ライフサイエンスコーパス: recession

1 26 with unilateral lateral rectus muscle re-recession.

2 es has been in decline since the most recent recession.

3 r AHP was corrected by performing a bimedial recession.

4 n, radiographic bone fill (RBF), and mucosal recession.

5 blems before and during the current economic recession.

6 used significant crayfish mortality and gill recession.

7 mental health effects of the global economic recession.

8 hniques at reducing CDH in cases of gingival recession.

9 much of the industrialized world into a deep recession.

10 , bleeding on probing reduction, and mucosal recession.

11 le KT dimensions and improve marginal tissue recession.

12 the modulation of bone turnover and gingival recession.

13 ysis was performed for intrabony defects and recession.

14 ents to determine probing depth and gingival recession.

15 imally effective protocols to treat gingival recession.

16 linical treatments in patients with gingival recession.

17 ne fenestration, dehiscence, and soft-tissue recession.

18 producible volumetric evaluation of gingival recession.

19 reservation of the papillae, and no gingival recession.

20 nd COPH in patients with and without papilla recession.

21 ot adult mass and experience subsequent mass recession.

22 ns following initial bilateral medial rectus recession.

23 achment levels while producing no detectable recession.

24 nts with Miller Class I or III facial tissue recession.

25 using PCG was effective in reducing gingival recession.

26 e tissue to treat multiple areas of gingival recession.

27 were classified as Miller Class III gingival recession.

28 e 64 untreated sites experienced increase in recession.

29 in consumption volume triggered by economic recession.

30 nfluence the degree of mass overshooting and recession.

31 (73%) treated with lateral rectus muscle re-recession.

32 ia following bilateral lateral rectus muscle recessions.

33 zes the financial system and causes economic recessions.

34 topic increase during and immediately after recessions.

35 flap (CAF) procedures in localized gingival recessions.

36 fits in the treatment of teeth with gingival recessions.

37 ical microscope in the treatment of gingival recessions.

38 rioration in quality of care during economic recessions.

39 e treatment of Miller Class I or II gingival recessions.

40 ortality among older workers declines during recessions.

41 ection or resection combined with antagonist recession (12 with esotropia and 19 with exotropia; mean

42 cation or plication combined with antagonist recession (13 with esotropia and 9 with exotropia; mean

43 g and after (compared with before) the Great Recession (2007-2009).

44 oidal detachment; 3.5 joules--moderate angle recession; 4 joules--anterior lens dislocation; 4.8 joul

45 has increased since the onset of the global recession, a trend that may have long-term health and so

46 dal behavior rise with the continuing global recession, additional suicide prevention efforts and lon

47 elected from 11 patients with Miller Class I recessions affecting canines or premolars in the maxilla

48 s of one patient demonstrated 2 mm of buccal recession after approximately 46 months in function.

49 The lack of post-surgical recession after VMIS has not been reported with traditio

50 ute gingivitis, chronic gingivitis, gingival recession, aggressive or acute periodontitis, chronic pe

51 tions that are too large for correction with recession alone.

52 l patients underwent bilateral medial rectus recession and a lateral rectus resection in the nondomin

53 t (CTG) is a popular means to treat gingival recession and augment keratinized tissue.

54 In an era of economic recession and budget cutbacks,Americans may be curious t

55 The recession and contamination of damaged Pt electrodes are

56 iary body and zonule corresponded with angle recession and lens displacement pathologically.

57 Bilateral medial rectus muscle recession and one lateral rectus muscle resection surger

58 nteraction between previous glacier advance, recession and outburst flooding.

59 mals of extreme elevation respond to glacial recession and past harvest, we combined our fieldwork wi

60 r fluid (GCF) samples from sites of gingival recession and saliva; and 2) clinical outcomes of corona

61 Recession and tenotomy surgery resulted in similar chang

62 are extremely adaptive to changes induced by recession and tenotomy surgery, responding with modulati

63 Depth of recession and width of GR below the cemento-enamel junct

64 nd for electricity triggered by the economic recession, and 28% can be attributed to switching of fue

65 measures, such as clinical attachment level, recession, and bleeding on probing.

