ライフサイエンスコーパス: recollection

1 r perceptual details in the face of impaired recollection.

2 evealed three key properties of constructive recollection.

3 rnally directed thought, for example, memory recollection.

4 d on an increase in item familiarity but not recollection.

5 sted verbal memory based on the mechanism of recollection.

6 the EAS is associated with more rapid memory recollection.

7 possibly reflects a "sensory echo" that aids recollection.

8 l item memory could still be associated with recollection.

9 ese experiences should not be accompanied by recollection.

10 in damage impaired familiarity while sparing recollection.

11 ea that the hippocampus selectively supports recollection.

12 e hippocampus in mental imagery and episodic recollection.

13 ortex make material-general contributions to recollection.

14 rontal control region, resulting in impaired recollection.

15 ocampus, PFC, and striatum during successful recollection.

16 campal damage impairs familiarity as well as recollection.

17 sed risk resulted in greater activity during recollection.

18 t in source monitoring resulting in impaired recollection.

19 refrontal cortex is predictive of subsequent recollection.

20 old/new effects, which are assumed to index recollection.

21 te Positive Complex (LPC), is a correlate of recollection.

22 ems associated with full relative to partial recollection.

23 miliarity and indirectly also be involved in recollection.

24 e spatial and nonspatial aspects of episodic recollection.

25 using a different operational definition of recollection.

26 brain regions are a signature of successful recollection.

27 be faithfully and rapidly reinstated during recollection.

28 extended memories, such as autobiographical recollections.

29 ories were accompanied by personal, episodic recollections.

30 ss with which participants experienced their recollections.

31 Canonical neural correlates of recollection [8-10] were also modulated by stimulation.

32 plex forms of human memory, such as episodic recollection, a primary challenge is to develop adequate

33 increases correlated across individuals with recollection accuracy in areas diffusely distributed thr

34 d activity in bilateral ventral IFG, whereas recollection after 30 min was associated with greater fu

35 Recollection after 48 h was associated with enhanced act

36 The generative nature of recollection allows us to represent and communicate the

37 s with familiarity-based memory and PhC with recollection, an alternative organizing principle is the

38 500 ms after the onset of a cue that prompts recollection and correlates with source memory accuracy.

39 on of VLPFC function led to subtle shifts in recollection and familiarity accuracy.

40 review evidence for the distinction between recollection and familiarity and then consider the evide

41 val of remote episodic memories and for both recollection and familiarity anterograde memory processe

42 prediction was based on the assumption that recollection and familiarity are independent or dependen

43 However, the qualitative experiences of recollection and familiarity are typically confounded wi

44 previous findings, these results dissociate recollection and familiarity by selective MTL damage.

45 signal detection analysis that distinguishes recollection and familiarity contributions to recognitio

46 reanalysis of these study results to obtain recollection and familiarity estimates that account for

47 recognition memory tests designed to assess recollection and familiarity for the studied pictures.

48 ing characteristic procedures to investigate recollection and familiarity in schizophrenia.

49 y, this result is predicted by a model where recollection and familiarity make independent contributi

50 d the medial temporal lobe memory regions in recollection and familiarity of emotional memory after l

51 in the PFC were also assessed in relation to recollection and familiarity processes.

52 icate that the hippocampus supports both the recollection and familiarity processes.

53 resonance imaging study, they indicate that recollection and familiarity rely on qualitatively disti

54 ivided into distinct cognitive mechanisms of recollection and familiarity that are supported by diffe

55 e estimates of the relative contributions of recollection and familiarity to task performance.

56 Recollection and familiarity were assessed in an object

57 Over 10 months, recollection and familiarity were assessed using an odor

58 s suggest that the hippocampus supports both recollection and familiarity when memories are strong.

59 oints out that these studies have confounded recollection and familiarity with strong and weak memori

60 of long-term memory storage, the concepts of recollection and familiarity, and the question of how di

61 us exclusively supports recollection or both recollection and familiarity--the two latent cognitive p

62 memory can be supported by the processes of recollection and familiarity.

63 ly associated with relatively high levels of recollection and familiarity.

64 nct medial temporal lobe (MTL) substrates of recollection and familiarity.

65 suggest that hippocampal lesions impair both recollection and familiarity.

66 recognition memory can be supported by both recollection and familiarity.

