ライフサイエンスコーパス: reaction time

1 ticipants' stopping performance (stop-signal reaction time).

2 effects jointly determined the overall motor reaction time.

3 solvent or high temperature water and a long reaction time.

4 al synchrony during visual attention predict reaction time.

5 8.2 (57.4%), and 10.0 (48.4%) after 24 h of reaction time.

6 and requires simple washing steps and short reaction time.

7 inform clinical decision-making and improve reaction time.

8 environment of the oxidized Hg changes with reaction time.

9 ylthiosemicarbazides by simply adjusting the reaction time.

10 ets after sensory cues and correlations with reaction time.

11 ependent upon the nature of the base and the reaction time.

12 receded the latency to stop, the stop signal reaction time.

13 tory inhibition in each trial was related to reaction time.

14 hoquinone products in good yields in a short reaction time.

15 adily available iodine and DMSO with a short reaction time.

16 hting of saccade targets as well as saccadic reaction times.

17 using a less coordinating solvent and short reaction times.

18 ning internal film structure at intermediate reaction times.

19 oylguanidines under mild conditions in short reaction times.

20 95% ee), under mild conditions and in short reaction times.

21 ology, measuring emotional attention through reaction times.

22 , but many enzymes are limited by their long reaction times.

23 this activity was correlated with behavioral reaction times.

24 se in CPT performance accuracy and increased reaction times.

25 ments in which O2 was present for equivalent reaction times.

26 with a large excess of cyanamide over longer reaction times.

27 even improved materials quality with shorter reaction times.

28 in one step, in good yields, and with short reaction times.

29 free conditions at room temperature in short reaction times.

30 Full regioselectivity along with short reaction time (1-2 h) and simple workup afford single pr

31 d rodent population with the 1-choice serial reaction time (1-CSRT) task.

32 1 g/L, temperature 35 degrees C, pH 7.5, and reaction time 20 h.

33 ons (100mM borate buffer at pH 8.5, labeling reaction time 60min, temperature 70 degrees C and NBD-Cl

34 vent-free synthetic procedures, and shortens reaction times, among others.

35 e.m.=0.6%) for memory, 11% (s.e.m.=0.6%) for reaction time and 21% (s.e.m.=0.6%) for educational atta

36 fore, the new design allows a 30-fold longer reaction time and a 40-fold increase in pressure compare

37 confidence simultaneously, their confidence, reaction time and a perceptual decision about motion wer

38 show that trial-to-trial variability in the reaction time and accuracy of eye-movements during a mem

39 relationships between trialwise variation in reaction time and brain activity in the inferior and mid

40 ify precisely trialwise associations between reaction time and brain activity.

41 ter estimates to demonstrate that changes in reaction time and error rate due to the probability of a

42 O3 is shown to be the fundamental control on reaction time and final Os content, yielding a well-defi

43 The reaction time and influence of foreign ions (potential i

44 nsformation of trace contaminants with short reaction time and little to none energy consumption.

45 etal templating solution methods in terms of reaction time and product purity.

46 taneously presented visual stimuli lengthens reaction time and reduces both the BOLD response and neu

47 we also found a similar relationship between reaction time and SOA for both visual and tactile stimul

48 target location changed unexpectedly during reaction time and the correction of hand trajectory requ

49 excitability of the motor system relates to reaction time and the regional content of the inhibitory

50 By changing the reaction time and the underlying catechol content, the f

51 g schizophrenia and the cognitive domains of reaction time and verbal-numerical reasoning, as well as

52 alenes were isolated in good yields in short reaction time and were further oxidized to the correspon

53 p(3)-Csp(2) bonds with significantly reduced reaction times and a broader substrate scope than when c

54 Further, express saccade reaction times and changes in SC activity depend on the

55 of UVA LEDs (365 nm), which have reduced the reaction times and come with a low setup cost.

56 rator systems nowadays significantly shorten reaction times and enable technical-scale operations.

