ライフサイエンスコーパス: receptive field

1 by stimuli that extend beyond the classical receptive field.

2 on emanating from the centre of the neuron's receptive field.

3 implemented in different sub-regions of the receptive field.

4 citation and suppression associated with the receptive field.

5 d figure-ground stimulus is located over the receptive field.

6 uency vibrations that occur within its large receptive field.

7 ptic inputs, which generate a color-opponent receptive field.

8 t can be modulated by stimuli outside of the receptive field.

9 he increase of preferred contrast inside the receptive field.

10 y a surprising bias in inhibition within the receptive field.

11 ction inhibition, on opposing sides of their receptive fields.

12 enerate orientation-selective, cue-invariant receptive fields.

13 ponses to auditory stimuli than the standard receptive fields.

14 fferent locations within and around neuronal receptive fields.

15 only 10 cells of two types with overlapping receptive fields.

16 an is seen in their standard spectrotemporal receptive fields.

17 hysical environments via regularly repeating receptive fields.

18 developing realistic, orientation-selective receptive fields.

19 via which ACh may mediate its effects on AC receptive fields.

20 e necessary for the development of localized receptive fields.

21 i-body-part responses and sexually dimorphic receptive fields.

22 he spatial arrangement of current and future receptive fields.

23 g neurons with the smallest (highest acuity) receptive fields.

24 d to instruct the refinement of postsynaptic receptive fields.

25 stood in terms of their spatial and temporal receptive fields.

26 in extent to the size of single bipolar cell receptive fields.

27 ons encode the target dynamics with shifting receptive fields.

28 et-specific contrast preferences and spatial receptive fields.

29 the balance of inputs that generate neuronal receptive fields.

30 generate orientation-selective cue-invariant receptive fields.

31 ling is vital to the maintenance of cortical receptive fields [2]; however, it is unclear how this fi

32 rround organization of retinal ganglion cell receptive fields [5], and biasing of competitive local n

33 Furthermore, the network receptive field, a parsimonious network consisting of 1-

34 These cells exhibit center-surround receptive fields, a prototype of lateral inhibition betw

35 lly antagonistic surround to individual cone receptive fields, a signature inherited by downstream ne

36 non in which individual neurons change their receptive fields according to the metrics of each saccad

37 ive cells, the second-order component of the receptive field aligned with stimulus preference, wherea

38 lso be influenced by stimuli that surround a receptive field, although the nature of these contextual

39 related modulation across both the classical receptive field and the surround.

40 lls (HCs) to cones generates center-surround receptive fields and color opponency in the retina.

41 s) to photoreceptors creates center-surround receptive fields and color-opponent interactions.

42 standard (non-OMS) DS cells by their smaller receptive fields and different organization of preferred

43 derive closed-form expressions for cortical receptive fields and domain layouts predicted by the mod

44 he role of different circuits in shaping RGC receptive fields and establish a foundation for continue

45 Next we mapped receptive fields and found surprisingly precise micro-re

46 optimize response sensitivity across distant receptive fields and preclude any bias toward local ligh

47 cat, most retinal cells have center-surround receptive fields and push-pull excitation and inhibition

48 Cortical neurons remap their receptive fields and rescale sensitivity to spared perip

49 ellular recording techniques to characterize receptive fields and response properties in S1 of Monode

50 Revealing VIP+ cell morphologies, receptive fields and synaptic connections advances our u

51 e excited by a probe stimulus in the current receptive field, and also simultaneously by a probe stim

52 lying vibrotactile stimulation to the unit's receptive field, and unit-type perceptual reports are an

53 initial LN elements as the "subunits" of the receptive field, and we allow two independent sets of su

54 CG neurons had simple, orientation-selective receptive fields, and generated sustained responses to s

55 ignal correlations, associated with neuronal receptive fields, and noise correlations, associated wit

56 on of extra neurons, suggesting the neurons' receptive fields are not optimised for recognising abstr

57 ain accomplishes this is by remapping visual receptive fields around the time of a saccade.