66 g on probing, mobility, suppuration, mucosal recession, and buccal tissue transparency, were recorded

67 bleeding on probing, probing depth, gingival recession, and clinical attachment level (CAL).

68 clinician-reported intercostal or subcostal recession, and clinician-reported wheeze on auscultation

69 o improve patient comfort, to prevent future recession, and in conjunction with restorative, orthodon

70 clinical attachment level (CAL); 3) gingival recession; and 4) percentage of sites with bleeding on p

71 previous orthodontic treatment; 4) gingival recession; and 5) band of keratinized gingiva for each o

72 riods of higher unemployment rates, that is, recessions, are associated with a moderate but significa

73 an recession depth (0.21 versus 0.39 mm) and recession area (0.31 versus 0.53 mm(2)) after 6 months w

74 s, with a duration of >/=6 months evaluating recession areas (Miller Class I or II) that were treated

75 ls, case series, and case reports evaluating recession areas that were treated by means of RC procedu

76 The areas of gingival recession associated with teeth #18 through #22 and teet

77 ingival index and amount of lingual gingival recession at both time periods compared to controls.

78 During the 12-month study period the mean recession at sites with PreGR >/=2 mm decreased signific

79 The mean recession at the initial examination for the CPT/PRP gro

80 ators, included CAL, probing depth, gingival recession, bleeding on probing (BOP), visible plaque, su

81 tachment loss (AL), the presence of gingival recession, bleeding on probing, and full-mouth radiograp

82 the post-surgery increase in buccal gingival recession (bREC), effect of a connective tissue graft (C

83 reases in attachment loss and facial/lingual recession, but the difference in change between groups w

84 r ameliorate the severity of central papilla recession by restorative/prosthetic or orthodontic inter

85 evaluate the treatment of localized gingival recessions by using gingival unit grafts (palatal tissue

86 erent clinical attachment level and gingival recession changes by the end of the maintenance period.

87 gival index, bleeding index, probing depths, recession, clinical attachment level, mobility, furcatio

88 ripled in 2008 following the global economic recession, closely associated with increased gold prices

89 Moderate angle recession commensurate with typical clinical traumatic g

90 eater loss of attachment, probing depth, and recession compared with controls.

91 MW, or CAL of Miller Class I and II gingival recessions compared with the other treatment modalities.

92 hange in horizontal furcation depth, and for recession complete root coverage.

93 han the conventional-energy industries under recession conditions.

94 Percentages of average recession coverage (ARC) and complete recession coverage

95 verage recession coverage (ARC) and complete recession coverage (CRC) were evaluated 3 and 6 months a

96 se of EMD with a coronally advanced flap for recession coverage will give superior results compared w

97 had significant improvement in the amount of recession coverage with means of 2.83 mm for the PDM and

98 ession defect treatment, to provide adequate recession coverage, the periodontal profession continues

99 Among patients with papilla recession, CW and PT-CP independently predicted PH (both

100 s is the first case report in which a severe recession defect and its associated carious lesion were

101 pilot study was to compare the percentage of recession defect coverage obtained with a coronally posi

102 CAF) have been deemed the gold standard for recession defect treatment, to provide adequate recessio

103 ngle maxillary anterior Miller Class I or II recession defect were enrolled.

104 ion, recurrent decay, and a Miller Class III recession defect.

105 s presenting with twenty-one Millers Class I recession defects (isolated or adjacent multiple) were s

106 st or control treatments for Miller Class II recession defects appear to lead to stable, clinically e

107 Untreated recession defects in individuals with good oral hygiene

108 two therapies in surgically created gingival recession defects in restoring missing cementum, periodo

109 Thirty-seven Miller Class I or II recession defects in six patients were treated using the

110 Seventeen patients with Class I to II recession defects on mandibular anterior teeth were incl

111 Overall, data from 325 single gingival recession defects revealed a statistically significant s

112 nths was 89.92+/-15.59% and 14 of 21 treated recession defects showed a100% root coverage.

