ライフサイエンスコーパス: reach statistical significance

1 ared to control, although the latter did not reach statistical significance.

2 SD participants a smaller response failed to reach statistical significance.

3 provement in perceived sleep quality did not reach statistical significance.

4 asma glucose among the three groups) did not reach statistical significance.

5 re were similar point estimates that did not reach statistical significance.

6 nd year of life lacked precision and did not reach statistical significance.

7 etween CF and non-CF isolates, these did not reach statistical significance.

8 y ICU outcomes and post-ICU outcomes did not reach statistical significance.

9 ) and inferior (P = 0.087) meridians did not reach statistical significance.

10 ghtly increased, although the result did not reach statistical significance.

11 ment errors than males although this did not reach statistical significance.

12 in the FLX and EE2 groups, but this did not reach statistical significance.

13 bral perfusion pressure 70 group but did not reach statistical significance.

14 n the t(4;14) group, but this number did not reach statistical significance.

15 trial outcome and publication status did not reach statistical significance.

16 hes that rely on the prevalence of events to reach statistical significance.

17 ction in hsCRP, d-8-iso and MMP-9 it did not reach statistical significance.

18 nd a 3.1-month survival benefit that did not reach statistical significance.

19 %, respectively) but the differences did not reach statistical significance.

20 eflecting systemic immune reactivity did not reach statistical significance.

21 ere noted in the Nocturnal Trial but did not reach statistical significance.

22 = 0.25), although these differences did not reach statistical significance.

23 deaths after ODN (4 vs. 0), but this did not reach statistical significance.

24 receptor mirrored those in EGFR, but did not reach statistical significance.

25 ), although these associations did not quite reach statistical significance.

26 BP was also reduced, but this change did not reach statistical significance.

27 l killer cell numbers, although this did not reach statistical significance.

28 yr mutations of 1.3 (0.6-3.1), which did not reach statistical significance.

29 rative chemotherapy, the differences did not reach statistical significance.

30 activity was reduced in AD but this did not reach statistical significance.

31 0.38-4.36; p = .67), the difference did not reach statistical significance.

32 ence for eight of the nine questions did not reach statistical significance.

33 fference in OS favored cetuximab but did not reach statistical significance.

34 ith more serious adverse events that did not reach statistical significance.

35 ucing anticonvulsants, although this did not reach statistical significance.

36 the association in Native Hawaiians did not reach statistical significance.

37 l LMS, a similar trend was noted but did not reach statistical significance.

38 (ORR) than docetaxel (35%), but this did not reach statistical significance.

39 cific (7%) and overall survival (5%) did not reach statistical significance.

40 he 1G allele, although this relation did not reach statistical significance.

41 regression, but these differences failed to reach statistical significance.

42 ptin level with temporal horn volume did not reach statistical significance.

43 groups in VAS pain scores at 3 days did not reach statistical significance.

44 a expression patterns, although this did not reach statistical significance.

45 However, these differences did not reach statistical significance.

46 men as provided in the current study did not reach statistical significance.

47 for colorectal and prostate cancers did not reach statistical significance.

48 T uptake slightly, but this increase did not reach statistical significance.

49 erences at higher pacing frequencies did not reach statistical significance.

50 dnisolone although these differences did not reach statistical significance.

51 e chemotherapy; however, the results did not reach statistical significance.

52 and OA suggested similar trends, but did not reach statistical significance.

53 tween the 3 major MLL rearrangements did not reach statistical significance.

54 ymph nodes, although this difference did not reach statistical significance.

55 anded examiners, but this difference did not reach statistical significance.

56 isease, although the latter estimate did not reach statistical significance.

57 ts as compared to control subjects failed to reach statistical significance.

58 d PD interaction, though this effect did not reach statistical significance.

59 drosarcoma (P = .026) was the only factor to reach statistical significance.

60 (92% vs 69%, respectively), but this did not reach statistical significance.

61 tively, for the two groups, but this did not reach statistical significance.

62 near work was 0.42 +/- 0.26 D, which did not reach statistical significance.

63 oved manual dexterity were noted but did not reach statistical significance.

64 ional VACP, although the differences did not reach statistical significance.

65 than in controls but the differences did not reach statistical significance.

66 component loss with the 7F stimulus did not reach statistical significance.

67 iew, these correlations remained but did not reach statistical significance.

68 nce in response rates between groups did not reach statistical significance.

