ライフサイエンスコーパス: rating of

1 istrict-level (smaller) hospitals had a mean rating of 0.8 for all items in 2004 vs 1.3 in 2014 (P =

2 s not particularly painful, with a mean pain rating of 1.08 of 10.

3 002); regional (larger) hospitals had a mean rating of 1.1 in 2004 vs 1.4 in 2014 (P = .01).

4 Goodness-of-fit ratings of 10 DSM-IV-TR and 37 ICSD-2 insomnia diagnoses

5 Ratings of 12 good-parent attributes, with subsequent us

6 reported quality of communication (QOC; mean rating of 17 items rated from 0-10, with 0 = poor and 10

7 An optimal subjective heterogeneity rating of 2 or higher was identified as a predictor of R

8 n the Lifetime Dimensions of Psychosis Scale ratings of 2,454 case subjects of European ancestry from

9 cordance by comparing patient and oncologist ratings of 2-year survival probability.

10 ted quality of end-of-life care (QEOLC; mean rating of 26 items rated from 0-10) and depressive sympt

11 egories, except time and motion, which had a rating of 3.

12 However, with a mean rating of 3.0/3 for PET/MR and 2.3/3 for PET/CT, image q

13 se preference was tested by measuring liking ratings of 3 desserts of varying sucrose content (A: 26%

14 months, that was moderate or severe (minimum rating of 4 out of 10) most, or all of the time.

15 ndents to both rounds assigned an importance rating of 5 or more in round 2.

16 ic quality varied, but 30 reviews had AMSTAR ratings of 5 or higher.

17 Three fuels had a constant octane rating of 87 with varied aromatic concentrations at 15%,

18 atus (SES) groups in German society provided ratings of 909 social concepts along three basic dimensi

19 Consensus was achieved through the rating of a series of recommendations by a large group o

20 The committee assigns the recommendations a rating of A, B, or C, depending on the quality of eviden

21 ting decreases in pain sensitivity and lower ratings of abuse-related subjective effects than marijua

22 ing symptoms along with independent clinical ratings of adaptive functioning.

23 go/no-go test and mean (SD) improvements in ratings of ADHD symptoms (55% [30%] vs 57% [25%]).

24 Parent ratings of ADHD symptoms (Development and Well-Being Ass

25 The association between self-ratings of ADHD symptoms and waiting-induced attenuation

26 Parent ratings of ADHD symptoms were obtained using the Develop

27 l as child self-reported depression and peer ratings of aggression and disruptive behavior.

28 had significantly larger increases in global ratings of akathisia (0.73 [95% CI, 0.59-0.87] vs 0.45 [

29 ygdala bilaterally and in behavioral arousal ratings of alcohol pictures, compared with the sham trai

30 amygdala correlated with craving and arousal ratings of alcohol stimuli; correlations in the nucleus

31 ic skin response, and changes in self-report ratings of alertness levels and affective states (arousa

32 va samples for hormonal analyses, subjective ratings of alertness, wellbeing, visual comfort and cogn

33 At both dose levels, visual ratings of amyloid burden identified 100% of AD subjects

34 Ratings of anxiety were assessed 3-h post-infusion and f

35 Serial ratings of appetite and food appeal were obtained.

36 Subjective ratings of appetite will be recorded by participants at

37 atiation was studied by measuring intake and ratings of appetite-related dispositions 3 h after inges

38 ing between December 2010 and July 2011 with rating of appropriateness by the ACCF and ACR criteria.

39 of Life Questionnaire scores and clinicians' ratings of asthma control.

40 tionnaire, and lung function and clinicians' ratings of asthma status among a population of children

41 assessed by the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (P = 0.037) and Unified Parkinson Disea

42 measure was the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) and secondary outcome measures w

43 outcome was the scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA), and the inventory of non-ataxia

44 CCFS) Scale and Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA), in patients with spinocerebella

45 ndpoint was the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA).

46 cebo, using the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA; mean difference [MD] = +2.70, 95

47 The average Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia score (SARA, a standardized measure of

48 sustained attention (P = .01) and on parent ratings of attention problems (P = .02).

