ライフサイエンスコーパス: radiology

1 and its subtypes (pharmacy, laboratory, and radiology).

2 thods that support practical applications in radiology.

3 is widely adopted for image and metadata in radiology.

4 rol and Prevention that may be applicable to radiology.

5 rphological imaging procedures delievered by radiology.

6 d arthritis (RA) also have been published in Radiology.

7 y technical advances in CT and manifested in Radiology.

8 droxyapatite deposition disease, appeared in Radiology.

9 and were treated with balloon angioplasty by radiology.

10 g and Data System of the American College of Radiology.

11 f cardiac imaging were initially reported in Radiology.

12 ewer than 5% of these have been published in Radiology.

13 on clinical suspicion, culture data, and/or radiology.

14 criptions of osteoarthritis (OA) appeared in Radiology.

15 erapy, injection therapy, and interventional radiology.

16 Radiology Data Registry, American College of Radiology.

17 asing importance, including in head and neck radiology.

18 ial for real-time tracking in interventional radiology.

19 sus automated volumetric methods in clinical radiology.

20 nes in the applications of DECT in abdominal radiology.

21 07 and 2017 in 12 journals, with the most in Radiology (12 articles).

22 llowed by endoscopy (76%) and interventional radiology (50%) and improved over time (78% vs 69%).

23 The American Board of Radiology (ABR) has provided certification for diagnosti

24 The American College of Radiology (ACR) and the American College of Cardiology F

25 ackground enhancement MR-American College of Radiology (ACR) categories 1, 2, 3, and 4 was 20%, 35%,

26 s were used to image the American College of Radiology (ACR) CT accreditation phantom LCR section at

27 ardization listed by the American College of Radiology (ACR) Subcommittee on MR Safety in their speci

28 rted and endorsed by the American College of Radiology (ACR), the system has been developed by a comm

29 1946 to June 2012 by using the combination "radiology AND (error OR peer review)." Two reviewers ind

30 ologic changes and secondly SM with atypical radiology and a more aggressive clinical course.

31 radiologists experienced in musculoskeletal radiology and blinded to findings of each other.

32 etic Resonance facility of the Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging at the St.

33 Three patients examined at the Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging of University Hospital

34 me-hernia recurrence assessed by barium meal radiology and endoscopy at 6 months.

35 nt, but the adjudication panel that reviewed radiology and endoscopy was masked to allocation and vis

36 Radiology and hospital information systems were searched

37 dicated emergency operating rooms, access to radiology and intensive care facilities (ITU) are all fa

38 y advancing scientific fields-interventional radiology and nanotechnology.

39 Radiology and pathology data bases were searched for pat

40 Radiology and pathology reports were reviewed.

41 tial processes involved in the production of Radiology and RadioGraphics by working closely with the

42 pancreatitis scoring systems with a focus on radiology and serology capture most patients who are cli

43 Both the clinical practice of radiology and the journal Radiology have had an enormous

44 l Fellows (15 of 16, 94%) stayed in academic radiology, and each is currently leading a successful ac

45 mparative review of the clinical case notes, radiology, and histopathology was performed.

46 between radiation oncology, nuclear medicine/radiology, and medical physics teams is necessary, as op

47 y, radiation, systemic therapies, pathology, radiology, and other specialties, selection of medicines

48 nd chart abstraction of surgical, pathology, radiology, and outpatient records, including detailed su

49 meters, including serum tumor marker levels, radiology, and pathology at surgical resection of residu

50 Progress in chemistry, radiology, and systems biology is beginning to provide u

51 nsive Cancer Network and American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria.

52 Uniform phantom and American College of Radiology-approved phantom results between scanner manuf

53 s, including uniform and American College of Radiology-approved phantoms, PET/CT images, and examples

54 ubjects was retrospectively collected from a radiology archive of CT examinations of the head perform

55 ests (PFTs), clinical signs and conventional radiology are able to detect emphysema usually in its la

56 Yang et al study published in this issue of Radiology as an example.

57 akuma et al study published in this issue of Radiology as an example.

58 ated free of active disease on endoscopy and radiology at final assessment (difference, 25.7% [95% CI

59 The editorial fellowship for radiology attending physicians was renamed the RSNA Will

60 henomenon-like reactions), lung function, or radiology attributable to vaccine were observed.

61 f this examination that may be applicable to radiology-based practice.

62 The evolution of modern interventional radiology began over half century ago with a simple ques

63 oses for their use, this review examines how radiology benefits from NLP.

