戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  GCs persisted in the community unchanged by reassortment.
2 mmunity, there was no evidence of interclade reassortment.
3 enes from other strains via a process called reassortment.
4 responsible for the lack of intertypic viral reassortment.
5 1-PA-NP cosegregation during avian influenza reassortment.
6 ial periodically emerge due to viral genomic reassortment.
7 tematically characterized the process of BTV reassortment.
8 rogate animal model to study influenza virus reassortment.
9  A viruses (IAVs) can exchange genes through reassortment.
10 ll-length form of PB1-F2 through mutation or reassortment.
11 s of IAV assembly is necessary to understand reassortment.
12 ated with relatively few documented cases of reassortment.
13 on could occur following genetic mutation or reassortment.
14 on of all human virus internal genes through reassortment.
15  acquire the full-length form by mutation or reassortment.
16 fect a cell, they can exchange genes through reassortment.
17 lature is essential to describe gene segment reassortment.
18 erent viruses via a process known as genetic reassortment.
19 rains of public health interest will undergo reassortment.
20 ses, possibly due to selective advantages of reassortment.
21 ghlighting the environment for potential IAV reassortment.
22 sequently produce new viruses through genome reassortment.
23 ut not the NA or NS segments, restricted IAV reassortment.
24 through transmission supports high levels of reassortment.
25 hin the target tissue could limit subsequent reassortment.
26 y comparison with previously reported strain reassortments.
27 by both individual gene mutations and genome reassortments.
28 phylogenetic heuristic approach to show that reassortment, a reticulate evolutionary mechanism, predo
29 o interspecific transmission that along with reassortment, allows IAV to achieve viral flow across su
30 ated as early as 1999 as a result of segment reassortment among Eurasian and North American avian IAV
31 to emerge due to mutation, recombination, or reassortment among genomic segments among individual vir
32                                              Reassortment among influenza A viruses allows viruses to
33 portion of the viral life cycle when genetic reassortment among influenza viruses occurs.
34  The recovery of H3N1 is further evidence of reassortment among SIVs and justifies continuous surveil
35 results show evidence of intragenogroup gene reassortment among the cocirculating strains.
36                                              Reassortments among subtypes from avian and human viruse
37 ics, possibly due to a very low frequency of reassortment and a lower evolutionary rate than that of
38                                      Segment reassortment and base mutagenesis of influenza A viruses
39 lls, suggesting the potential capability for reassortment and contributions to new pandemic or panzoo
40 us, A/TX/6/1996 (TX/96), to measure in vitro reassortment and growth potentials.
41 stem is a fast and efficient method to model reassortment and highlight the risk of reassortment betw
42                               Recombination, reassortment and horizontal gene transfer constitute exa
43 ce what we currently know about the roles of reassortment and mutations in virus fitness and have imp
44  the H5N1 subtype continue to evolve through reassortment and mutations.
45 ized by a complex interplay between frequent reassortment and periodic selective sweeps.
46 ne cells, recombination is required for gene reassortment and proper chromosome segregation at meiosi
47              Genome segmentation facilitates reassortment and rapid evolution of influenza A virus.
48 etic information by DNA replication, and its reassortment and repair by DNA recombination.
49 d human species suggest criteria for segment reassortment and strains that might be ideal candidates
50 which is generated by high levels of genetic reassortment and strong positive selection in the mening
51 at packaging signals are crucial for genetic reassortment and that suboptimal compatibility between t
52 quisition of swine-origin internal genes via reassortment and the adaptation of human influenza virus
53 is important to understand the efficiency of reassortment and the factors that limit its potential.
54 ing the significance of the region for viral reassortment and the potential emergence of novel avian
55 erstood though it is generally accepted that reassortment and/or genetic complementation among the th
56           Antigenic drift and shift, genetic reassortment, and cross-species transmission generate ne
57  we infer evolutionary structures, including reassortment, and demonstrate some of the difficulties o
58  effectively characterizes clonal evolution, reassortment, and recombination in RNA viruses.
