ライフサイエンスコーパス: reference standard

1 ues detected at histopathologic examination (reference standard).

2 etic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) logMAR chart (reference standard).

3 rwent MR imaging and fine-needle biopsy (the reference standard).

4 resence or absence of delirium and dementia (reference standard).

5 centile for age, sex, and height percentile (reference standard).

6 MR images served as the reference standard.

7 ume (n=341 versus 422) using FFR</=0.80 as a reference standard.

8 F assay using M. tuberculosiscultures as the reference standard.

9 r clinical and imaging follow-up served as a reference standard.

10 , with consensus in two cases, served as the reference standard.

11 calculated with the 10-2 VF as the clinical reference standard.

12 results obtained with a broth microdilution reference standard.

13 tologic and/or histologic examination as the reference standard.

14 cell count parameters compared with a valid reference standard.

15 ears of follow-up were used to establish the reference standard.

16 94.5% to 96.2%) compared to a broth-enriched reference standard.

17 ce narrowing and osteophytes, using MRI as a reference standard.

18 ells and ((125)I-BA)KuE as a radioligand and reference standard.

19 P were assessed using adjudicated SAP as the reference standard.

20 ingle-photon emission computed tomography as reference standard.

21 nostic performance of FFRCT using FFR as the reference standard.

22 atic sclerosis-related ILD compared with the reference standard.

23 ng results of the histologic analysis as the reference standard.

24 ance of MPI, using coronary angiography as a reference standard.

25 of 120 nodules; this selection served as the reference standard.

26 smear, and Xpert MTB/RIF, using MGIT as the reference standard.

27 klists using facility staff responses as the reference standard.

28 was assessed via comparison to a phenotypic reference standard.

29 Phl p 5.0109, the second available allergen reference standard.

30 e additional human reviewers was used as the reference standard.

31 B/RIF with an M. tuberculosis culture as the reference standard.

32 the BacterioScan device, with culture as the reference standard.

33 e positivity of 2 of 3 tests was used as the reference standard.

34 ical prostatectomy specimens was used as the reference standard.

35 dings in the surgical specimen served as the reference standard.

36 dies are needed to assess accuracy against a reference standard.

37 the general dental practitioner acted as the reference standard.

38 ed with cerebrospinal fluid Abeta1-42 as the reference standard.

39 fied in the domains of patient selection and reference standard.

40 tive cross-sectional blind comparison with a reference standard.

41 ricular (LV) remodeling after surgery as the reference standard.

42 s that did not exhibit these features as the reference standard.

43 n-demand spot sputum collection was the main reference standard.

44 80); these measurements were regarded as the reference standard.

45 or more diagnostic tests against a clinical reference standard.

46 within the previous 2 weeks, was used as the reference standard.

47 ncorrectly classified as nonrecurrent in the reference standard.

48 79.00+/-5.56% antitumour activity which were reference standard.

49 hn's disease (CD) using ileocolonoscopy as a reference standard.

50 n clinician-collected specimens (HC2-C) as a reference standard.

51 ituations where there is no single, accurate reference standard.

52 oning, and choice-were used to establish the reference standard.

53 The PET images served as part of the reference standard.

54 lts were compared using the plasma VL as the reference standard.

55 tified as having COPD did not meet the trial reference standard.

56 imaging follow-up (>/=6 mo) were used as the reference standard.

57 th CRC, using findings from colonoscopy as a reference standard.

58 cteristics associated with meeting the trial reference standard.

59 stical Manual diagnosis of depression as the reference standard.

60 s using fractional flow reserve (FFR) as the reference standard.

61 samples, using mycobacterial cultures as the reference standard.

62 -negative patients as classified against any reference standard.

63 udies that did not use histopathology as the reference standard.

64 bution as the population used to develop the reference standard.

65 n considering the DSM-IV-TR criterion as the reference standard.

66 sheep's blood (BMHA), using mecA PCR as the reference standard.

67 or clinical follow-up was considered as the reference standard.

68 nsitivity analysis with Xpert MTB/RIF as the reference standard.

69 ogic assessment (Mankin score) served as the reference standard.

70 ire Score using a score of 5 or greater as a reference standard.

71 all clinical and imaging data, served as the reference standard.

72 ing a score of 5 or greater on the LLQS as a reference standard.

