ライフサイエンスコーパス: red light

1 e measured in response to blue compared with red light.

2 assays, show hyposensitive responses to far-red light.

3 ast ratio on irradiation with ultraviolet or red light.

4 tificially illuminated with white, green, or red light.

5 and the ots1/ots2 mutant is hyposensitive to red light.

6 gaseous SrO, which emits undesirable orange-red light.

7 anobacteria that is capable of utilizing far-red light.

8 e GAF domains were removed monomerizes under red light.

9 above 700 nm and enable cells to grow in far-red light.

10 ed that some cyanobacteria could utilize far-red light.

11 velengths of the visible spectrum, including red light.

12 displayed PIF1-mediated enhanced response to red light.

13 have a sustained response to blue but not to red light.

14 meters) and enhances oxygen evolution in far-red light.

15 e of the transcriptome of the phyA mutant to red light.

16 expression of selected genes in response to red light.

17 etect using intrinsic signals from reflected red light.

18 hboring plants for photosynthetically active red light.

19 ases accumulated the most in response to far-red light.

20 logical activity and accelerated turnover in red light.

21 expression controlled by both heat shock and red light.

22 17 nm following a brief irradiation with far-red light.

23 emitting diode comprising the same MCP emits red light.

24 iated from the target genes upon exposure to red light.

25 ortant for phyA-mediated deetiolation in far-red light.

26 d in seedlings grown under low-intensity far-red light.

27 r import of phyA-5 under low fluences of far-red light.

28 ponse to blue light, but also in response to red light.

29 t, along with reduced cotyledon expansion in red light.

30 cpeCDESTR (cpeC) expression during growth in red light.

31 multicellular tumor spheroids with 2-photon red light.

32 ing of two neural populations by blue versus red light.

33 zymes' activity was promptly affected by the red light.

34 hite light to an immobilized state under far-red light.

35 its them to thrive in niches enriched in far-red light.

36 is effectively triggered by blue, but not by red light.

37 al range for photosynthesis by absorbing far-red light.

38 in darkness even after illumination with far-red light.

39 hing can be achieved using blue or green and red light.

40 light (VLFR) and high fluences (HIR) of far-red light.

41 thesis in two cyanobacteria that grow in far-red light.

42 d with peripheral test points in response to red light.

43 ller than those generated by blue, amber and red lights.

44 ignificantly less than white, blue, amber or red lights.

45 stituents can be effectively isomerized with red light (630-660 nm), a wavelength range that is order

46 xposure to narrowband blue light (469 nm) or red light (631 nm) using a modified Ganzfeld dome.

47 activate classical photoCORM Mn2(CO)10 using red light (635 nm).

48 toswitching properties upon irradiation with red light (660 nm LED).

49 Methylene blue (4 muM) irradiated with red light (660 nm) catalyzes the rapid oxidation of a di

50 tects Synechocystis cells from strong orange-red light, a condition in which OCP is not photoactivate

51 The red/far red light absorbing photoreceptor phytochrome-B (phyB) c

52 263F change prevents a red light-induced far-red light absorbing phytochrome chromophore configuratio

53 evaluate the effects of a papain-gel with a red-light absorbing pigment (methylene blue - MB) to med

54 nversion of red light-absorbing (Pr) and far-red light-absorbing (Pfr) states.

55 nd microorganisms through interconversion of red light-absorbing (Pr) and far-red light-absorbing (Pf

56 We report that in the red light-absorbing (Pr) state, the bilin chromophore of

57 -light-absorbing ground state (Pr) and a far-red light-absorbing active state (Pfr).

58 ch light triggers the conversion between the red light-absorbing form, Pr, and the far-red-light-abso

59 Photoreceptors, especially the far-red light-absorbing phytochrome A, play a crucial role i

60 Red/far-red light-absorbing phytochromes (phys) also play a role

61 images of the full-length BphP dimer in the red light-absorbing state and the photoactivated far-red

62 the bilin-binding pocket in the dark-adapted red light-absorbing state illuminated the intricate netw

63 t-absorbing state and the photoactivated far-red light-absorbing state revealed a large scale reorien

64 he red light-absorbing form, Pr, and the far-red-light-absorbing form, Pfr.

