ライフサイエンスコーパス: randomized controlled clinical trial

1 rolled in a large-scale, multiinstitutional, randomized controlled clinical trial.

2 sponses to a booster aP vaccine dose in this randomized controlled clinical trial.

3 The DCCT was a large multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial.

4 advanced-stage CHL in a multicenter phase 3 randomized controlled clinical trial.

5 Prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.

6 its management has never been subjected to a randomized controlled clinical trial.

7 This was a single-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial.

8 advances that have come from the results of randomized controlled clinical trials.

9 linical practice will require the conduct of randomized controlled clinical trials.

10 need to be compared to parathyroidectomy in randomized controlled clinical trials.

11 abilitation should be investigated in future randomized controlled clinical trials.

12 mples from 38 Dutch volunteers enrolled in 2 randomized controlled clinical trials.

13 Eighteen-month, multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial.

14 pate in this single-masked, parallel design, randomized, controlled clinical trial.

15 ls and should be evaluated for efficacy in a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

16 Design: Randomized, controlled clinical trial.

17 gingival recessions (REC), in a prospective randomized, controlled clinical trial.

18 ished literature remains the general lack of randomized, controlled clinical trials.

19 h a level of rigor analogous to multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trials.

20 iated OAS to apple were included in an open, randomized, controlled clinical trial: 27 patients consu

21 In a double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial, 44 mothers with ac

22 There are few randomized, controlled clinical trials about the effect

23 Few prospective, randomized controlled clinical trials address the diagno

24 es in four northeastern states, as part of a randomized controlled clinical trial aimed at stress red

25 mega-3 supplementation should be tested in a randomized controlled clinical trial and that the analys

26 Evidence from randomized, controlled clinical trials and observational

27 Randomized controlled clinical trials are needed to conf

28 ients with acute liver failure, multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trials are needed to con

29 However, long-term, multicentered, randomized, controlled clinical trials are required to k

30 re now available which require evaluation in randomized controlled clinical trials as adjunct therapi

31 All English-language articles of large, randomized controlled clinical trials assessing the mort

32 A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial at 5 centers was co

33 n a cohort of patients who participated in 2 randomized controlled clinical trials at the National In

34 The PLCO Trial is a 23-year randomized controlled clinical trial begun in 1992.

35 A randomized controlled clinical trial compared intermitte

36 This prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial compared changes i

37 We performed a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial comparing NPWT to s

38 Randomized controlled clinical trials comparing a strate

39 Randomized controlled clinical trials comparing DES and

40 Fifty-five randomized controlled clinical trials comparing regenera

41 methodologic article, the extended data of a randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing two epoe

42 Twenty-five randomized, controlled clinical trials comparing cytotox

43 Included studies were randomized, controlled clinical trials comparing interfe

44 We analyzed data from a randomized, controlled clinical trial conducted in 17 De

45 prospective cost-effectiveness study with a randomized controlled clinical trial design that has bee

46 n Study in Children (DISC) is a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial designed to examin

47 However, a metaanalysis of three randomized, controlled clinical trials did not reveal a

48 prospective, participant- and surgeon-masked randomized controlled clinical trial (EudraCT No.

49 This randomized controlled clinical trial evaluated the effec

50 inical use of psychodynamic psychotherapies, randomized controlled clinical trials evaluating such ps

51 We are not aware of any randomized controlled clinical trials evaluating the eff

52 There is a major lack of randomized controlled clinical trials evaluating the eff

53 Methods A systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials evaluating weight

54 a 36-month extension study of a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial evaluating the eff

55 No randomized controlled clinical trials exist to definitiv

56 A large randomized controlled clinical trial failed to show effi

57 However, randomized, controlled, clinical trials failed to demons

58 vels of evidence, from case reports to large randomized controlled clinical trials, for the possible

59 ta from two large multicenter, multicountry, randomized controlled clinical trials have demonstrated

60 To date, randomized, controlled clinical trials have not reproduc

61 Reports were of randomized controlled clinical trials if available, case

62 The first randomized controlled clinical trial in refractory adult

63 Multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial in which 37 nursing

64 The study was a double-masked, randomized, controlled clinical trial in 103 term infant

65 A parallel-group, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial in 150 adults afte

66 Results of the first randomized, controlled clinical trials in this populatio

67 tify all English-language reports of unique, randomized controlled clinical trials involving recently

68 diagnosed type 2 diabetes in a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial involving 4360 pat

69 is likely extends beyond the skin and that a randomized controlled clinical trial is needed to confir

70 A randomized controlled clinical trial is the best way to

71 The randomized controlled clinical trial is the gold standar

72 Further evaluation in a randomized controlled clinical trial is warranted to tes

73 s, but robust evidence from population-level randomized controlled clinical trials is lacking.