67 ought to consist of two component processes--recollection and familiarity.

68 judgments are not process-pure indicators of recollection and familiarity.

69 ory is thought to consist of two components: recollection and familiarity.

70 features considered to be characteristic of recollection and familiarity.

71 e brain potentials corresponding to explicit recollection and familiarity.

72 thought to depend on two distinct processes: recollection and familiarity.

73 airs recollection or whether it impairs both recollection and familiarity.

74 n the recognition task, young rats used both recollection and familiarity.

75 MTL interact to support the phenomenology of recollection and familiarity.

76 ns of the MTL make distinct contributions to recollection and familiarity.

77 issociation between the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity.

78 ognition memory performance and tracked both recollection and familiarity.

79 memory is thought to rely on two processes: recollection and familiarity.

80 atic stress disorder (PTSD) during traumatic recollection and imagery.

81 patients had the characteristics of episodic recollection and included references to particular place

82 ng-term memories are rapidly replayed during recollection and involve representations that were forme

83 s were recruited indiscriminately for detail recollection and item recognition; in 10- to 11-year-old

84 different and that the hippocampus supports recollection and not familiarity.

85 systems support our subjective experience of recollection and our senses of familiarity and novelty?

86 d particle arrangements, as well as particle recollection and pattern transfer.

87 orty-eight hours later, they were given cued recollection and recognition memory tests designed to as

88 results extend the pattern of impairment in recollection and relative sparing of familiarity observe

89 st, the aged rats showed a selective loss of recollection and relative sparing of familiarity, simila

90 t hippocampal pattern completion to episodic recollection and reveal how oscillatory dynamics in the

91 preted to mean that the hippocampus supports recollection and that the adjacent perirhinal cortex sup

92 en linked in previous work to the process of recollection, and the findings described here represent

93 iliarity-based recognition in the absence of recollection, and this circumstance (termed the "butcher

94 Reinstatement was evident during both recollection- and familiarity-based judgments, providing

95 nts with lateral PFC damage were impaired in recollection- and familiarity-based recognition, and the

96 Several brain structures involved in recollection are affected by anesthesia-induced neurodeg

97 Familiarity and recollection are components of recognition memory.

98 Although familiarity and recollection are functionally distinct, there is conside

99 te that the mechanisms supporting recall and recollection are linked to accurate neural reactivation

100 etal lobe appears to have a critical role in recollection aspects of episodic memory.

101 The size of the ERP index of recollection associated with correct responses to target

102 terpretation is complicated by the fact that recollection-based decisions are typically associated wi

103 ased memories whenever they are as strong as recollection-based memories.

104 dicted subsequent item memory strength while recollection-based memory (performance on source memory

105 cMEC plays a critical and selective role in recollection-based performance, supporting the view that

106 indicating that mPFC damage severely reduced recollection-based performance, while sparing familiarit

107 Recollection-based processes (parietal EM effect) were r

108 Recollection-based recognition is characterized by the r

109 tributed positivity that was associated with recollection-based source memory in both the high- and l

110 rC in familiarity-based item recognition and recollection-based source retrieval, event-related fMRI

111 based item memory, independent of subsequent recollection-based success.

112 p by either or both mechanisms, by comparing recollection before and after sleep.

113 If hippocampal damage selectively impairs recollection but leaves familiarity intact, then patient

114 preted to mean that the hippocampus supports recollection but not familiarity.

115 suggest that the hippocampus is critical for recollection but not familiarity.

116 ely influenced the putative ERP-correlate of recollection but not the putative ERP-correlate of famil

117 They also showed impaired recollection but preserved familiarity.

118 ed sensory cortex responses during emotional recollection, but decreased resting-state blood flow in

119 ex, an anterior medial region was related to recollection, but lateral regions, including the anterio

120 dicate that the hippocampus is essential for recollection, but not for familiarity.

121 processes of voluntarily avoiding conscious recollection by asking participants to either attempt to

122 mponents of episodic recall, familiarity and recollection, can be behaviorally dissociated.

