ライフサイエンスコーパス: reconstructive

1 haracterized by early deadhesion and delayed reconstructive activity that appear to contribute to the

2 d to patient factors, defect morphology, and reconstructive agents used.

3 s might allow the widespread clinical use of reconstructive allotransplantation if protocols to achie

4 ssue expanders appear to offer an intriguing reconstructive alternative to the frustrating condition

5 rgeon-controlled, robotic-assisted, ureteral reconstructive and ablative surgery is being performed r

6 ggest modified PCR techniques which separate reconstructive and amplification polymerization reaction

7 heumatoid hand, but the correlations between reconstructive and early intervention procedures are mod

8 observed focal atrophy on other CA3-mediated reconstructive and episodic mechanisms, and the role of

9 s for prolapse can be categorised broadly by reconstructive and obliterative techniques.

10 an extensive literature documenting both the reconstructive and predictive abilities of these models

11 peripheral vascular reconstructions, plastic reconstructive, and thoracic procedures also have been p

12 A reconstructive approach based on computational fragmenta

13 Some advocate for a multistaged reconstructive approach with delayed definitive repair,

14 prospect of using neural precursor cells for reconstructive approaches in the nervous system has rece

15 ls, alloys, and simple minerals will exhibit reconstructive "bond-breaking" transitions.

16 mal perforator to be harvested for DIEP flap reconstructive breast surgery.

17 However, comparing the reconstructive capacity of the two donor cells types is

18 erformed in dedicated trauma, obstetric, and reconstructive centers for 2 years.

19 e postprostatectomy or cystectomy presents a reconstructive challenge combined with the goal of resto

20 ty structure as well as the dissociation and reconstructive characteristics of apoferritin at differe

21 ews have mainly focused on different colonic reconstructive configurations and their comparative effe

22 (CHF) patients treated by the international Reconstructive Endoventricular Surgery returning Torsion

23 In dentistry and reconstructive facial surgery, it is of great interest t

24 raindications to the use of the omentum as a reconstructive flap.

25 Reconstructive hand surgery was required in 4.4% of seco

26 Risks associated with pediatric reconstructive heart surgery include injury of the sinoa

27 Application of the approach in pediatric reconstructive heart surgery may reduce risks of injurin

28 ed, feasible, and effective for ablative and reconstructive indications with minimal complications.

29 sses underlying the patterns, by experiment, reconstructive inference, or both; the complementarity,

30 lumn but also be proficient in using various reconstructive instruments.

31 The 'reconstructive ladder' has served to guide urologists ov

32 uperior-memory group suggests that malleable reconstructive mechanisms may be fundamental to episodic

33 facial trauma, is a formidable challenge in reconstructive medicine, and yet scarcely investigated i

34 yses were performed, studying the effects of reconstructive method, laterality, and risk factors on s

35 letal muscle form, determined using the same reconstructive methodology, allowing us to identify comm

36 Reconstructive microsurgery is a clinical technique used

37 breast reconstruction are common and vary by reconstructive modality.

38 strates how real measurements could be used (reconstructive modeling) to improve model predictions.

39 his major structural difference explains the reconstructive nature of the transformation observed bet

40 d have significant clinical implications for reconstructive nerve surgery.

41 etween silica polymorphs obeys a homogeneous reconstructive nucleation and grain growth model.

42 ry teams, orthopaedics, cardiac, paediatric, reconstructive, obstetric fistula, neurosurgery, burn, g

43 ry teams, orthopaedics, cardiac, paediatric, reconstructive, obstetric fistula, neurosurgery, urology

44 Complex reconstructive, oncologic and laparoscopic procedures ar

45 ory system is achieved in a series of staged reconstructive operations, each of which was formerly ac

46 arm or proximal forearm transplantation is a reconstructive option for patients who have experienced

47 ite tissue allografts opens unique one-stage reconstructive option.

48 ds in treatment of these diseases, different reconstructive options available, and the methods and re

49 the certainty of postoperative radiotherapy, reconstructive options should be based on tissue charact

50 Reconstructive options using a catheterizable abdominal

51 ts controversy, not only because of the many reconstructive options, but also because dental and faci

52 ovascular free flaps, have greatly increased reconstructive options.

