ライフサイエンスコーパス: rank

1 s a subordinate based on their difference in rank).

2 group I and control group II (P = 0.184, Log Rank).

3 ed by >/=2 ranks, and 4 (14%) changed by >10 ranks.

4 ily on memorizing near-meaningless taxonomic ranks.

5 n on patients across all social and economic ranks.

6 survival data into a linear space of hazard ranks.

7 licy with capital requirements based on this ranking.

8 sgRNA enrichment/depletion analysis and gene ranking.

9 IQR, 25.5%-31.4%; P = .60) or prognosis (log-rank 0.8; P = .38).

10 In the global context, Brazil ranks 11th in apple production and thousands of tons of

11 sted ranks, 24 of 28 (86%) hospitals changed ranks, 16 (57%) changed by >/=2 ranks, and 4 (14%) chang

12 ut in 2014-2015 China, India and South Korea ranked 1st, 3rd and 4th respectively among the productiv

13 ankings by crude proportion to risk-adjusted ranks, 24 of 28 (86%) hospitals changed ranks, 16 (57%)

14 t Congo (Brazzaville) ranked 38th and Guinea ranked 25th, thus receiving little investment.

15 he United States lag behind other countries, ranking 35th in mathematics and 27th in science achievem

16 h malaria mortality, yet Congo (Brazzaville) ranked 38th and Guinea ranked 25th, thus receiving littl

17 Fos, partly via C/EBPalpha regulation by the RANK (535)IVVY(538) motif.

18 n eculizumab and placebo (least-squares mean rank 56.6 [SEM 4.5] vs 68.3 [4.5]; rank-based treatment

19 diac mortality (AHI of </>/=15 events/h; log-rank: 6.6, 8.7, and 5.3, respectively; all p < 0.05; cen

20 all survival (89% +/- 3% vs 90% +/- 4%; Plog-rank = .64), event-free survival (EFS; 87% +/- 3% vs 89%

21 in PPARG were significantly overrepresented (ranked 7-11 and 67 of 556,000 SNPs; P < 2.2 x 10(-7)), a

22 urvival (EFS; 87% +/- 3% vs 89% +/- 4%; Plog-rank = .71), and cumulative incidence of relapse/nonresp

23 l apnea index [CAI] of </>/=10 events/h; log-rank 8.9, 11.2, and 10.9, respectively; all p < 0.001).

24 Through its different modules, users can (i) rank a list of variants (ii) perform genotype filtering

25 taxonomy to a given OTU) across datasets and ranks; a small number of OTUs were assigned unique class

26 provided the most effective weighted average ranking ability of 3 for the MoNA matched spectra in spi

27 The motifs were ranked according to a one-dimensional Bayesian classifie

28 Composite end point components were ranked according to importance (minor, moderate, major,

29 FoodEX2 and ODIN classification systems and ranked according to quality criteria.

30 (N2 O emissions divided by crop yields) were ranked accurately by three-model ensembles across crop s

31 Malawi, Tanzania, and Uganda remained highly ranked after adjusting for national gross domestic produ

32 sity of the system and whose energies can be ranked against combinations of currently known materials

33 ive evaluation of these two parameters and a ranked aggregation strategy on network performance, usin

34 ith the greatest summed intensity using this ranking algorithm were comparable to other lipid identif

35 measures for segmentation and tracking that rank all participating methods.

36 Mississippi River floods rank among the costliest climate-related disasters in th

37 the blood fluke that causes schistosomiasis, ranked among the most prevalent parasitic diseases world

38 This impressive result ranks among the best from known Co-based OER catalysts u

39 elevation McMurdo Dry Valleys of Antarctica ranks among the driest and coldest on Earth.

40 ilutra is larger than all living otters, and ranks among the largest fossil otters.

41 ificance differences in (18)F-FDG SUVmax Log-rank analysis showed statistically significant differenc

42 We present Gene-Ranking Analysis of Pathway Expression (GRAPE) as a nove

43 The use of a worst-rank analytical approach proved to be an important limit

44 nd a stronger relationship between dominance rank and reproductive success than chimpanzees.