74 The aim of this randomized, controlled clinical trial is to determine wh

75 Population-based randomized controlled clinical trial of first graders fr

76 A randomized controlled clinical trial of LCP supplementat

77 with at least intermediate AMD enrolled in a randomized controlled clinical trial of lutein/zeaxanthi

78 ons using high-quality phenotype data from a randomized controlled clinical trial of nAMD.

79 thors' knowledge, this is the first efficacy randomized controlled clinical trial of panic-focused ps

80 In this randomized controlled clinical trial of patients with ac

81 This was a randomized controlled clinical trial of subjects with pr

82 We conducted a meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled clinical trials of ACE inhibitors

83 Several relatively small randomized controlled clinical trials of anticoagulation

84 Randomized controlled clinical trials of BT in severe as

85 rued rapidly from several sources, including randomized controlled clinical trials of DES versus BMS

86 Three randomized controlled clinical trials of fasting in huma

87 nical endpoint that should be used in future randomized controlled clinical trials of novel therapies

88 Of the 4 beta-blockers tested in large randomized controlled clinical trials of patients with h

89 We conducted a randomized, controlled clinical trial of a peer mentorin

90 Our results justify a randomized, controlled clinical trial of anti-TNF therap

91 participated as neonates in a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial of caffeine versus

92 We conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial of diabetic patien

93 We conducted a large, randomized, controlled clinical trial of these treatment

94 29 randomized, controlled clinical trials of CAM therapies

95 Randomized controlled clinical trials offer the best evi

96 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized controlled clinical trial performed at an urb

97 In this randomized, controlled clinical trial, physicians receiv

98 ke risks with blood pressure (BP) levels and randomized controlled clinical trials providing evidence

99 This randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) called for 12

100 Based on large randomized controlled clinical trials (RCT), ACE inhibit

101 ses were systematically reviewed to identify randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) in chronic

102 an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) to evaluate

103 Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs), prospectiv

104 omized into pilot (phase I and phase II) and randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs).

105 The highest level of evidence comes from randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs).

106 Randomized controlled clinical trials remain the best me

107 riodontics includes a review of split-mouth, randomized, controlled clinical trial results that speci

108 Results of recent randomized controlled clinical trials suggest that most

109 There is a large body of evidence from randomized controlled clinical trials supporting the car

110 ON) trial was a prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial testing the hypothe

111 The ICTUS trial was a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial that included 1,200

112 addition, there is substantial evidence from randomized controlled clinical trials that a mean reduct

113 sh language, prospective, retrospective, and randomized controlled clinical trials that evaluated imp

114 Randomized controlled clinical trials that evaluated the

115 sing sensitive search strategies to identify randomized controlled clinical trials that evaluated the

116 elded limited and inconsistent evidence from randomized controlled clinical trials that greater PAC i

117 esophagitis pooled data from 5 prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trials that assessed the

118 Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trials that reported iso

119 in a large-scale, prospective, blinded, and randomized controlled clinical trial the safety and effe

120 currently being evaluated prospectively in a randomized controlled clinical trial, the AREDS2.

121 In this randomized, controlled clinical trial, the questionnaire

122 METHODS AND We performed a randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate the eff

123 isease study (AREDS) is the only large-scale randomized controlled clinical trial to show a 25% benef

124 The challenge will be to design prospective randomized controlled clinical trials to provide the evi

125 We performed an open, prospectively randomized, controlled clinical trial to determine wheth

126 A 6-center, randomized controlled clinical trial was carried out in

127 A single-blind randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in so

128 corn-soy blend.A prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in wh

129 A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted to co

130 Background: The aim of the present randomized controlled clinical trial was to assess the b

131 The objective of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to assess the e

132 A randomized, controlled clinical trial was performed with

133 The primary aim of this randomized, controlled clinical trial was to determine t

134 The purpose of this single-masked, randomized, controlled clinical trial was to evaluate th

135 In the current prospective randomized controlled clinical trial, we examined the ef

136 In a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial, we compared the e

137 Two independent prospective randomized controlled clinical trials were performed for

138 The aims of the present multi-center, randomized, controlled clinical trial were: 1) to compar

139 However, long-term, multicenter randomized, controlled clinical trials will be required

140 ter a decade of preliminary studies, ongoing randomized, controlled clinical trials will potentially

141 Randomized controlled clinical trial with 4-week follow-

142 Other long-term randomized controlled clinical trials with a large sampl

143 We conducted a 24-week randomized, controlled clinical trial with 166 patients

144 is is being tested in multiple double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trials with durations of