65 ight perception by photoconverting between a red-light-absorbing ground state (Pr) and a far-red ligh

66 nsfer bands could be responsible for the far-red light absorption leading to PS I photochemistry at w

67 Upon red-light absorption, LAPD up-regulates hydrolysis of cA

68 overcome these problems, we prepared the far-red light-activatable prodrug of PTX by conjugating phot

69 far-red (Pr) state of phyB, but not with the red light-activated (Pfr) or the chromophore unconjugate

70 at aCRY is a functionally important blue and red light-activated flavoprotein.

71 lopmental Cell, Shi et al. (2016a) show that red-light-activated phytochrome B interacts with transcr

72 We demonstrate its application to far-red-light-activated prodrugs.

73 han forming a far-red-shifted Pfr state upon red light activation.

74 at intermediate R2 and causes an alternative red light-adapted state.

75 d indicated an absence of cross-talk between red light and ABA.

76 cally with OST1 during stomatal responses to red light and altered [CO2 ].

77 utants show an elongated hypocotyl under far-red light and are impaired in other far-red high-irradia

78 ific functionality as a voltage sensor under red light and as an inhibitory actuator under green ligh

79 cumulation of SUMOylated phyB is enhanced by red light and displays a diurnal pattern in plants grown

80 The nanoparticles are excitable by red light and emit in the near-infrared spectra region w

81 In the presence of red light and oxygen, singlet oxygen is formed on the su

82 osensitivity to continuous low-intensity far-red light and shows reduced very-low-fluence response an

83 o interact genetically with OST1 both during red light- and low [CO2 ]-induced stomatal opening.

84 phyB2 tomato mutants and was reversed by far-red light applied immediately after the red or blue ligh

85 organs in response to a 1-h treatment of far-red light are highly distinctive.

86 In aquatic environments, red and far-red light are rapidly attenuated with depth; therefore,

87 hat blue, yellow, and red light, but not far-red light, are absorbed by the neutral radical state of

88 However, normal far-red light-associated transcript accumulation patterns ar

89 n activity before and after irradiation with red light at 652 nm, showcasing the effective "activatio

90 reinhardtii, which is controlled by blue and red light at the steps of gametogenesis along with its r

91 viation in LMCV parameter in response to the red light between different test point was significantly

92 High levels of red light but not of blue light were enough to restrain

93 yB enhanced the long-term growth response to red light but reduced the expression of selected genes i

94 E synthesis by repressing cpeC expression in red light, but acts posttranscriptionally, requiring the

95 in vitro data showing that blue, yellow, and red light, but not far-red light, are absorbed by the ne

96 omule formation was sensitive to red and far-red light, but not to blue light.

97 ouble mutants are markedly hypersensitive to red light, but not to far-red or blue light, and are com

98 e relative tissue transmissibility of orange-red light, but their dependence on illumination limits t

99 The absorption of red or far-red light by one domain affects the conformation of the

100 ining photoreceptors that detect red and far-red light by photointerconversion between a dark-adapted

101 s finding was explained by the absorption of red light by the flavin neutral radical as the dark stat

102 cAMP and cGMP by up to sixfold, whereas far-red light can be used to down-regulate activity.

103 light intensities and ratios of red and far-red light caused by shading and neighbor proximity.

104 In red light, cells produce red-absorbing phycocyanin (PC),

105 inally we show that both shaded, low red/far-red light conditions and high temperature induce more ve

106 tion of photomorphogenesis under red and far-red light conditions involves both positively and negati

107 uple mutant pifq both in the dark and in far-red light conditions.

108 esulting CDots gradually shifts from blue to red light, covering the entire light spectrum.

