ライフサイエンスコーパス: randomized clinical trial

1 Screening program results for a prospective randomized clinical trial.

2 stigator initiated, open label, single site, randomized clinical trial.

3 of recurrent colorectal adenomas in a recent randomized clinical trial.

4 t of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage II (ATACH-II) randomized clinical trial.

5 analysis from a multicenter, double-masked, randomized clinical trial.

6 Secondary analysis of a large randomized clinical trial.

7 anisometropia, or both were enrolled into a randomized clinical trial.

8 of DAPT score-guided treatment duration in a randomized clinical trial.

9 Multicenter randomized clinical trial.

10 Multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial.

11 lopecia, efficacy has not been assessed in a randomized clinical trial.

12 Prospective randomized clinical trial.

13 Secondary analysis of a multicenter, block-randomized clinical trial.

14 Cohort study ancillary to a randomized clinical trial.

15 Randomized clinical trial.

16 wering treatment can be established only via randomized clinical trials.

17 Pooled analysis of 2 multicenter, randomized clinical trials.

18 databases, observational cohort studies, and randomized clinical trials.

19 FLOT3 trial provides a rationale for further randomized clinical trials.

20 tions that have been reported in large-scale randomized clinical trials.

21 Gene transfer has rarely been tested in randomized clinical trials.

22 diabetes associated with statin treatment in randomized clinical trials.

23 complications, and areas of ongoing study in randomized clinical trials.

24 ed by meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and randomized clinical trials.

25 ate significant benefits of new therapies in randomized clinical trials.

26 Results From 109 included randomized clinical trials, 108 ASCOv1, 111 ASCOv2, and

27 double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel, randomized clinical trial, 173 participants (mean +/- SE

28 For this randomized clinical trial, 206 men with unfavorable-risk

29 lticenter, double-masked, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial, 240 patients from the Aravind

30 In this randomized clinical trial, 268 active-duty servicemember

31 In a randomized clinical trial, 336 eligible participants who

32 Randomized clinical trial (55 United States sites).

33 In this randomized clinical trial, 55 patients with inoperable m

34 In this randomized clinical trial, 80 patients with periodontiti

35 In this single-blind randomized clinical trial, 8003 adults with acute stroke

36 ting, and Participants: In this double-blind randomized clinical trial, 90 pregnant women were recrui

37 In this secondary analysis of a phase 3 randomized clinical trial, a low level of preexisting cy

38 METHOD: In a randomized clinical trial, adults (N=80) with current ma

39 One randomized clinical trial and 18 prospective-retrospecti

40 clinical practice before and after the 2009 randomized clinical trial and to estimate the economic e

41 1985, to December 31, 2015, which yielded 8 randomized clinical trials and 24 epidemiological studie

42 Of the 83 studies, 37 (45%) were randomized clinical trials and 25 (30%) were blinded.

43 Randomized clinical trials and cohort or case-control st

44 lyze evidence from observational studies and randomized clinical trials and find that the probability

45 a systematic PubMed literature review (1042 randomized clinical trials and guidelines from June 3, 2

46 evidence and perspectives have emerged from randomized clinical trials and other sources, particular

47 Reference sections of published randomized clinical trials and previously published revi

48 We included randomized clinical trials and prospective observational

49 y, including 9 retrospective reports and one randomized clinical trial, and five retrospective studie

50 A randomized clinical trial (April 2012-May 2015) that inv

51 Contemporary cardiovascular randomized clinical trials are more likely to use primar

52 Further randomized clinical trials are needed in current era to

53 Randomized clinical trials are needed to compare effecti

54 kin) may improve vascular diseases; however, randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm these f

55 More randomized clinical trials are needed to strongly suppor

56 Prospective randomized clinical trials are needed to test ICD effica

57 ding large unselected patient populations in randomized clinical trials, as well as residual confound

58 A search was performed of randomized clinical trials assessing the effectiveness o

59 usal women aged 50 to 79 years enrolled in 2 randomized clinical trials between 1993 and 1998 and fol

60 npharmacological interventions (eg, surgical randomized clinical trials) blinding is usually more dif

61 This parallel-design, double-blind, randomized clinical trial, called Resveratrol to Improve

62 : Lack of blinding in randomized clinical trials can bias the effect estimates