45 Desirability of outcome ranking and response adjusted for duration of antibiotic

46 The ranking and screening of MOS sensors, specific for volat

47 chi(2), Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon signed rank, and McNemar tests, as well as receiver-operating-c

48 a exhibited low levels of Cathepsin K, TRAP, RANK, and tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated fact

49 tals changed ranks, 16 (57%) changed by >/=2 ranks, and 4 (14%) changed by >10 ranks.

50 tly elevated and Vgamma9/Vdelta2 transcripts ranked as the most upregulated in vaccinees who were pro

51 ducing community transmission were generally ranked as the two best options.

52 The noctuid moth Spodoptera frugiperda ranks as one of the world's worst agricultural pests.

53 rated hierarchically on the basis of average rank assigned.

54 of the size of smallest exogenous shocks we rank banks in terms of their systemic importance, and we

55 his highlights the limitations of the purely rank-based AUROC criterion.

56 ares mean rank 56.6 [SEM 4.5] vs 68.3 [4.5]; rank-based treatment difference -11.7, 95% CI -24.3 to 0

57 udy, we developed GuanRank, a non-parametric ranking-based technique to transform patients' survival

58 on 87 biomarkers and 240 clinical variables, ranking biomarkers associated with New York Heart Associ

59 edian, >/=4; interquartile range, </=1) were ranked by importance in the third round.

60 businesses and municipal locations were then ranked by spatiotemporal OHCA coverage.

61 Hospitals were ranked by SSI proportion and risk-adjusted standardized

62 ovel algorithm named SCP, which combines the ranking by a modified PageRank algorithm based on subcel

63 measures irrespective of the distributional ranking by age and sex.

64 bcellular compartments information, with the ranking by Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) calcula

65 logical scores (r=0.095; p=0.525, Spearman's rank coefficient).

66 work to demonstrate how multiple partial age ranks coming from multiple camps of hunter-gatherers can

67 Among the top ranked compounds predicted to be therapeutic for IF/TA w

68 The flavonoid apigenin was among 9 top-ranked compounds predicted to have anti-fibrotic activit

69 nown structure have more than 50% of the top-ranked contacts predicted correctly.

70 etween uveitis activity and sIL-2R (Spearman rank correlation coefficient [rho], 0.070, P = .27) nor

71 Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to assess the rela

72 ase severity between the 2 cohorts (Spearman rank correlation rho = 0.94), indicating near-perfect ag

73 Spearman rank correlation was applied to link the statistically m

74 n or within groups, and Pearson and Spearman rank correlation was used to compare fibrosis measured i

75 7-0.95], p<0.0001, Spearman's coefficient of rank correlation).

76 t scale scores and analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation.

77 on pathology was assessed with the Spearman rank correlation.

78 nstantly receive search results as a list of ranked datasets deemed to be the most relevant.

79 Considering only top-ranked de novo predictions, 70% of the pairs were deciph

80 This problem is due to "local rank deficiency", which is introduced in this contributi

81 In vitro, the activation of RANK-dependent signals is enhanced in DJ-1-deficient BMM

82 PELDOR experiments correctly rank DNA force fields and resolve subtle differences in

83 The top-ranked docked model predicted that a region in the nucle

84 Although top-ranked docked molecules with and without the GIST term o

85 a 5' thymidine is present in most of the top ranking elements.

86 Our approach to identify taxonomic ranks enables taxonomists to revise and propose classifi

87 cell proliferation in vitro correlated with RANK expression and was impaired by Denosumab-mediated d

88 e tumor xenografts reduced proliferation and RANK expression while maintaining EGFR expression.

89 ian semiparametric model, which combines low-rank factorizations and flexible Gaussian process priors

90 Starbucks ranked first in downtown, covering 110 OHCAs.

91 In summary we present a resource for top ranked five stable HKGs and their transcriptional behavi

92 f 1.1, 2.6, and 8.6 years, respectively (log-rank for trend, P < .001).

93 kinetic transport assays on four of the top-ranking genes (EXOC2, EXOC7, PARD6B, and LEPROT) reveale

94 developed OncoScore, a text-mining tool that ranks genes according to their association with cancer,

95 The highest ranked Gram-positive bacteria (high priority) were vanco

96 Overall, the in situ affinity ranking greatly depends on the on-rate instead of the of

97 e identification of biomarkers called RGIFE: Rank Guided Iterative Feature Elimination.