113 aterial) influence root coverage outcomes in recession defects treated with a coronally advanced flap

114 e results and healing responses of bilateral recession defects treated with acellular dermal matrix (

115 ination with a CAF in subjects with gingival recession defects using a randomized, controlled, split-

116 eventeen patients with 40 bilateral gingival recession defects were compared.

117 In the histologic/micro-CT study segment, recession defects were created in six teeth, each requir

118 d controlled trial, Miller Class II gingival recession defects were treated with either a connective

119 Management of gingival recession defects, a common periodontal condition, using

120 ngle-tooth recession defects, multiple-tooth recession defects, and additional focused questions on r

121 l comparison of matched-pair, within-patient recession defects, collagen matrix (CMX) + CAF therapy w

122 iew, which covered treatment of single-tooth recession defects, multiple-tooth recession defects, and

123 ss the treatment outcomes for multiple-tooth recession defects, oral sites other than maxillary canin

124 tion: For Miller Class I and II single-tooth recession defects, SCTG procedures provide the best outc

125 hat assessed single-tooth, Miller Class I/II recession defects, surgically treated by CAF.

126 possible for single-tooth and multiple-tooth recession defects, with SCTG procedures providing the be

127 eir ability to correct Miller Class I and II recession defects.

128 successfully to correct Miller Class I or II recession defects.

129 e method for the treatment of Miller Class I recession defects.

130 odalities for clinically correcting gingival recession defects.

131 depth, especially for Miller Class I and II recession defects.

132 These defects were created with a recession depth > or = 3 mm, the osseous crest 2 to 3 mm

133 Mean recession depth (0.21 versus 0.39 mm) and recession area

134 eeding score (FMBS), probing depth (PD), and recession depth (RD) were recorded at baseline and 1, 3,

135 aque and gingival index, probing depth (PD), recession depth (RD), and attachment level were recorded

136 Plaque index, papilla bleeding index, recession depth (RD), recession width (RW), and root sur

137 cedures can provide significant reduction in recession depth and CAL gain for Miller Class I and II r

138 There was no difference in the midfacial recession depth and recession width at the test and cont

139 n reduction is associated with both baseline recession depth and with the amount of initial KT.

140 The primary outcome parameter, change in recession depth at 5 years, demonstrated statistically s

141 icant results favoring the CTG were found in recession depth reduction (-2.9 + 0.5 mm, test; -3.3 + 0

142 lagen matrix led to the best improvements of recession depth, clinical attachment level (CAL) gain, a

143 procedures provide significant reduction in recession depth, especially for Miller Class I and II re

144 Outcomes examined were recession depth, probing depth, clinical attachment leve

145 Clinical parameters, including recession depth, recession width (RW), width of keratini

146 Gingival thickness, recession depth, recession width, probing depth (PD), cl

147 djusted covariates, the greater the baseline recession depth, the smaller the chance of achieving CRC

148 dies) showed significantly increased odds of recession development long term, regarding either number

149 uring the later phases of peak abundance and recession due to an influx of swans from adjacent pastur

150 ncrease in existing recession or develop new recession during the 18- to 35-year follow-up.

151 The probability of recession during tooth movement in thin biotype is high

152 ssociated with COPH in patients with papilla recession, especially IW, PTW, PT-CP, and BC-pCEJ (P <0.

