ライフサイエンスコーパス: recommendation

1 and the quality of evidence supporting each recommendation.

2 ths early for futility on the basis of their recommendation.

3 rationale, and strength of evidence for each recommendation.

4 l equipment and provide infection prevention recommendations.

5 ystematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) recommendations.

6 r guidance in regard to personalized therapy recommendations.

7 ent of these disorders, has formulated these recommendations.

8 infrequently follows all aspects of clinical recommendations.

9 study quality, reducing confidence in these recommendations.

10 ting recurrence patterns may guide treatment recommendations.

11 classified as SORT level C expert consensus recommendations.

12 n/Pediatric Advanced Life Support sanctioned recommendations.

13 o guide the measurement of impact and future recommendations.

14 keholder task force to develop CRC screening recommendations.

15 enterological Association has reviewed these recommendations.

16 udies are needed to confirm and refine these recommendations.

17 among individuals who meet physical activity recommendations.

18 l protein intake remained inadequate to meet recommendations.

19 009 to July 2017, bibliographies, and expert recommendations.

20 assessed and compared with those of current recommendations.

21 earch and reviewed the guideline content and recommendations.

22 that differed in some respect from guideline recommendations.

23 high-quality evidence to support many of the recommendations.

24 r which the USPSTF has already made specific recommendations.

25 disparities, and advocacy experts to produce recommendations.

26 Recommendation 1: ACP and AAFP recommend that clinicians

27 Recommendation 1: ACP recommends that clinicians choose

28 Recommendation 1: ACP recommends that clinicians prescri

29 Recommendation 1: For initial treatment of seasonal alle

30 Recommendation 1: Given that most patients with acute or

31 sults Twenty-one guideline statements (eight recommendations, 10 expert consensus opinions and three

32 ution meets the international guidelines and recommendations (15ng/mL) for diagnostic ERBB2 assays th

33 Recommendation 2: ACP and AAFP recommend that clinicians

34 Recommendation 2: ACP recommends that clinicians treat o

35 Recommendation 2: For patients with chronic low back pai

36 Recommendation 3: ACP and AAFP recommend that clinicians

37 Recommendation 3: For treatment of moderate to severe se

38 Recommendation 5: ACP recommends against using menopausa

39 Recommendation 6: ACP recommends that clinicians should

40 Primary care physicians followed management recommendations 93% of the time.

41 Twenty-three evidence-based recommendations about diagnostic testing for latent tube

42 orkgroup reviewed the evidence and developed recommendations about initial treatment approaches by us

43 es on AF with respect to the distribution of recommendations across classes of recommendations and le

44 nt component of ERPs but, despite guidelines recommendations, adherence remains quite low.

45 First-surgeon recommendation against CPM does not appear to substantiv

46 logic), the guideline panel made conditional recommendations against making a clinical diagnosis of L

47 has potential applications in the design of recommendation algorithms.

48 Recommendations All patients with resected pancreatic ca

49 Large gaps exist between recommendations and current practice regarding LLT in th

50 lementation of guidelines regarding nutrient recommendations and estimation of vitamin C intake among

51 rocess, termed the Convergence of Opinion on Recommendations and Evidence (CORE) process.

52 review can be used to inform development of recommendations and guidelines for the management of eth

53 in widespread debate about the public policy recommendations and guidelines that are the intended res

54 This review provides a summary of these recommendations and illustrates how they are being used

55 ibution of recommendations across classes of recommendations and levels of evidence.

56 Recommendations and proposed algorithms for the investig

57 ion approach was used to make strong or weak recommendations and to classify levels of evidence as hi

58 ordance of the course of action, strength of recommendation, and quality of evidence, as well as the

59 nce intervals, factors associated with these recommendations, and effect on outcome, determined at th

60 Recommendation approval required the agreement of at lea

61 These recommendations are based on the literature, ongoing nat

62 Recommendations are based on the scientific evidence tha

63 How these recommendations are implemented in high-risk patients or

64 Leishvet recommendations are provided for control practices based

65 Revised recommendations are provided for patients with clinical

66 Six of the recommendations are strong, whereas the remaining 17 are

67 Treatment recommendations are, in part, based on methodologically

68 The committee rated the recommendations as A, B, or C, depending on the quality

69 The Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation ap

70 developed in accordance with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (

71 treatment approaches by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation a

72 ty was determined by using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation)

73 tem, which is based on the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation)

74 commendations by using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation)

75 017 and were formulated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation

76 According to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation

77 recommendations using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation)

78 ty evidence as examined using the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation.