49 yellowed colouration had negative effects on ratings of attractiveness and that these effects were ma

50 tes that these colour induced alterations in ratings of attractiveness are mediated by increased/decr

51 iameter change was not related to subjective ratings of attractiveness, but was positively correlated

52 s to identify groups of parents with similar ratings of attributes, and ascertainment of whether memb

53 scans each; total = 742 scans), and provided ratings of autistic and antisocial traits.

54 (EA) and 6% (AA)) was associated with lower ratings of aversive effects (P<5 x 10(-8)) with marked s

55 ration timecourse of 'anxious' and increased ratings of 'bad drug effects,' as compared with placebo.

56 This tool will allow for more transparent rating of bias and applicability of primary diagnostic a

57 varied widely and positively correlated with ratings of bitterness intensity of PROP (P = 0.007) and

58 PSS ratings of breast biopsy patients were significantly hig

59 Neither dose condition increased ratings of capsule 'liking' or desire to take the capsul

60 nd high predicted Medicare spending, overall ratings of care differentially improved in the ACO group

61 cancer treatment were associated with lower ratings of care quality and physician communication.

62 had the strongest relationship with overall ratings of care, followed by physicians' affective behav

63 leted by spiritual care providers and family ratings of care.

64 and an eleventh scale measured their overall ratings of care.

65 Survey respondents who reported very good ratings of case manager performance across all items had

66 jects' condition were assessed with a global rating of change questionnaire.

67 n-group differences in scores for the Global Rating of Change scale (0 [CI, -2 to 1]) and pain rating

68 gic rhinitis (AR) recorded a 15-point global rating of change scale (GRCS) score and the Rhinoconjunc

69 Both groups showed improvements in Global Rating of Change scale and pain rating scores, but betwe

70 oved post-therapy, assessed both by a global rating of change score (GRCS) and by the VCDQ [median (I

71 The 2 primary outcomes were 1-year global rating of change scores for complete recovery or much im

72 Secondary outcomes included the Global Rating of Change scores, the Numeric Pain Rating Scale s

73 Gemini twin birth cohort, including parental ratings of child EOE and EUE using the Child Eating Beha

74 the autism spectrum comparison group, parent ratings of childhood behaviour indicated children with a

75 A continuous rating of children's attachment security to their primar

76 At 40 months, parent ratings of children in the phosphatidylcholine group (N=

77 Parent/guardian ratings of children on a measure of temperament were use

78 Brain activity was related to parents' ratings of children's SOR symptoms.

79 dicted the increase in smoker's pleasantness ratings of cigarette cues.

80 Participants provided baseline ratings of clear (happy, angry) and ambiguous (surprised

81 or cocaine before presentation of a cue, and ratings of cocaine "liking" (hedonic feelings toward coc

82 stress (and their interaction) on momentary ratings of cocaine and heroin craving.

83 agnitude activity correlated negatively with ratings of cocaine craving and positively with how high

84 , clinical attachment level (CAL), clinician rating of color and texture compared with surrounding ti

85 hysiotherapy groups did not differ on 1-year ratings of complete recovery or much improvement (91% vs

86 lems group showed suppressor effects between ratings of conduct problems and callous-unemotional trai

87 NTX decreased overall subjective ratings of 'crave drug,' 'stimulated,' and 'would like d

88 inistration, but it did significantly reduce ratings of craving for COC and tobacco during COC sessio

89 Participants also completed subjective ratings of craving for cocaine before presentation of a

90 elations between observer (OSAD) and trainee rating of debriefing were obtained (median rho = 0.566,

91 n a graded way with participants' subjective ratings of decision confidence, as expressed on a 6-poin

92 negatively correlated with food pleasantness ratings of depressed participants with increased appetit

93 tionship to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale ratings of depression severity.

94 RSD-24 score </=8), as well as self-assessed ratings of depression, global functioning, and quality o

95 e Clinical Global Impression Scale, and self-ratings of depression.

96 ion the reliability and validity of observer ratings of depression.

97 Valence ratings of different eye-contact conditions revealed tha

98 gnificantly increased the psychiatrists' CGI ratings of disease severity by 0.65 [0.27; 1.02] points.