109 a unique CBCR called IflA (influenced by far-red light), demonstrating that a second CBCR called RcaE

110 aks at dusk, binds phytochrome B (phyB) in a red light-dependent manner, and co-localizes with phyB i

111 mpletion of the Arabidopsis life cycle under red light, despite the lack of a transcriptomic response

112 plished via an amide bond to further enhance red-light-driven, direct electron transfer and stability

113 Our analysis revealed that illumination with red light effectively terminates VT in diseased, ChR2-ex

114 s KZrPS(6), RbZrPS(6), and CsZrPS(6) exhibit red light emission at room temperature.

115 electrically-driven GaN:Eu based device for red light emission is analyzed in the framework of a cur

116 than the state-of-the-art GaN:Eu system for red light emission.

117 Red-light emission based solely on transient SrOH(g) has

118 anic/h-BN vdW solid arrays are patterned for red-light emission.

119 IQE in the electrically-driven GaN:Eu based red light emitters.

120 eral advantages such as being excitable with red light, emitting in the near-infrared spectral region

121 These red light-emitting BRET systems have great potential for

122 they can operate with low-power density far-red light-emitting diode light.

123 ere photo-irradiated for 15 min with visible red light-emitting diodes with a light-fluence of 0.54 J

124 Here, we describe red light-emitting reporter systems based on bioluminesc

125 y concerns, the development of lithium-based red-light-emitting pyrotechnic compositions of high puri

126 The development of a red-light-emitting pyrotechnic illuminant has garnered i

127 nsitizer (PS) with the photoCORM and shining red light, energy transfer occurs from triplet excited-s

128 ity and shade (i.e. to the perception of far-red light-enriched light filtered through or reflected f

129 of their contrasting growth responses to far-red light enrichment.

130 le in sustaining robust clock function under red light, even in the absence of photosynthesis or exog

131 Under biotissue-penetrable red-light excitation, we found that such nanocrystals po

132 ies have examined the efficacy of low dosage red light exposure for cellular repair and increasing sp

133 In response to blue and red light exposure, this animal-like cryptochrome (aCRY)

134 the primary route for IAA biosynthesis after red light exposure.

135 Low red light/far-red light ratio (R:FR) serves as an indica

136 Vegetation-induced reduction in the red light:far-red light ratio provides a competition sig

137 results confirmed that cells grown under far-red light form biofilms with a significantly increased a

138 duction in the ratio of red light (R) to far-red light (FR) as a warning of competition with neighbor

139 Far-red light (FR) pretreatment and transfer to white light

140 plants have to adapt to a high ratio of far-red light (FR)/red light (R) light in the canopy before

141 sponses to the ratio of red light (R) to far-red light (FR; an indicator of competition) by suppressi

142 cidiopsis thermalis PCC 7203 grown under far-red light (FRL; >725 nm) contains both chlorophyll a and

143 plete recovery of the etiolated phenotype of red light-grown seedlings of the tomato phytochrome-defi

144 In red-light-grown seedlings PIF4 ubiquitination was reduce

145 d with steady-state light at 350 nm and with red light (>610 nm) of modulated intensity, the BPEA flu

146 from white light D2O-seawater medium to far-red light H2O-seawater medium, the observed deuteration

147 such that axillary buds growing in added far-red light have greatly increased receptor transcript abu

148 Whereas other red light-hypersensitive mutants accumulate phyA protein

149 This red light hypersensitivity can be overcome by eliminatin

150 Arg)-YFP photoreceptor are hypersensitive to red light, (ii) light-induced SUMOylation of the mutant

151 2.6 s, which is present already 1 mus after red light illumination of the flavin radical.

152 nate hydrochloride incubation and subsequent red light illumination.

153 ct measurement of curvilinear velocity under red light illumination.

154 1 transcript itself is down-regulated by far-red light in a phytochrome A- and PAT1-dependent manner.

155 This was due to the deeper penetration of red light in cardiac tissue compared with blue light, wh

156 with those genes showing hyper-promotion by red light in phyA.

157 mbered the genes showing reduced response to red light in phyA.

158 pparently by sensing the ratio of red to far-red light in the environment.

159 gated concentration range, and doing so with red light in the therapeutic window.