58 The dermis model resulted in a larger receptive field, as the calculated strain showed less in

59 ion drove the eyes accurately to the site of receptive fields, as in normal animals.

60 We modeled each eye's receptive field at each cortical site using a difference

61 ervated volumes of muscle sheet, presumptive receptive fields, averaging 0.1 mm(3) .

62 wo Bayesian population-decoding methods (one receptive field-based, and the other not), we systematic

63 question in primary visual cortex (V1) using receptive-field-based models, combined with an experimen

64 ntaneous activity to drive the maturation of receptive fields before visual experience.

65 tive field structure (shifts and resizing of receptive fields both spatially and in complex feature s

66 well as modifying the structure and size of receptive fields, both in topological and feature space.

67 ity is not limited to the current and future receptive fields but encompasses the entire region of vi

68 the most numerous cell type has the smallest receptive fields but lacks push-pull.

69 iven primarily by the visual stimulus in the receptive field, but by the broader context that stimulu

70 res in a region of visual space known as the receptive field, but can be modulated by stimuli outside

71 ation that will be brought into the neuron's receptive field by the saccade (the future receptive fie

72 em, the response to a stimulus in a neuron's receptive field can be modulated by stimulus context, an

73 opulation of V1 neurons with locally diverse receptive fields can be described with surprisingly limi

74 In all examples, receptive fields can be predicted a priori by reformulat

75 ng sensory cells in which stimulation of the receptive field center excites the cell whereas stimulat

76 evation along with a concomitant decrease in receptive field center size for OFF RGCs.

77 hree high-definition (HD) RGCs possess small receptive-field centers and strong surround suppression.

78 e we use natural speech stimuli and advanced receptive field characterization methods to show that sp

79 ecoding performance occurred for voxels with receptive fields closer to the fovea and overlapping wit

80 responses to mechanical stimulation of their receptive fields, compared to control animals.

81 ained activation of the STG, spectrotemporal receptive fields could be reconstructed from vigorous re

82 y patterns presented over an unusually large receptive field: could this cell be a (de)focus detector

83 maintained as the animal develops to ensure receptive field coverage.

84 /-) OFF bipolar cells showed enlarged visual receptive fields, demonstrating that expanded dendritic

85 aracterized by one or more linearly weighted receptive fields describing sensitivity in sensory space

86 However, receptive fields do not capture the fact that the respon

87 d orientation is decodable from voxels whose receptive fields do not overlap with the stimulus edges,

88 cal and thalamic neurons, the weight of each receptive field element depends on the pattern of sound

89 patial separation across multiple peripheral receptive fields ensures the composite stimulus timecour

90 s receptive field by the saccade (the future receptive field), even before saccade begins.

91 Indeed, we find that V4 neurons whose receptive fields exhibit intricate selectivity also show

92 hat neurons with protracted resting temporal receptive fields exhibit stronger chosen value correlate

93 onses in these areas increases, and neuronal receptive fields expand and shift towards the remembered

94 A computational model shows that this receptive field expansion is consistent with the propaga

95 Here, we demonstrate multiple distinct receptive-field features in individual high-level audito

96 es display topographic organization, whereby receptive fields follow a characteristic pattern, from t

97 nse rates, as adaptations of spectrotemporal receptive fields following stimulation by temporally coh

98 Neurons in the owl's midbrain show shifting receptive fields for moving sources that are consistent

99 anching during development form the basis of receptive fields for neurons and are essential for the w

100 l statistics can account for many aspects of receptive field formation across models and sensory moda

101 Notably, the receptive-field-free decoding method was found to be wel

102 vidual ring neurons inherit simple-cell-like receptive fields from their upstream partners.