73 e polyps were also collected and used as the reference standard.

74 digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference standard.

75 an MI, using </=50% TEI at follow-up as the reference standard.

76 as confirmed by medical record review as the reference standard.

77 sts against polymerase chain reaction as the reference standard.

78 ats by using histopathologic findings as the reference standard.

79 MR imaging served as the reference standard.

80 LAP tears, by using surgical findings as the reference standard.

81 adenomas and cancers using endoscopy as the reference standard.

82 stopathologic tumor regression grade was the reference standard.

83 he Xpert test and the other for culture as a reference standard.

84 has been hampered by a lack of tumor/normal reference standards.

85 fined according to World Health Organization reference standards.

86 and 6-week clinical follow-up as diagnostic reference standards.

87 0-day follow-up medical records were used as reference standards.

88 alysis and follow-up imaging as the clinical reference standards.

89 as glycan microarrays, affinity resins, and reference standards.

90 Athens and seven were finally confirmed with reference standards.

91 results or follow-up examinations served as reference standards.

92 mass fragmentation patterns with those of 25 reference standards.

93 als and humans when compared to experimental reference standards.

94 traction, and histology as three independent reference standards.

95 olic steatohepatitis categories were used as reference standards.

96 etabolites of anthocyanins, were obtained as reference standards.

97 ure tests and drug susceptibility testing as reference standards.

98 ans of linear regression with the respective reference standards.

99 l diagnosis and clinical follow-up served as reference standards.

100 e cytochrome b gene) and quantitative PCR as reference standards.

101 olon cancer xenografts compared with ex vivo reference standards.

102 force microscopy (AFM)-based indentation as reference-standards.

103 that showed almost perfect agreement to the reference standard (0.943 and 0.931 Cohen kappa).

104 % (CI, 0.29-0.74), respectively, with AVF as reference standard (13 studies).

105 nical setting (24%), patient sampling (10%), reference standard (48%), whether test readers were mask

106 The precursor compound ( 5A: + 5B: ) and reference standard ( 6: ) were synthesized in multistep

107 ed by using a semiautomated method and, as a reference standard, a manual method.

108 Using colonoscopy as the reference standard, a test for NK cell activity in whole

109 seven substances was confirmed by authentic reference standards, all of which exhibited an elevated

110 Subsequently obtained reference standards allowed confirmation for 19 out of t

111 um samples were compared to a phenotypic DST reference standard alone.

112 surements as well as cell counts for BioBall reference standard and 24 environmental water samples.

113 gh sensitivity and specificity relative to a reference standard and could be an important tool for im

114 howed no significant differences between the reference standard and optimal settings (P = .089-.923).

115 Using pCR as the reference standard and ROC curve methodology, %TOITN AUC

116 th histopathology or clinical follow-up as a reference standard and subjected to statistical analysis

117 dal reflectivity, with the RPE as the bright reference standard and the vitreous as the dark referenc

118 y planning by using pathology volumes as the reference standard and to compare pharmacokinetic rate c

119 spectral library compiled from 146 flavonoid reference standards and a novel chemometric model that u

120 ystem against the CRAFT and ShARe corpora as reference standards and compared it to MMTx, MGrep, Conc

121 Metabolic reference standards and deuterium-labeled internal stand

122 GP) as well as of sialylated oligosaccharide reference standards and found that for more highly sialy

123 We observed wide variety in reference standards and study designs and now recommend

124 e periods providing better agreement between reference standards and SUVRs for hROIs, a good compromi

125 with filtered back projection (group 1, the reference standard) and (b) reduced-dose images (generat

126 h the measurement of LBM from whole-body CT (reference standard) and the results of 5 predictive equa

127 nsitivity included use of an explanted liver reference standard, and smaller or more well-differentia

128 versus late/confirmed clinical diagnosis as reference standard, and subjects with movement disorders

129 bas Laboratory of the CDC was considered the reference standard, and the performance characteristics

130 material-enhanced images were considered the reference standard, and the predictive value of diameter

131 ral products databases, (ii) LC-QTOF data of reference standards, and (iii) LC-QTOF data of crude ext

132 The informed use of reference standards, and associated statistical principl

133 y and microvascular assessment techniques as reference standards, and to compare the performance of C

134 aces in primary or permanent teeth; 3) had a reference standard; and 4) reported sufficient data abou

135 r post-acquisition suspect screening when no reference standards are a priori available.