53 d failed reconstructions require alternative reconstructive options.

54 The oncologic and reconstructive outcomes of this procedure have never bee

55 The field of reconstructive pediatric urologic surgery is constantly

56 and gene tissue engineering technologies for reconstructive periodontology.

57 morphization or by mechanisms that involve a reconstructive phase transition that culminates in the f

58 suggests that those reactions will undergo a reconstructive phase transition when they take place abo

59 vskite that undergoes complex displacive and reconstructive phase transitions and exhibits near-infra

60 personality and success, Skowronek (1997) on reconstructive politics, and Winter (1987) on presidenti

61 may allow amplification of large fragments, reconstructive polymerization and amplification polymeri

62 r augmentation is still a commonly performed reconstructive procedure for pediatric patients with sev

63 ntation has been shown to be a revolutionary reconstructive procedure for severe disfigurements.

64 Multiple reconstructive procedures are common for the reconstruct

65 ng experience, advanced ablative and complex reconstructive procedures are now being performed laparo

66 Reconstructive procedures can be done by either an abdom

67 omarkers during wound healing of soft tissue reconstructive procedures comparing living cellular cons

68 The introduction of reconstructive procedures designed to preserve motion in

69 but patients treated with CEA required more reconstructive procedures during the first 2 years after

70 ter prognostication and in reserving corneal reconstructive procedures for eyes with a favorable visu

71 iew aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of reconstructive procedures for treating peri-implantitis.

72 Various reconstructive procedures have been attempted to restore

73 Numerous reconstructive procedures have been used to address the

74 earch on the effects of aging with regard to reconstructive procedures in elderly patients.

75 allowed the successful completion of complex reconstructive procedures in the pediatric population, i

76 nical systems tool technology, it can enable reconstructive procedures inside the beating heart.

77 Experience in the full spectrum of urethral reconstructive procedures is important.

78 tracorporeal techniques are evolving for the reconstructive procedures necessary for urinary diversio

79 Other robotic reconstructive procedures of the upper tract have includ

80 and effective alternative to laparoscopy for reconstructive procedures of the ureter and may represen

81 iac function, muscle strength, and number of reconstructive procedures performed were measured during

82 e of specialists conducting examinations and reconstructive procedures promptly, carefully, and thoro

83 sting abnormalities is essential in planning reconstructive procedures so that the risks of recurrenc

84 not only simple removal of tissues, but also reconstructive procedures such as pyeloplasty in more th

85 We indicate both the reconstructive procedures supported by sound evidence an

86 Complex reconstructive procedures that are being currently perfo

87 -sparing treatments using laser ablation and reconstructive procedures to preserve glans or phallus l

88 vidence for supporting additional benefit of reconstructive procedures to the other treatment modalit

89 The number of operative reconstructive procedures was significantly lower with r

90 ry), cardiac function indexes, and number of reconstructive procedures were compared during acute hos

91 The rates of the reconstructive procedures-fusion and arthroplasty-were h

92 has systematically evaluated efficacy of any reconstructive procedures.

93 oplasty are still commonly used for arterial reconstructive procedures.

94 HS has been altered dramatically with staged reconstructive procedures.

95 tients, and treatment often requires complex reconstructive procedures.

96 d to evaluate the overall performance of the reconstructive procedures.

97 with congenital anomalies who often require reconstructive procedures.

98 can nucleate from tavorite-LiFeSO(4)F via a reconstructive process whose kinetics are significantly

99 ate autobiographical memories using fallible reconstructive processes.

100 20 years to provide reservoir function after reconstructive proctectomy for rectal cancer.

101 Here we show how this reconstructive property may be utilized within optical t

102 ries is malleable because of their intrinsic reconstructive property.

103 ely to identify UC patients undergoing major reconstructive revisions of their IPAA at our institutio

104 This review provides an overview of reconstructive robotic procedures in urology.

105 This study documents reconstructive roles for proteins known to orchestrate a

106 g rehabilitation programs and evaluating the reconstructive services.