79 ted a systematic review using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations

80 he quality of evidence) using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation

81 he quality of evidence) using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation

82 tten, and graded using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation

83 Dietary recommendations associated with bone geometry in additio

84 We have made several recommendations based on our study that could further st

85 Working groups developed consensus recommendations based on review of evidence, considerati

86 the obese liver transplant population, offer recommendations based on the currently available data, a

87 as changed in 51% of patients who received a recommendation before testing; the definitive CT recomme

88 s required, 17.9% of questions did not yield recommendations, but for those that did, the recommended

89 This guideline grades the evidence and recommendations by using the ACP grading system, which i

90 This guideline grades the recommendations by using the GRADE (Grading of Recommend

91 clinical utility and accessibility of these recommendations, by offering a systematic and efficient

92 scribed during pregnancy lack a fetal safety recommendation - called FDA 'category C' drugs.

93 These recommendations can include weight loss, adequate hydrat

94 The majority of recommendations coincide with those endorsed by the Amer

95 s diagnostic acumen and subsequent treatment recommendations compared with two-dimensional radiograph

96 The evidence and guideline recommendations consistently support a clinical diagnosi

97 llenges in N.C. are common nationwide, these recommendations could serve as models for other states.

98 lity of evidence, as well as the duration of recommendation development, were measured.

99 nce base; earlier phase trials also informed recommendation development.

100 er of specimens to five or more, per current recommendations, does not improve accuracy of PJI diagno

101 The recommendations emphasise that intervention packages sho

102 Recommendations Evidence supports mutational testing for

103 tors that had a significant association with recommendation for a 3-year surveillance interval includ

104 s other than stage to consider when making a recommendation for adjuvant chemotherapy, including tumo

105 e provides the evidence review and treatment recommendation for chest compression-only CPR versus CPR

106 l evidence is necessary to make a definitive recommendation for or against the use of extracorporeal

107 ients (20.2%) in the ITT analysis received a recommendation for surgery within 6 months (P = .25).

108 To determine whether a recommendation for systematic ICU admission in criticall

109 To develop recommendations for a minimum set of items that should b

110 to initial intravenous immune globulin, and recommendations for additional therapies are provided.

111 The American Heart Association recommendations for adult basic life support incorporate

112 atification of the 2017 European LeukemiaNet recommendations for AML.

113 men who have sex with men, has prompted new recommendations for antibiotic therapy.

114 prevalence of hypertension, implications of recommendations for antihypertensive medication, and pre

115 microbial resistance, the workgroup provides recommendations for appropriate antibiotics for the trea

116 h Consortium met to review evidence and make recommendations for assessment of disease severity, data

117 nt PVL Academic Research Consortium provides recommendations for assessment of disease severity, data

118 Finally, the authors offer recommendations for clinicians actively initiating and u

119 based opinion, as well as to provide updated recommendations for diagnosis, treatment of the acute il

120 original 2010 European Society of Cardiology recommendations for ECG interpretation in athletes, ECG

121 pport of the development of leading practice recommendations for end-of-life conversations with famil

122 s new set of ambiguity rules, guidelines and recommendations for experimentalists and software develo

123 pedigree, and refined clinical surveillance recommendations for family members.

124 treat multiple sclerosis and make consensus recommendations for future research and clinical trials.