63 This single-center, unblinded, randomized clinical trial compared methods of fluid remo

64 l survival in the context of a prospectively randomized clinical trial comparing androgen-deprivation

65 BENEFIT was a randomized clinical trial comparing early versus delayed

66 A randomized clinical trial comparing fluocinolone acetoni

67 To analyze long-term outcome of a randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic Nissen

68 cceptance of randomization within a 5-center randomized clinical trial comparing lumbar spinal decomp

69 Randomized clinical trial comparing robotic-assisted vs

70 Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment (MUST) randomized clinical trial comparing the alternative trea

71 A randomized clinical trial comparing the internet CBT-I w

72 Randomized clinical trials comparing aggressive manageme

73 uperior response, both occur infrequently in randomized clinical trials comparing CBT and pharmacothe

74 Randomized clinical trials comparing nonpharmacological

75 The randomized clinical trials comparing nonvitamin K antago

76 Meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials comparing the efficacy of ant

77 Primary end points (protocol) were the randomized clinical trial completion rate, the proportio

78 study was a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial conducted at 16 tertiary medic

79 Randomized clinical trial conducted at 2 urban EDs in th

80 For this parallel-group randomized clinical trial conducted at 2 US academic med

81 Multinational, randomized clinical trial conducted at 202 sites across

82 Single-center, double-blind, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial conducted at an acute palliati

83 Double-blind randomized clinical trial conducted at St Jude Children'

84 nary Dysplasia in Extremely Preterm Infants) randomized clinical trial conducted between 2008 and 201

85 was an investigator-blinded, 6-month, 2-arm randomized clinical trial conducted between January 22 a

86 Randomized clinical trial conducted between October 2014

87 Parallel-group, nonblinded, randomized clinical trial conducted from March 1, 2016,

88 Randomized clinical trial conducted from May 24, 2011, t

89 Open-label crossover randomized clinical trial conducted in 15 diabetes outpa

90 A factorial (2x2), double-blind, randomized clinical trial conducted in 18 general adult

91 A randomized clinical trial conducted in 2 centers include

92 Randomized clinical trial conducted in Baltimore, Maryla

93 SPS3 is a randomized, clinical trial conducted between 2003 and 20

94 Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial (conducted March 10, 2011-Apri

95 atients and Methods This single-institution, randomized clinical trial, conducted from January 2003 t

96 Data from randomized clinical trials consistently suggest that int

97 These randomized clinical trial data demonstrate the widesprea

98 Secondary analysis of randomized clinical trial data.

99 This randomized clinical trial demonstrated better postoperat

100 Since the publication of a large randomized clinical trial demonstrating the benefit of l

101 The lack of prospective randomized clinical trials demonstrating that full-body

102 Inclusion criteria consisted of a randomized clinical trial design and comparison of the I

103 An open-label, phase 4 randomized clinical trial designed as a noninferiority s

104 Phase III prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial designed to assess whether int

105 s study, we described how participation in a randomized clinical trial designed to enhance supportive

106 ervention Trial) study, a placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial designed to test the effects o

107 Evidence from prospective randomized clinical trials does not provide support for

108 This phase 3 randomized clinical trial enrolled 200 young patients (a

109 The ACOSOG Z0011 phase 3 randomized clinical trial enrolled patients from May 199

110 This multicenter, randomized clinical trial enrolled patients with persist

111 eligible for inclusion if they were phase 3 randomized clinical trials, enrolled patients with atria

112 To our knowledge, this is the first randomized clinical trial evaluating an alternating trea

113 We undertook a post hoc analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials evaluating IIV efficacy among

114 Our findings agree with available randomized clinical trial evidence and support a conserv

115 e Prevencion con Dieta Mediterranea Study, a randomized clinical trial executed between 2003 and 2011

116 An initial meta-analysis identified 14 randomized clinical trials for treatment of mNSCLC with

117 A meta-analysis of 27 randomized clinical trials found no difference in postop

118 In 1 randomized clinical trial from Hungary initiated in 1984

119 Pragmatic randomized clinical trial from March 2013 to July 2016 a

120 erformed metabolic profiling in the GIPS-III randomized clinical trial (Glycometabolic Intervention a

121 Bottom Line: No high-quality randomized clinical trials have addressed this question.

122 e not yet been conclusively determined as no randomized clinical trials have been published on this i

123 Although large randomized clinical trials have found that primary preve

124 Randomized clinical trials have reported improved clinic

125 However, to date, no randomized clinical trials have studied this proposition

126 -blind, placebo-controlled, population-based randomized clinical trial in 31 rural counties (June 24,

127 ) was investigated in a phase 3, open-label, randomized clinical trial in adults aged >/=50 years.