57 l monomers are employed, as they ensure fast reaction times and good final mechanical properties of t

58 ignificant negative correlation between task reaction times and hemodynamic responses from left LPFC

59 The results indicated faster reaction times and larger pupil diameter to the presenta

60 during decision making revealed that saccade reaction times and peak velocities were influenced in pr

61 ask, and the Emotional Test Battery in which reaction times and performance accuracy are measured dur

62 kinetics are well studied with controllable reaction times and precursor concentrations.

63 We recorded reaction times and pupil dilation in response to a serie

64 uidic technologies can undoubtedly fine-tune reaction times and reagents concentration profiles; fact

65 can increase task efficiency via shortening reaction times and saving on neural tissue [8-16].

66 elay epoch, whose activity predicted saccade reaction times and the cells' saccade tuning.

67 ith more excitable motor pathways had faster reaction times and, paradoxically, higher concentrations

68 rried out under microwave heating to shorten reaction times and/or increase the yield.

69 microreactor accelerated the reaction (5 min reaction time) and increased the yields (8 examples).

70 ing, 6 loci shared between schizophrenia and reaction time, and 14 loci shared between schizophrenia

71 The effects of solvent, base, temperature, reaction time, and amount of base on the efficiency of c

72 performance was measured by trial accuracy, reaction time, and d'-context score.

73 on incongruent (high-conflict) errors, mean reaction time, and N2.

74 imization of reagent stoichiometry, solvent, reaction time, and temperature led to an intensified pro

75 that measured spatially and temporally cued reaction times, and (3) a simple reaction time task as a

76 ditions, i.e., ambient temperature, moderate reaction times, and the need for only a slight excess of

77 Reactions were completed within shorter reaction times, and turnover numbers of up to 100 could

78 Conversely, preserved normal-range reaction times are associated with left-lateralized phon

79 Reaction times are long and variable, almost certainly b

80 Shorter reaction times are obtained by decreasing the solution f

81 Remarkably similar reaction times are obtained for three different proteins

82 show the extent to which folding occurs, and reaction times are obtained from known protein folding t

83 plets to, e.g., study reaction kinetics when reaction times are short relative to typical bulk reacto

84 normal reaction times to test whether normal reaction times are strictly necessary for accurate movem

85 independence provides an explanation for why reaction times are usually so sluggish: delaying the mea

86 We used trial-by-trial reaction time as a proxy for syntactic processing load,

87 h respect to ligand type, concentration, and reaction time as well as distinguish between functionali

88 confidence, and stimuli discriminability and reaction times, as well as the fluctuations influence on

89 the frequency of these oscillations predicts reaction times, as well as the maximum temporal interval

90 ction of actions (pro- and antisaccades) and reaction times based on previously published models.

91 ed by decreasing the solution flow rate, and reaction times between 1.0 and 22 mus are obtained using

92 of 4, 25, 37, and 65 degrees C and digestion reaction times between 2 and 24 h.

93 , we observed that accuracy was modulated by reaction time, bias and sensitivity, but noise compensat

94 tions, patients showed a general increase in reaction time, but not a reduction in accuracy.

95 t in fact improved performance by decreasing reaction times by 23 ms, and significantly decreasing to

96 rial produced after optimizing the microwave reaction time can effectively generate H2 under visible-

97 sual integration in populations where simple reaction times cannot be collected, such as developmenta

98 ically with choice, stimulus difficulty, and reaction time-characteristics of a candidate decision va

99 ally relevant coagulation metrics, including reaction time, clot formation kinetics and maximum shear

100 compromise the precision and accuracy of the reaction times collected in psychological experiments, e

101 on of participants' behavior in conventional reaction-time conditions revealed that they generated oc

102 ction times were measured instead of saccade reaction times, confirming that these interactions resul

103 Catalytic amounts of CBr4 reduced the reaction times considerably due to the formation of chai

104 to atomoxetine: the reduction in stop-signal reaction time correlated with structural connectivity an

105 Importantly, faster reaction times corresponded to larger pupil dilation, su

106 tration scan that tells the story of a batch reaction time course in a qualitative "fingerprinting" m

107 During the Emotional Test Battery, reaction times decreased to identification of positive f

108 lose to FEF) shortened or prolonged saccadic reaction times, depending on the task-instructed saccade

109 It has been influentially suggested the reaction time distribution therefore reflects deliberate

110 gin of the remarkably wide dispersion of the reaction time distribution, an interval far greater than

111 stical analyses, its effects on model fit to reaction-time distributions remains unexplored.