125 In addition, we provide recommendations for future research in this area.

126 c distribution and prevalence, and make some recommendations for future research towards the preventi

127 Recommendations for future studies in this and similar s

128 odology, critically synthesises surveillance recommendations for gonadotoxicity in male childhood, ad

129 en of hearing loss and offer our and others' recommendations for halting and then reversing the conti

130 al Oncology/College of American Pathologists recommendations for HER2 testing in breast cancer did no

131 We provide recommendations for how to proceed with research and coo

132 al Oncology/College of American Pathologists recommendations for human epidermal growth factor recept

133 n Society of Cardiology Guidelines specified recommendations for ICD implantation in ACHD patients fo

134 Cutoff values, guidelines, and clinical recommendations for iFR can therefore be extended to the

135 sional, comprehensive review of evidence and recommendations for indications, duration, and implement

136 We present here a model set of recommendations for institutional animal care and use co

137 cose chart in the electronic medical record, recommendations for insulin changes were entered in a vG

138 REPORTING METHOD: Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trails (SPIRIT).

139 Trials) and SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) guideline aut

140 help develop a definition of ACP and provide recommendations for its application.

141 of land cover map error, and suggest several recommendations for land cover map users.

142 y care RN roles and responsibilities to make recommendations for maximizing the contributions of RNs

143 The guideline panel also made conditional recommendations for offering pleurodesis after an initia

144 to develop an evidence-based guideline with recommendations for optimal HER2 testing in patients wit

145 Guideline recommendations for oral anticoagulants in AF are based

146 r Disability and Oral Health guidelines made recommendations for oral health care for people with men

147 We conclude with a set of key recommendations for oversight bodies that would support

148 Recommendations For patients with low-risk prostate canc

149 nical cardiovascular events, we update prior recommendations for patients with prevalent coronary hea

150 Current recommendations for pharmacologic treatment of delirium,

151 TION: The INTREPID results support guideline recommendations for pitavastatin as a preferred drug in

152 elopment and Evaluations methodology to make recommendations for practice.

153 Food and Drug Administration or manufacturer recommendations for reprocessing.

154 We conclude with recommendations for research and systems of care to addr

155 oxicity and its possible mechanisms, provide recommendations for risk mitigation, address the advanta

156 onal levels, using World Health Organization recommendations for sampling frequency.

157 sess the discriminative ability of these ICD recommendations for SCD in ACHD patients.

158 e present alternative approaches and provide recommendations for single-cell RNA sequencing users.

159 s of switching, and available literature and recommendations for switching between P2Y12 inhibitors.

160 iation for Neuro-Oncology guideline provides recommendations for the clinical care of adult patients

161 other interested parties with evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of pati

162 Evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of patie

163 this Series paper, we summarise the existing recommendations for the provision of routine psychosocia

164 Consensus was also reached for two recommendations for the timing of follow-up assessment.

165 Evidence-based recommendations for the use of corticosteroids in critic

166 nt women and consistent post-test management recommendations for those with discordant test results.

167 From the 70 recommendations formulated, in this Review we describe t

168 This paper summarizes recommendations from a two-day summit to identify option

169 studies, review articles, book chapters, and recommendations from leading patient safety organization

170 We made 23 recommendations from moderate, low, and very low level o

171 ant differences between the 3-year vs 5-year recommendation groups in proportions of subjects found t

172 These evidence-based recommendations have been shown to reduce the chance of

173 The Summit recommendations, if undertaken, could improve the health

174 The major new recommendation in the 2014 update is consideration of in

175 sociation and 2004 Adult Treatment Panel III recommendations in HIV-infected adults and evaluated ass

176 diology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) recommendations in identifying African American individu

177 ent and blindness form an important basis of recommendations in public health policies.

178 escription indications and HIV/STI screening recommendations in the CDC guidelines.

179 (DON), are subject to strict regulations and recommendations in the European Union.

180 decisions, as well as the impact of surgeon recommendations, in a large, diverse sample of patients

181 Key recommendations include administration of oral and, as n

182 In addition, the recommendations include our own extensive experience in

183 Recommendations include the following: (1) animal model

184 However, some general recommendations include: (1) low to modest dosages of tr

185 Recommendations included the adaptation of ACP based on

186 san and triclocarban is presented along with recommendations intended to prevent future harm from tri

187 The current recommendation is to perform re-resection for select pat

188 on these topics, the strength of the panel's recommendations is classified as SORT level C expert con

189 Association for the Study of Liver Diseases recommendations is predicted to reduce harms from unnece

190 cal decision-making and subsequent treatment recommendations is warranted.