128 other neutrophil functions in a double-blind randomized clinical trial in healthy elders.

129 tro results were confirmed in a double-blind randomized clinical trial in healthy elders.

130 um (PREADViSE) trial began as a double-blind randomized clinical trial in May 2002, which transformed

131 al vitamin D3 supplementation.We performed a randomized clinical trial in vitamin D-deficient adults

132 ohort study initiated at the conclusion of a randomized clinical trial in which individuals presented

133 Randomized clinical trials in adults with cancer were se

134 Randomized clinical trials in which self-guided iCBT was

135 -masked, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial included 117 patients with pla

136 A multicenter, double-masked, randomized clinical trial included 40 clinical sites (70

137 This parallel, two-arm randomized clinical trial included 40 patients evenly di

138 This randomized clinical trial included 540 late preterm and

139 This cluster-randomized clinical trial included patients from 4 prima

140 y reviewed and selected studies if they were randomized clinical trials, included adults hospitalized

141 Multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial including 500 patients aged 18

142 Two-stage randomized clinical trial including 511 adult patients w

143 In this 2-group, parallel, randomized clinical trial, including a nonrandomized obs

144 e in observational studies and evidence from randomized clinical trials indicates that calcium supple

145 METHODS AND This randomized clinical trial involved 180 HF outpatients wi

146 A randomized clinical trial involving 136 patients with hy

147 Randomized clinical trial involving 98 patients with bio

148 l history data are inherently limited, and a randomized clinical trial is needed to definitively dete

149 f this parallel, double-masked, dual-center, randomized clinical trial is to evaluate clinical outcom

150 ouble-masked placebo-controlled parallel-arm randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the clinical ef

151 ation of these results in larger multicenter randomized clinical trials is warranted.

152 lticenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, is also outlined.

153 otland), minor allele frequency (=0.02), and randomized clinical trial (JUPITER [Justification for th

154 This study was a randomized clinical trial (Lutein Influence on Macula of

155 Four randomized clinical trials met the selection criteria an

156 onal (n = 13), pretest and posttest (n = 9), randomized clinical trials (n = 9), and crossover studie

157 n-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in a randomized clinical trial (NCT01806506).

158 atic review (1996 to 2016) of meta-analyses, randomized clinical trials, observational studies, and c

159 Randomized clinical trial of 212 adults with sepsis (sus

160 Multicenter, cluster-randomized clinical trial of 3037 critically ill patient

161 Randomized clinical trial of 371 adults requiring intuba

162 This cluster randomized clinical trial of 577 eligible patients enrol

163 nocyte Carcinoma Chemoprevention Trial was a randomized clinical trial of 932 US veterans with a rece

164 Double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial of adult cardiac surgery patie

165 As follow-up to a 12-week randomized clinical trial of aripiprazole augmentation f

166 ds All patients (n = 500) of the Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for

167 btained from all patients in the Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for

168 Prespecified subgroup analysis of a randomized clinical trial of endovascular treatment for

169 loratory analysis of secondary outcomes of a randomized clinical trial of extremely preterm infants,

170 Results support conducting a randomized clinical trial of hypothermia in acute respir

171 as to assess the feasibility of performing a randomized clinical trial of hypothermia in patients wit

172 Double-blind, superiority randomized clinical trial of infants and children aged 9

173 Four-group cluster randomized clinical trial of mothers of healthy term new

174 A randomized clinical trial of patients with calcific aort

175 In this randomized clinical trial of patients with CPVT, flecain

176 In this 2-year, follow-up, randomized clinical trial of patients with Duchenne or B

177 Phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of patients with HFrEF (<40%)

178 Randomized clinical trial of patients with hypoxemia aft

179 A randomized clinical trial of patients with persistent hy

180 Therefore, we conducted a randomized clinical trial of stereotactic conformal radi

181 This is a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial of tamoxifen vs no systemic th

182 This study reports the results of a randomized clinical trial of telemonitoring on health st

183 itamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT), a randomized clinical trial of the same antioxidant supple

184 Multicenter randomized clinical trial of women with breast cancer un

185 Included were randomized clinical trials of adults with diagnosed BPD

186 Randomized clinical trials of behavioral interventions t

187 orts use of PB-MRD as a primary end point in randomized clinical trials of chemoimmunotherapy in CLL.