64 ion from prior authorization requirements by radiology benefits managers.

65 ition, experimental biology, physiology, and radiology between February 2008 and January 2011 reveals

66 cant advances in the field of interventional radiology both in terms of technology and how these appl

67 extremely dense breasts (American College of Radiology breast density category 4) and a negative resu

68 d the development of the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System have

69 culated according to the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, 5th

70 rd can improve appropriate use of diagnostic radiology by a moderate amount and decrease use by a sma

71 om interventional cardiology, interventional radiology, cardiac surgery, cardiac imaging, and critica

72 d interventional procedures performed in the radiology, cardiology, and gastroenterology practice are

73 residual breast tissue (American College of Radiology categories A-D) and normal conventional imagin

74 The American College of Radiology classification system was used to characterize

75 .18 years) patients who were referred to the radiology clinic to undergo MRI.

76 d according to the Society of Interventional Radiology Clinical Practice Guidelines.

77 tic Neuroradiology/Society of Interventional Radiology collateral grading system) were assessed by a

78 atment and imaging will help ensure that the radiology community remains relevant and central in the

79 iology, treatment, and imaging will help the radiology community to remain effective contributors to

80 d describes how these discoveries affect the radiology community.

81 Ambulatory radiology costs decreased (difference in monthly trend c

82 sity of 2-4 according to American College of Radiology criteria were recruited between November 2008

83 mized repeat scans of an American College of Radiology CT accreditation phantom (module 2, low contra

84 aterials and Methods The American College of Radiology CT accreditation phantom was scanned by using

85 Images of the American College of Radiology CT quality assurance phantom were acquired by

86 s, such as outpatient lab workup, pathology, radiology, current treatments, molecular signatures and

87 culture data, whether BAL GM was performed, radiology data consistent with invasive aspergillosis, a

88 for CT Scans in Children within the National Radiology Data Registry, American College of Radiology.

89 ctively acquired data from an interventional radiology database and of individual electronic medical

90 A search of the radiology database revealed 2180 pediatric patients who

91 With a radiology database search of pelvic magnetic resonance i

92 2010, were identified from an interventional radiology database.

93 Twenty patients presenting to our pediatric radiology department for bone scintigraphy were evaluate

94 he outside institution were submitted to our radiology department for interpretation.

95 d woman with RCC history was referred to our radiology department for neck ultrasound (US) with painf

96 ent of standardized structured reports for a radiology department of 36 radiologists at a tertiary ca

97 d from the imaging material collected at the Radiology Department of Hamad Medical Corporation during

98 between November 2002 and April 2004 at the Radiology Department of Oncology Center in Bydgoszcz, we

99 year-old female, gravida one was referred to radiology department with history of lower abdominal pai

100 -year-old man has been admitted to the local radiology department with symptoms of the superior vena

101 ic treatment in the intervention unit of the Radiology Department, from 1 January 2010 to 30 December

102 structured reporting can be implemented in a radiology department, with a high rate of adoption by th

103 article is to consider the effect of EVD on radiology departments and imaging equipment, with partic

104 all the CT and MRI studies performed by two radiology departments and to determine the types of exam

105 al of 118 patients underwent brain CT at two radiology departments equipped with 64-slice CT scanners

106 ions of the oral cavity and were referred to radiology departments for MRI.

107 Radiology departments should consider policies for and a

108 United Kingdom radiology departments with a department leader for audit

109 biopsy is performed safely in United Kingdom radiology departments, with complication rates within ex

110 airs and six vice-chairs of their respective radiology departments.

111 The authors of 51 articles were from radiology departments.

112 irst authors but one primarily affiliated to radiology departments.

113 nary studies have shown promising results in radiology, dermatology, intensive care, diabetes, rheuma

114 ternational Society for Strategic Studies in Radiology discussed the opportunities and challenges ari

115 a were obtained from the American College of Radiology dose registry for CT examinations submitted fr

116 , Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Radiology during 2 years (July 2009 through June 2011).

117 study by Laemmel et al (1) in this issue of Radiology elucidates the potential mechanisms for steroi

118 of expensive and potentially easily damaged radiology equipment.

119 ion protection were provided by the staff of radiology facilities and emergency departments with 1-5

120 the United States has legislation requiring radiology facilities to disclose mammographic breast den

121 Setting: 30 radiology facilities within the 3 breast cancer screenin

122 om six BCSC registries (418 radiologists, 92 radiology facilities).

123 A medical student, a radiology fellow, and two senior radiologists reviewed 1

124 cal abnormalities and mild disease, based on radiology findings.