103 We undertook the first population receptive field functional magnetic resonance imaging an

104 Paradoxically, these highly variable receptive fields go alongside and are in fact required f

105 eading to a deep dynamic reshaping of neural receptive fields going far beyond simple surround suppre

106 murine cells with classical center-surround receptive fields had a "push-pull" structure of excitati

107 The receptive field has an excitatory ON center, flanked by

108 The development of sensory receptive fields has been modeled in the past by a varie

109 d portion of the visual field, termed their "receptive field." However, neuronal responses can also b

110 ractions create antagonistic centre-surround receptive fields important for detecting edges and gener

111 The most common receptive field in rodent thalamus, however, is center-s

112 reas DALcl2 neurons share a large excitatory receptive field in the contralateral hemifield.

113 systems is typically addressed by measuring receptive fields in a fixed, sensor-based coordinate fra

114 d two-photon calcium imaging, have described receptive fields in anesthetized animals.

115 used to study contextual effects on auditory receptive fields in animal models.

116 We have performed a comparative survey of receptive fields in dLGN, lateral posterior nucleus, and

117 d space remains undefined: classical spatial receptive fields in head-fixed subjects can be explained

118 Our results show that the diversity of receptive fields in L2/3 is likely due to diversity in t

119 ere we revisited the spatial organization of receptive fields in mouse primary visual cortex by measu

120 regions, a structure similar to simple cell receptive fields in primary visual cortex.

121 ly moving subjects; here we recorded spatial receptive fields in the auditory cortex of freely moving

122 g with descriptions of random, discontinuous receptive fields in the central olfactory neurons in mam

123 ests participation of neurons with localized receptive fields in the comparison process.

124 location, implicating neurons with localized receptive fields in the comparison process.

125 We map voxel population receptive fields in V1 and evaluate orientation decoding

126 al waves are critical for the development of receptive fields in visual thalamus (LGN) and cortex (VC

127 ort-tailed opossum S1 exhibited multiwhisker receptive fields, including a single best whisker (BW) a

128 right stimuli moving either in or out of the receptive field, independent of the direction of motion.

129 ntre and surround components of bipolar cell receptive fields interact to decorrelate bipolar cell ou

130 ints in space, we found that the Tm9 spatial receptive field is large.

131 Accurate estimation of neuronal receptive fields is essential for understanding sensory

132 Yet a full characterization of receptive fields is still incomplete, especially with re

133 al neuron including orientation selectivity, receptive field location and eye preference.

134 o measure BOLD activity at precisely defined receptive field locations in visual cortex (V1) of human

135 ecreased trial-to-trial variability whenever receptive field locations were associated with large rew

136 First, population receptive field mapping revealed strong biases for the c

137 Using visual receptive field mapping, glutamate uncaging, two-photon

138 Meanwhile, the VT2-3 cells have motion receptive fields matched to the lift axis.

139 sent novel cell types that have local motion receptive fields matched to translation self-motion, the

140 on responses in mouse rods, tracer coupling, receptive field measurements and pharmacological manipul

141 es on the activity of a recently-proposed V1 receptive field model and a deep convolutional neural ne

142 nction of stimulus location using population receptive field modeling to isolate each voxel's overlap

143 igh-field (7T) functional MRI and population receptive field modeling, we describe tuned responses to

144 l experimental task and nonlinear population receptive field modeling, we map and characterize the to

145 Here we show that auditory cortex receptive field models benefit from a nonlinear preproce

146 Population receptive field models have been successful in character

147 ward network models expands on simple linear receptive field models in a manner that yields substanti

148 ng properties of neurons will likely improve receptive field models in other sensory modalities too.

149 icantly beyond that of simple, mostly linear receptive field models.

150 ad-out strategy that emphasized neurons with receptive fields near the stimulus center.