188 for inclusion if they were (1) double-blind randomized clinical trials of DCS as an augmentation str

189 ooled data from 3016 patients from 4 phase 3 randomized clinical trials of evolocumab as part of the

190 In contrast, randomized clinical trials of omega-3 fatty acids have y

191 Observations: Although randomized clinical trials of omega-3 in symptomatic AD

192 Methods Randomized clinical trials of oncology drug approvals by

193 this review, we synthesize the evidence from randomized clinical trials of palliative care interventi

194 In 3 randomized clinical trials of participants with chronic

195 and BCL6 translocations in two prospectively randomized clinical trials of patients with diffuse larg

196 Published and unpublished randomized clinical trials of SSRIs or SNRIs in youths w

197 Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials of statins vs placebo, fixed-

198 To date, randomized clinical trials of vitamin D supplementation

199 RANDE) study was a multicenter, double-blind randomized clinical trial on 2 parallel groups conducted

200 Three pragmatic multicenter, nonblinded randomized clinical trials on the effectiveness of minim

201 itute (NCI) sponsored, multicenter, phase 3, randomized clinical trial open to patients with biopsy-p

202 In a pilot randomized clinical trial, overminus spectacles improved

203 In this follow-up of randomized clinical trial participants (from December 15

204 In this single-center, randomized clinical trial, patients undergoing coronary

205 Inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trial, patients with LMCA stenosis,

206 In this multicenter, randomized clinical trial, patients with onset of sympto

207 This intent-to-treat study was a randomized clinical trial performed at 33 US and Canadia

208 med from May 3, 2016, to June 21, 2016, of a randomized clinical trial performed from August 22, 2012

209 we sought systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized clinical trials, prospective comparative obse

210 Of the 13 citations, 6 articles on 5 randomized clinical trials provided level II evidence su

211 Studies were included if they were randomized clinical trials published in English, enrolle

212 INE and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for randomized clinical trials published up until August 201

213 pated in a 6-month multinational multicenter randomized clinical trial (RCT), followed up 18 patients

214 In a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial (RCT), we evaluated the effect

215 ted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) according to the Prefe

216 es (n = 8930 participants) were included: 67 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and 11 nonrandomized s

217 Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses have

218 CU) length of stay (LOS), are widely used in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational rese

219 Controlled randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and prospective studie

220 We used a retrospective cohort of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) based on archived prot

221 es, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing LRR vs ORR.

222 A lack of head-to-head randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing targeted and

223 Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) currently apply the sa

224 reatments have been shown to be effective in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) for hidradenitis suppu

225 However, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) for statin use have in

226 ssive treatments in advanced cancer, yet few randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of communication inter

227 Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of fall-prevention int

228 English-language randomized clinical trials (RCTs) or prospective cohort

229 All randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were identified betwee

230 English-language randomized clinical trials (RCTs); studies evaluating ac

231 year Baby-Led Introduction to Solids (BLISS) randomized clinical trial recruited 206 women (168 [81.6

232 This noninferiority, double-masked, randomized clinical trial recruited children aged 11 to

233 t-quality evidence from rigorously conducted randomized clinical trials remains scant.