69 cts than in the comparison subjects) did not reach statistical significance.

70 response to treatment, although this did not reach statistical significance.

71 The difference did not reach statistical significance.

72 atin had a 22% reduction in GVD that did not reach statistical significance.

73 roup on a measure of verbal memory failed to reach statistical significance.

74 r in group B at every time point but did not reach statistical significance.

75 ortality rates also were reduced but did not reach statistical significance.

76 raft in a meta-regression model that did not reach statistical significance.

77 mple size and limited follow-up this did not reach statistical significance.

78 in the temporal PCA, the differences did not reach statistical significance.

79 surgery, weight loss, and histology did not reach statistical significance.

80 erin also increased, but this effect did not reach statistical significance.

81 hose without CAD, but the difference did not reach statistical significance.

82 mages, but this difference (of 2.9%) did not reach statistical significance.

83 se RPA class III, but the difference did not reach statistical significance.

84 retic peptide levels after captopril did not reach statistical significance.

85 sus 12 of 55 (22%)], this difference did not reach statistical significance.

86 ayer patients; this difference did not quite reach statistical significance.

87 (100.3% +/- 12.9%), but this effect did not reach statistical significance.

88 io 2.02 (95% CI 0.86-4.73), but this did not reach statistical significance.

89 e skeleton, although the association did not reach statistical significance.

90 ho received morphine, but this trend did not reach statistical significance.

91 uvant hormone therapy, although this did not reach statistical significance.

92 L-1beta, VLA-4, and VCAM-1, but this did not reach statistical significance.

93 The improvement in survival did not reach statistical significance.

94 ds improved survival, but this trend did not reach statistical significance.

95 racial difference between the 2 eras did not reach statistical significance.

96 tion that, despite previous reports, did not reach statistical significance.

97 cy in favour of the active group but did not reach statistical significance.

98 the tumor edge, although this effect did not reach statistical significance.

99 th control, although this difference did not reach statistical significance.

100 l meta-analyses showed a trend but failed to reach statistical significance.

101 but differences between drug classes did not reach statistical significance.

102 color (OR, 1.17 [95% CI, 0.51-2.71]) did not reach statistical significance.

103 larly elevated, but this association did not reach statistical significance.

104 ventional wines, however differences did not reach statistical significance.

105 s showed continuous improvement that did not reach statistical significance.

106 d to the F <1 and F > 3 groups did not quite reach statistical significance.

107 tion between AF-alb and child growth did not reach statistical significance.

108 7 animals but the group mean changes did not reach statistical significance.

109 her in DSA-positive patients, though did not reach statistical significance.

110 al change in overall QOL and anxiety did not reach statistical significance.

111 e interval, 0.98-1.87) although this did not reach statistical significance.

112 tric contractions with morphine that did not reach statistical significance.

113 (P = 0.19) and ETAR (P = 0.32), but did not reach statistical significance.

114 ar incident AF in men 70 to 79 years did not reach statistical significance.

115 Other notable morbidities did not reach statistical significance.

116 and by the type of physical therapy applied reached statistical significance.

117 d 34 duplications from five loci) would have reached statistical significance.

118 9 deletion CNVs and 11 duplication CNVs that reached statistical significance.

119 controls, age-related deterioration with SAP reached statistical significance.

120 ip of CH and CRF to RNFL thickness no longer reached statistical significance.

121 thmatics and for C. albicans this difference reached statistical significance.

122 However, neither of these effects reached statistical significance.

123 not estimable) was suggested, neither effect reached statistical significance.

124 but only the likelihood of discharge to home reached statistical significance.

125 pt of biphasic waveform shock, none of which reached statistical significance.

126 dence interval: 0.31, 0.76; p trend = 0.002) reached statistical significance.

127 No other factors reached statistical significance.

128 untreated initial psychosis were weak; none reached statistical significance.

129 a genetic risk score combining all NOS1 SNPs reached statistical significance.

130 None of the remaining outcomes reached statistical significance.

131 status, but none of the genetic comparisons reached statistical significance.

132 hs, the reduction in brain atrophy no longer reached statistical significance.

133 ene copies, only amodiaquine and piperaquine reached statistical significance.

134 Neither cause nor the depression scores reached statistical significance.

135 No other indirect comparison reached statistical significance.

136 food intake for 2 h after injection without reaching statistical significance.

137 confirmed by real time RT-PCR, with 5 genes reaching statistical significance.