59 ion of multiple virus lineages, gene segment reassortment, and the common ancestry of the 2006/2007 o
60 ar and that several subtypes contributing to reassortment are going undetected.
61   Specialized bioinformatic tools to analyze reassortment are not available, which hampers progress i
62 in the Nile Delta create conditions favoring reassortment, as evident from the gene constellations id
63  and sca1 along with the comparative genomic reassortments associated with ISRpe1 in the non-virulent
64 pecies may be the primary host for influenza reassortment at Delaware Bay.
65 enza A virus (IAV) genome enables rapid gene reassortment at the cost of complicating the task of ass
66 ntly emerged novel influenza strains through reassortment, avian influenza subtypes such as H5N1, H7N
67                                            A reassortment-based viral genetic system was used to map
68 f novel pandemic influenza A viruses through reassortment because of their susceptibility to both avi
69  in the creation of pandemic viruses through reassortment because of their susceptibility to infectio
70 ecific genetic group and was not a result of reassortment between A(H3N2) and A(H1N1) viruses.
71                    Our data demonstrate that reassortment between an avian H5N1 virus with low pathog
72 nsfer of an avian influenza virus or through reassortment between avian and human strains.
73 d H1N1 reassortant viruses have emerged from reassortment between classical H1N1 and H3N2 viruses.
74      Taken together, these data suggest that reassortment between cocirculating human pH1N1 and avian
75                                 Here, marker reassortment between coexpressed vectors was measured du
76  nature of the influenza virus genome allows reassortment between coinfecting viruses.
77              Genome segmentation facilitates reassortment between different influenza virus strains i
78 rains and suggest the possibility of genetic reassortment between different RVA genotypes within thes
79 segmented nature of their genome that allows reassortment between different species to generate novel
80 on of these interactions might limit genetic reassortment between divergent influenza A viruses.
81                                            A reassortment between genotype A and D was found in the c
82 uggest that a recombination hierarchy limits reassortment between groups and may explain why some var
83                                              Reassortment between H5 or H9 subtype avian and mammalia
84                  These studies indicate that reassortment between H5N1 avian influenza and H3N2 human
85 N9 outbreak lineage is confounded by ongoing reassortment between H7N9 and H9N2 viruses.
86 model reassortment and highlight the risk of reassortment between H9N2 and pH1N1 viruses.
87                                        Rapid reassortment between independently selected variants com
88 n together, we show here that the absence of reassortment between influenza viruses belonging to diff
89 N9 outbreak lineage is confounded by ongoing reassortment between outbreak viruses and diverse H9N2 v
90 s indicate that strong intrinsic barriers to reassortment between seasonal H3N2 and pH1N1 viruses are
91 hich IAV packaging signal divergence impacts reassortment between seasonal IAVs.
92 combination events and (ii) frequent genetic reassortment between segments.
93                     Here, we studied genetic reassortment between the A/Moscow/10/99 (H3N2, MO) virus
94 se, 4 contained a vdG1P[8] strain derived by reassortment between the G1P[5] and G6P[8] parental vacc
95 safety concerns regarding the possibility of reassortment between the H5 gene segment and circulating
96                                      Ongoing reassortment between the H7N9 outbreak lineage and diver
97    Using clinical specimen material, we show reassortment between the two coinfecting viruses occurre
98 1N1 and 2009 pandemic (pdm/09) H1N1 viruses, reassortment between them is highly plausible but largel
99 ccurred readily in vivo and furthermore that reassortment between these two viral subtypes is likely
100 described here offers new tools for studying reassortment between two strains of interest and applies
101 use they highlight an example of how genetic reassortment between virus strains could produce phenoty
102                              Second, genomic reassortment between viruses cocirculating in exhibition
103 10N8 viruses were generated through multiple reassortments between H10 and N8 viruses from domestic d
104 ional influenza vaccine strains because gene reassortment by more traditional methods is cumbersome.
105 completion of the motif, combined with viral reassortment can contribute to pandemic risks.