191 Recommendations It is recommended that there be a discus

192 We examined report of surgeon recommendations, level of discussion about CPM, satisfac

193 We assessed all primary prevention ICD recommendations listed in both documents.

194 Despite recommendations, many patients with type 2 diabetes rece

195 ysician practices, it is recognized that the recommendations may have applicability to other professi

196 apy, findings that support the new Class IIb recommendation ("may be considered") to extend dual anti

197 es on sugar intake and assess consistency of recommendations, methodological quality of guidelines, a

198 (Grade: strong recommendation; moderate-quality evidence).

199 of SCD cases and 17% of controls had an ICD recommendation (odds ratio, 5.9; P<0.001).

200 Factors most significantly associated with recommendation of 3-year vs a 5-year surveillance interv

201 ffer of induction of labour from the current recommendation of 41-42 weeks to 40 weeks of gestation i

202 e Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendation of a single dose of BPG in HIV-infected p

203 supervised interventions of HIIT, MCT, or a recommendation of regular exercise (RRE).

204 The trial was stopped early, on the recommendation of the data and safety monitoring board,

205 The study was terminated early on the recommendation of the independent data monitoring commit

206 mmendation before testing; the definitive CT recommendation of the physician was in line with the 70-

207 in predicting fish pollutant load, and thus recommendations of consumption, capture location is usua

208 The recommendations of learned societies have created a fram

209 dietary pattern and lack of adherence to the recommendations of the 2015 DGAI were associated with a

210 assessed for adherence to the best practice recommendations of the British Society for Allergy and C

211 edicine and Molecular Imaging, based on 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radio

212 ow-up metric data relating to the eight main recommendations of the Lancet Standing Commission on Liv

213 The recommendations of this workshop can serve as guidance f

214 9 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on folic acid supplementation in women of

215 1 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for amblyopia and its risk f

216 w US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for gynecologic conditions w

217 2 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on the use of menopausal hormone therapy

218 CP grading system, the committee based these recommendations on a systematic review of randomized, co

219 onally to guide treatment goals and clinical recommendations on drinking reduction.

220 use of EPD, and meanwhile, current guideline recommendations on EPD use should be revisited.

221 yielded key scientific findings, lessons and recommendations on how to increase diversity in genomic

222 Research is needed to inform firm recommendations on how to protect this vulnerable popula

223 International guidelines provide conflicting recommendations on how to use bronchodilators to manage

224 This document does not provide detailed recommendations on infection prevention and control aspe

225 ege of Cardiology/American Heart Association recommendations on initiating statin therapy for primary

226 Recommendations On the basis of tumor-specific findings

227 Purpose This guideline provides recommendations on the management of adults after head a

228 to present the evidence and provide clinical recommendations on the management of gout.

229 To our knowledge, there are no published recommendations on the medical management of Parkinson d

230 trials does not provide support for specific recommendations on the optimal high intensity conditioni

231 Purpose To update the guideline recommendations on the use of larynx-preservation strate

232 Purpose To provide current recommendations on the use of sentinel node biopsy (SNB)

233 ed macular degeneration (AMD) and to provide recommendations on the use of these modalities in natura

234 he 2008 American College of Physicians (ACP) recommendations on treatment of low bone density and ost

235 Recommendations on vaccine spacing and procedural prepar

236 The recommendations outlined in this review are based on exp

237 Recommendations Partial-brain fractionated radiotherapy

238 Recommendations Patients with breast cancer who have evi

239 clinical practice guideline panels drafting recommendations, physicians using clinical practice guid

240 positive predictive value (PPV) of a biopsy recommendation (PPV2), 27.5% (95% CI: 27.1%, 27.9%); PPV

241 e (CDR), positive predictive value of biopsy recommendation (PPV2), sensitivity, and specificity.