99 ndition compared with the placebo condition, ratings of drug liking following 15 mg of oxycodone were

100 ated end point ratios for each participant's ratings of each nonfatal end point relative to death.

101 s for a median of 9.5 years to obtain weekly ratings of eating disorder symptoms, comorbidity, treatm

102 lenial cortex (RSC) correlated strongly with ratings of "ego-dissolution" and "altered meaning," impl

103 choice questionnaire and clinical confidence ratings of eight trauma scenarios, measured against cova

104 Locations and ratings of emboli were compared with reference standard

105 Participants' ratings of emotion transitions predicted others' experie

106 ion, BPD patients showed blunted self-report ratings of emotional but not neutral pictures.

107 h Parkinson's disease (PD) and the affective ratings of emotional valence and arousal performed subse

108 ed with less beneficial change in subjective ratings of everyday functioning and quality of life (QOL

109 , evidence review, basis of recommendations, ratings of evidence and recommendations, guideline revie

110 viewed the remaining 10 studies and assigned ratings of evidence quality; 7 studies were rated level

111 among hospitals receiving an overall safety rating of excellent from nurses (1.5%), compared with th

112 Family member-reported quality rating of "excellent" for end-of-life care.

113 A rating of "excellent" for the psychiatry clerkship (odds

114 Furthermore, independent behavioral ratings of expanse and distance correlated strongly with

115 ), the 5-item dry eye questionnaire (DEQ-5), rating of eye dryness using a visual analogue scale (VAS

116 : The NIH eye score, patient-reported global rating of eye symptoms, Lee eye subscale, Ocular Surface

117 tle work to determine whether attractiveness ratings of faces correspond to sexual or more general at

118 onstructs that are tapped via attractiveness ratings of faces, and support the development of methodo

119 Greater hunger correlated with higher appeal ratings of "fattening" (r = 0.46, P = 0.03) but not "non

120 stringent beverages with fatty foods yielded ratings of fattiness and astringency that were lower tha

121 a) responses during appraisal and subjective rating of fearful faces.

122 tion-evoked change in the explicit emotional ratings of fearful faces.

123 ce of eating, eating frequencies, and liking ratings of food pictures significantly decreased during

124 Naltrexone had intrinsic effects: decreasing ratings of friendliness, food intake, and systolic blood

125 However, visual rating of FTD scans was challenging, with a higher rate

126 ortant, 5 = very important) and 2) a 5-point rating of fulfillment (1 = not at all met, 5 = completel

127 r ratings increased (both P = 0.02), whereas ratings of fullness decreased in the evening (P = 0.04).

128 these regions correlated with the subjective ratings of funniness of the presented material.

129 e available option for increasing the octane ratings of gasoline and would provide additional engine

130 ers further caused substantial change in the ratings of gay men and lesbians more generally.

131 m or arm/palm, has an effect on pleasantness ratings of gentle brush stroking with varying velocity.

132 A third interviewer provided independent ratings of global adaptive functioning.

133 ponse to treatment as assessed by daily self-ratings of global IBS symptoms and individual symptoms o

134 e decreased cannabis self-administration and ratings of 'good effect' in nontreatment-seeking daily c

135 .8%; P<0.001 for all), or provide an overall rating of >/= 9 out of 10 (AMI: 56.7% versus 60.7% versu

136 to test the hypothesized mediating effect of ratings of healthiness of foods on calorie estimates.

137 ced significant, time-dependent increases in ratings of 'High', 'Good Effect', ratings of the cannabi

138 Only self-ratings of hirsutism were significantly associated with

139 In addition, BNP decreased the subjective rating of hunger (P = 0.009) and increased the feeling o

140 Despite the decreased energy intake, ratings of hunger and fullness did not significantly dif

141 appetite-regulating hormones and subjective ratings of hunger and satiety in 10 healthy volunteers.

142 Subjective ratings of hunger and satiety were evaluated by visual a

143 Ratings of hunger were decreased during nightshift days

144 a response to treatment as assessed by daily ratings of IBS symptoms, bloating, abdominal pain, and s

145 Importance ratings of identified HCT outcomes rated on a Likert sca

146 ictions) correlated strongly with subjective ratings of illness severity.