125 usion A deep learning CNN model can classify radiology free-text reports with accuracy equivalent to

126 patients with OO referred to interventional radiology from other clinics primarily from orthopedics;

127 In this issue of Radiology, Gade et al ( 1 ) describe a unique mechanism

128 region sequencing, including iliac crest and radiology-guided focal lesion specimens from 51 patients

129 rade >/=3 fistula or need for interventional radiology-guided procedures.

130 Radiology had the highest PRISMA reported items (24.7 of

131 The style and tone of the writing in Radiology has changed over the years since its first pub

132 Given the critical role that diagnostic radiology has in patient care, it is important for provi

133 Radiology has the chance to leverage AI to become a cent

134 inical practice of radiology and the journal Radiology have had an enormous effect on our understandi

135 rasound convened a panel of specialists from radiology, hepatology, pathology, and basic science and

136 a secondary analysis of American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) 6668/RTOG 0235, high p

137 he clinical trial by the American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) and the Gynecology Onc

138 operative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) affiliates in Eur

139 operative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) E2491 (intergroup

140 The American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6666 database was reviewed for

141 The American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6667 trial was compliant with

142 imaging companion trial (American College of Radiology Imaging Network [ACRIN] 6687) to a multicenter

143 operative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network Cancer Research Group trial E1

144 cohort of women from the American College of Radiology Imaging Network Pennsylvania 4006 trial was re

145 om multicenter Merck and American College of Radiology Imaging Network trials was performed.

146 om multicenter Merck and American College of Radiology Imaging Network trials was performed.

147 T arm of the NLST-ACRIN (American College of Radiology Imaging Network) cohort, COPD status was assoc

148 ed analysis of ACRIN-PA (American College of Radiology Imaging Network-Pennsylvania) 4005 and the ROM

149 It has been widely accepted in practice in radiology in academic and hospital settings and included

150 non-diabetic mother and discuss the role of radiology in early diagnosis and timely management.

151 reed that promoting awareness of the role of radiology in patients' overall health care is important

152 ecisions that influence the effectiveness of radiology in the care of patients on a daily basis.

153 Based on American College of Radiology Incidental Findings Committee White Paper on M

154 ist members of the Society of Interventional Radiology, including attending-level physicians and trai

155 able phantoms for diagnostic and therapeutic radiology, including the reproduction of individual pati

156 The radiology information system was queried for these patie

157 The radiology information system was searched in a 10-year p

158 procedure code or a group of codes from the radiology information system.

159 utcome measure was concordance between final radiology interpretation and final pathology report.

160 ly verified disease but had uncharacteristic radiology involving multiple compartments of the abdomen

161 n patients undergoing cardiac interventional radiology (IR) procedures.

162 The role of radiology is of utmost importance not only in diagnosing

163 In major radiology journal studies, there was modest improvement

164 American Journal of Roentgenology, European Radiology, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Ra

165 er, and/or editorial board member of various radiology journals and clinical journals related to thei

166 reviews and meta-analyses published in major radiology journals between January 2007 and December 201

167 interventional cardiology or interventional radiology laboratories took an electronic survey.

168 ery, and support services, such as pharmacy, radiology, laboratory, and counselling) at Hopital Unive

169 Reference to these injuries in the radiology literature is scarce and anecdotal, resulting

170 hich is a promising subspecialty of clinical radiology mainly for psychiatric disorders.

171 psychoradiology, an evolving subspecialty of radiology mainly for psychiatry and clinical psychology.

172 s involve open procedures and interventional radiology methods (endovascular).

173 = 13, 33%), jointly by nuclear medicine and radiology (n = 11, 28%), and radiology only (n = 10, 26%

174 istorical divides between the NM and nuclear radiology (NR) communities.

175 of the 116 journals in the subject category "radiology, nuclear medicine, and medical imaging" at the

176 In this issue of Radiology, O h-Ici et al ( 1 ) have demonstrated this ab

177 ent of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology of the Pomeranian Medical University Hospital

178 the patients diagnosed at the Department of Radiology of the Provincial Hospital No 2 in Rzeszow bet

179 ar medicine and radiology (n = 11, 28%), and radiology only (n = 10, 26%).

180 definition; pneumonia was confirmed in 4 by radiology only, in 9 by qPCR only, in 17 by serology onl

181 e Boston Marathon bombing stressed emergency radiology operations.