242 Those recommendations provided a high-level view of how to acc

243 Seven recommendations provided nonquantitative guidance; 5 rec

244 BPE groups at diagnostic MR imaging, biopsy recommendation rate was 325 of 1443 versus 195 of 601 (2

245 tion, the ECDP writing committee down-graded recommendations regarding bile acid sequestrant use, rec

246 We now provide additional recommendations regarding four specific questions relate

247 ustry, and the government, who together made recommendations regarding the implementation, oversight,

248 orking group focused on developing consensus recommendations regarding the inclusion of patients with

249 body of literature to provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the safety of procedural inter

250 Purpose To make recommendations regarding the use of bisphosphonates and

251 howed to contribute to the daily nutritional recommendations respectively, with an appreciable percen

252 This recommendation results in unnecessary Xpert MTB/RIF test

253 venom immunotherapy, evidence-based clinical recommendations, risk factors for adverse events and for

254 Recommendations Routine SLN biopsy is not recommended fo

255 Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendations should be encouraged.

256 The task force included recommendation statements in the final guideline only if

257 Current guideline recommendations still hold minor differences.

258 tions with QALYs and with NICE/pCODR funding recommendations, suggest different constructs of clinica

259 iology used the patient-centered Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) method to evaluate and gr

260 king group convened in July 2016 to identify recommendations that are instrumental in preparing IRBs

261 A more comprehensive list of recommendations that includes considerations for specifi

262 ences, Engineering, and Medicine has made 14 recommendations that require ongoing commitments to erad

263 This study provides intuitive context for recommendations that should promote more realistic ecolo

264 evelopment of a meta-analysis and to provide recommendations that will be useful for carrying out met

265 Recommendations The ASCO Expert Panel emphasized that ca

266 (D recommendation) The USPSTF recommends against the use of

267 6; 95% CI, 2.48 to 361.41; P = .007), parent recommendation to bank (OR, 12.30; 95% CI, 2.01 to 75.94

268 ithin IP is rare, which does not support the recommendation to regularly obtain biopsies for histopat

269 ions was associated with a positive provider recommendation to the caregiver.

270 Current guidelines give a class I recommendation to use of embolic protection devices (EPD

271 valuation of IFD in prolonged FN, and a weak recommendation to withhold empirical antifungal therapy

272 allenges policy makers' abilities to develop recommendations to effectively deploy registered nurses

273 ASCO identified five overarching recommendations to enhance the role of observational res

274 We also make recommendations to help improve reactive vaccination cam

275 atient representatives produced the COS-STAD recommendations to help improve the quality of COS devel

276 Recommendations to improve end-of-life care for patients

277 Purpose To provide evidence-based recommendations to oncology clinicians, patients, family

278 of patient-specific osteoarthritis treatment recommendations to providers.

279 n is relevant to adjusting the LFS screening recommendations to these specific carriers.

280 Statin recommendation under both guidelines was associated with

281 This guideline grades the evidence and recommendations using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendati

282 On the basis of predominantly consensus recommendations, various strategies for managing DAPT du

283 However, recommendations vary among organizations, and their impl

284 The 2016 USPSTF recommendations vs 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines.

285 According to WHO recommendations, we classified BMI into categories of he

286 To inform the development of clinical recommendations, we undertook systematic reviews to crit

287 Associations between CPM receipt and surgeon recommendations were also evaluated.

288 DESIGN/The recommendations were based on the summarized evidence fr

289 Most recommendations were equally split among class I (49/113

290 Evidence-based recommendations were formulated and graded initially by

291 Recommendations were graded according to the strength of

292 assess evidence quality, articles supporting recommendations were independently reviewed and their qu

293 Evidence-based recommendations were then formulated, written, and grade

294 All recommendations were weak, highlighting the relative nas

295 s, 10 expert consensus opinions and three no recommendations) were established.

296 evalent coronary heart disease, and we offer recommendations, when data are available, for patients w

297 combination of imaging modalities, and these recommendations will need to be updated as new imaging t

298 xisting cardio-oncology or imaging guideline recommendations will provide increased value or cause in

299 Results The Panel is proposing 11 recommendations with strong agreement from the open comm

300 edication, full implementation of the USPSTF recommendations would be associated with initiation of s