112 times lower than 96-well plate) and reduced reaction time due to increased surface volume ratio (2.5

113 Control subjects had similarly shorter reaction times during a startle cue in all motor tasks.

114 sing an online navigation study, we recorded reaction times, error rates (confusion of turning axis),

115 ll measures to reduce the impact of noise on reaction-time experiments, we conclude that the typical

116 improvement indicated by reduced stop-signal reaction time) following atomoxetine correlated with str

117 ation frequencies ( 1500 Hz); improved their reaction time for bimodal stimuli (i.e. when both vibrat

118 (e.g., in lateral intraparietal cortex) and reaction time for discrimination is drift-diffusion.

119 f organic content that remains constant with reaction time for methylglyoxal-ammonium sulfate systems

120 he accumulation of gains gradually increased reaction times for "continue" choices, indicating growin

121 h require large amounts of SrtA and extended reaction times for efficient conjugation.

122 As predicted, they showed faster reaction times for the cued sequence after targeted memo

123 using MEG decoding methods, correlates with reaction times for visual categorization during the peri

124 gages the reticulospinal tract, by measuring reaction times from electromyographic activity in an int

125 Short reaction times, good to excellent yields of products, an

126 approach, broad substrate scope, very short reaction times, good to excellent yields, and simple sta

127 hodology is highly advantageous due to short reaction time, gram scale synthesis, and broad substrate

128 22 patients (11.9%) achieved a difference in reaction time greater than 1 minute, which was similar b

129 wever, few patients achieved a difference in reaction time greater than 1 minute.

130 old whose advantages include catalysis, fast reaction times, high concentrations, and facile scale-up

131 industry as this technology provides reduced reaction times, higher selectivities, straightforward sc

132 actions with low catalyst loadings and short reaction times highlight the versatility and practicalit

133 ge-detection paradigm, human performance and reaction times improved with longer pre-change exposure,

134 is coverage can be controlled by varying the reaction time in a manner that allows for the constructi

135 ctroencephalogram data, cognitive state, and reaction time in humans using a multimodal approach.

136 ions result in deficits in both accuracy and reaction time in tasks involving the recognition of othe

137 had higher brightness perception and faster reaction times in a sustained attention task during blue

138 odology using mechanochemistry which reduces reaction times in comparison with conventional synthetic

139 food rewards accurately predicts choices and reaction times in four independent sets of subjects maki

140 ave been proposed to explain error rates and reaction times in this task, no formal model comparison

141 The platform can accelerate an immuno-reaction time, in which the on-chip detection time was 5

142 The monkeys' choices and reaction times, including their variability, were explai

143 In contrast, for longer SOAs, reaction time increased when different tempos were prese

144 ive to standard batch conditions, with short reaction times, increased safety profile, and potential

145 erformed online digestion of proteins (5 min reaction time, instead of 4-16 h in previous in-solution

146 Moreover, this fast reaction time is obtained with a 48 pL/s flow rate, whic

147 For stimuli that are extended in time, reaction time is quicker for larger signal values (e.g.,

148 s, e.g., a left key to report stimuli, their reaction time is shorter when stimuli appear to the left

149 e traditionally low-yielding, requiring long reaction times, laborious purification steps and often e

150 y with the Chan-Lam reaction using optimized reaction times leads to complete coverage of the electro

151 lution of Au NPs prepared with a short 5 min reaction time led to the successful capture of 1-2 nm di

152 gent not environmentally friendly, undefined reaction time, long sample pretreatment, and low precisi

153 t produce a visible readout suffer from long reaction times, low sensitivity, and narrow dynamic rang