182 Only 38% (330 of 867) of SRs on radiology or nuclear medicine-related imaging published

183 a nonvascular thoracic MR imaging study via radiology order entry, he or she was sent a link to the

184 y hospitals; attendances at outpatients; and radiology, pathology, and pharmacy services.

185 y MSERg are found to be more appropriate for radiology-pathology co-registration.

186 luation Criteria in Solid Tumors [mRECIST]), radiology-pathology correlation and long-term survival w

187 We assessed the efficacy (response, radiology-pathology correlation, survival) of radiation

188 technique with a favorable risk profile and radiology-pathology outcomes for solitary HCC </= 5 cm.

189 ey fit with the current dominant approach to radiology peer review.

190 In addition, the protection of radiology personnel must be considered during the work-u

191 to (a) describe the importance of educating radiology personnel, patients, and referring clinicians

192 The first reports in Radiology pertaining to magnetic resonance (MR) imaging

193 s, leaders must assure that services such as radiology, pharmacy, the laboratory, and information ser

194 RM remain underrepresented in the diagnostic radiology physician workforce despite an available medic

195 luate trained readers' (nuclear medicine and radiology physicians) visual assessments of FA from soli

196 k factors for needlesticks in interventional radiology physicians, as well as the attitudes, behavior

197 gical treatment combined with interventional radiology played a decisive role in the final result.

198 mmendations of the Polish Medical Society of Radiology (PLTR) and the Polish Society of Polish Societ

199 tic MR images of the knee interpreted by one radiology practice between January and April 2009 for pa

200 were recorded per Society of Interventional Radiology practice guidelines.

201 Reasons are considered for radiology practices on both sides of the Atlantic about

202 assess differences for 2010 among diagnostic radiology practicing physicians, academic faculty, resid

203 rvative treatment, surgery or interventional radiology procedure.

204 milar reoperation (both <1%), interventional radiology procedures (15% vs 19%; P = 0.1), and mortalit

205 seful information for guiding interventional radiology procedures and localized therapies and for in

206 cates the conditions in which interventional radiology procedures can be applied for the management o

207 As indications for interventional radiology procedures during pregnancy continue to expand

208 gery to ablation with various interventional radiology procedures, and include both regional and syst

209 ing anesthetic management for interventional radiology procedures.

210 r bundles of care advance the imperative for radiology providers to articulate their value.

211 f care provides an excellent opportunity for radiology providers to take a leading role within the he

212 process and were vetted through a consensus radiology quality assurance committee.

213 a mean of 21 years of experience in thoracic radiology (range, 17-22 years), selected images of 10 so

214 Moreover, diagnostic radiology ranks 17th in female and 20th in URM represent

215 We determined injury outcomes by CT radiology readings and categorized injuries as major or

216 The American College of Radiology recently released Lung-RADS, a classification

217 Current American College of Radiology recommendations to discontinue imaging follow-

218 Radiology records were reviewed to identify 25 patients

219 electronic hospital admission databases and radiology records were reviewed.

220 deemed the reference expert group, and four radiology registrars, five senior house officers (SHOs),

221 RIAL/It is a retrospective study analyzing a radiology report database and MR images of 92 patients w

222 s disagreement among all 9 reviewers and the radiology report on the presence/absence of a ventral he

223 s compared among 9 blinded reviewers and the radiology report.

224 ons, adoption of a standardized template for radiology reporting, using universally accepted and agre

225 e compared with both findings in prospective radiology reports and surgical and histopathologic findi

226 Although radiology reports are stored for communication and docum

227 ted natural language processing algorithm to radiology reports for 15 695 unique patients who underwe

228 s retrospective chart review, which included radiology reports of carotid artery imaging for patients

229 pathology findings from biopsy specimens and radiology reports on MR images to evaluate the accuracy

230 general practitioners, specialists' letters, radiology reports, and discharge letters.

231 tured clinical text, such as progress notes, radiology reports, and pathology reports.

232 ted natural language processing algorithm on radiology reports, each CT pulmonary angiographic examin

233 Used on radiology reports, NLP techniques enable automatic ident

234 cture was adjudicated by a central review of radiology reports.

235 ories of test results, such as pathology and radiology reports.