151 ction of neurons in early visual cortex with receptive fields not selective for orientation that have

152 With a mean receptive field of 118 degrees , MLG1s have a large supe

153 surface sensory receptors, and therefore the receptive field of each sense is defined by the aggregat

154 rine cell type, in which the extra-classical receptive field of ON parasol cells is formed by recipro

155 As the spatiotemporal receptive field of T5 in Drosophila is common to the sim

156 induced visual sensations is matched to the receptive field of the cortical site measured with broad

157 We find that the receptive fields of both T4 and T5 exhibit spatiotempora

158 miR-132/212 deletion affects development of receptive fields of cortical neurons determining a speci

159 Here we assessed one-dimensional spatial receptive fields of individual dendritic spines within i

160 plained by neurons having different temporal receptive fields of integration, indexed by examining ne

161 ON-OFF convergence visualized by mapping the receptive fields of layer 2/3 neurons in the tree shrew

162 The spatial receptive fields of neurons in medial entorhinal cortex

163 s study demonstrates for the first time that receptive fields of neurons in the midbrain inferior col

164 ending on where those stimuli lie within the receptive fields of neurons.

165 been used as the canonical model to describe receptive fields of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) for de

166 that inhibition is evoked broadly across the receptive fields of simple cells, and we identify a surp

167 Characterizing the receptive fields of such neurons is difficult with stand

168 ntracellular calcium signals, we measure the receptive fields of the first direction-selective cells

169 er will perform Bayesian prediction when the receptive fields of the neurons encode the target dynami

170 Moreover, we show that the receptive fields of the newly discovered speed neurons c

171 Recently the receptive fields of these neurons have been mapped, allo

172 We examined the corticocortical receptive field organization of resting-state BOLD data

173 ttern between areas reflected the underlying receptive field organization with higher correlations be

174 Most qualitative receptive field parameters were found to be unchanged be

175 ented cells, the second-order subunit of the receptive field predicted the preferred angle.

176 k, the spatiotemporal organization of the T5 receptive field predicts the activity of T5 in response

177 Computational modeling of these receptive fields predicts responses to motion and reveal

178 volves first estimating a voxel's population receptive field (pRF) and then "drifting" attention thro

179 reported in vivo We used fMRI and population receptive field (pRF) mapping to demonstrate that the fi

180 of these deficits using fMRI and population receptive field (pRF) mapping to infer properties of vis

181 We first develop a population receptive field (pRF) model [11, 12] of spatial response

182 et of visual field locations (the population receptive field [pRF]) that evoked a response for each v

183 d by less than 10 mum shared similar spatial receptive field properties and exhibited a distance-depe

184 cally either concentrated on tuning curve or receptive field properties and remained agnostic as to t

185 gulating experience-dependent plasticity and receptive field properties develop late, like their inhi

186 pines defined by dimensionality reduction of receptive field properties exhibited non-random dendriti

187 However, the normal development of many receptive field properties has not yet been thoroughly q

188 Overall, however, receptive field properties in the anesthetized animal re

189 there have been few comprehensive studies of receptive field properties in the awake mouse, especiall

190 ly mature neural organization and adult-like receptive field properties in very young infants.

191 Spatial receptive field properties of dendritic spines were stri

192 nce is necessary for the development of some receptive field properties of neurons in primary sensory

193 e primary auditory cortex (A1) can shape the receptive field properties of neurons in the ventral div

194 The non-canonical receptive field properties of the OND RGC-integration of

195 s known about how feedforward pathways shape receptive field properties of visual neurons, relatively

196 Their receptive field properties suggest that they could serve

197 mouse, called the ON delayed (OND) RGC, with receptive field properties that deviate from center-surr

198 Thus, despite the absence of barrels, most receptive field properties were similar to those reporte

199 led stream differences in the development of receptive field properties.

200 ion in controlling both temporal and spatial receptive field properties.

201 e three "high-definition" RGCs share certain receptive-field properties, they also have distinct tuni

202 lassical surround suppression is a prominent receptive field property of neurons in the lateral genic

203 ying stimuli, whereas the spatial aspects of receptive fields remain comparatively unchanged.

