ライフサイエンスコーパス: reason about

1 Perhaps for this reason, about 1% of birds (around 100 species) save them

2 This difference shows that the crows can reason about a hidden causal agent.

3 that people may be even more egocentric when reasoning about a religious agent's beliefs (e.g., God).

4 rize what is known about infants' ability to reason about agents' motivational, epistemic, and counte

5 thinking about food that incorporates social reasoning about agents and their relationships, and allo

6 Our brains allow us to reason about alternatives and to make choices that are l

7 eaning and increases the capacity for formal reasoning about anatomy.

8 nd God's beliefs, but clear divergences when reasoning about another person's beliefs (Study 7).

9 h self-referential thinking more so than did reasoning about another person's beliefs.

10 Because known landscapes may be assessed and reasoned about as a whole, simultaneously, this offers o

11 e capacity for mental state reasoning (i.e., reasoning about beliefs and intentions), which is suppor

12 can be used to powerfully and quantitatively reason about biological systems, particularly at the int

13 Thus, reasoning about causes and beliefs involve processes tha

14 omparative genomic data sets, and facilitate reasoning about comparisons and features of interest.

15 article describes the use of probability in reasoning about diagnostic test results and the importan

16 tive study aimed to elucidate older people's reasoning about drinking in later life and how this inte

17 ) involves the ability to carry out accurate reasoning about emotions and the ability to use emotions

18 Specifically, infants' reasoning about food choice is tied to their thinking ab

19 Additionally, infants' systems for reasoning about food is differentially responsive to pos

20 Importantly, infants' reasoning about food preferences is flexibly calibrated

21 Infants' reasoning about food preferences is fundamentally social

22 Third, we describe the debate over the reason about forgetting from short-term memory, whether

23 We compared reasoning about four-term analogy problems in the format

24 The quantitative concepts used to reason about gene regulation largely derive from bacteri

25 f multiple genome datasets and to facilitate reasoning about genomic comparisons.

26 ently distinct from other regions engaged in reasoning about goals and actions (suggesting that the t

27 o components: an early-developing system for reasoning about goals, perceptions, and emotions, and a

28 In particular, reasoning about God's beliefs activated areas associated

29 f individuals' decisions, even when they are reasoning about high-level, moral issues.

30 enge for biologists to process these data to reason about hypotheses.

31 y of mind (SToM) integrating ToM and RT with reasoning about incentives of all players.

32 In humans, the ability to reason about mathematical quantities depends on a fronto

33 In congenitally blind adults, reasoning about mental states leads to activity in bilat

34 Reasoning about mental states that are based on seeing i

35 ur approach offers an alternative to current reasoning about model construction and has the potential

36 a clear convergence in neural activity when reasoning about one's own beliefs and God's beliefs, but

37 most closely associated with the ability to reason about other people's mental states and form impre

38 reasoning can be selectively impaired while reasoning about other domains is left intact.

39 Human strategic interaction requires reasoning about other people's behavior and mental state

40 lops throughout childhood and contributes to reasoning about other people's beliefs, including their

41 hological and neural basis of perception and reasoning about other people, especially in terms of inv

42 resent in infancy that support sophisticated reasoning about perceptual properties of food.

43 tively, these studies differentiate explicit reasoning about possibilities from default implicit repr

44 tic pathways, and equally as significant, to reason about proteolysis.

45 intended to aid the scientific community in reasoning about proteolytic networks and pathways.

46 reasoning methodologies for representing and reasoning about signaling networks.

47 e system BioSigNet-RR for representation and reasoning about signaling networks.

48 rgumentation is an established technique for reasoning about situations where absolute truth or preci

49 are believed to show better competencies for reasoning about social dilemmas and conflicts.

50 reasoning performance provides evidence that reasoning about social exchange is a specialized and sep

51 have an evolved cognitive specialization for reasoning about social exchange, including a subroutine

52 with a neurocognitive system specialized for reasoning about social exchange.

53 soning is asymmetric (L>R) and necessary for reasoning about social situations.

54 As they age, children's reasoning about testimony increasingly reflects an abili

55 ction supports the uniquely human ability to reason about the contents of mental states.

56 tions are known, which makes it difficult to reason about the exact flow of signals and the correspon

57 dency to jump to conclusions, and ability to reason about the mental states of others).

58 tal and temporoparietal cortices when humans reason about the mental states of others.

59 Humans reason about the mental states of others; this capacity

60 However, although animals can reason about the outcomes of accidental interventions, o

61 among a wide range of positive emotions and reason about the probable causes of others' emotional re

62 cognitive abilities necessary for recursive reasoning about the behaviors of others.

63 ft temporoparietal junction is necessary for reasoning about the beliefs of others.

64 t the first developmental step in children's reasoning about the biological world.

65 e, such as OWL, thus enabling future work on reasoning about the Mouse Atlas in the context of an int

66 hat humans have an early-emerging system for reasoning about the social nature of food selection.

67 unction in everyday situations is to support reasoning about the thoughts and intentions of conspecif

68 works from experimental data and use them to reason about their dynamics and design principles will i

69 ondition also showed much more sophisticated reasoning about their data.

70 teractions they reveal makes it difficult to reason about them.

71 p researchers understand, interact with, and reason about these complex pathways in a number of ways.

72 sks how humans explicitly and deliberatively reason about what is possible but has not investigated w

73 human cognitive abilities is the capacity to reason about what others think, want, and see--a capacit

74 on understanding the purpose of research and reasoning about whether to participate, suggesting vulne