147 ed and was rated on two scales: 1) a 5-point rating of importance (1 = not at all important, 5 = very

148 study was to compare PD patients' subjective rating of improvement with measured improvement on a num

149 e compared with the patients' own subjective ratings of improvement (nil, slight, moderate, good, exc

150 CAARS-INV ratings of inattention, memory problems, and emotional l

151 s region was also associated with subjective ratings of increased urge to perform habits.

152 ignificantly with hoarding severity and self-ratings of indecisiveness and "not just right" feelings

153 The data were obtained using ratings of individual stimuli or using the method of pai

154 iscriminated between man-made versus natural ratings of individual trials was related to SC, but not

155 ary sleep outcomes were self-reported online ratings of insomnia severity (Insomnia Severity Index) a

156 level correlations between these effects and ratings of intense and positive subjective effects.

157 Objective: To compare ratings of internal medicine residents using the pre-201

158 Self-reported ratings of intoxication correlated with striatal activat

159 ensory cortex was correlated with subjective ratings of itchiness, and the responsivity of the left B

160 In study two, self ratings of leadership (using the MPS) from 15 senior cha

161 e) to 5 (strongly disagree) scale, explained ratings of less than 5, and optionally provided comments

162 The panel methodologist assigned ratings of level of evidence to each of the selected cit

163 authors to review in full text and to assign ratings of level of evidence to each of the selected stu

164 : The late positive potential amplitudes and ratings of liking and wanting cocaine in response to coc

165 association with categorical and continuous ratings of lithium response.

166 Finally, there were no differences between ratings of lower-dose cigarettes, but the 0.763-mg cigar

167 the number of subjects with a mean efficacy rating of <2.5, was 100%.

168 om 105 expectant mothers, 80 underwent blind-rating of maternal sensitivity at 4-6 months postpartum

169 tion Examination scores, fellowship director ratings of medical knowledge, and demographic variables.

170 which conflicts with participants' own high rating of medication adherence.

171 ge of carrying the risk allele on subjective ratings of memory and objective memory test performance

172 (pupil diameter change) was correlated with ratings of men's facial attractiveness.

173 Main Outcomes and Measures: Annual teacher ratings of mental health problems and academic performan

174 Participants provided ratings of mind wandering frequency that were used to in

175 ant difference in the VCDQ associated with a rating of 'minimally better' on the GRCS was 4 points.

176 s assessed during nontreatment follow-up and ratings of mood, anxiety, and suicidal ideation or behav

177 d every 6 months during year 2, using weekly ratings of mood.

178 Response was measured as a rating of "much improved" or "very much improved." RESUL

179 egions of interest, and participant-reported ratings of nicotine dependence, craving, and self-effica

180 e the aversive, pleasurable, and stimulatory ratings of nicotine's effects, cardiovascular reactivity

181 abstinence from smoking and reported greater ratings of nicotine-induced good drug effects, drug liki

182 A rating of "not assessable" indicated insufficient inform

183 a reaction time task and provided perceptual ratings of noxious and tactile stimuli.

184 h the Yale-Brown compulsion subscale and CGI rating of obsessive-compulsive symptoms, as well as on t

185 nfusions but did not affect the pleasantness ratings of odors.

186 ormed by a thin-slicing study of participant ratings of officer utterances.

187 ings are preliminary, they suggest that peer rating of operative skill may be an effective strategy f

188 l fear and depression groups and compared on ratings of pain and state anxiety across time.

189 nce (1.98%; 20 mg), and decreased subjective ratings of pain intensity (1.98, 3.56%; 20 mg).

190 more pain than they originally report, with ratings of pain related to state anxiety and dental fear

191 Furthermore, mean subjective ratings of pain were lower in the active ibudilast condi

192 Ratings of participants' liking for each Chinese charact

193 Ratings of pathological severity in 16 brain regions fro

194 in adaptive coping style of patients through ratings of patients or their close family members.