236 se developed rapidly in the initial years of radiology residency and leveled off in the 3rd and 4th t

237 ewed by 2 board-certified radiologists and a radiology resident individually; each reviewed 2D and th

238 Significant differences in diagnostic radiology resident representation were evaluated for aca

239 State-to-state variations in radiologist and radiology resident workforces are high, which suggests a

240 vely), faculty (26.1%, 5.9%), and diagnostic radiology residents (27.8%, 8.3%), compared with the U.S

241 ere evaluated on dedicated workstations by 2 radiology residents and 1 board-certified nuclear medici

242 Longitudinal test data of 577 of 2884 radiology residents who took semiannual progress tests d

243 Four attending radiologists and six radiology residents without prior DE CT experience each

244 ] with everolimus; p<0.0001) per independent radiology review among all randomised patients.

245 site as assessed by independent centralized radiology review blinded to study arm.

246 -free survival as assessed by an independent radiology review committee in the first 375 randomly ass

247 ctive response as assessed by an independent radiology review committee.

248 ctive response as assessed by an independent radiology review committee.

249 nt was PFS assessed by a masked, independent radiology review committee.

250 hed, retrospective cohort study with blinded radiology review for 133 patients with high-grade glioma

251 An independent central radiology review team assessed SEGA response (at least a

252 rogression-free survival assessed by central radiology review, analysed by intention to treat.

253 autoimmune pancreatitis including dedicated radiology review.

254 SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.12111

255 Supplemental material: http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.12111

256 Supplemental material: http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.12111

257 Supplemental material: http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.12112

258 SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.12120

259 SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.12120

260 Radiology's engagement across a broad spectrum of care p

261 tization, having triggered disaggregation of radiology's professional service model, may soon usher i

262 ts who underwent FBD with our interventional radiology service (1999-2011) were reviewed retrospectiv

263 h the variety of pressures within a clinical radiology setting has proven challenging, especially in

264 r the special centennial year of the journal Radiology, several former editorial fellows were interes

265 nal masses has been detailed in the pages of Radiology since the 1920s.

266 oradiology (ASITN)/Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) collateral vessel grading system, while

267 ety of North America (RSNA) Patient-Centered Radiology Steering Committee survey were to (a) assess R

268 Conclusion Despite an increased focus on radiology subspecialization, most U.S. radiologists are

269 tion in a combined MR imaging-interventional radiology suite between February 2006 and June 2010 were

270 g on patient morphology, availability of the radiology suite, and patient medical history.

271 internal medicine, pathology, microbiology, radiology, surgery, preventive medicine, and rehabilitat

272 s the importance of establishing a dedicated radiology team to manage CT radiation, and (d) describe

273 e thymic function based on an interventional radiology technique for intrathymic injection of cells o

274 g scores on knowledge and image questions on radiology tests, mediated by the training environment.

275 r joint imaging review by transplant surgery/radiology, these patients underwent PVR-TIPS to potentia

276 ternational Society for Strategic Studies in Radiology, this report outlines the effects of reforms a

277 ergy computed tomography (DECT) in abdominal radiology Thomson Reuters Web of Science All Databases w

278 The American College of Radiology, through its Subcommittee on MR Safety, has pr

279 velopments has potential to bring diagnostic radiology to the forefront in AD research, therapeutic t

280 resentation varies from 8.6% (interventional radiology) to 63.1% (breast imaging); cardiothoracic ima

281 Radiology trainee numbers exhibited weak-to-moderate pos

282 Although the number of radiology trainees dramatically increased, radiologists

283 Nationally, the number of radiology trainees increased 84.2% from a nadir in 1997

284 ars ago, a second fellowship was created for radiology trainees, which is now named the RSNA William

285 ively analyze the outcomes of interventional radiology treatment of patients with hepatic artery sten

286 with indications of possible interventional radiology treatment.

287 om the procedure) and that of interventional radiology (typically two-dimensional imaging).

288 ultrasonography performed by a radiologist (radiology ultrasonography), or abdominal CT.

289 ultrasonography, 10.8% of those assigned to radiology ultrasonography, and 11.2% of those assigned t

290 908 to point-of-care ultrasonography, 893 to radiology ultrasonography, and 958 to CT.

291 h articles with a primary focus on abdominal radiology using DECT were selected.

292 A diagnostic radiology value chain is constructed to define its main

293 This group with typical radiology was labelled MP.

294 Psychoradiology, an emerging subspecialty of radiology, which seems primed to play a major clinical r

295 In this issue of Radiology, White et al ( 6 ) introduced their work on de

296 enges, and requirements for advancing NLP in radiology will be discussed.

297 Under health care reform, radiology will transition its emphasis from volume to gr

298 l applications, as seen through the pages of Radiology, will be considered.

299 in the field, as chronicled in the pages of Radiology, will be described.

300 and experiences concerning patient-centered radiology, with specific attention paid to radiologist-t