98 Human homologs of top-ranked hits protected against alphaSyn-induced cell deat

99 ity and positive likelihood ratio of class I ranking HRCT criteria to diagnose active pulmonary TB we

100 Variant Ranker allows researchers to rank identified variants and determine the most confiden

101 These data uncover a direct role for RANK in lung cancer and may explain why female sex hormo

102 l stress, such as being in proximity to high-ranking individuals, or non-friends.

103 re significant differences (P=0.001) in high-ranking interventions related to location (appointment n

104 nt) and reminder for visit compared with low-ranking interventions related to time (weekend appointme

105 al animals, subordinate status or low social rank is associated with increased caloric intake and wei

106 Specificity of small ions, the Hofmeister ranking, is long-known and has many applications includi

107 h- and ultrahigh resolution data, while also ranking lipid classes by their propensity to cause ambig

108 Another unique feature of LipidMatch is ranking lipid identifications for a given feature by the

109 We evaluate the concordance of two ranked lists of transcription factors using a statistica

110 tational approaches, we develop improved low-rank matrix recovery (ILRMR) for miRNA-disease associati

111 erposition between a sparse matrix and a low-rank matrix, which account for the differentially and no

112 earch and clinical trials; further, survival ranking may offer additional advantages in clinical tria

113 thermore, medical students attending the top-ranked medical schools are less altruistic than those at

114 stantively alter the association for the top-ranked metabolites.Sodium intake is associated with chan

115 rmalization show that our proposed CNN-based ranking method outperforms traditional rule-based method

116 esults indicate that, regardless of the seed ranking method used, sequential seeding strategies deliv

117 s a classifier, the cognate pair was the top-ranked model in 80% (14/17) of the antigen targets using

118 Ambient PM2.5 was the fifth-ranking mortality risk factor in 2015.

119 ting defect was within the top 3% of defects ranked most harmful.

120 om network's internal structural similarity, ranking networks on a continuous scale from crystalline,

121 ), motor impairment (defined as a percentile rank of </=5 on the Movement Assessment Battery for Chil

122 we find no correlation between the distance rank of a neighbor and its likelihood to be influential.

123 Importantly, median predicted rank of catalytic residues is the lowest (best) for CSme

124 urden (increase [95% confidence interval] in rank of plaque volume for each 10-year increase in cumul

125 including the elevation of Artiopoda to the rank of subphylum, and the establishment of a new superc

126 rs even after controlling for the gender and rank of the available speakers.

127 e concept of metagene entropy and allows the ranking of cells based on their differentiation potentia

128 vivo dosimetry in the hazard assessment and ranking of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs).

129 In Patagonia, the ranking of natural variability of drivers is as follows:

130 The ranking of responses to drivers with comparable manipula

131 in MEK1, a MAPK kinase, and provide a robust ranking of these mutations.

132 ssifications on an objective basis, changing ranks of clades only when inconsistent with most taxa in

133 Omicseq is trackRank, a novel algorithm for ranking omics datasets that fully uses the numerical con

134 of NF-kappaB ligand (RANKL) to its receptor RANK on osteoclast (OC) precursors up-regulates c-Fos an

135 edicted that the influence of male dominance rank on reproductive success and the extent of male repr

136 ferent numbers of source nodes, an influence ranking on genes was produced.

137 n ASEs were instrumental to our second place ranking on Template Based Modeling (TBM) and Free Modeli

138 stic cell fusion and activation by the RANKL/RANK/OPG and ATP-P2RX7-IL1 pathways; and (3) regulatory

139 g positional interdependencies and utilizing ranked or weighted sequences increasingly available from

140 The rank order and the transition time distribution of multi

141 The rank order for estrogenicity was BPAF > BPA = BPF > BPS.

142 The rank order for toxicity was BPAF > BPA > BPF > BPS.

143 The rank order of biochemical and transcriptomic responses w

144 ion-dependent increases in fluorescence with rank order of potencies among GABAAR isoforms consistent

145 For 32 g oil, the interindividual rank order of the chylomicron AUCs was consistent across

146 ors with a higher metabolic rate displayed a rank order of uptake similar to that of the parental tum

147 nt as they can provide selection criteria to rank order vaccine candidates.