138 ival with surgical intervention although not reaching statistical significance.

139 y was numerically higher with L-DAPT without reaching statistical significance.

140 ference in glomerulosclerosis scores did not reach statistical significance (0.67 +/- 0.42 versus 1.2

141 scular risk factors, which, however, did not reach statistical significance (0.720 to 0.730 for risk

142 tudy arms for this primary end point did not reach statistical significance (-0.13 [95% CI, -0.01 to

143 deaths was noted in the elderly but did not reach statistical significance (13% v 8%; P =.29).

144 on, and depression, with only skin reactions reaching statistical significance (14.4% vs 7.8%; P = .0

145 veldt group, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (38% Ahmed, 50% Baerveldt

146 isease was higher among siblings but did not reach statistical significance (4.0% vs 2.3%, respective

147 e difference in severe complications did not reach statistical significance (4.5% for LRYGB vs 1% for

148 1) (71%, 67%, and 67%, respectively) did not reach statistical significance (5-year P = 0.09).

149 patients receiving NPPV, this trend did not reach statistical significance (5.26 intubations versus

150 n in clinically significant symptoms did not reach statistical significance (5.7% vs 22.4%; aRR, 0.33

151 h the clinical periodontal disease failed to reach statistical significance (50% in those with gestat

152 ifference between positive predictive values reached statistical significance (61% and 82%; p = .04).

153 sham at 6 weeks, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (95% CI, -0.7 to 2.4; P =

154 er in patients who received plating and this reached statistical significance (95% CI: 1.38 to 3.23,

155 otein levels increased in the spinal cord to reach statistical significance after 7 days of exercise

156 f processed meat and fasting insulin did not reach statistical significance after correction for mult

157 The difference reached statistical significance after the first month a

158 although the genetic correlations failed to reach statistical significance among PLRS blacks.

159 In addition, potentials for halogens have reached statistical significance and are included also.

160 Overall survival differences did not reach statistical significance, and response rate was no

161 However, only MAb 74.5.2 prophylaxis therapy reached statistical significance, and only sera from ani

162 te rejection at 6 months, but this no longer reached statistical significance, and there was no assoc

163 , and false-positive rate (P = 0.66) did not reach statistical significance as additional predictors

164 ation in favor of thalidomide may eventually reach statistical significance as well.

165 Implant location approached, but did not reach, statistical significance as a risk factor for exp

166 Short LTL reached statistical significance as a determinant of tot

167 s means in the BIC vs non-BIC groups did not reach statistical significance at every month.

168 rventions and indirect interventions did not reach statistical significance at the 0.05 level (OR 0.6

169 This reached statistical significance at 10-14 mol/L 17beta-e

170 crease in serum sodium versus time zero that reached statistical significance at 24, 48, and 72 hrs (

171 All test statistics reached statistical significance at p < 0.0001.

172 None of the investigated contrasts reached statistical significance at P < 0.05, apart from

173 with overall myocardial function, no longer reaching statistical significance at 3 hr.

174 0-min images had a similar trend but did not reach statistical significance (AUC = 0.79 vs. 0.73, P =

175 the reduction in the obese subjects did not reach statistical significance (baseline, 33.5 +/- 4.7;

176 Neither anti-PSP nor anti-SP1 reached statistical significance because of the small nu

177 ers (P = .03, log-rank test), but it did not reach statistical significance between patients with GD

178 The difference in plasma Hcy concentrations reached statistical significance between the patient and

179 ular conductance during hypoxaemia failed to reach statistical significance both during H1 and during

180 Questionnaire sleep quality ratings did not reach statistical significance, but there were significa

181 ith its own baseline (P = 0.03), but did not reach statistical significance compared with its control

182 nd 10 years, respectively), but this did not reach statistical significance compared with those with

183 though differences in neutralization did not reach statistical significance, cross-linked Env spikes

184 polypeptide A levels between groups did not reach statistical significance (difference between group

185 thermia, xenon-augmented hypothermia did not reach statistical significance for any measure.

186 rmia, however, combination treatment did not reach statistical significance for any measure.