204 neural mechanism to construct such versatile receptive fields remains unclear.

205 However, the relationship between these receptive fields remains unclear.

206 anges exhibit properties similar to those of receptive field remapping, a phenomenon in which individ

207 map in V4 matches many of the properties of receptive field remapping.

208 he course of functional recovery, we tracked receptive field reorganization, spontaneous activity, an

209 put-output analysis based on spectrotemporal receptive fields revealed inhibition to render the neuro

210 The network receptive field reveals separate excitatory and inhibito

211 Further, we found that with maturation receptive field (RF) center sizes decrease, spike-trigge

212 for correlations among curvature preference, receptive field (RF) end-stopping, and RF eccentricity i

213 Are silencing, ectopic shifts, and receptive field (RF) scaling in cortical scotoma project

214 When light falls within a neuronal visual receptive field (RF) the resulting activity is referred

215 ity of stimuli in the surround of a neuron's receptive field (RF) to modulate (typically suppress) th

216 red with responses to distractor bars in the receptive field (RF).

217 e movies to determine the optimal space-time receptive fields (RFs) for encoding local motion speed i

218 We map spatial receptive fields (RFs) for SCN neurons and find that onl

219 Spatial receptive fields (RFs) mapped using melanopsin-isolating

220 We mapped the visual receptive fields (RFs) of neurons recorded at the same e

221 city of thalamocortical connectivity and the receptive fields (RFs) of postsynaptic cortical neurons.

222 All neurons (n = 82) that had receptive fields (RFs) on the contralateral forelimb exh

223 cted LGN-V1 pairs were only found when their receptive fields (RFs) overlapped, and the probability o

224 are not influenced by stimuli outside their receptive fields (RFs), dynamics of the high-dimensional

225 s and integrating visual inputs across their receptive fields (RFs).

226 y altering the encoding properties of single receptive fields (RFs).

227 bbian learning is applied to natural images, receptive field shapes were strongly constrained by the

228 nd to the presaccadic enhancement [9-11] and receptive field shifts reported in neurophysiological st

229 This produces firing rate modulations and receptive field shifts.

230 ased stimulus selectivity and expanded their receptive fields significantly.

231 We introduce a new method for estimating receptive fields simultaneously for a population of V1 n

232 ng-surround receptive field, which varied in receptive field size and degree of ON-OFF asymmetry with

233 tinal waves also causes long-term impacts on receptive field size and fine-scale retinotopy in the dL

234 ver, functional pairs exhibit asymmetries in receptive field size and response kinetics.

235 ive effects that are automatically scaled to receptive field size in any given area.

236 , biased competition automatically scaled to receptive field size) and receptive field structure (shi

237 ghtly tuned than predictions based simply on receptive field size, indicating that correlated activit

238 played decreases in spontaneous activity and receptive field size.

239 pike-timing precision, and reduced classical receptive field size.

240 (1) dendritic field size, which approximate receptive field size; (2) dendritic complexity, which af

241 logical recordings of their light responses, receptive-field size and structure, and synaptic mechani

242 rences exist between the species in terms or receptive field sizes and orientation map organization,

243 ct-based attention, leveraging the different receptive field sizes in distinct cortical areas.

244 Here the authors show that the receptive field sizes of reticular neurons are small eno

245 tisation in both species, including enhanced receptive field sizes.

246 whether cells in the reticular nucleus have receptive fields small enough to provide localized feedb

247 addressed this issue by quantifying spatial receptive fields (SRFs) in two functionally distinct cor

248 These long-term modifications in receptive field statistics match recent sensory percepti

249 Spectrotemporal receptive field (STRF) mapping describes the neural resp

250 ave pronounced effects on the spatiotemporal receptive fields (STRFs) of neurons.