106      The genetic diversity generated through reassortment can facilitate the emergence of novel outbr
107 been shown previously with H9N2 viruses that reassortment can generate novel viruses with increased t
108                       For segmented viruses, reassortment can introduce drastic genomic and phenotypi
109 ia reassortment to create a novel virus, and reassortment can result in possible pandemics.
110  study was designed to quantify the relative reassortment capacities of classical and TRIG swine viru
111 reassort, suggesting that factors other than reassortment capacity alone are responsible for the diff
112              The present study revealed high reassortment compatibility between EA and pdm/09 viruses
113 the result of changes in herd immunity, with reassortment continuously generating novel genetic varia
114 solates, suggesting that genetic exchange by reassortment contributed to the evolution of the Califor
115 d in enhanced virulence while heterosubtypic reassortment contributed to the extinction of EIV H7N7.
116              Zoonotic transmission and viral reassortment contributed to the rich diversity of strain
117                             However, lack of reassortment could have been the result of differences i
118                      Through this process of reassortment, diversity is generated by the mixing of ge
119 olated from humans; however, intergroup gene reassortment does not occur for reasons that remain uncl
120 ion, more efficient selection resulting from reassortment during mixed infections, better regulation
121 potential for stochastic factors to restrict reassortment during natural infection, we sought to dete
122          Here, we tested the hypothesis that reassortment efficiency following coinfection through tr
123 ent RNA polymerase (RdRP) or through genetic reassortment enables perpetuation of IAV in humans throu
124                  An additional neuraminidase reassortment event indicated a recent inter-hemispheric
125  parts of the world, raising concerns that a reassortment event may lead to highly pathogenic influen
126 trains are the result of a relatively recent reassortment event of the G9 VP7 gene into a short-E-typ
127 ng that it may be a product of a decades-old reassortment event.
128 logenetic analysis reveals the occurrence of reassortment events among the Victoria and Yamagata line
129 ene products, we have shown that single-gene reassortment events are sufficient to alter the virulenc
130     Finally, we provide evidence of multiple reassortment events between CIV and other influenza viru
131 e rH3N2p viruses were generated in swine via reassortment events between H3N2 viruses and the pM segm
132 iruses to adapt to various hosts and undergo reassortment events ensures constant generation of new s
133  detect genotype differences attributable to reassortment events in influenza A virus evolution.
134 ajor factor controlling host adaptation, and reassortment events involving polymerase gene segments o
135 ts of this strain will also help to identify reassortment events involving this and other virus linea
136     These data will help to identify further reassortment events involving this or other virus lineag
137 culated in some locations, and a sequence of reassortment events over time could not be established.
138 ypes of poultry has facilitated the frequent reassortment events that are mostly responsible for the
139  branching inconsistencies that suggest five reassortment events, all involving the M segment, and th
140 ed multiple intrasubtypic and heterosubtypic reassortment events, including the acquisition of the NS
141                   This approach also detects reassortment events, such as those that led to the 2009
142 increases the risk of adaptive mutations and reassortment events, which may result in a novel virus w
143 nstellations (GCs) and illuminating putative reassortment events.
144 st that ferrets recapitulate influenza virus reassortment events.
145 r interest as a known participant in natural reassortment events.
146 ree topologies document multiple RNA segment reassortment events.
147 eight segment genotypes based on the genetic reassortment feature of influenza A viruses.
148           I then discuss the implications of reassortment for influenza A virus evolution, including
149 nship between mutation accumulation and gene reassortment for rotaviruses and how it impacts viral ev
150 ens in China, which was responsible, through reassortment, for the emergence of H7N9 viruses that cau
151 m avian consensus sequences, consistent with reassortment from an avian source shortly before 1918.
152 ficking and defines a time window for genome reassortment from same-cell coinfections.
153                                     Frequent reassortment generated 14 different genotypes distinct f
154                                     Although reassortment generated genetic diversity at the genotype
155 ic threat owing to the risk of a mutation or reassortment generating a virus with increased transmiss
156 2)] identified the previously undefined 11th reassortment group (K) expected for rotavirus.