234 English-language randomized clinical trials reporting health outcomes.

235 nopathy Clinical Research Network Protocol S randomized clinical trial results suggest that ranibizum

236 A randomized clinical trial seems warranted.

237 In this substudy of a randomized clinical trial, study eyes of subjects assign

238 An additional 11 randomized clinical trials submitted from January 1, 201

239 Bottom Line: The evidence from randomized clinical trials suggests that lymphadenectomy

240 nducted an updated systematic review seeking randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, and meta

241 This randomized clinical trial tested the effects of naltrexo

242 However, there is still a need for randomized clinical trials testing oral care interventio

243 xploratory analysis of the multicenter FinXX randomized clinical trial that accrued 1500 women in Fin

244 lticenter, double-masked, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial that enrolled 240 patients wit

245 n With Vesicoureteral Reflux Study, a 2-year randomized clinical trial that enrolled participants fro

246 Symptom Control Trial SC.23, a double-blind randomized clinical trial that investigated dexamethason

247 cted in the ARISTOTLE trial, a multinational randomized clinical trial that observed 18201 patients (

248 We demonstrated in a randomized clinical trial that vitamin C supplementation

249 Randomized clinical trials that compared any rTMS interv

250 lved conventions for choosing sample size in randomized clinical trials that rest on the theory of hy

251 rting of blinding was assessed from surgical randomized clinical trials that were published in leadin

252 A multicenter phase 2 randomized clinical trial, the Arginine Deiminase and Me

253 We conducted an open-label randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of sin

254 ancer Trials Group study HN.6 is the largest randomized clinical trial to date comparing the concurre

255 ntake of Energy Phase 2) study was the first randomized clinical trial to examine the metabolic and p

256 age and type of statin to use when designing randomized clinical trials to assess the association bet

257 dated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials to assess the efficacy of psy

258 gs are currently being investigated in large randomized clinical trials to assess their therapeutic p

259 tional meta-analysis and create a network of randomized clinical trials to compare outcomes after spe

260 Properly powered randomized clinical trials to confirm these results are

261 this area are conflicting, and there are no randomized clinical trials to guide practitioner decisio

262 ow how Bayesian analysis takes evidence from randomized clinical trials to update what is already kno

263 s a need for high-quality evidence including randomized clinical trials to validate the implementatio

264 prospective, mixed-design, human laboratory randomized clinical trial took place between December 20

265 Forty-nine participants from a prior randomized clinical trial underwent a neurocognitive ass

266 THOD: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, unmedicated adults with depre

267 This secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial used archived DNA samples and

268 prospective, multicenter, evaluator-blinded, randomized clinical trial was conducted among adult outp

269 12-week, multicenter, outpatient, open-label randomized clinical trial was conducted at 5 urban addic

270 A randomized clinical trial was conducted between April 20

271 A randomized clinical trial was conducted during the winte

272 A randomized clinical trial was conducted from February 1

273 This 2-arm, blinded, randomized clinical trial was conducted from June 2014 t

274 A double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted from October 1,

275 This randomized clinical trial was conducted from October 1,

276 A randomized clinical trial was conducted from September 2

277 e-blind and placebo (or low-dose)-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted in 22 US acute c

278 A randomized clinical trial was conducted in a residential

279 A randomized clinical trial was conducted in adults aged 3

280 This randomized clinical trial was performed from February 15

281 This single-center, masked, sham-controlled randomized clinical trial was performed from March 25, 2

282 This intraindividual, randomized clinical trial was performed from November 28

283 The aim of the randomized clinical trial was to compare the 2 years of

284 EURAPRO, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, was conducted from March 1, 2

285 ticenter, double-masked, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, was conducted in India and Ne

286 In this registry-based randomized clinical trial, we used nationwide Swedish re

287 ous reviews and meta-analyses and reports of randomized clinical trials were also checked.

288 Of 5509 studies, 39 randomized clinical trials were included in the meta-ana

289 A total of 4 randomized clinical trials were pooled; 4394 patients we

290 In this post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial which tested the effect of den

291 Randomized clinical trial with 2 x 2 factorial design.

292 Design, Setting, and Participants: Cluster randomized clinical trial with 6 months' follow-up condu

293 An open-label, randomized clinical trial with a 5-month follow-up in ou

294 This noninferiority randomized clinical trial with a follow-up of 1 year aft

295 rocardiography) Trial was a 6-year multisite randomized clinical trial with crossover that took place

296 different breast cancer subtypes in a large, randomized clinical trial with long-term follow-up.

297 This 2-center randomized clinical trial with masked outcome assessment

298 Future multicenter, randomized clinical trials with blinded independent inve

299 PREVAIL and PROTECT AF are prospective randomized clinical trials with patients randomized 2:1

300 The study design was a randomized clinical trial, with 2 parallel arms.