136 lassifying children as competent against the reference standard (area under the receiver operating ch

137 culated by using pathologic diagnosis as the reference standard, as well as lesion stability at 3 and

138 ained critical care nurses and compared with reference standard assessments by delirium experts using

139 um mean difference remained within 5% of the reference standard (at 5.0 mSv) was marked as the optima

140 were assigned to target compounds, with 376 reference standards available.

141 The results were compared with a reference standard based on all clinical, imaging, and h

142 s at the establishment of well-characterized reference standards based on recombinant allergens and v

143 nces were found when comparing international reference standards, being consistent with their source

144 ing organic and chemical compounds from pure reference standards, biological substances, and pharmace

145 ce (MAD) between the model estimates and the reference standard bone ages.

146 howed better discriminatory ability than the reference-standard CMR-derived ventricular volumes.

147 ation remains higher (67%-85% agreement with reference standard, Cohen kappa, 0.90) when compared wit

148 ET signal intensity between a method and the reference standard continuous CT attenuation correction

149 lity of PCR assay was evaluated by composite reference standard (CRS).

150 ons and ratings of emboli were compared with reference standard CT images by using an alternative fre

151 n children younger than 16 years against two reference standards-culture results and culture-negative

152 The method integrates a reference standard database of known DDIs with drug simi

153 The reference standards developed here have been compared wi

154 designed to classify images compared with a reference standard diagnosis (RSD).

155 nt at the time of PET/MRI was related to the reference standard diagnosis of spondylodiskitis.

156 zone I by experts compared with a consensus reference standard diagnosis when interpreting the color

157 xperts that was calculated using a consensus reference standard diagnosis, determined from the diagno

158 treatment) were calculated using a consensus reference standard diagnosis, determined from the diagno

159 direct immunofluorescence assay (IFA) is the reference standard due to its presumed high sensitivity

160 or single-energy and DE CT by using a common reference standard established by relevant prior and fol

161 From the reference standard examination, 26 subjects (5.1%) had P

162 umerous definitions; however, no established reference standard exists.

163 ed on a pharmacophoric approach, with an ADE reference standard extracted from the SIDER database.

164 The reference standard for a diagnosis of ABPA was the crite

165 The reference standard for ACS was either a final hospital d

166 For women with a BMI of 20 (reference standard for all outcomes), 25, and 30, absolu

167 pletion of chemotherapy has been used as the reference standard for assessment of the accuracy of (18

168 MTB/RIF assay supports its inclusion in the reference standard for bacteriological diagnosis of chil

169 with simple-appearing cysts with an adequate reference standard for benign outcome.

170 localization and histologic results were the reference standard for calculating sensitivity and posit

171 for tissue genotyping, which was used as the reference standard for comparison; rebiopsy was required

172 The reference standard for confirmation of active Crohn dise

173 Evidence supports ABPM as the reference standard for confirming elevated office BP scr

174 ulture and/or pericardial histology were the reference standard for definite TBP.

175 globulin M (IgM) seroconversion has been the reference standard for dengue diagnosis.

176 The reference standard for determination of proper needle po

177 ement (LGE) and T1 mapping, is emerging as a reference standard for diagnosis and characterization of

178 The reference standard for diagnosis of active NCC was the d

179 Follow-up LGE imaging was used as the reference standard for final IS and viability assessment

180 available as European Pharmacopoeia allergen reference standard for grass pollen products.

181 erse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction reference standard for influenza diagnosis.

182 of microcirculatory resistance is used as a reference standard for invasively assessing the microvas

183 tial enough to warrant the introduction of a reference standard for medical image viewing workstation

184 CT was considered the reference standard for nodule detection.

185 latory blood pressure (BP) monitoring is the reference standard for out-of-clinic BP measurement.

186 Doppler echocardiography served as a reference standard for PH.

187 mediately after diuretic renal scintigraphy (reference standard for presence of urinary tract obstruc

188 io With this platform, we aim to establish a reference standard for radiomic analyses, provide a test

189 The reference standard for strangulation was surgery.

190 with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) is a reference standard for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloido

191 trate on chest radiograph was considered the reference standard for the diagnosis of pneumonia.