195 QOD was determined using validated caregiver ratings of patients' physical and mental distress in the

196 ith assessments of self-views and likability ratings of peers.

197 In addition to the subjective rating of perceived exertion, effort perception was esti

198 Lower total mood disturbance and ratings of perceived exertion were found during the V(GR

199 Ratings of perceived warmth increased in proportion to t

200 ATP](d)) using a luciferase-based assay, and ratings of perceived warmth were taken at each temperatu

201 between objective performance and subjective ratings of performance.

202 Main Outcome Measure Daily ratings of perimenstrual symptoms and functioning.

203 Visual ratings of PET image quality and tracer retention or bet

204 red) roles were less likely to provide a top rating of physician communication (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.4

205 delivered by nurses, nurses' and physicians' ratings of physician care were significantly different w

206 nd P=0.006, respectively), whereas patients' ratings of physicians, interactions with physicians, and

207 of picture-word associations and subjective ratings of pleasantness and arousal in response to the p

208 One week later, cueing led to reduced ratings of pleasantness of negative information in SAD b

209 n tomography scan is to assign a dichotomous rating of positive or negative for the presence of amylo

210 injustice and unfairness) predict behavioral ratings of praise and blame and how they modulate the on

211 ey received a mail survey that included self-ratings of problems with continence and sexual function

212 higher EI but felt less full and had higher ratings of prospective food consumption than did the swe

213 these seeds were compared with reductions in ratings of psychotic symptoms.

214 Surrogates' subjective ratings of quality of communication have been used in ot

215 e octane rating by increasing (i) the octane rating of refinery-produced hydrocarbon blendstocks for

216 /day regimen also resulted in higher arousal ratings of sad stimuli.

217 Operating room administrator ratings of safety culture were not related to rates of c

218 The pattern was similar for ratings of salience, distress, personal relevance, globa

219 m Scenic-Or-Not, a website that crowdsources ratings of "scenicness" for geotagged photographs across

220 t injuries (medium severity), while the self ratings of SCNs indicated that Supporting behaviours wer

221 with respect to the chemical composition and rating of sensory attributes.

222 differ in contingency knowledge or explicit ratings of shock expectancy following the habit test.

223 mpared the occurrence rates for and severity ratings of sleep disturbance in patient-family caregiver

224 ocial anxiety was positively correlated with ratings of smiling relative to neutral-face primed chara

225 es of BNA were significantly correlated with ratings of smoking motivations of getting a 'rush', gett

226 Interestingly, ratings of social closeness covaried with this activity,

227 ed to examine longitudinal changes in parent ratings of social competence, social problems, and withd

228 For normal-hearing participants, the highest ratings of sound quality were obtained when the reproduc

229 plans and demographic factors influenced the rating of specific factors.

230 later in the analysis window, the subjective rating of stimuli correlated with the amplitude of the N

231 ices would parametrically reflect subjective ratings of stimulus awareness.

232 Quality ratings of studies were based on a modified version of t

233 Quality ratings of studies were based on a modified version of t

234 ent of Functioning (GAF) and other consensus ratings of study psychiatrists.

235 ity of reactivation, as determined by online ratings of subjective recollection, would increase subse

236 Their mean self-rating of successful aging was 8.2, and older age was as

237 asons for surgeon and hospital selection and ratings of surgeon and hospital.

238 Peer ratings of surgical skill varied from 2.6 to 4.8 on a 5-

239 cortisol were associated with more negative ratings of surprised faces, and with more direct respons

240 This proposal was tested using ratings of swallowing effort and measuring regional brai

241 Ratings of swallowing effort were correlated with activi

242 eases were associated with the reductions in ratings of symptoms of inattention with clinical treatme

243 Multirater, blinded review and ratings of taped video recordings of elliptical excision

244 rmance (accuracy) and subjective experience (ratings of target visibility and choice confidence) over

245 Mean summary ratings of technical skill ranged from 2.6 to 4.8 across

246 A major innovation in this document is the rating of tests side by side for the same indication.

247 Surgeons' rating of the appropriateness of CPM and the patient's r

248 the child or caregiver, and the caregiver's rating of the child's oral health.

