ライフサイエンスコーパス: random allocation

1 Materials were supplied after random allocation.

2 d by telephone interview about 3 weeks after random allocation.

3 the auto-auto group subsequently underwent a random allocation (1:1) to maintenance therapy (thalidom

4 During the 15 days after random allocation, 12 (1%) infants died in group A, comp

5 , and 781 were angiographically eligible for random allocation; 454 of these patients constitute the

6 ents were enrolled and 676 were eligible for random allocation, 598 (88%) of whom were randomly assig

7 Following random allocation, 747 women received T+CEF, and 753 wom

8 REVIEW Random allocation conducted by the primary researcher as

9 By random allocation, each defect was filled with PPart or

10 sed roots were hand root planed only and, by random allocation, either a fitted AD or fitted CT graft

11 n the United Kingdom in the 1940s introduced random allocation for participants to either the treatme

12 ndomised with a validated computer-generated random allocation list.

13 ith documented hyperlipidemia; double-blind, random allocation of > or = 100 patients to statin monot

14 in protein sequences may arise due to nearly random allocation of alpha and beta structure along wild

15 in one indicator in studies designed without random allocation of interventions into treatment and co

16 Random allocation of participants resulted in well-balan

17 Replication is needed that includes a random allocation of patients to conditions to ensure th

18 rolled trial or controlled-clinical trial or random-allocation or double-blind method, or single-blin

19 omly assigned (1:1; via a computer-generated random allocation overseen by Gynuity Health Projects) t

20 By random allocation, PG or ePTFE was placed into or fitted

21 rom confounded associations because of their random allocation prior to disease.

22 standard care) or the shortest time, using a random allocation schedule and stratified by centre and

23 The random allocation schedule was computer-generated and ce

24 The random allocation schedule was computer-generated; patie

25 ce-response system with a computer-generated random allocation sequence (stratified by cirrhosis stat

26 day or 14 day bladder catheterisation (via a random allocation sequence computer generated centrally

27 The random allocation sequence was computer generated.

28 Without it, even properly developed random allocation sequences can be subverted.

29 group (Group S) according to a computerized, random allocation software program.

30 Patients were assigned by random allocation software to receive red yeast rice, 18

31 e practice centres, using computer-generated random allocation stratified by site, to carpal tunnel s

32 Random allocation to 1 of 4 treatments (placebo metformi

33 Random allocation to a conventional antipsychotic, halop

34 e measured under free-living conditions with random allocation to daily breakfast (>/=700 kcal before

35 e measured under free-living conditions with random allocation to daily breakfast (>/=700 kcal before

36 Random allocation to endoscopic transgastric or surgical

37 ng data from 312,321 participants, naturally random allocation to long-term exposure to lower LDL-C w

38 This study evaluated the effect of naturally random allocation to lower LDL-C mediated by polymorphis

39 Random allocation to pragmatic standard care or early PN

40 s opioid and/or benzodiazepine infusions and random allocation to protocolized sedation (n = 209) (co

41 article concentrations at baseline and after random allocation to rosuvastatin 20 mg/d or placebo wer

42 al Evaluating Rosuvastatin) before and after random allocation to rosuvastatin 20 mg/d or placebo, wi

43 ardiovascular disease (CVD) before and after random allocation to rosuvastatin 20 mg/d or placebo.

44 Inclusion criteria were random allocation to treatment and comparison of levosim

45 The median follow-up time after random allocation was 10.3 years.

46 Random allocation was done by the study statistician usi

47 Random allocation was done with a pseudorandom number ge

48 The random allocation was generated by computer and patients

49 Random allocation was masked to study investigators and

50 Random allocation was to usual medical care or CBT-based

51 ient ischaemic attack within 180 days before random allocation were enrolled in CREST at 117 clinical