192 e imaging (cMRI) has become the non-invasive reference standard for the evaluation of cardiac functio

193 a pressure wire technique is the established reference standard for the functional assessment of coro

194 antitative x-ray angiography was used as the reference standard for the presence of myocardial ischem

195 ation and slope closest to 1 relative to the reference standards for all values was 120-140 min for h

196 nd calibrated against isotopically different reference standards for both CCl4 and CHCl3 (two of each

197 bial susceptibility testing were used as the reference standards for comparison.

198 ts were compared with each other and used as reference standards for defining an appropriate 20-min w

199 ed to estimate the similarity of samples and reference standards for identification.

200 The reference standards identified spondylodiskitis in 12 di

201 nem-cilastatin, which is less expensive than reference standard imipenem powder, and an updated versi

202 well with those measured using a laboratory reference standard in 94 patient samples ranging from 1.

203 CAD with fractional flow reserve (FFR) as a reference standard in a multicenter setting.

204 e measured against duodenal histology as the reference standard in all patients.

205 (18)F-FDG PET/CT has become the reference standard in oncologic imaging against which th

206 ial source of bias was use of explant as the reference standard in only 13% of studies, although lowe

207 agreed with their initial determination (the reference standard) in 77% of cases (range, 45%-100%).

208 ns provide a much-needed alternative when no reference standard is available for measurement.

209 The commutability of international reference standards is critical for ensuring quantitativ

210 with teledermatology (51%-85% agreement with reference standard, kappa, 0.41-0.63), for the diagnosis

211 ials Network, comparing the TAPS tool with a reference standard measure.

212 r Fulvic Acid Standard II) complemented with reference standard measurements and theoretical calculat

213 chemical threshold values (this requires the reference standard method (RAMP(R) immunoassay)) or alte

214 nal cluster assay (this does not require any reference standard method).

215 od matrices might mean it has potential as a reference standard method.

216 e coronary arteries combined were related to reference standard microsphere perfusion measurements (P

217 d complex-magnitude reconstruction and, as a reference standard, MR spectroscopy.

218 (vs. not) were less likely to meet the trial reference standard (odds ratio [95% CI], 0.37 [0.26-0.53

219 form clinical case definition or a composite reference standard of any positive CSF tuberculous test.

220 s the performance of self-report against the reference standard of clinically defined periodontitis i

221 HSIL identified by any biopsy was the reference standard of disease used to evaluate the incre

222 topy patch test (APT) were compared with the reference standard of double-blind placebo-controlled fo

223 and 74.2% respectively when compared to the reference standard of human expert manual annotations.

224 d blaOXA-58 found in this study) against the reference standard of MIC determinations.

225 d blaOXA-58 found in this study) against the reference standard of MIC determinations.

226 ification algorithms compared with that of a reference standard of MSU crystals in joint aspirate for

227 ification algorithms compared with that of a reference standard of MSU crystals in joint aspirate for

228 s for identifying intracranial injury with a reference standard of neuroimaging or follow-up evaluati

229 tive values of IVCM compared with those of a reference standard of positive culture or light microsco

230 Questions were validated against a reference standard of severe and moderate-to-severe peri

231 mpared with using smear microscopy against a reference standard of solid and liquid cultures.

232 oid malignancy was evaluated relative to the reference standard of surgical pathologic findings.

233 edema, or both, were generated based on the reference standard of the majority decision of the ophth

234 Compared with the reference standard of using only 1 bin of PET data, moti

235 idation of the first fully synthetic gaseous reference standards of CO2 and CH4 in a whole air matrix

236 OCT was proposed as the reference standard or base imaging method to diagnose an

237 transvalvular gradient correlated well with reference standard pressure catheters across a range of

238 due to improvement in the clinical diagnosis reference standard, rather than changes in reader accura

239 ay in the emergency department, as well as a reference standard rating.

240 ng was the reference standard, with positive reference standard result defined as detectable HIV-1 RN

241 wo central readers, blinded to site read and reference standard, reviewed PET/CT images for distant m

242 genotyping HPV in anal samples, against the reference standard Roche Linear Array (LA).

