戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (right1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                     In AUGUSTUS (Open-Label, 2x2 Factorial, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety
2                                             The trial was a randomized, controlled, crossover, intervention study.
3 CE4U was a six-month, multicenter, multinational, parallel, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial in 108 participa
4                                                     In this randomized, controlled pilot trial, a post-debridement system
5                                                             Randomized controlled studies were utilized when available; h
6                                                        This randomized controlled study shows that a 45 W radiofrequency
7                                           In an open-label, randomized controlled trial (RCT), consecutive patients with
8                                 We identified 17 studies (6 randomized controlled trial [RCT], 5 cohorts, and 6 case-cont
9 n longer-term AVF patency, we performed an observer-blinded randomized controlled trial at three university hospitals in
10                                                           A randomized controlled trial comparing mBCG and RC will be cha
11                           These are secondary analyses of a randomized controlled trial in rural Malawi.
12                                               Ultimately, a randomized controlled trial is needed, examining effects of c
13 ated cryptococcal meningitis using clinical isolates from a randomized controlled trial of antifungal treatment (amphoter
14  registration number NCT03702582Rationale and Design of the Randomized Controlled Trial of New Oral Anticoagulants vs. Wa
15                    In the DIRECT PLUS (Dietary Intervention Randomized Controlled Trial Polyphenols-Unprocessed) weight-l
16                         A recent multicenter, international randomized controlled trial showed that DOF following a MIE i
17                Findings from this exploratory analysis of a randomized controlled trial support further investigation of
18 zed with COVID-19 should be prospectively investigated in a randomized controlled trial to ascertain the extent of risk r
19                                                        This randomized controlled trial was primarily aimed at testing th
20                                        Largely based on one randomized controlled trial, standard dose of epinephrine imp
21 ardiovascular events and self-rated health in a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
22  Graft Angioplasty; NCT01121224) prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.
23  was an open-label, two-arm, non-inferiority, multi-center, randomized controlled trial.
24 ng in Genomic Medicine and Public Health (NSIGHT2) study, a randomized, controlled trial of rapid diagnostic genomic sequ
25                                              We performed a randomized, controlled trial to investigate the effects of a
26                     This was an open-label, parallel-group, randomized, controlled trial.
27 py for Heart Failure) trial was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial; subjects were randomized 1:1 to
28                                 The aim of this prospective randomized-controlled trial was to evaluate the risks/benefit
29           PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses of RCTs
30           PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews of
31                                We systematically identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the safety
32 ivered was much lower than dictated by the protocol in many randomized controlled trials and negative results may reflect
33                                                             Randomized controlled trials and prospective observational st
34                                                             Randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the appr
35                       Our findings indicate the impact that randomized controlled trials can have on real-world practice
36 ucted a post hoc analysis on 1,047 patients with PDD from 2 randomized controlled trials comparing rivastigmine versus pl
37 se in premature infants remains lacking; adequately powered randomized controlled trials evaluating probiotic supplementa
38                                                             Randomized controlled trials examining the impact of self-mea
39  are unable to prove biologic plausibility and causality as randomized controlled trials have not been performed.
40                                                             Randomized controlled trials including the use of either agen
41  Multicenter observational study using data from four large randomized controlled trials investigating different preventi
42 are at increased risk of acute respiratory infection (ARI), randomized controlled trials of vitamin D supplementation hav
43                                                      All 29 randomized controlled trials that were included had no report
44 part from probiotics that have already been tested in human randomized controlled trials, most of these potential therape
45 tial approval for 53 (93%) of the vaccines was supported by randomized controlled trials, with a median cohort size of 41
46                     Two-thirds of the included studies were randomized controlled trials.
47 h type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
48                                                             Randomized, controlled trials evaluating the clinical efficac
49 ium signaling upon injury might explain results from large, randomized, controlled trials in which improved renal outcome
50                                                             Randomized, controlled trials of hydroxychloroquine in patien