153 the development and progression of gingival recession, especially when restorative margins may inter

154 No recession from preoperative levels was noted.

155 es (control group), with or without gingival recession (GR) and with attached gingiva, were left untr

156 evaluate the 2-year term results of gingival recession (GR) associated with non-carious cervical lesi

157 of attached gingiva associated with gingival recession (GR) at baseline were treated with FGGs in a p

158 tcomes after treatment of localized gingival recession (GR) by a coronally advanced flap (CAF) combin

159 Root exposure due to gingival recession (GR) can cause cervical dentin hypersensitivit

160 s presenting with 21 Miller Class I gingival recession (GR) defects (isolated or adjacent multiple) w

161 g-term outcomes of untreated buccal gingival recession (GR) defects and the associated reported esthe

162 roaches for the treatment of single gingival recession (GR) defects are documented in the literature.

163 Gingival recession (GR) defects can be treated by various methods

164 The effective treatment of gingival recession (GR) defects is crucial for predictable outcom

165 iated with LLLT in the treatment of gingival recession (GR) defects.

166 and approximately 10% of teeth with gingival recession (GR) had DH.

167 Gingival recession (GR) is one of the most common esthetic concer

168 Gingival recession (GR) might be associated with patient discomfo

169 ), clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession (GR), and radiographic bone level (BL) were co

170 en toothbrushing and development of gingival recession (GR), but relevant GR data for the multidirect

171 ), clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession (GR), gingival index (GI), bleeding on probing

172 clinical attachment level (CAL) and gingival recession (GR).

173 linical attachment level [CAL], and gingival recession [GR]) and radiographic (defect bone level [DBL

174 CTG + CAF resulted in greater reductions in recession, greater percentage of root coverage, and incr

175 and 18.1 PD in the lateral rectus muscle re-recession group.

176 nd 2.9 years in the lateral rectus muscle re-recession group.

177 ea (AERSA) as a prognostic test for gingival recessions (GRs) and to compare the predictive value of

178 teen bilateral Miller Class I or II gingival recessions (GRs) were selected.

179 rformed for the treatment of single gingival recessions (GRs).

180 chment apparatus when used to treat gingival recessions (GRs).

181 teral Miller's Class I or II buccal gingival recessions >/=2.0 mm in canines or premolars were select

182 atients with Miller Class II buccal gingival recession, > or = 3 mm deep and > or = 3 mm wide in cont

183 The recent economic recession has led to increases in suicide, but whether U

184 depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), recession height (RH), width of keratinized gingiva (WKG

185 Recession height, probing depth, clinical attachment lev

186 For all parameters except recession height, there was an improvement in the final

187 Data on Class I, II, III, and IV gingival recessions, histologic attachment achieved after treatme

188 During the Great Recession, however, first-trimester unemployment was ass

189 , keratinized tissue width (KTW), horizontal recession (HR), mucogingival junction localization, and

190 ), determinate growth patterns, such as mass recession in birds (weight loss prior to fledging, prece

191 Irreversible tissue recession in chronic inflammatory diseases is associated

192 trends in Spain before and during the Great Recession in different socioeconomic groups, quantifying

193 probing, clinical attachment level, gingival recession, interleukin-1beta, tumor necrosis factor (TNF

194 to the unesthetic appearance of the gingival recession involving both maxillary central incisors.

195 y retinal detachment; 7 joules--severe angle recession, iridodialysis, and cyclodialysis; 7.5 joules-

196 Gingival recession is a frequent clinical finding in the general

197 Botulinum toxin-augmented medial rectus recession is an effective treatment for large-angle infa

198 rs confirmed again that the risk for mucosal recession is low with early implant placement.

199 Clinical measurements of vertical recession, keratinized tissue, probing depths, and attac

200 producible volumetric evaluation of gingival recession marks on stone replicas.

201 A period of economic recession may be particularly difficult for people with

202 to esthetic challenges, including midfacial recession (MFR) and papillary height (PH) loss.

