological size of the lesion is a powerful alternativ

280 Since its establishment in 1998, the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Editorial F

281 Purpose The objectives of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Patient-Cen

282 Our understanding of the clinical and radiological spectrum of CAA has continued to evolve, an

283 rdized diagnostic criteria, and the clinical-radiological spectrum, causes, and optimum investigation

284 Radiological studies are crucial not only for detecting

285 dity with ophthalmological, neurological and radiological studies being normal, they are offered vari

286 nts who are unable to undergo contrast-based radiological studies.

287 70) and no infection was noted on an initial radiological study (1.76, 1.11-2.79).

288 (except for metastatic melanoma which was a radiological suggestion after brain MRI).

289 mmended to be kept under long-term and close radiological supervision.

290 n leads to protracted follow-up with ongoing radiological surveillance, however, clinical calculators

291 loss and elevated liver enzymes with clinico-radiological suspicion of cholangiocarcinoma.

292 disease course, with no further clinical or radiological symptoms.

293 Extensive serum, urine, and radiological testing did not reveal a new or recurrent n

294 ation of creatine kinase, mild anaemia), and radiological (thickened calvarium) features to patients

295 iled during the 1970s and do not represent a radiological threat to human health or the environment.

296 ll survival and secondary endpoints included radiological, tumor marker and pathological response to

297 HER2-negative early invasive breast cancer (radiological tumour size >20 mm, with or without axillar

298 according to the randomising centre, largest radiological tumour size, clinical stage, and prespecifi

299 Their clinico-radiological variables and survival outcome were analyze

300 The radiological variables of interest were quantified using