154 The rapid radiochemical reaction time (</=1 min) and high functional-group toler

155 his novel plasmonic-TDD method include short reaction times (<30 s/200 mum), compatibility with MALDI

156 acy (RE<5%), reduced reagent consumption and reaction times (<6min), and excellent sample versatility

157 ay lack acceptable reproducibility, and long reaction times may preclude its adoption as a rapid scre

158 ; verbal-numerical reasoning (n = 36035) and reaction time (n = 111483) in the UK Biobank cohort; and

159 al reasoning (N=36 035), memory (N=112 067), reaction time (N=111 483) and for the attainment of a co

160 The 1.0 mus reaction time obtained here is about an order of magnitu

161 d 57 mus, respectively), indicating that the reaction times obtained using rapid mixing from theta-gl

162 gent (0.2M NAC and 0.2M NaHCO3 in water) and reaction time of 1h at 50 degrees C.

163 also investigated, where it was found that a reaction time of 5 min, which is essential in the standa

164 on system in yields up to 90% within a short reaction time of 8-10 min.

165 resulting folding during nanoESI indicate a reaction time of between 7 and 25 mus depending on the s

166 The initial reaction time of toluene is also reduced remarkably in E

167 dy relates to enhanced yields and/or reduced reaction times of glycosylations.

168 o-dimensional image-regions by measuring the reaction times of human participants and report that it

169 es were investigated using a proton transfer reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometer (PTR-ToF-MS) a

170 perimental setup involving a proton-transfer-reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometer (PTR-ToF-MS),

171 fluxes were estimated with a Proton Transfer Reaction Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer (PTR-ToF-MS).

172 nline") particle inlet and a proton-transfer-reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometer (PTR-ToF-MS).

173 ids content, while the novel proton transfer reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometer was employed f

174 university classroom using a proton-transfer-reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometer.

175 re tentatively identified by Proton Transfer Reaction Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometric (PTR-(ToF)MS)

176 cultivars was studied using proton transfer reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometry (PTR-ToF-MS) w

177 good agreement with benchtop proton transfer reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometry (PTR-TOF-MS).

178 racterized the novel PTR3, a proton transfer reaction-time-of-flight mass spectrometer (PTR-TOF) usin

179 ion region (drift tube) of a proton transfer reaction-time-of-flight-mass spectrometer (PTR-ToF-MS) c

180 ial frontal cortex exhibits a sensitivity to reaction time on functional imaging that is consistent w

181 proved distractor accuracy and slowed target reaction time on our task.

182 tion of acid catalyst, oxidant quantity, and reaction time on the distribution of phlorin and 5-isoco

183 sponse inhibition was indexed by stop-signal reaction time on the stop-signal task and commission err

184 Children's accuracy and reaction time on the visual monitoring task was quantifi

185 arkably, SLR magnitudes also correlated with reaction times on both pro-reaches and anti-reaches, but

186 discrimination, frequency discrimination and reaction time) on 12 upper and lower limb amputees and f

187 es were estimated using biochemical data and reaction time performance on the psychomotor vigilance t

188 ofactor radical intermediate at the earliest reaction time points and that Trp-321 is the preferred s

189 With increase in reaction time portion of xylotriose and xylotetraose in

190 s that conform to the regularities of choice-reaction time predicted by the sequential sampling frame

191 n order of magnitude lower than the shortest reaction time probed using a conventional mixer (8 mus).

192 The TEG group would receive FFP if the reaction time (r) was >40 min and/or PLT if maximum ampl

193 At longer reaction times, rare examples of polyborylation were obs

194 of different experimental parameters such as reaction time, reaction temperature, calcination, pH and

195 xponential relationship; minor variations in reaction time result from wet/dry glassware and light/da

196 d a measure of motor urgency, indexed by the reaction time (RT) difference between go and stop error

197 xcitability, local cortical GABA levels, and reaction time (RT) in a group of 20 healthy human adults

198 ly correlated with standard deviation at the reaction time (RT) level and with excessively long RTs (

199 et discrimination difficulty, fixations, and reaction time (RT) measures.