249 Single-blinded rating of the exenatide group suggested clinically relev

250 A high self-report rating of the importance of religion or spirituality may

251 ly significant difference in the clinicians' rating of the importance of the study or the need to run

252 icating greater physical disability) and the rating of the intensity of leg pain (on a scale from 0 t

253 Blinded self-assessment rating of the overall stiffness for individual patients

254 melanopsin pulses and provided a structured rating of the perceptual experience.

255 rs do not agree with participants' conscious rating of the stimuli.

256 Increasing the octane rating of the U.S. gasoline pool (currently approximatel

257 Importantly, performers' ratings of the "goodness" of their performances were pos

258 onal reactivity index (IRI) scores, explicit ratings of the advisers' helpfulness and the advisers' s

259 en CS- inducing a shift in the frequency for ratings of the ambiguous CS+ as either "green" or "blue,

260 Symptoms were obtained using parent and self-ratings of the Attention Problems Scale at ages 8 to 9,

261 creases in ratings of 'High', 'Good Effect', ratings of the cannabis cigarette (eg, strength, liking)

262 ealthy subjects, did not show habituation in ratings of the emotional intensity of the images.

263 Healthiness ratings of the food were also assessed.

264 Nurses' ratings of the hospital-specific subscale (P = 0.002) an

265 Ratings of the importance of 16 personal wellness promot

266 ght amygdala and hippocampus correlated with ratings of the intensity of global subjective effects of

267 Surprisingly, ratings of the larger audience are predicted with greate

268 -specific subscale (P = 0.002) and surgeons' ratings of the operating room-specific subscale (P = 0.0

269 s' DSM-IV and prototype diagnoses with their ratings of the patients' adaptive functioning and patien

270 Surrogates' subjective ratings of the quality of communication about prognosis

271 ere was no predictive utility of surrogates' ratings of the quality of communication about prognosis

272 e care, family satisfaction, or nurse/family ratings of the quality of dying.

273 Ratings of the quality of longer term mental health faci

274 Surrogates' ratings of the quality of prognostic communication do no

275 to determine whether surrogates' subjective ratings of the quality of prognostic communication predi

276 experts joined them for two rounds of formal ratings of the recommendations.

277 FC activation also tracked normative valence ratings of the stimuli when participants were asked to e

278 Patient and clinician ratings of the TR were weakly inter-correlated (r(s) = 0

279 Diplomates' comments and ratings of the usefulness of the activity in assisting t

280 ivation tracked participants' own subjective ratings of the valence of stimuli.

281 Health visitor ratings of the video clips were compared to the GRS rati

282 and their parents completed neurobehavioural ratings of their child (Behavior Rating Inventory of Exe

283 PD patients' subjective ratings of their degree of improvement often do not accu

284 in significant differences in participants' ratings of their experience, but unlike other bodily ill

285 erventions have a positive impact on trainee ratings of their faculty intraoperative teaching perform

286 Participants' ratings of their liking for the Chinese characters were

287 ons between QuIRC ratings and service users' ratings of their quality of life and the unit's therapeu

288 In study two, staff nurses' ratings of their SCNs' behaviours (Monitoring and Recogn

289 The service users' quantitative ratings of their subjective improvement indicated that r

290 easons for physician selection and patients' ratings of their surgeon and hospital.

291 care were significantly different with nurse ratings of this care lower than physician ratings on all

292 nterhospital variability in family and nurse ratings of this care.

293 In contrast, rTMS did not alter ratings of touch pleasantness.

294 ces were found between treatments on patient ratings of treatment credibility.

295 inverse relationship with the participants' ratings of UCS expectancy.

296 High pleasantness ratings of unpleasant stimuli correlated with left dorsa

297 ine (ABIM) certification examination scores; rating of unprofessional behavior using the 2 systems.

298 was a significant decrease in participants' ratings of urge-to-cough after the placebo antitussive a

299 nge management based on FSC results; overall rating of usefulness of FSCs was low.

300 Food craving was indicated with subjective ratings of visual cues of high-calorie food.

301 onnectivity profile correlated strongly with ratings of visual hallucinations, implying that intrinsi