203 These results suggest that recessions might be protective in the absence of job los

204 D = -0.48, 95% CI = -0.70 to -0.27), mucosal recession (MR) (WMD = -0.60 mm, 95% CI = -0.85 to -0.36

205 ere included, with data on midfacial mucosal recession (MR) of immediately placed implants following

206 uccal (bREC) and interdental (iREC) gingival recession observed at 6 months after treatment of period

207 Some degree of mass recession occurred in 73% of all study chicks.

208 nge in COPH was large but later slowed after recession occurred while there was no severe interdental

209 At 12 months, a mean +/- SE gingival recession of 1.1 +/- 0.3 mm in OF and 0.9 +/- 0.4 mm in

210 he financial crisis of 2007 and the economic recession of 2008-2009.

211 The global economic recession of 2008-2010 severely depressed light-duty veh

212 Surgical recession of an extraocular muscle (EOM) posterior to it

213 ides a principled rationale for the apparent recession of the ascending pathway in motor cortex.

214 Unilateral re-recession of the lateral rectus muscle and medial rectus

215 hern Appalachian Mountain refugium following recession of the Laurentide Ice Sheet at 22,000-19,000 B

216 at these differences corresponded to general recession of the midface and superior displacement of th

217 tissue graft (CTG) for treatment of multiple recessions of Miller Classes I and II over a short perio

218 ur understanding of the effects of the Great Recession on health and add to growing literature sugges

219 this study examined the effects of the Great Recession on maternal harsh parenting.

220 Twice as many teeth had recession on ST-site (approximately 20%) than NST-site (

221 cisors that initially presented with 2 mm of recession on the facial surface.

222 ates during and after the 1980 and 1981-1982 recessions, on rates of subsequent adolescent substance

223 es showed a tendency to increase in existing recession or develop new recession during the 18- to 35-

224 ng economic conditions linked with the Great Recession or food prices.

225 atch with prey such that the extent of range recession or local adaptation may appear as a geographic

226 ed statistically significant improvements in recession over baseline, although intergroup comparisons

227 None of the implants developed mucosal recession over time, as confirmed by values of the dista

228 many advantages, carries a risk of gingival recession, papilla loss, collapse of ridge contour, and

229 nt decreases were recorded in both groups of recession parameters compared with baseline measurements

230 l trials (RCTs) to evaluate whether baseline recession-, patient-, and procedure-related factors can

231 FMPI), full-mouth BOP score (FMBS), gingival recession, PD, and clinical attachment level (CAL).

232 For the recession period between 2008 and 2011, there were 11 si

233 solitarious phase of each subspecies during recession periods to understand whether both subspecies

234 ch from a harmless solitarious stage, during recession periods, to swarms of gregarious individuals t

235 iotic factors during the growth-, peak-, and recession-phases of the plant growth cycle.

236 xamination including probing depth, gingival recession, plaque index, and bleeding on probing was per

237 d that as unemployment rates increase during recessions, population mortality actually declines.

238 ntries, our analysis suggests that, although recessions pose risks to health, the interaction of fisc

239 The results indicate that greater gingival recession prevalence and extent are associated with ST p

240 Recession prevalence is much greater in ST-site quadrant

241 plaque score), bleeding on probing, gingival recession, probing depth (PD), and vertical (VAL) and ho

242 tarious distributions and forecast potential recession range shifts under two extreme climate change

243 orthern clade could contract its solitarious recession range, while the southern clade is likely to e

244 e the southern clade is likely to expand its recession range.

245 evel (CAL), probing depth (PD), and gingival recession (REC) were assessed immediately before surgery

246 ive to CTG+CAF for the treatment of gingival recessions (REC), in a prospective randomized, controlle

247 nd of T3, 83% of the 64 treated sites showed recession reduction (RecRed), whereas 48% of the 64 untr

248 ex, age, and smoking are not associated with recession reduction at 8 years.

249 Recession reduction from baseline to 8 years was 2.3 +/-

250 The general linear model shows that recession reduction is associated with both baseline rec

251 eline width of KT is a predictive factor for recession reduction when using the CAF technique.