107 The oxygen uptake promotes a reconstructive shearing of the [YbO2] sub-units controll

108 , by PXRD, and therefore these reactions are reconstructive solid-state reactions (there is also evid

109 ally induced oxygen migration and subsequent reconstructive structural transformation in a SrCoO2.5-s

110 Thus, the reconstructive surgeon forms an integral part of a multi

111 The reconstructive surgeon must have wide knowledge of recon

112 combined effort between breast surgeons and reconstructive surgeons has a high probability of succes

113 PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pelvic reconstructive surgeons in the fields of urology, gyneco

114 d at an institution with a greater supply of reconstructive surgeons or where patients live further f

115 ommitment, and research from dedicated bowel reconstructive surgeons toward a better opportunity for

116 competence present a challenging dilemma for reconstructive surgeons.

117 as a robust addition to the armamentarium of reconstructive surgeons.

118 perative complication following ablative and reconstructive surgeries, in an animal model of radical

119 local recurrence salvaged by mastectomy and reconstructive surgery (0.82 and 0.81, respectively).

120 -negative resection (100% vs 73%, P < 0.01), reconstructive surgery (100% vs 13%, P < 0.01), and re-o

121 is correlated with changes in proportions of reconstructive surgery among these patients is unclear.

122 The median time between reconstructive surgery and first MR imaging examination

123 erious complications, including the need for reconstructive surgery and prolonged stay in the intensi

124 ble with comprehensive management, including reconstructive surgery and visceral transplantation.

125 with large facial lesions requiring complex reconstructive surgery and/or recurrent or poorly deline

126 Recent changes in pediatric urologic reconstructive surgery are discussed in the present revi

127 Long-term follow-up, hand therapy, and reconstructive surgery are emphasized.

128 Recent clinical trials may transform reconstructive surgery as well as current surgical pract

129 hing </=2.5 kg undergoing the first stage of reconstructive surgery at our institution between Januar

130 CTA holds great potential for reconstructive surgery but is at present restricted by t

131 Roux-en-Y reconstructive surgery excludes the biliopancreatic syst

132 term survival of patients who have undergone reconstructive surgery for hypoplastic left heart syndro

133 authors review their experience with staged reconstructive surgery for hypoplastic left heart syndro

134 ration may aid the planning for cosmetic and reconstructive surgery in those who develop orbital asym

135 e American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery mailing list server in 2010.

136 d complications in aesthetic, functional and reconstructive surgery must have an understanding of the

137 Many urologic conditions that require reconstructive surgery occur in elderly patients.

138 Many urologic conditions that necessitate reconstructive surgery occur in geriatric patients.

139 ely used as a filler material in periodontal reconstructive surgery of intrabony defects.

140 oft tissue samples from a patient undergoing reconstructive surgery owing to a traumatic amputation.

141 Craniofacial reconstructive surgery requires a bioactive bone implant

142 sults from members of ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery societies confirm that antibiotic

143 geons were members of ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery societies.

144 Reconstructive surgery was performed in 48.3% of CPM pat

145 Reconstructive surgery was performed in 48.3% of CPM pat

146 Reconstructive surgery will become increasingly unnecess

147 mandating that physicians communicate about reconstructive surgery with patients undergoing mastecto

148 er-based and transcardiac interventions into reconstructive surgery, a new robotic tool delivery plat

149 cision, potential problems with implants and reconstructive surgery, and occurrence of adverse psycho

150 Preoperative work-up, coordination of reconstructive surgery, and referral to tertiary care ce

151 with expertise from critical care, surgery, reconstructive surgery, and rehabilitation specialists.

152 In the field of plastic reconstructive surgery, development of new innovative ma

153 resection can lead to the need for extensive reconstructive surgery, resulting in significant morbidi

154 e American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, the North American Neuro-Ophthal

155 Biomaterials play crucial roles in reconstructive surgery, tissue engineering and regenerat

156 well as for their application in plastic or reconstructive surgery.