123 ontrast, children appeared to rely mainly on recollection concordant with their conservative decision

124 that unitization affects the manner in which recollection contributes to performance, rather than inc

125 The results revealed an episodic recollection deficit for events encoded out-of-body comp

126 , we found evidence for both familiarity and recollection deficits across studies, suggesting multi-f

127 range is common among theoretical models of recollection, direct evidence supporting this hypothesis

128 The recollection DM effect involved a robust sustained (onse

129 nally arousing stimuli had greater levels of recollection during delayed memory testing compared to t

130 eness heuristic source factor which enhanced recollection during remembering.

131 ition memory tasks assessing familiarity and recollection each using different procedures and a high-

132 e retrieved, words giving rise to successful recollection elicited transient responses in the hippoca

133 We discovered key features of constructive recollection embedded in the rat CA1 ensemble discharge

134 In the Encoding group, MDMA reduced recollection estimates for negative and positive picture

135 rationalized by introspective report) or, if recollection failed, their level of familiarity (operati

136 dazolam administration, suggesting that when recollection fails, subjects may leverage familiarity to

137 The recollection failure was associated with an impaired abi

138 veform associated with later memory based on recollection, familiarity or priming with ERP waveform f

139 We indexed strong familiarity and recollection for previously studied words by obtaining c

140 g of emotion can endure beyond the conscious recollection for the events that initially triggered the

141 performance based on an objective measure of recollection for visual details.

142 quantitative difference in memory strength (recollection > familiarity).

143 ge-related deficits in source monitoring and recollection have revealed a selective decline in memory

144 echanistic basis for selective impairment of recollection in normal aging.

145 The fornix and hippocampus are critical to recollection in the healthy human brain.

146 ed during encoding are later replayed during recollection in the human brain.

147 ations during successful versus unsuccessful recollection in three separate experiments, each using a

148 testing scheduled after sleep, responses to recollection increased significantly more in Val/Val ind

149 tissue injury during anesthesia had similar recollection indices as rats that had been anesthetized

150 Recollection involves remembering specific details about

151 Recollection involves retrieving specific contextual det

152 ection versus a feeling of familiarity (when recollection is absent).

153 he hypothesis that the development of detail recollection is also associated with changes in MTL func

154 c information, consistent with the idea that recollection is based on a continuous neural signal.

155 ally used as a compensatory ability, whereas recollection is conceptualized as a therapeutic target f

156 Recollection is constructive, the product of memory retr

157 wever, patients with hippocampal lesions, if recollection is impaired, should frequently experience h

158 r, cognitive psychology has established that recollection is not a verbatim replay of stored informat

159 ersus recollected items, indicating that the recollection is not merely a consequence of strong famil

160 Recollection is recovery of qualitative information abou

161 otocol for rats that enabled us to show that recollection is reduced, whereas familiarity is increase

162 Contrary to previous conclusions that recollection is selectively impaired in schizophrenia, w

163 Recollection is therefore impaired following MD damage,

164 Recollection is thought to be the hallmark of episodic m

165 othesized that anesthesia in infancy impairs recollection later in life in humans and rats.

166 t that general anesthesia in infancy impairs recollection later in life in humans and rats.

167 Thus key features of episodic recollection manifest in rat hippocampal representations

168 However, impaired recollection may underlie persistent age-related source

169 d to be associated with significantly better recollection memory.

170 tes that the amnestic drug midazolam impairs recollection more than familiarity.

171 xpress strong familiarity (in the absence of recollection) more often than controls.

172 nectivity with different members of the core recollection network.

173 cessful versus failed recollection-the "core recollection network." In the present study, we investig

174 simple cue can be sufficient to elicit vivid recollection of a past episode.

175 s believed to support episodic memory, vivid recollection of a specific event situated in a particula

176 ections, suggesting that subjects were using recollection of actual-source information to avoid sourc

177 PrC is critical for item familiarity but not recollection of associations between items and their con

178 e results demonstrate a positive bias in the recollection of autobiographical memory following right-

179 Network connectivity supported recollection of contextual details based on visual image

180 tation of test items which elicited accurate recollection of contextual details of the prior study ep

181 Recollection of contextual information represents the co

182 ct overall memory accuracy, it did alter the recollection of details associated specifically with emo

183 whether or not they were accompanied by the recollection of details from encoding.

184 tem was encoded and are thought to depend on recollection of details from the study episode.

185 the possibility of decreasing the persistent recollection of distressing memories.

186 The recollection of emotional autobiographical memories has

187 A behavioral experiment revealed that recollection of episodic details was diminished in the p

188 gions where neural activity is enhanced when recollection of episodic information is successful.