157                                          The reassortment group K mutant RRVtsK(2) maps to genome seg
158  genetically characterized, were assigned to reassortment groups by pairwise crosses with the SA11 mu
159 RRVtsD(7), RRVtsJ(5), and RRVtsK(2), were in reassortment groups not previously mapped to genome segm
160 r SA11 mutants contained mutations in single reassortment groups, and four RRV mutants contained muta
161  these events and the constraints on genetic reassortment has implications for assessment of the pand
162    We show that both intra- and intersubtype reassortment have played a major role in the evolution o
163 ment level, which allows us to construct the reassortment history of individual segments within each
164                            Additionally, the reassortment history of these viruses raises concern for
165                            This high rate of reassortment illustrates the inaccuracy of a classificat
166                     Our study has shown that reassortment in BTV is very flexible, and there is no fu
167 on within-host genomic variation, we tracked reassortment in coinfected guinea pigs over time and giv
168                      While the importance of reassortment in generating genetically diverse influenza
169 nks this formula to a mechanistic account of reassortment in multipathogen systems in the form of sub
170           However, experiments to understand reassortment in pigs in detail have been limited because
171 gs highlight the importance of monitoring PA reassortment in seasonal flu, and confirm the role of th
172 enza viruses, highlighting the importance of reassortment in the generation of viruses with pandemic
173 ted natural occurrences of recombination and reassortment in the virus population.
174                                  Conversely, reassortment in vivo can be rendered undetectable by low
175 ints and drivers acting on influenza A virus reassortment, including the likelihood of coinfection at
176                    To address the need for a reassortment-incompetent live influenza A virus vaccine,
177                                              Reassortment increased with both time and distance, resu
178 stent with the evolutionary expectation that reassortment increases the efficiency of adaptation at t
179  provide a mixing vessel for influenza virus reassortment independent of differential sialic acid dis
180 rk raises important questions about mutation-reassortment interplay and its impact on human RV evolut
181  gene regions that correlate with restricted reassortment into simian RV strain SA11.
182                                              Reassortment is an important driving force for influenza
183  We found that intrahost diversity driven by reassortment is dynamic and dependent on the amount of e
184 er, as host evolutionary distance increases, reassortment is increasingly favored.
185                                              Reassortment is known to occur readily under well-contro
186                                     However, reassortment is limited in cases where the genes or enco
187 he factors that can affect influenza A virus reassortment is needed for the establishment of disease
188                   These results suggest that reassortment is not exquisitely sensitive to stochastic
189                              Influenza virus reassortment is prevalent in nature and is a major contr
190 t the importance of packaging signals in IAV reassortment is segment dependent.IMPORTANCE Influenza A
191 very presented here suggests that continuing reassortment led to the emergence of the A/Guangdong/1/2
192  With a high dose of 2 x 10(6) PFU, however, reassortment levels were high (avg. 59%) at 1 dpi and re
193                                     However, reassortment may also impose fitness costs if it unlinks
194 viruses that acquire a long-stalk NA through reassortment might be more likely to support transmissio
195  five amino acid substitutions, or four with reassortment, might be sufficient for mammal-to-mammal t
196                             The high rate of reassortment observed in influenza viruses and the preva
197 udy provides direct evidence that continuing reassortment occurred and led to the emergence of a nove
198                                        Here, reassortment occurred in the coinoculated donor host, mu
199 st animals and in vitro; however, reports of reassortment occurring naturally in humans are rare.
200 , and there is no fundamental barrier to the reassortment of any genome segment.
201 ha2,6-Gal receptors could facilitate genetic reassortment of avian and human IAVs.