148 terol, accepted 3HPC as a substrate with the rank order: WT > D303A approximately D303N >> D303R, D30

149 ions of ages for each individual, based on a ranking order of individuals from youngest to oldest and

150 ), but SNP88 was independent of TC (Spearman rank-order correlation, 0.012; P = .7), and when combine

151 note several concerns: the uses of g and G, rank-ordering species on cognitive ability, and the mean

152 o those with LGE and high lateral MAPSE (log-rank P < .0001).

153 imary radiation subgroups were examined (log-rank P < .001 for all).

154 urvival outcomes when analyzed globally (log-rank P < .001 for all).

155 s 83% vs 93% for the rest of the cohort (log rank P < .001).

156 hs v 21 months, respectively; stratified log-rank P < .01; hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.78).

157 (arrhythmia free-survival: 85% vs. 59%; log-rank p < 0.001).

158 greater mortality than those with a PVA (log rank P <0.0001).

159 .2% for 29 patients with Ki-67 LI < 15% (log-rank P = .002), and the rate of relapse increased by 24%

160 late (group C: 22.4 months) reoperation (log-rank P = .03).

161 rate, 10 of 55 [18.2%] vs 0 of 21 [0%]; log-rank P = .04).

162 stages I and IVA were compared, however (log-rank P = .17).

163 procedural AR </= mild (46.1% vs. 21.8%; log-rank p = 0.001).

164 ses at follow-up in univariate analysis (Log-rank P = 0.0084) but not in multivariate analysis.

165 ival in the combination of both cohorts (log rank p = 3.90 x 10(-4) and p = 3.75 x 10(-5), respective

166 lower in FM than NFM (64.5% versus 100%, log-rank P<0.0001).

167 azard ratio [HR] 2.14, 95% CI 1.67-2.74; log rank p<0.0001).

168 for less than 1 month or never treated (log-rank p<0.0001).

169 , but higher than G- HCM (22% versus 6%; log-rank P<0.001) and FG+ relatives with HCM (22% versus 4%;

170 patency (89.0% versus 65.0% at 365 days; log-rank P<0.001) and for rates of clinically driven target

171 3 years compared with 56% for the HM II (log-rank P<0.003).

172 ause and cardiovascular mortality risks (log rank P=0.004 and P=0.003, respectively).

173 iac transplantation, and cardiac arrest (log-rank P=0.008).

174 13-0.856) by time-to-infection analysis (log-rank p=0.01), and 0.712 (0.528-0.918) by proportional an

175 patients had the worst overall survival (log-rank P=0.04) after STEMI during a median follow-up of 5.

176 M was similar to G+ HCM (22% versus 14%; log-rank P=0.14), but higher than G- HCM (22% versus 6%; log

177 zard ratio [HR] 0.95 [95% CI 0.80-1.12]; log-rank p=0.53).

178 .5% CI 0.656-2.292; one-sided stratified log-rank p=0.77); at 24 months, the estimated probability of

179 on 3, 2, 1, and 0 metrics, respectively (log-rank, P < 0.001).

180 nificant difference between both groups (log rank, p 0.036).

181 re be used as an unbiased way to measure and rank participant's phenotypic contribution towards the P

182 The RANKL/RANK pathway is critical for both osteoclast formation a

183 can promote lung cancer progression via the RANK pathway.

184 utative catalytic residues at lower (better) ranked positions, which can facilitate and expedite thei

185 e cancer cell lines, we validate the highest ranking prediction (TNRC6B) as a ceRNA of PTEN.

186 eighborhoods yield higher precision for high-ranking predictions than RBM when no information regardi

187 onformation can often be found among the top-ranking predictions.

188 competence like others and, hence, that high-ranking primates have protoprestige.