187 Clinical progression-free survival did not reach statistical significance for either Sr89 or ZA.

188 I, 26.8-33.2; P=0.02), although this did not reach statistical significance for hospital discharge.

189 dex based on arterial blood pressure did not reach statistical significance for predicting outcome me

190 If the difference did not reach statistical significance for superiority, a noninf

191 nce in ABL between TG and WT animals did not reach statistical significance for the 12-month age grou

192 s in subjects with AAU with axial SpA, which reached statistical significance for 2DS5 (P = 0.025, co

193 BNP beginning with 2-day moving averages and reached statistical significance for 3- and 4-day moving

194 cted epitopes, although this comparison only reached statistical significance for EBV epitopes.

195 pathway (hsa04020) was the only pathway that reached statistical significance for LAD and LVA in both

196 sociated with lower scores on all syndromes, reaching statistical significance for Anxious/Depressed

197 ACR core criteria set, with the differences reaching statistical significance for patient's global a

198 s consistently lower in the improved cohort, reaching statistical significance for primary care visit

199 se of emollients compared to uncommon users, reaching statistical significance for some LMW phthalate

200 f therapy in favor of thalidomide (P = .09), reaching statistical significance for the one third of p

201 olitis compared with their matched controls, reaching statistical significance for ulcerative colitis

202 ction in the hazard for death and HF did not reach statistical significance (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95%

203 enosis resistance, and flow velocity did not reach statistical significance; however, the diastolic v

204 rted data showed similar results but did not reach statistical significance (HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.78 t

205 igher with LAAC, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (HR: 1.71; p = 0.080).

206 cannabinoids but these associations did not reach statistical significance in all trials.

207 and >4.00 mm), although differences did not reach statistical significance in any group.

208 All other biomarkers failed to reach statistical significance in multivariate analysis.

209 The primary end-point did not reach statistical significance in the intention to treat

210 hippurate, and prolyl-hydroxyproline did not reach statistical significance in this cohort.

211 Differences between the 2 groups reached statistical significance in a clustered analysis

212 pared with a diverse group of LOCM that just reached statistical significance in a meta-analysis (poo

213 m disorders (ASD), and several of these have reached statistical significance in case-control analyse

214 of 18 years, and divorce; most similar risks reached statistical significance in men.

215 e caudate nucleus and nucleus accumbens that reached statistical significance in methamphetamine-depe

216 nd cold ischemia more than or equal to 12 hr reached statistical significance in the combined (OR 1.2

217 All secondary end points reached statistical significance in the ferric citrate g

218 h also caused an increase in cell death that reached statistical significance in two of the four nucl

219 comparison with HFpEF and HFrEF, albeit not reaching statistical significance in fully adjusted anal

220 se in the RI in the nasal and temporal PCAs, reaching statistical significance in the nasal PCA only.

221 requent in the active groups of both trials, reaching statistical significance in the trial of conjug

222 by about 35% (although the decrease did not reach statistical significance) in the medial arcuate nu

223 le treatment than for placebo, but failed to reach statistical significance, including improvement in

224 Though only one of these regions has yet reached statistical significance individually, we detect

225 trials, a pervasive issue in the failure to reach statistical significance may be the initial study

226 e changes in total cholesterol level did not reach statistical significance (mean [SD] level preopera

227 nearly 2-fold, respectively [the latter not reaching statistical significance]), MMP-1 (expressed pr

228 Although differences in needle size did not reach statistical significance, no participant in the 24

229 l ablation group was detected, which did not reach statistical significance (odds ratio, 1.53; 95% co

230 8%; no patient, disease, or treatment factor reached statistical significance on univariate or multiv

231 specimens negative for all drugs, but these reached statistical significance only for individuals co

232 7; P = 0.029 per C allele), this association reached statistical significance only in the MedDiet int

233 ach cohort was in the positive direction but reached statistical significance only in the women.

234 line receptor (mAChR) increases with age but reaches statistical significance only in patients with d

235 ent among case than control subjects, though reaching statistical significance only in one case.

236 eloping de novo DSA, the DSA results did not reach statistical significance (only 22% of patients wit

237 however, these mortality differences did not reach statistical significance over the entire study per

238 improved in both Bet v 1 COP-treated groups, reaching statistical significance over placebo in the 50

239 r curve, although these improvements did not reach statistical significance (P > 0.05).

240 rence between the CP and DMCP groups did not reach statistical significance (P >0.05).

241 ee survival was also improved but it did not reach statistical significance (P = .057).

242 ever, the reduction in invasion area did not reach statistical significance (P = .06).

243 ange in controls, but the comparison did not reach statistical significance (P = .07).