157 es in the proportions of those who underwent reconstructive surgery.

158 er-expanding role in pelvic and pelvic floor reconstructive surgery.

159 ces influence complications in postbariatric reconstructive surgery.

160 essfully managed, without the need for major reconstructive surgery.

161 nal and aesthetic impairments, which require reconstructive surgery.

162 Allografts are commonly used in orthopedic reconstructive surgery.

163 d women are more likely to receive end-stage reconstructive surgery.

164 e tissue allografts offer great potential in reconstructive surgery.

165 , liver transplantations and complex biliary reconstructive surgery.

166 r modified for use in ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery.

167 t be considered a contraindication to staged reconstructive surgery.

168 nt with a history of silicone implant breast reconstructive surgery.

169 e improved after autologous gastrointestinal reconstructive surgery.

170 is a major clinical problem in maxillofacial reconstructive surgery.

171 as been widely used in tunica albuginea (TA) reconstructive surgery.

172 ectomy versus breast-conserving surgery, and reconstructive surgery.

173 From 2004 to 2012, the proportion of reconstructive surgical procedures among women aged 20 t

174 cial emphasis in children undergoing complex reconstructive surgical procedures worldwide.

175 ts for TED patients and obviate the need for reconstructive surgical therapies.

176 avoids the motion artifact inherent with any reconstructive technique and permits analysis of events

177 nimize these risks by altering operative and reconstructive technique were then applied to patients i

178 Advances in reconstructive techniques allow more limbs to be salvage

179 Although reconstructive techniques are safe with few drawbacks, m

180 Newer reconstructive techniques can improve quality of life in

181 There have also been improvements in reconstructive techniques for the maintenance of functio

182 Reconstructive techniques for which non-vaginal tissue i

183 Outcomes of reconstructive techniques seem to be conflicting, wherea

184 e to complications and changing surgical and reconstructive techniques to eliminate risk factors has

185 Conventional reconstructive techniques using free vascularised tissue

186 , localized tumor resection and a variety of reconstructive techniques were possible.

187 ma by providing knowledge of a wide range of reconstructive techniques, including the advantages and

188 tructive surgeon must have wide knowledge of reconstructive techniques, including the advantages and

189 Advances in bone reconstructive techniques, including the potential of ba

190 decreased morbidity when compared with open reconstructive techniques.

191 nd cosmesis of the penis using modern penile reconstructive techniques.

192 opment of new medical formulations (NMF) for reconstructive therapies has considerably improved the a

193 trolled trial was identified, which compared reconstructive therapy and open flap debridement.

194 l preclinical situations of periodontitis or reconstructive therapy.

195 r bone gain following periodontal disease or reconstructive therapy.

196 Here we show that a reconstructive transition occurs in the heteroanionic co

197 at multianionic compounds are likely to host reconstructive transitions that are frequently difficult

198 nterpenetrated Zn(CN)2 framework can undergo reconstructive transitions to porous, non-interpenetrate

199 able outcomes, broad clinical application of reconstructive transplantation is limited by the risks a

200 ejection, and ischemia reperfusion injury in reconstructive transplantation.

201 roteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) in the reconstructive treatment of surgically created buccal, d

202 rowing patient-specific bone substitutes for reconstructive treatments of the skeletal system and for

203 es now include virtually all extirpative and reconstructive urologic procedures.

204 at influence the feasibility and outcomes of reconstructive urologic surgery in older adults.

205 feasible, well tolerated and advantageous in reconstructive urological procedures.

206 nt state of laparoscopy and robotic-assisted reconstructive urological surgery on the lower urinary t

207 ations describing the use of PROMs following reconstructive urological surgery.

208 challenging patient populations have allowed reconstructive urologists to remain committed to rehabil

209 PROMs uptake and awareness is increasing in reconstructive urology but more work is required to demo

210 sought to define the impact of surgical and reconstructive variables on complication rates and asses

211 ant-, anatomic-, or prosthetic-specific, and reconstructive variables.

212 ing neurogenesis may act in a protective and reconstructive way even in later stages of AD.