189 The Rank Product (RP) is a statistical technique widely used

190 lyses suggest that CSmetaPred_poc is able to rank putative catalytic residues at lower (better) ranke

191 We conclude that the OPG-RANK-RANKL system and the OPN system play important role

192 bone inflammation-the osteoprotegerin (OPG)-RANK-RANKL system or osteopontin (OPN)-play a role in th

193 The OPG-RANK-RANKL system plays the principal role in determinin

194 evaluation was combined with the analysis of RANK/RANKL loop activation in the leukemic clone, given

195 ired by Denosumab-mediated disruption of the RANK/RANKL loop.

196 Rank-rating evaluations further showed the significant e

197 Reduced rank regression has previously been used to identify a d

198 likely to be used if provided were similarly ranked: reminder message (48%), appointment near home (4

199 Finally class III ranking results were 45%, 90%, 11.5, respectively.

200 Mechanistically, RANK rewires energy homeostasis in human and murine lung

201 e less altruistic than those attending lower-ranked schools.

202 The primary endpoint was a composite global rank score (hierarchy of death, cardiovascular hospitali

203 In this paper, we develop a Quantile Rank-score based test (QRank), which provides an easy wa

204 tic acid were associated with worse clinical rank scores in both treatment groups (beta, -96.60, P =

205 Overall, IntPred ranks second of six methods tested with SPPIDER having s

206 egative matrix factorization based method to rank, so as to predict, the disease miRNA candidates.

207 this paper proposes a novel Regularized Low Rank-Sparse Decomposition (RegLRSD) algorithm.

208 re sensitive to abundance changes than other ranking statistics.

209 Using various ranking strategies including a range of parameters, we f

210 o reviewers independently extracted data and ranked study quality; 2 rated overall strength of eviden

211 gimens with the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities.

212 The Wilcoxon rank sum or signed rank test was used for statistical co

213 e linear regression analyses, Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test, and post hoc Dunn test with Holm correcti

214 ic rating scale in the past 3 days (Wilcoxon rank sum test, P = 0.0175), 5-D itch scale (P = 0.0146),

215 erformed with Wilcoxon signed rank tests and rank sum tests, as well as Pearson correlation analysis.

216 s determined by using Mann-Whitney (Wilcoxon rank sum) test.

217 ) in the liberal group (P < 0.0001, Wilcoxon rank sum).

218 Wilcoxon rank-sum analysis indicates that Mn contamination consis

219 Wilcoxon rank-sum and Fisher exact tests were performed.

220 are proportions, Student t test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used to compare means, and the log-ra

221 regions were compared by using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

222 FR-negative) was assessed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

223 r than that among women without MS (Wilcoxon rank-sum test; P = 0.002).

224 Fisher's exact and non-parametric Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to identify significant differe

225 stical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, the Fisher exact test, and Kaplan-Meier

226 e-matched control subjects by using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.

227 nn-Whitney U test which is based on weighted rank sums computed from correlated observations.

228 lity and lesion conspicuity was consistently ranked superior with SAFIRE-3 when compared with FBP (P

229 Conclusion A simple ranking system based on interinstitutional variation in

230 , qualitatively by using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and quantitatively by using the Friedman two-w

231 The Wilcoxon Signed Rank test for paired samples was used to analyze the dat

232 n for binary outcomes and the stratified log-rank test for time-dependent outcomes.

233 d third tertiles of PCSK9, respectively (log-rank test p = 0.009).

234 -week, and placebo groups, respectively (log-rank test P=0.10).

235 The log-rank test showed P = .014 (comparator group vs endoresec

236 The Wilcoxon rank sum or signed rank test was used for statistical comparisons between o

237 The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to assess for differences among treat

238 test were used to compare means, and the log-rank test was used to compare time-to-outcome events.

239 Log-rank test was used to compare time-to-parasitemia betwee

240 McNemar's test and signed-rank test were used to compare groups.

241 n-free survival by stratified univariate log-rank test with Kaplan-Meier curves and by multivariate C

242 L-20 BALF levels (P < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test) and a significant rise of CCL-20 (P < 0.0001,

243 d 86+/-1.2%, respectively; P=0.42 by the log-rank test) at a median follow-up of 43 months.

244 rise of CCL-20 (P < 0.0001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test) but not of CCL-18 in the blood.