251 atically scaled to receptive field size) and receptive field structure (shifts and resizing of recept

252 a robust, biologically plausible account of receptive field structure for all cell types encountered

253 in the evolutionarily advantageous nature of receptive field structure in visual systems and suggests

254 For example, in rodent, thalamic receptive field structure is markedly diverse, and many

255 nglion cell in the retina and shows that the receptive field structure is remarkably similar to that

256 Thus, receptive field structure supersedes size per se for for

257 w sampling scheme motivated by physiological receptive field structure, localized random sampling, wh

258 l connectivity, or imposing simple-cell-like receptive field structure, no study has exploited the fa

259 ons occur between cells with similar spatial receptive field structure.

260 tical columns exhibit an invariant aggregate receptive field structure: an OFF-dominated central regi

261 Yet how attention interacts with the receptive-field structure of cortical neurons remains un

262 Inhibition to SbC-RGC is driven by rectified receptive field subunits, leading us to hypothesize that

263 er, although it is well established that the receptive field surround is strongest when ambient or ba

264 re strongly suppressed by stimulation of the receptive field surround.

265 in motion-sensitive neurons that have larger receptive fields than those found in V1, giving the pote

266 rons in early visual cortex have specialized receptive fields that allow them to selectively respond

267 that central auditory neurons have composite receptive fields that can arise through a combination of

268 ntribute most to classifier performance have receptive fields that cluster in cortical regions corres

269 Early visual areas have neuronal receptive fields that form a sampling mosaic of visual s

270 a parsimonious network consisting of 1-7 sub-receptive fields that interact nonlinearly, consistently

271 enhances the response gains of neurons with receptive fields that partially overlap, or abut, the ph

272 s of inputs received from neurons in MT with receptive fields that resemble basis vectors recovered w

273 cost function, AMA returns the filters (i.e. receptive fields) that extract the most useful stimulus

274 neurons are commonly characterized using the receptive field, the linear dependence of their response

275 ll characterized RGC with a comparably small receptive field, the local edge detector, in response to

276 an be characterized by their spectrotemporal receptive fields, the spectral and temporal features of

277 ignals are characterised by relatively large receptive fields, this is likely to be due to an increas

278 Thus, Wave neurons match their receptive field to appropriate motor programs by partici

279 nlinear feedforward network model (a network receptive field) to cortical responses to natural sounds

280 fically center-surround, temporally biphasic receptive fields, to the generation of direction selecti

281 for the locations represented by the visual receptive fields (VRFs) of the disconnected Ipc units, a

282 e use fMRI to relate changes in single voxel receptive fields (vRFs) to changes in population-level r

283 ay might be pooled to generate cue-invariant receptive fields, we recorded visual responses from sing

284 serine-treated animals, tectal neuron visual receptive fields were expanded, suggesting a failure to

285 ed neural responses indicate that population receptive fields were explicitly tuned for object catego

286 Receptive fields were mapped in the superior colliculus

287 The data showed that receptive fields were offset in position by the ocular d

288 Both symmetrical and asymmetrical receptive fields were present.

289 Early surveys of visual response properties (receptive fields) were performed in anesthetized animals

290 t auditory cortical neurons can modify their receptive fields when animals engage in auditory detecti

291 e small ipsilateral, retinotopically ordered receptive fields, whereas DALcl2 neurons share a large e

292 osities with a small-center, strong-surround receptive field, which varied in receptive field size an

293 ion of visual space across which the current receptive field will be swept by the saccade.

294 Accounting for this change in effective receptive field with spectrotemporal context improves pr

295 and discriminated the search target in their receptive fields with a time course earlier than in FEF

296 mes completely fill available space in their receptive fields with evenly spaced dendrites to uniform

297 We find that these neurons have compact receptive fields with primarily overlapping ON and OFF s

298 th pre- and postsynaptic expression develops receptive fields with reduced variability and improved d

299 We then show that receptive fields with similar characteristics can be rep

300 that S1 neurons had multimodal (tactile/IR) receptive fields, with clear preferences for those stimu