243 For each image set used, a reference standard ROP diagnosis was established by comb

244 ic performance using month-18 diagnosis as a reference standard (sensitivity, 67.0%-73.7%; specificit

245 When Xpert MTB/RIF results were used as the reference standard, sensitivity of point-of-care CRP and

246 son with each commercial system serving as a reference standard showed 88.9% agreement with MicroScan

247 d as having bone metastases according to the reference standard, SPECT/CT, (18)F-NaF PET/CT, and PET/

248 nd Vikia tests and dried blood spots for the reference standard test (AxSYM HBsAg enzyme-linked immun

249 Of 628 who underwent CMR, SPECT, and the reference standard test of X-ray angiography, 104 (16.6%

250 with this technique were much closer to the reference standard than those obtained by the mathematic

251 79 test strains were compared to a composite reference standard that used phenotypic drug susceptibil

252 With CC angiographic imaging as the reference standard, the accuracy of CT for lesion detect

253 spectively) scenario, which was taken as the reference standard, the change in SUL was -41% +/- 25 an

254 video goggles, is compared with the existing reference standard, the Hess screen test.

255 rsions of the TAPS tool were compared with a reference standard, the modified World Mental Health Com

256 c (n = 32) biopsy specimens were used as the reference standard; the results of video-capsule endosco

257 low-up, 11 mo; range, 3-35 mo) was used as a reference standard to define each missed nodule as benig

258 uantitative coronary angiography was used as reference standard to define ischemia.

259 Histopathologic analysis is the reference standard to detect and quantify fat in the liv

260 in angiography (FFA) has been considered the reference standard to detect nAMD activity, but FFA is c

261 ith surgical and microbiology reports as the reference standard to determine the sensitivity, specifi

262 ollowed with available clinical imaging as a reference standard to determine the true nature of ident

263 ralized linear models by using biopsy as the reference standard to distinguish benign from malignant

264 A reference standard to identify HHV8-positive patients wa

265 earson correlations were used to compare the reference standards to 20-min SUVRs (start times varied

266 angles, and cortical thicknesses), (b) DXA (reference standard) to determine areal bone mineral dens

267 effects were assessed in comparison with the reference standard (total study cohort) and separately i

268 The reference standard used to define the presence of true f

269 The software and reference standards used in this study to evaluate seman

270 irubin levels measured with BiliSpec and the reference standard was 0.3 mg/dL (95[Formula: see text]

271 The reference standard was a combination of HC2 and Onclarit

272 Reference standard was a combination of pathological evi

273 The reference standard was biopsy along with treatment decis

274 The reference standard was clinical diagnosis by a masked gl

275 The reference standard was defined by a study-specific inter

276 Reference standard was full ophthalmic examination by an

277 The reference standard was histologic findings.

278 The reference standard was histology or > 12 months of clini

279 Reference standard was pathologic and imaging follow-up.

280 The reference standard was serum osmolality, and index tests

281 Results Agreement with the reference standard was significantly better for 3D measu

282 The reference standard was the clinical evidence for acute m

283 The reference standard was the intraoperative and/or histolo

284 masses between the studied technique and the reference standard was the smallest for the proposed tec

285 erence standard and the vitreous as the dark reference standard, was computed using the formula: norm

286 Using the resulting reference standard, we show that experimental functional

287 se suppressor of Ras 1 (KSR1) depletion as a reference standard, we used functional signature ontolog

288 understood and mitigated through the use of reference standards - well-characterized genetic materia

289 mean differences in values from those of the reference standard were 4.5%, 5.0%, and 1.9%, for cerebr

290 n using the Arabic CAM-ICU compared with the reference standard were 81% (60%-93%) and 85% (65%-95%),

291 Antimicrobials without an available reference standard were calculated as cryptotanshinone-b

292 ns (ICC) of this technique compared with the reference standard were excellent (the best ICC being ob

293 species and from impurity components of the reference standard were investigated.

294 verse events caused by the index test or the reference standard were observed.

295 chymal hyperattenuating lesions in which the reference standards were available were included in the

296 The predefined reference standards were combined quantitative coronary

297 ctions (bodies and faeces) and international reference standards (WHO/IUIS, two CBER/FDA), have been

298 HIV RNA testing was the reference standard, with positive reference standard res

299 ative detection without the need for analyte reference standards would offer substantial benefits in

300 %, respectively, in the 31 patients for whom reference standard x-ray coronary angiography results we