200 Here, we used a serial reaction time (RT) task to show that prior expectations

201 F(5,883) = 5.8, p < 0.001), and with faster reaction time (RT, beta = -0.01; p = 0.01); independent

202 (p = 0.022), as well as, prolonged dilation reaction time (RT, p = 0.047).

203 Behavioral costs were measured by prolonged reaction times (RT) in sustained attention to response t

204 Reaction times (RTs) are assumed to reflect the underlyi

205 lapping with target onset shortened saccadic reaction times (RTs) for ipsiversive (to the stimulation

206 significantly more predictive of subsequent reaction times (RTs) than traditional methods.

207 The effects of signal strength and value on reaction time should interact multiplicatively because t

208 cal for perceptual decision-making, and that reaction times should therefore correlate with distance

209 Reaction times significantly varied with gender and age,

210 initiation by relating variations in saccade reaction time (SRT) to variations in such parameters as

211 ctivity to concomitant increases in saccadic reaction time (SRT).

212 We computed the stop signal reaction time (SSRT) and a measure of motor urgency, ind

213 Surprisingly, the stop signal reaction time (SSRT) can be adjusted by weights of certa

214 study, participants with longer stop signal reaction time (SSRT) reported greater amphetamine-induce

215 of isochronous repetitive auditory stimuli, reaction time strongly depended on the stimulus onset as

216 al responses also led to shortest behavioral reaction times, suggesting functional relevance of the e

217 y cortex model accounted for performance and reaction times, suggesting that the primary cortical rep

218 were evaluated using the five-choice serial reaction time task (5-CSRTT) and delay discounting proce

219 hallenging variant of the five-choice serial reaction time task (5-CSRTT) in which alcohol-exposed ra

220 trait, as measured in the five-choice serial reaction time task (5-CSRTT), and the associated propens

221 In the 5-choice serial reaction time task (5-CSRTT), gestational exposure to a

222 Participants learned two serial reaction time task (SRTT) sequences associated with diff

223 d twitch response or impulsivity in a serial reaction time task (SRTT), whereas ketamine increased re

224 et mice, was improved on the 5-choice serial reaction time task after tolcapone administration.

225 in which healthy human subjects performed a reaction time task and provided perceptual ratings of no

226 measured by the finger-tapping test, simple reaction time task and the Digit Symbol Substitution Tas

227 orally cued reaction times, and (3) a simple reaction time task as a control for motor speed.

228 The STAP is a competitive reaction time task in which the purported opponent displ

229 While punishment improved serial reaction time task performance, it impaired force-tracki

230 cranial self-stimulation and 5-choice serial reaction time task tests but remained dysregulated in th

231 osseous muscle in the preparatory phase of a reaction time task where individuals with chronic incomp

232 trained on either a sequencing skill (serial reaction time task) or a motor skill (force-tracking tas

233 being the number of errors, and Stop-Signal Reaction Time task, which evaluates motor inhibition.

234 P affects performance in the 5-choice serial reaction time task, which quantifies attention and error

235 with the attention-based five-choice serial reaction time task.

236 itution errors across this pair on a speeded reaction time task.

237 of uncertainty during a probabilistic serial reaction time task.

238 r impulsive behavior on a five-choice serial reaction time task.

239 attention tasks using the five-choice serial reaction time task.

240 ratio, and the PFC-dependent 5-choice serial reaction timed task (5-CSRTT), we determined that F1 fem

241 Subjects performed a choice reaction-time task known to trigger impulsive responses,

242 ry cell types in behaving zebrafish during a reaction-time task that reports alertness.

243 the induction, and higher negative bias on a reaction-time task.

244 neurons during the warning period of various reaction time tasks.

245 ion were retested during visual and auditory reaction-time tasks (RT).

246 0-500 times the concentration and at shorter reaction times than common slow addition/high dilution t

247 Upon prolonging the reaction time, the in situ generated thiones are transfo

248 Reaction times thus include a seemingly unnecessary dela

249 Recent data suggest that a difference in reaction time (time to initial fibrin formation) greater

250 attention cue during visual-motor task; and reaction time to a response cue during the same task bet

251 hT silencing opsin resulted in a decrease in reaction time to touch the target but not to retrieve re

252 guration, in direct relation to increases in reaction times to correct responses.