160 A biosynthesis were increased by low-fluence red light in the top section (meristem, cotyledons, and

161 hese rhythms gated the hypocotyl response to red light, in part by changing the expression of phytoch

162 nsport and biosynthesis of IAA, showing that red light increases both IAA biosynthesis in the top sec

163 SIVE GATA FACTOR1 as well as that of SPCH is red light induced but the induction of SPCH is compromis

164 We characterized red light-induced clustering localization and adjustable

165 Red light-induced degradation of the mutant phyA-5 prote

166 h the model that the Y263F change prevents a red light-induced far-red light absorbing phytochrome ch

167 ble to simultaneously activate expression of red light-induced genes and repress expression of green

168 Faster dark reversion attenuates red light-induced nuclear import and interaction of phyB

169 Further analysis reveals that far-red light-induced phosphorylation and degradation of PIF

170 m (strain Shark) and engineered to result in red light-induced photocurrents three times those of ear

171 esults demonstrate that HT1 is essential for red light-induced stomatal opening and interacts genetic

172 The question of whether red light-induced stomatal opening is mediated by a phot

173 ere, we report a strong impairment in ht1 in red light-induced stomatal opening whereas blue light wa

174 imentally showed that ABA is able to inhibit red light-induced stomatal opening, and our model offers

175 low [Ci ]-dependent pathway may function in red light-induced stomatal opening.

176 pen question concerning the effect of ABA on red light-induced stomatal opening.

177 ine signaling was not likely responsible for red-light-induced DPC activity.

178 This reaction is a new example of red-light-initiated atmospheric chemistry that may help

179 the YHB mutation is sufficient to phenocopy red light input into the circadian mechanism and to sust

180 ght-regulated histidine kinases that convert red light into signaling events.

181 edox catalyst, pheophorbide a (PheoA), under red light irradiation (lambdamax = 635 nm, 0.4 mW/cm(2))

182 15EaPCB were however less efficient than by red light irradiation given to biliverdin-rescued seeds

183 Combination of (13)CO gas exposure, blue or red light irradiation, and controlled hydration of three

184 0.04 (mol O(2)) (mol PSII)(-1) s(-1) during red light irradiation.

185 ymerization of a methacrylate backbone under red light irradiation.

186 lated Arabidopsis seedlings before and after red-light irradiation, we identified a number of influen

187 rsion efficiency of 5.4% under low-intensity red-light irradiation.

188 Red light is less scattered by tissue and is absorbed le

189 Visible red light is observed when pumped with a telecommunicati

190 odopsins and can enable experiments in which red light is preferred.

191 as also agravitropic but when adapted to dim red light it displayed a reversed gravitropic response.

192 chemical water splitting under broadband and red light (lambda > 590 nm) illumination in a dye-sensit

193 R), that is optimally excited with orange to red light (lambda approximately 590-630 nm) and offers i

194 r of the excited states formed upon blue- or red-light laser excitation.

195 Additionally, exposure to yellow but not far-red light leads to comparable increases in the expressio

196 posing liquid-stored boar semen to different red light LED regimens on sperm quality and reproductive

197 anging R:FRs or lowering R:FRs by adding far-red light led to the appearance of small nuclear bodies

198 re dimeric photoreceptor proteins that sense red light levels in plants, fungi, and bacteria.

199 iberated upon irradiation with low-intensity red light (</=36 mW 635 nm).

200 ere demonstrate that HOS1 is involved in the red light-mediated degradation of CO that takes place in

201 display strong hyposensitive response to far-red light-mediated seed germination and light-regulated

202 A narrowband red-light nanocomposite photodetector with gain is prese

203 riction diameter in blast-injured mice using red light or blue light stimuli 24 hours after injury co

204 ular peroxy decomposition is promoted by the red-light or near-IR radiation excitation.