189 tion can be based on stimulus familiarity or recollection of event details.

190 Reminders of the past can trigger the recollection of events that one would rather forget.

191 hippocampus itself, may be necessary for the recollection of highly emotional, unpleasant autobiograp

192 erior-medial (HPM) network implicated in the recollection of highly precise contextual and spatial in

193 The results show that the recollection of images depicting faces and scenes is ass

194 cal model based on memory or the storage and recollection of information in the flow field.

195 losing that language and having no conscious recollection of it.

196 atural lifestyle involves the processing and recollection of memories for multiple stimuli [5].

197 results in anterograde amnesia while sparing recollection of old, schema-based memories.

198 how the human hippocampus not only supports recollection of past experiences, but also the construct

199 ts administered with oxytocin showed reduced recollection of previously studied faces and houses.

200 ment is characterized by a selective loss in recollection of previously studied items contrasted with

201 Recognition memory judgments can be based on recollection of qualitative information about an earlier

202 results provide firm evidence that conscious recollection of recollectable information can be volunta

203 s revealed that visual distraction disrupted recollection of relevant details to a greater degree in

204 We quantitatively evaluated recollection of short audiovisual segments from movies a

205 participants were successful at prioritising recollection of some kinds of information over others.

206 gery, and social cognition contribute to the recollection of specific plays in the mind of a sports f

207 as evidence of successful prioritisation of recollection of target information.

208 ure for 12.6 y, on average, and no conscious recollection of that language.

209 essment of the familiarity of an item and by recollection of the context in which an item was encount

210 , with possible consequences for navigation, recollection of the past, and imagination of the future,

211 nced stimulus is supported by two processes: recollection of the stimulus in the context of other inf

212 r life-after the prize-and includes personal recollections of how she mentored young scientists and i

213 sexes to obtain genealogical information and recollections of raids in which they and their relatives

214 In the present study of personal recollections of the terrorist attacks of September 11,

215 s brief essay, I set down some miscellaneous recollections of these meetings and some thoughts about

216 Patients showed poor recollection on all three tasks.

217 whether the hippocampus exclusively supports recollection or both recollection and familiarity--the t

218 which these deficits reflect impairments in recollection or familiarity is less well understood.

219 amage to the hippocampus selectively impairs recollection or whether it impairs both recollection and

220 debate whether the hippocampus supports only recollection or whether it supports both processes.

221 lder adults showed reduced ERP correlates of recollection (parietal old-new effect), as well as a sus

222 rrelates with the accuracy of the integrated recollection performance.

223 e parahippocampal cortex also contributes to recollection, possibly via the representation and retrie

224 object-location memory task that segregated recollection precision from general recollection success

225 asting ( approximately 24 hr) enhancement of recollection precision, without effects on general succe

226 ntinuous familiarity process and a threshold recollection process.

227 hat the hippocampus selectively supports the recollection process.

228 hat under some circumstances familiarity and recollection processes activate competing responses.

229 man primates suggests that some animals have recollection processes similar to those of humans.

230 gate the role of the cMEC in familiarity and recollection processes that underlie nonspatial recognit

231 y retrieval processes (i.e., familiarity and recollection processes) interact with motor and control

232 ion memory by acting on both familiarity and recollection processes, as purportedly indexed by the FN

233 memory often is thought to rely primarily on recollection processes, but opinions differ regarding th

234 othesize separate underlying familiarity and recollection processes, but the necessity of multiple pr

235 ion memory by acting on both familiarity and recollection processes.

236 ons may be dependent on both familiarity and recollection processes.

237 dex the activity of separate familiarity and recollection processes.

238 , we characterized quantitatively individual recollection profiles and showed that rats are able to i

239 Their recollections provide a view of the changes that have oc

240 s signal detection model yields estimates of recollection (r) and familiarity (d').