244 demonstrated a trend for dose which did not reach statistical significance (p = .090) and soluble C5

245 ectively; however, these differences did not reach statistical significance (P = .12).

246 mortality, although the correlation did not reach statistical significance (P = .18).

247 (95% CI, 80-302) days, although this did not reach statistical significance (P = .20).

248 the room with a loved one during CPR did not reach statistical significance (p = .275) between the tw

249 sociation between ERCC1 and response did not reach statistical significance (P = .29).

250 A similar trend for plasma did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.053).

251 e false negative results (5/56) this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.063).

252 CI 1.0, 1.8); however, this result failed to reach statistical significance (P = 0.07).

253 with AT1R-Ab >17 U/ml, although this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07).

254 was also elevated in MpIL12 mice but did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.081).

255 red to the healthy/FS - group, which did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.0898).

256 = 45; 1.92+/-0.60), but this result did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.09).

257 ] % for placebo) but the differences did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.11 and 0.24, respe

258 .99 +/- 0.82; n = 17); however, this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.11).

259 in women, although in men this trend did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.12).

260 histologic analysis, such difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.15).

261 s in ERMBT results among groups that did not reach statistical significance (p =.06).

262 without, although these differences did not reach statistical significance (p homogeneity=0.104/0.05

263 eated animals, however these results did not reach statistical significance (p>0.05).

264 l head rotations, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (P=0.06).

265 stage 3 and 4 tumours (17%) but this did not reach statistical significance (P=0.06).

266 (relative risk, 0.68), although this did not reach statistical significance (P=0.06).

267 tisite LV stimulation, although this did not reach statistical significance (P=0.08).

268 +/-0.9 mm), although this difference did not reach statistical significance (P=0.16).

269 ol subjects, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (P=0.22).

270 gG seropositivity among the 2 groups did not reach statistical significance (P=0.306).

271 These differences reached statistical significance (P < 0.0001).

272 oration in VA in the P group and this effect reached statistical significance (P < 0.05).

273 groups (P = .1) and 100 ms groups, where it reached statistical significance (P = .02).

274 expression and response to FU and leucovorin reached statistical significance (P =.034).

275 e in area 35 and low cROD value in area Te3V reached statistical significance (p<0.05).

276 4)), and PICALM (rs561655, P = 2.2 x 10(-3)) reaching statistical significance (P < .005).

277 rences in IL-12 and IFN-gamma concentrations reaching statistical significance (P < 0.001).

278 bilirubin and direct bilirubin, with 29 SNPs reaching statistical significance (P < 1.84 x 10(-7)).

279 group (n=6 vs. n=14 in basiliximab arm) just reaching statistical significance (P=0.049); however, a

280 is (15%), and hypertension (14%) but without reaching statistical significance (P=0.12).

281 orphology, exhibiting a trend toward-but not reaching-statistical significance (P = .0627).

282 acebo (n = 148) group; however, this did not reach statistical significance (pasireotide, MP$22,800 v

283 Despite not reaching statistical significance, patients with BRCA-mu

284 These differences did not reach statistical significance (placebo, 7%; 40 microg/k

285 g a positive direction of association and 11 reaching statistical significance; pooled OR from six st

286 low at 0.3 (95% CI 0.04 to 2.20) but did not reach statistical significance possibly due to the relat

287 in the proportions of each ethical principle reached statistical significance (Q = 73.8, P < 0.0001).

288 dentified by external reviewers that did not reach statistical significance (reduction factor, 0.92;

289 n relative and absolute terms, which did not reach statistical significance (relative risk 0.83 [95%

290 hite spouses of 10.4% (SE, 1.7%) but did not reach statistical significance (RR, 1.8; 95% CI, 0.5-6.0

291 Although the relationship did not reach statistical significance, there was a trend toward

292 t the differences in HOAs between the groups reached statistical significance, they were not of patho

293 s, although there was a trend, which did not reach statistical significance, toward small dimensions

294 However, the variants that reach statistical significance typically explain only a

295 se of toxicity, its clinical benefit did not reach statistical significance until year 10.

296 amples (P=0.0014) but the difference did not reach statistical significance when analyzed by patient

297 replication study and focus on findings that reach statistical significance when stage 2 data are con

298 nary reflex vagal bradycardias but this only reached statistical significance when the rats were anes

299 with systemic inflammation but fell short of reaching statistical significance when comparing against

300 to CRT-ON; the comparison with women did not reach statistical significance, which may be because of