202 /88-like NA gene, which likely resulted from reassortment of B/Hong Kong/330/01 and B/Hong Kong/1351/
203                                              Reassortment of gene segments between coinfecting influe
204                                          The reassortment of gene segments between influenza viruses
205 osaic nature of the capsule loci, suggesting reassortment of genes by horizontal transfer, and demons
206                              No evidence for reassortment of genes other than VP4 and VP7 between maj
207 c recombination, required for the beneficial reassortment of genetic information and for DNA double-s
208 rformed in C.albicans, one that leads to the reassortment of genetic material in this organism.
209 ossible mechanisms inhibiting the intertypic reassortment of genetic segments could be due to incompa
210    These results highlight the potential for reassortment of H1N1 viruses with avian influenza virus
211  that the novel A(H7N9) viruses emerged from reassortment of H7, N9, and H9N2 viruses.
212 han two parental strains, such as the triple reassortment of H7N9 avian influenza and the formation o
213                                 Mutation and reassortment of highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1
214 e of pigs in pandemic virus creation through reassortment of human and avian influenza viruses.
215 tential for coinfection of dogs and possible reassortment of human and other animal influenza A virus
216 V adaptation to new hosts typically involves reassortment of IAV gene segments from coinfecting virus
217                                              Reassortment of influenza A and B viruses has never been
218                                              Reassortment of influenza A or B viruses provides an evo
219  have developed a method to prevent the free reassortment of influenza A virus RNAs by rewiring their
220                                              Reassortment of influenza A viruses is an important driv
221                                              Reassortment of influenza A viruses is readily observed
222 eks postinfection, raising the potential for reassortment of influenza genes in a host infected with
223               The continuous circulation and reassortment of influenza H6 subtype viruses in birds hi
224 her in some parts of the world and favor the reassortment of influenza through simultaneous multiple
225                         Genetic mutation and reassortment of influenza virus gene segments, in partic
226 etic diversification of influenza A virus is reassortment of intact gene segments between coinfecting
227 pandemics of 1957 and 1968 resulted from the reassortment of low pathogenic avian viruses and human s
228 eplication and excretion of RotaTeq vaccine, reassortment of parental strains can occur.
229                       These blooms may favor reassortment of plasmid-encoded genes between pathogens
230 hogens have provided additional evidence for reassortment of segments within this region.
231                                              Reassortment of shorebird M and HA genes was evident, bu
232 ptation of the 1918-like avian virus through reassortment of the 1918 PB2 led to increased lethality.
233 ese results show the potential for continued reassortment of the 2009 pandemic H1N1 virus with endemi
234 and light chains is greatly increased by the reassortment of the antibody Fv domains themselves insid
235 cted cells with WT LCMV (LCMVwt) resulted in reassortment of the L segment of LCMVwt with the Sr at l
236                     This study suggests that reassortment of unusual G types into a background of glo
237 n two subjects, one of which resulted in the reassortment of V1 and V2 regions.
238 cated in homogenization of gene families and reassortment of variation among paralogs.
239 fection exclusion may limit the frequency of reassortment of viral genes.
240                 Pandemic IAVs emerge through reassortment of vRNA in animal or human hosts.
241 enetic analysis reveals that H5N6 arose from reassortments of H5 and H6N6 viruses, with the hemagglut
242  multiple influenza pandemics were caused by reassortments of viruses typically found in separate hos
243 sis of LD between segments supports frequent reassortment, on a time scale similar to the genomic mut
244    IAV can overcome host restriction through reassortment or adaptive evolution, and these are mechan
245 However, the mechanism preventing intertypic reassortment or gene exchange between influenza A and B
246 hat can adapt to its new host through either reassortment or point mutations and transmit by aerosoli
247 za A viruses restore HA/NA balance following reassortment or transfer to new host environments.
248                                The second is reassortment, or the exchange of gene segments between v
249 d as such, they have the potential to impact reassortment outcomes between different IAV strains.
250 ents we determined the occurrence of segment reassortment over a 30-year sampling period.
251 with genotypes A2 and B were common, and the reassortment pattern of different subtypes of A2 isolate
252 r approach to a new experiment that examines reassortment patterns between the 2009 H1N1 pandemic and
253 ound the rate of reticulate events (i.e., 20 reassortments per year in avian influenza).