241 rain activation reveals that episodic memory recollection recruits a specific, distributed network of

242 The finding that recollection-related activity in the angular gyrus track

243 Results showed that recollection-related activity in the posterior hippocamp

244 hese regions dissociate according to whether recollection-related activity is transient or sustained

245 ine), subjects' accuracy correlated with the recollection-related but not the familiarity-related ERP

246 ibuted set of regions consistently exhibited recollection-related increases in connectivity with diff

247 vestigated whether these regions demonstrate recollection-related increases not only in activity but

248 are interpreted as support for a continuous, recollection-related neural signal that has been central

249 ated with familiarity ('Know' responses) and recollection ('Remember' responses) and by (2) examining

250 widely agreed that the hippocampus supports recollection (remembering the episode in which an item w

251 ity in response to competing familiarity and recollection retrieval processes is inconsistently repor

252 nesthetized children had significantly lower recollection scores and were impaired at recollecting as

253 nesthetized subjects had significantly lower recollection scores than controls while familiarity was

254 that demonstrated this effect included both recollection-sensitive regions and areas where activity

255 opment and is maintained with aging, whereas recollection shows protracted development and deteriorat

256 Placing rats in a contextually challenging recollection situation at recall reveals the ability for

257 y, fast-acting and relatively automatic, and recollection, slower-acting and more effortful.

258 We can show that recollection-specific theta-alpha (4-13 Hz) effects are

259 ll as whether recognition was accompanied by recollection, strong familiarity, or weak familiarity.

260 e same encoding mechanisms are predictive of recollection success after hours as after a retention in

261 regional activity levels during encoding and recollection success over short time intervals.

262 where activity did not vary as a function of recollection success.

263 gions during encoding is predictive of later recollection success.

264 gregated recollection precision from general recollection success.

265 erent EAS components during performance of a recollection task known to coactivate regions of both ne

266 pocampus, the emotion effect was greater for recollection than for familiarity, whereas in the entorh

267 nts in the current study possibly engendered recollection that augmented remembering "old" words.

268 investigated by contrasting an ERP index of recollection (the left-parietal ERP old/new effect) with

269 e left parietal positivity indexes conscious recollection, the results provide firm evidence that con

270 more active during successful versus failed recollection-the "core recollection network." In the pre

271 ams' in the hippocampus that enable episodic recollection--the re-experiencing or holistic retrieval

272 al gyrus become increasingly specialized for recollection; these changes may be in part responsible f

273 potential (ERP) measures of familiarity and recollection to assess the contribution of each process

274 on of memory and thus in producing the vivid recollections to which the term flashbulb memory is ofte

275 tested the causal role of the HPM network in recollection using network-targeted noninvasive brain st

276 judgments, particularly those accompanied by recollection versus a feeling of familiarity (when recol

277 elements forming an event, allowing holistic recollection via pattern completion of all elements.

278 behavioral results and found that diminished recollection was associated with the disruption of funct

279 arity-related ERP component, suggesting that recollection was dominant in driving memory.

280 default process, these results suggest that recollection was dominant until its impairment unveiled

281 ty resembling the ERP correlate of conscious recollection was found only in the recall task.

282 An MEG index of the process of recollection was larger for Remember than Know judgments

283 ition was correlated with spatial memory and recollection was poorer in aged rats that were also impa

284 s of actual-source activity (suggesting that recollection was taking place), but the relationship bet

285 new effect--an electrophysiological index of recollection--was reliable for words from the drawing ta

286 was substantially less than was predicted if recollection were impaired.

287 The electrophysiological correlates of recollection were investigated with a modified Remember/

288 Instances in which recognition was based on recollection were removed from all analyses.

289 thesized to be indicative of familiarity and recollection were sensitive to the novelty of the associ

290 ons are ordinarily accompanied by successful recollection (when memory is intact).

291 mpal gyrus selectively for subsequent detail recollection, whereas 8- and 10- to 11-year-olds did not

292 pocampus selectively supports the process of recollection, whereas adjacent cortex in the parahippoca

293 on decisions are based disproportionately on recollection, whereas perirhinal activity predicts recog

294 associations that form the basis of episodic recollection, whereas the perirhinal cortex (PRc) suppor

295 king the vividness of participants' reported recollections, whereas distinct unimodal memories were r

296 c nucleus (AN) complex would be critical for recollection while the Mediodorsal nucleus (MD) of the t

297 been suggested that the hippocampus supports recollection, while adjacent cortex supports familiarity

298 e and interchangeable use of familiarity and recollection with a breakdown in the latter at older age

299 This article provides a personal recollection (with all the known faults of self-reportin

300 s determined by online ratings of subjective recollection, would increase subsequent true memories bu