205 nm or 613 nm wavelength narrow-band green or red light, or wide-spectrum white light, and thereby pro

206 ite light or blue light, over 60%, and under red light, over 90% of all simulated knockouts had simil

207 Red light penetrates deeper into tissue than other visib

208 Because red light penetrates tissue more deeply than light of sh

209 t manner, thereby increasing the response to red light perceived by phyB.

210 jor family of photoreceptors responsible for red light perception in plants, fungi and bacteria.

211 terconversion between red light (Pr) and far-red light (Pfr)-absorbing states.

212 In addition, the long hypocotyl in far-red light phenotype of the laf6 mutant could not be resc

213 art of an extensive acclimation process, far-red light photoacclimation (FaRLiP), which occurs in man

214 Far-red light photoacclimation appears to be controlled by a

215 Far-red light photoacclimation leads to substantial remodell

216 Here we propose that the red/far-red light photoreceptor HvPHYTOCHROME C (HvPHYC), carryi

217 Phytochrome B (phyB) is the primary red light photoreceptor in plants, and regulates both gr

218 The red/far-red light photoreceptor phytochrome mediates photomorpho

219 Phytochrome is a multidomain dimeric red light photoreceptor that utilizes a chromophore-bind

220 ated by plant photoreceptors [3-5], with the red-light photoreceptor phytochrome B (phyB) having a do

221 hat interact physically with the red and far-red light photoreceptors, phytochromes, are called PHYTO

222 e light through photointerconversion between red light (Pr) and far-red light (Pfr)-absorbing states.

223 r a light program of alternating red and far-red light pulses and were named eid (for empfindlicher i

224 adapt to a high ratio of far-red light (FR)/red light (R) light in the canopy before they reach the

225 lants perceive the reduction in the ratio of red light (R) to far-red light (FR) as a warning of comp

226 haliana) branching responses to the ratio of red light (R) to far-red light (FR; an indicator of comp

227 ights (RGB) during the day and to: darkness; red light (R); combined red-green LED (RG) lights; and c

228 receptor that senses the ratio of red to far-red light (R:FR) to regulate the shade-avoidance respons

229 a reduction in the ratio of red light to far-red light (R:FR).

230 ited and super-resolution imaging in the far-red light range, is optimally excited with common red la

231 tion of light quality, including the red/far-red light ratio (R/FR) that informs plants about proximi

232 lants interpret a decrease in the red to far-red light ratio (R:FR) as a sign of impending shading by

233 Low red light/far-red light ratio (R:FR) serves as an indicator of impendi

234 The influence of red/far-red light ratio on the fibre length prompted us to exami

235 ation-induced reduction in the red light:far-red light ratio provides a competition signal sensed by

236 ight quality (as crowding and the red-to-far-red light ratio) and phosphate availability, such that t

237 el development to spt mutants by low red/far-red light ratios, simulating vegetation shade, which we

238 During growth in red light, RcaC is able to simultaneously activate expre

239 flowering via physical interactions with the red-light receptor phytochrome B (phyB).

240 jor thermosensory role for the phytochromes (red light receptors) during the night.

241 Phytochrome-mediated detection of far-red light reflection from neighboring plants activates g

242 s that affect photosynthesis, flowering, and red light response are described.

243 , AS of the putative splicing factor REDUCED RED-LIGHT RESPONSES IN CRY1CRY2 BACKGROUND1, previously

244 limitations, we report the development of a red light responsive initiator capable of polymerizing a

245 ontrol gene expression from blue, green, and red light responsive optogenetic tools in bacteria, yeas

246 monstrate that expression of the majority of red-light-responsive genes are misregulated in the pubs

247 cause it enables plants to deetiolate in far-red light-rich environments typical of dense vegetationa

248 hereas cells are smaller and spherical under red light (RL).

249 When phytochrome B is activated by red light, seed germination is promoted by epigenetic tr

250 ed farther through seawater than the red/far-red light sensed by land plant phytochromes.

251 rate a role for phytochrome C as part of the red light sensing network that modulates phytochrome B s

252 iple photoreceptors, among which the red/far-red light-sensing phytochromes have been extensively stu

253 Phytochromes are a major family of red-light-sensing kinases that control diverse cellular

254 ive sweep centered on the adjacent blue- and red-light sensitive opsins SWS2 and LWS.