254 ned to independent and reliable estimates of reassortment, perhaps obtained through molecular surveil
255 ments do not support the hypothesis that the reassortment process is driven by selection for function
256                                              Reassortment provides the evolutionary independence of C
257           In this study, the influenza virus reassortment rate in swine and human cells was determine
258 s/02860/09) virus (swH1N2) resulted in a 23% reassortment rate that was independent of alpha2,3- or a
259 ide an indirect, model-based estimate of the reassortment rate.
260          Associated virus evolution involves reassortment, recombination, and component capture.
261 tely 10-fold discordant doses did not reduce reassortment relative to equivalent inputs but markedly
262 y or if packaging signals prevent intertypic reassortment remains unknown.
263 ficity of viroplasm formation and, possibly, reassortment restriction between rotavirus groups.
264 n, thereby informing an understanding of the reassortment restriction mechanism.
265 ion of EIV, and we suggest that intrasubtype reassortment resulted in enhanced virulence while hetero
266            This is the first illustration of reassortment resulting in the host range expansion of a
267 ferent P and G serotype combinations through reassortment suggests that it will be important to deter
268 ression predicting the rate of viral subtype reassortment to be proportional to both prevalence and S
269            Our data reveal the potential for reassortment to contribute to intrahost diversity in mix
270   Influenza A viruses can change rapidly via reassortment to create a novel virus, and reassortment c
271                          In the pig, genetic reassortment to create novel influenza subtypes by mixin
272 esults demonstrate the immense potential for reassortment to generate viral diversity in nature.
273 ibodies are assembled by random gene segment reassortment to produce a vast number of specificities.
274                            The importance of reassortment to public health is clear from its role in
275 ere we investigate the ability of polymerase reassortment to restore the activity of an avian influen
276 e impact of packaging signal mismatch on IAV reassortment using the human seasonal influenza A/Panama
277 t both that subtype diversity (and therefore reassortment) varies from year to year and that several
278                           Intriguingly, this reassortment was associated with the acquisition of heig
279 s reassortment was random while heterologous reassortment was characterized by specific biases.
280              The potential for interspecific reassortment was examined for MCLCuV and its closest rel
281 /year, although some evidence of RNA segment reassortment was found.
282                                 As examples, reassortment was key to the emergence of the 1957, 1968,
283 f genotype patterns revealed that homologous reassortment was random while heterologous reassortment
284 hen such exposure led to coinfection, robust reassortment was typically seen, with 50 to 100% of isol
285 o assess phenotypic variation as a result of reassortment, we examined viral growth kinetics and plaq
286                   Single or multiple segment reassortments were made between the pandemic A/Californi
287 uses (RVs) can evolve through the process of reassortment, whereby the 11 double-stranded RNA genome
288 f emerging strains is altered by patterns in reassortment, whether biases are consistent across multi
289  insight into the factors that influence IAV reassortment will inform and strengthen ongoing public h
290  Nor is it likely to have obtained its NP by reassortment with an avian strain similar to those now c
291 man viruses can infect dog tracheas and that reassortment with CIV results in viable viruses.
292 to pigs in the United States was followed by reassortment with endemic SIV, resulting in reassorted v
293                                          The reassortment with endemic swine viruses and maintenance
294            Phylogenetic analysis showed that reassortment with long-stalk NA occurred sporadically an
295  HP H5 clade 2.3.4.4 H5N8 IAV and subsequent reassortment with low-pathogenic H?N2 and H?N1 North Ame
296 s in the virus hemagglutinin (HA) protein or reassortment with other pandemic viruses endow HPAI H5N1
297 d from the U.S. swine population by 2013 via reassortment with other swIAVs, these antigens reemerged
298  circulated in swine since being acquired by reassortment with seasonal human H3N2 viruses in 2001-20
299 ting in pig populations set the stage for PA reassortments with the potential to generate novel virus
300                                              Reassortment within polymerase genes causes changes in t

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top