253 MPH also improved reaction times to make correct responses, indicating mor

254 dicated by the precue were faster than their reaction times to targets on the opposite side.

255 like "volitional" facilitation effect: their reaction times to targets that appeared on the side indi

256 an participants to move at lower-than-normal reaction times to test whether normal reaction times are

257 is when comparing the slowest behavioral PVT reaction times to the fastest.

258 atterns, readily available substrates, short reaction time, transition metal-free, and gram-scale syn

259 The thioether effect also enables short reaction times under mild conditions for many O-, S-, an

260 roducts (up to 97% isolated yield), in short reaction times under mild experimental conditions using

261 e measured using KOH as a base in very short reaction times (up to 65% in 80 s).

262 the flow rate required to obtained the 8 mus reaction time using a conventional mixer.

263 ting partially mediated group differences in reaction time variability (beta = .010, 95% confidence i

264 ith BP or at risk for BP exhibited increased reaction time variability (F2,102 = 4.26, p = .02, etap(

265 hat individual developmental trajectories of reaction time variability are related to individual traj

266 Reaction time variability was available in a subset of p

267 but not in their unaffected siblings, while reaction time variability was higher in both groups than

268 elf-reports of ADHD symptoms on the SDQ, and reaction time variability were each negatively associate

269 nificantly correlated with congruent errors, reaction time variability, and error-related positivity

270 e number of congruent (low-conflict) errors, reaction time variability, error-related negativity, and

271 orrelated with the subjects' performance and reaction time variability, two vastly studied indicators

272 of ADHD symptomatology, brain structure, and reaction time variability-an index of lapses in attentio

273 d cuneus is a strong predictor of the slower reaction times via disruption of neural synchrony in vis

274 hand reaching a squeeze force criterion and reaction time was defined as time to criterion.

275 When the reaction time was extended to 6 days, (S)-(+)-butanoate

276 Simple reaction time was not affected by hormonal manipulation.

277 id catalyst concentration, DDQ quantity, and reaction time was performed with monitoring by HPLC.

278 spontaneous errors in trials in which their reaction time was unusually short.

279 ctive preparatory inhibition, the faster the reaction time was.

280 veling off of incorporation profiles at long reaction times was interpreted as reaching equilibrium b

281 At longer reaction times, we observe the formation of the initial

282 p differences in intrasubject variability in reaction time were examined, and a sophisticated fMRI an

283 Stop-signal task reaction times were longer and error rates were higher i

284 variability in search performance, such that reaction times were longer when distractors had a higher

285 Movement times, choice and simple reaction times were measured in all participants.

286 he same instructed saccades, and when manual reaction times were measured instead of saccade reaction

287 Reaction times were prolonged in SCI participants compar

288 icipants voluntarily responded to all tasks, reaction times were shorter during a startle cue while p

289 Specifically, we found that reaction times were shorter when shifting attention to m

290 parameters (pH 8, 60 degrees C and 60 min of reaction time) were determined for the reaction with ter

291 aving (MW) parameters, microwaving power and reaction time, were optimized for the pretreatment.

292 that distractors had a greater influence on reaction time when they appeared in colors associated wi

293 igm, which typically refers to a decrease of reaction times when subjects perform an action (e.g., a

294 the VS lesions hastened the monkeys' choice reaction times, which emphasized a speed-accuracy trade-

295 s can be used to access significantly faster reaction times while consuming substantially less sample

296 dure is highly advantageous due to its short reaction time, wide substrate scope, and gram-scale synt

297 carbon-nitrogen bonds are achieved in short reaction times with excellent selectivities and high to

298 the substrate sequence enabled programmable reaction times within the cell cytoplasm.

299 Patients show delayed reaction time, WM compromise, and reduced phase synchron

300 ately approximately 80 ms earlier than their reaction times would suggest.