ライフサイエンスコーパス: random genetic drift

1 under stochastic lineage birth and death and random genetic drift.

2 to what can be achieved set by the power of random genetic drift.

3 fing phenomenon in continuous models without random genetic drift.

4 ing downward to the lower barrier imposed by random genetic drift.

5 ional deleterious mutational load, and (iii) random genetic drift.

6 tion driven by local climatic conditions and random genetic drift.

7 arwinian positive selection or can be due to random genetic drift.

8 se of HIV-1 genetic variation appeared to be random genetic drift.

9 them to diverge through local adaptation or random genetic drift.

10 idered to be obligatorily founded in part on random genetic drift.

11 a rate that is too rapid to be explained by random genetic drift.

12 tive fine tuning but a simple consequence of random genetic drift.

13 onary change from both natural selection and random genetic drift.

14 two taxa was caused by natural selection or random genetic drift.

15 response to new host environments and/or by random genetic drift.

16 ot in eukaryotes experiencing high levels of random genetic drift.

17 ions, reached such high frequency because of random genetic drift alone.

18 t mutation does not obliterate the effect of random genetic drift and clearly indicate that populatio

19 triction/amplification event attributable to random genetic drift and clonal expansion.

20 sweep pattern over time as a consequence of random genetic drift and discuss potential effects of re

21 that population size is sufficiently small, random genetic drift and mutation can conspire to produc

22 he relative power of two nonadaptive forces: random genetic drift and mutation pressure.

23 concurrent amplifications of the effects of random genetic drift and mutation.

24 Competition between random genetic drift and natural selection play a centra

25 ory) to be acted upon by the twin engines of random genetic drift and natural selection.

26 This paper summarizes simulation studies of random genetic drift and selection in malaria parasites

27 otspots (rate heterogeneity), selection, and random genetic drift and the limitations of phylogenetic

28 However, a simple model incorporating random genetic drift and weak mutation pressure against

29 y the forces of mutation, recombination, and random genetic drift, and drawing from observations on t

30 subsequent mutation, population subdivision, random genetic drift, and perhaps natural selection.

31 les of natural selection, population growth, random genetic drift, and recombination in shaping the v

32 ngle random mating population with mutation, random genetic drift, and recombination.

33 omplex disease loci, incorporating mutation, random genetic drift, and the possibility of purifying s

34 and the consequent reduction in the power of random genetic drift appears to be sufficient to enable

35 utation, gene conversion, recombination, and random genetic drift, approximate formulas for the expec

36 onic infection, ongoing HCV evolution is not random genetic drift but rather the product of strong pr

37 with region-specific sexual selection and/or random genetic drift, but not universal sexual selection

38 Here, it is argued that random genetic drift can impose a strong barrier to the

39 observations provide compelling support for random genetic drift (chance founder effects, one approx

40 ing from the joint processes of mutation and random genetic drift, even in the face of constant direc

41 quations, adapted from the work of Kimura on random genetic drift, for the full mtDNA heteroplasmy di

42 thod utilizes the differences accumulated by random genetic drift in allele count data from single-nu

43 Our results show that random genetic drift in the malaria life cycle is more p

44 ing the relative importance of selection and random genetic drift in virtually any gene in almost any

45 , the role of natural selection, relative to random genetic drift, in governing this process is uncle

46 umulate in population-genetic settings where random genetic drift is a relatively strong force.

47 he extent to which variation in the power of random genetic drift is capable of influencing phylogene

48 largely rests on a 'standard model' in which random genetic drift is the dominant force, selective sw

49 selection with varying strength among sites, random genetic drift, linkage, and recombination.

50 a sets can be explained by a predominance of random genetic drift of neutral mutations with brief epi

51 f whether the observed variability is due to random genetic drift or is a result of natural selection

52 dividual ancestry associated with migration, random genetic drift or natural selection.

53 pidly to be explained by any simple model of random genetic drift or sampling variation.

54 es down to a lower limit set by the power of random genetic drift rather than by intrinsic physiologi

55 and immunity genes are neutral mutation and random genetic drift rather than diversifying selection,

56 Thus, random genetic drift, recent changes in mutational tende

57 /C is approximately balanced by the power of random genetic drift, such that variation in equilibrium

58 nvolves the paradoxical constructive role of random genetic drift, typically mildly deleterious, in f

59 nds: those produced by stochastic processes (random genetic drift) within a species, and clades that