255 r results suggest that cardiac expression of red light-sensitive ion channels is necessary for the de

256 successfully terminated VF, illumination of red light-sensitive ion channels with dense arrays of im

257 erefore postulate that Ppr functions as a UV-red light sensor and describe the different Ppr states t

258 imeric proteins that function as red and far-red light sensors influencing nearly every phase of the

259 vivo, optimized the conditions for using the red-light-shifted halorhodopsin Jaws in primates, and de

260 2 (cry1 and cry2) exposed to a background of red light show severely impaired stomatal opening respon

261 and abi mutants indicates that ZFP3 enhances red light signaling by photoreceptors other than phytoch

262 CRY2 BACKGROUND1, previously identified as a red light signaling component, was shifted to the functi

263 phyB pool after light exposure, potentiating red-light signaling and prolonging memory of prior illum

264 ight-to-dark) switch, the blue, red, and far-red light signals, and UV-B irradiation.

265 shade or neighbor proximity (low red to far-red light), some plant species exhibit shade-avoiding ph

266 ion channels with dense arrays of implanted red light sources resulted in successful defibrillation.

267 emonstrated that a LED array emitting 653-nm red light stimulated significantly increased cell growth

268 t correlate to age either for bright blue or red light stimulus conditions.Lens transmission decrease

269 tion phase response following cessation of a red light stimulus.

270 es below the top section was not affected by red light, suggesting that the increase of free IAA in t

271 e photoacclimative response to growth in far-red light that includes the synthesis of chlorophylls d

272 When stimulated by far-red light, the intense TTA upconversion blue emission in

273 However, once illuminated with far-red light, the prodrug effectively killed SKOV-3 ovarian

274 rissa motion in awake mice when excited with red light through intact skull.

275 cleus in the brainstem and illumination with red light through the external auditory canal.

276 Land plant phytochromes perceive red and far-red light to control growth and development, using the l

277 etative shade as a reduction in the ratio of red light to far-red light (R:FR).

278 odimers that translocate into the nucleus in red light to mediate photomorphogenic responses.

279 triode tube or transistor and the modulated red light to the grid signal of the tube or gate voltage

280 ablated tumors by the illumination with far-red light to the mice, presumably through the combined e

281 We then assess the safety of red light treatment of sperm by analyzing, (1) the level

282 Soon after red-light treatment, PhyA becomes the dominant ubiquityl

283 osure and to complete this process under far-red light (typical of dense vegetation canopies).

284 Bright red light was observed with the addition of ODI and H2O2

285 e to the relative proportions of red and far red light was regulated by SIG5 through phytochrome and

286 Hypocotyl growth of B19OE seedlings in red light was very similar to phyB mutants.

287 oid shading through sensing of both blue and red light wavelengths.

288 nts showing altered photomorphogenesis under red light, we identified a mutant with dramatically enha

289 through a reduced ratio between red and far-red light, we show here through computational modeling a

290 Pupillary responses to blue light and red light were compared between control subjects and tho

291 psis thaliana) mutants hypersensitive to far-red light were isolated under a light program of alterna

292 rkably, RR enhancement occurs with low-toxic red light, which is close to maximum transparency in the

293 FHY3) promotes seedling de-etiolation in far-red light, which is perceived by phytochrome A (phyA).

294 tissue penetrable and clinically useful far-red light, which kills the cancer cells through the comb

295 ime to be photochromic upon irradiation with red light, which should be advantageous for many applica

296 ity as a decrease in the ratio of red to far-red light, which triggers a series of developmental resp

297 otyl regions below the hook was increased by red light, while the level of conjugated IAA was unchang

298 Here we present clear evidence that even far-red light with wavelengths beyond 800 nm, clearly outsid

299 disease severity compared with responses to red light, with a significant linear correlation observe

300 orophyll for photosynthesis under continuous red light, yet require elevated fluence rates for surviv