252 Complete root coverage, recession reduction, and amount of keratinized tissue (K

253 s effective in the treatment of GRs However, recession relapse and reduction of KT occurred during th

254 Gingival recession remains an important problem in dental estheti

255 abismus who underwent surgical correction by recession, resection, advancement, or a combination of b

256 ia/exotropia) and/or the surgical procedure (recession/resection) (34 of 114 responses [29.8%]), glob

257 Among all study patients, papilla recession status and PT-CP were significant independent

258 Age, papilla recession status, PT-CP, and BC-pCEJ were significant in

259 of root sensitivity associated with gingival recession stemming from toothbrush abrasion.

260 change differed in patients without and with recession, suggesting that the initial change in COPH wa

261 mm posterior to its original insertion site (recession surgery) or at the same site (tenotomy).

262 ulation health tends to evolve better during recessions than in expansions.

263 Following the onset of the recession, the gap in unemployment rates between individ

264 Of the 602 recessions treated, 310 (51.5%) achieved CRC.

265 e graft (CTG) + PRF in Miller Class I and II recession treatment compared to CAF + CTG.

266 advocate the true clinical effect of PRF on recession treatment with CAF + CTG, and additional trial

267 Data on Class I, II, III, and IV recessions, type of histologic attachment achieved with

268 indings on soft tissue root coverage (RC) of recession-type defects to daily clinical practice.

269 depth and CAL gain for Miller Class I and II recession-type defects.

270 h at least one Miller Class I or II gingival recession underwent a surgical root coverage procedure.

271 In 3 patients, an inferior rectus recession using an adjustable suture was performed to tr

272 The determination of gingival recession volume was highly reproducible.

273 rs of plaque index, gingival index, vertical recession (VR), probing depth, clinical attachment level

274 Clinical parameters including vertical recession (VR), probing depth, keratinized tissue (KT),

275 e WMD of CAL gain was 0.10 mm and the WMD of recession was -0.18 mm; again, no significant difference

276 The Great Recession was associated with small increases in caloric

277 ooting adult mass followed by extensive mass recession was most prevalent at our freshwater colony, b

278 Gingival recession was not associated with the thickness of both

279 examined, and the average depth of the gold recessions was determined to be 1.15 mum and 910 nm, res

280 atment of intrabony defects, furcations, and recessions was evaluated.

281 Probing depths and gingival recession were measured at two points (mid-labial and mi

282 Differences in the volume of the gingival recession were recorded with reference to the initial da

283 Marks designating gingival recession were scratched into the anterior segments of t

284 st one site of Miller Class I or II gingival recession were treated by a coronally advanced flap with

285 o the test group (TG), and the contralateral recessions were assigned to the control group (CG).

286 Gingival recessions were randomly designated to receive treatment

287 The recessions were treated and assigned randomly to the tes

288 Recessions were treated with gingival unit grafts in gro

289 bony defects, one for furcation, and six for recession) were eligible for the review.

290 ith lack of attached gingiva associated with recessions, were treated with marginal or submarginal fr

291 nsisting of short illness, temperature, age, recession, wheeze, asthma, and vomiting (mnemonic STARWA

292 r root coverage in areas of localized tissue recession when using Alloderm (ADM) and Puros Dermis (PD

293 apilla bleeding index, recession depth (RD), recession width (RW), and root surface area were evaluat

294 nical parameters, including recession depth, recession width (RW), width of keratinized gingiva (KW),

295 ference in the midfacial recession depth and recession width at the test and control sites at baselin

296 +/- 0.7 mm, control, -3.3 +/- 1.3 mm, test, recession width reduction (P = 0.035), whereas mid-bucca

297 Gingival thickness, recession depth, recession width, probing depth (PD), clinical attachment

298 l, or clinical healing for treatment of root recession with a coronally advanced flap and ADM with an

299 emissions were largely a result of economic recession with changes in fuel mix (for example, substit

300 ital, iris depigmentation and thinning, iris recession with retinal necrosis and hypotony, a filterin

301 onstrates the possibility of treating buccal recessions with gingival unit grafts as an alternative t