245 P < 0.001 by related-samples Wilcoxon signed-rank test) suggestive of less coherent underlying fibre

246 nd VAS-work (Rho=0.83, P<0.00001, Spearman's rank test).

247 erity of acute kidney injury (P<0.001 by log-rank test).

248 evascularization occurrence (P=0.017 for log-rank test).

249 lower in the total PPV group (P = 0.018, log-rank test).

250 10.78 vs. 12.86, P < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test).

251 the lower tertiles of ScvO2 (P = 0.005, log-rank test).

252 difference, 8.7-25.2 cm(3); Wilcoxon signed rank test, P < .001).

253 red with the ViV group (28.7% vs. 12.6%; log-rank test, p = 0.01).

254 The Wilcoxon signed rank test, paired t test, and Friedman analysis of varia

255 was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.

256 en stage groups were evaluated using the log-rank test.

257 er method and were compared by using the log-rank test.

258 ed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test.

259 red treatment groups with the stratified log-rank test.

260 the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test.

261 ar regression analysis and survival with log-rank testing.

262 ng the Kaplan-Meier method compared with log-rank tests and modeled by using proportional hazards reg

263 analysis was performed with Wilcoxon signed rank tests and rank sum tests, as well as Pearson correl

264 Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests revealed that high levels of WIF1 methylation

265 tistical analyses using nonparametric signed rank tests were performed in all cohorts examining the a

266 Log rank tests were used to compare adjacent classes and to

267 se events were assessed with Cox models, log-rank tests, and mediation (path) analyses.

268 angle surgery cohorts using Wilcoxon signed rank tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and Fisher exact tests

269 ompared using Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank tests, multivariable Cox regression, and propensity

270 he deterioration of renal function (both log-rank tests, P <0.0001).

271 using the Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, with a P value of less than .05 considered i

272 were used to calculate P values for the log-rank tests.Twenty patients received the taurolidine-citr

273 the binding of a protein to ligands and can rank the affinities of a library of ligands.

274 This systematic review aimed to examine and rank the effectiveness of these therapies on POCs in adu

275 in the ligand binding sites, allowing us to rank the energetic contributions of these individual int

276 under different combinations of parents and rank the estimated models by their posterior probabiliti

277 and produce a variant-to-gene score used to rank the relative confidence among potential effector ge

278 diagnostic criteria based on the results to rank the risk of PTB.

279 We then ranked the comparative effects of all regimens with the

280 We ranked the described methods for indicators to derive hi

281 A screening process ranked the effect of perturbations in 223 inputs, isolat

282 his framework, we exhaustively predicted and ranked the efficacy and synergism of all possible combin

283 In 2016, Science ranked the schistosomiasis vaccine as one of the top 10

284 oncentrations and higher resolutions favored ranking the correct formula in the top 10.

285 Methods for ranking the importance of nodes in a network have a rich

286 between cohorts on relative disease severity ranking, the higher average score and classifications fo

287 oxidant activity (RAA), has been proposed to rank these antioxidants according to their reaction rate

288 It ranked third in North America (14.2%).

289 ISG ranks third and LFGTE fourth on all four soil-quality an

290 e-art benchmarking of catalytic performances ranks this new class of cobalt-based complexes among the

291 suggests that synbiotic therapy is the first rank to reduce SSI, pneumonia, sepsis, hospital stay, an

292 ance of the classification was evaluated and ranked using several classification quality metrics.

293 ying impediments limiting bnAb induction and ranking vaccine strategies for their ability to promote

294 ness of the receptor activator of NF-kappaB (RANK), which is central for mTEC differentiation, defici

295 pared with control mice (P = 0.002; ANOVA on ranks with Dunn test), while standard gemcitabine failed

296 uskal-Wallis analysis of variance (ANOVA)-on-Ranks with post-hoc Mann-Whitney U-tests showed signific

297 The correct diagnosis was ranked within the top 3 highest-scoring diagnoses at a s

298 Comparable taxonomic ranks within clades can facilitate more consistent class

299 ghest in the positive concordance group (log rank: X(2)=80.96; P=0.001) and lowest in the negative co

300 which increased to 8.44-9.13 after baking as ranked: xylitol>maple syrup>corn syrup>honey>agave syrup