ライフサイエンスコーパス: reference value

1 g" elements; that is, elements closer to the reference value).

2 , respectively (5-6 times the upper limit of reference values).

3 itivity and decreased BRS (all P<0.01 versus reference values).

4 l/L of circulating folate in contrast to the reference value.

5 ice of the alternative foods was kept at the reference value.

6 tended to overestimate FZA compared with the reference value.

7 phosphatase levels greater than twofold the reference value.

8 e imply increased risk, when compared with a reference value.

9 er the average was greater or smaller than a reference value.

10 of tumor delineation methods with different reference values.

11 pid) was comparable with U.S. adult national reference values.

12 Healthy non-brain-dead rats served as reference values.

13 stimates were missing and were replaced with reference values.

14 An Institute of Medicine report provided reference values.

15 ion to determining the corresponding analyte reference values.

16 ot require laboratory prepared or determined reference values.

17 um scored as normal or abnormal according to reference values.

18 astolic volumes were increased compared with reference values.

19 which obviates the need for race-specific RV reference values.

20 r (2) use the actual values and overlook the reference values.

21 LT cutoffs for screening were based on local reference values.

22 een generic formulations after adjusting for reference values.

23 c review into development of future nutrient reference values.

24 oductively used to inform the development of reference values.

25 ies have no accepted standard methodology or reference values.

26 any dual-head gamma-camera and to establish reference values.

27 CLSM to be between 0.46% to 3.8% of the SEM reference values.

28 e Dietary Reference Intakes, which include 4 reference values.

29 tamine concentrations down 26% compared with reference values.

30 se of chronic disease endpoints to establish reference values.

31 vailability are required for setting dietary reference values.

32 e liquid chromatography provided independent reference values.

33 results were in excellent agreement with the reference values.

34 QLQ C30 scores are overall comparable to the reference values.

35 H may be taller than age- and gender-matched reference values.

36 nd had similar mean values (52% vs. 51%) and reference values (29% vs. 30%).

37 t the NIR-CGM sensor data reflects the blood reference values adequately, if a proper calibration and

38 zole E-test MICs had better concordance with reference values after 48 h (95.2%) than after 24 h (90%

39 The findings of this study provide reference values against which arterial switch operation

40 The large range of normal pediatric reference values allows diagnosis of DD in only a small

41 re under development for establishing normal reference values analogous to the Task Force data for ca

42 atically deriving and updating micronutrient reference values and dietary recommendations.

43 w into the IOM process for updating nutrient reference values and highlighted major challenges encoun

44 Reference values and lower limits of normal were derived

45 al settings has been hampered by the limited reference values and the lack of uniformity in software,

46 nd these showed good correlation between the reference values and those calculated using the PLS mode

47 In order to establish reference values and to evaluate lung growth, we obtaine

48 to define normal cardiac magnetic resonance reference values and to identify the main determinants o

49 quality assessment, we propose new pediatric reference values and Z score equations for most left ven

50 The PAAT normal reference values and z scores we provide here will be us

51 Current reference values and Z scores, allowing adjustment for g

52 n excellent agreement with the corresponding reference values and/or results obtained using double-fo

53 ith respect to the age- and ancestry-matched reference value) and with an increased risk of allergic

54 The program options are mapped into the FBB reference values, and all the aligners can be compared r

55 I and (2)I values within +/-20 index unit of reference values, and by MS spectrum matching above a ma

56 e calculated to assess correlations with the reference values, and paired t tests were performed to c

57 Intakes in group 1 were similar to reference values, and the patients adhered to the prescr

58 We conclude that if age-specific reference values are applied, CSF glucose and lactate le

59 ent and impaired outcome when currently used reference values are applied.

60 Previously published reference values are inaccurate and induce clinically si

61 ions are still in the normal range, reliable reference values are needed.

62 New empirical reference values are provided for use in pediatric hydro

63 e challenge the previous annual soil erosion reference values as our estimate, of 35.9 Pg yr(-1) of s

64 However, their normal reference values, as measured by cardiac magnetic resona

65 nd the proportion who established a baseline reference value at home.

66 ials, and the results were in agreement with reference values at 95% confidence level (paired t-test)

67 based ovary-intact rats provided age-matched reference values at baseline (n = 8) and landing (n = 10

68 sion was compared with the penumbra and core reference values at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to d

69 ations allows better prediction of blood gas reference values at sea level and at altitudes as high a

70 acy (relative difference with respect to the reference value below 1%).

71 not meaningfully increased from the -0.2-SD reference value between z scores of -0.97 and +0.33 SDs

72 ing the proposed method, agreements with the reference values between 97 and 104% for Br and I were o

73 useful, not only in helping to set nutrient reference values, but also for increasing the transparen

74 GF was elevated in both groups compared with reference values, but it was higher in CF: 403 +/- 280 v

75 ysiologic requirements for iron into Dietary Reference Values, but the absorption from single meals c

76 foods, and a Daily Value (called a Nutrient Reference Value by Codex) of 150 mug for iodine.

77 M8574 (L-Glutamic Acid USGS41) differed from reference values by 0.06-0.20%.

78 These United States cancer reference values can help facilitate interpretation of t

79 e phosphatase level of less than twofold the reference value characterizes corticosteroid-responsive

80 The lower reference value combined with increased repurposing of p

81 from 18 types of chocolate and corresponding reference values determined using DPPH, ORAC, Folin-Cioc

82 isfactory and in accordance with the Dietary Reference Values (DRVs).

83 ess than 80 mm Hg or lower than 40% from the reference value during and for 4 hours following surgery

84 Compared with age- and gender-matched reference values, early adolescent patients were taller

85 These reference values encompass a wide age range for three ra

86 the DNA reference material with a certified reference value expressed in amount of DNA molecules per

87 rements were standardized as percentage of a reference value, expressed as bone material strength ind

88 should be able to establish a home baseline reference value for future monitoring.

89 and SRM1950, for which literature data and a reference value for SEPP1 have been reported, were analy

90 rature (7-DAM) of 13 degrees C was used as a reference value for the biological limit governing suita

91 the optimal timing as well as the threshold reference value for the urine albumin creatinine ratio i

92 The variation from the reference value for the whole air standards was determin

93 vitamin D metabolites and has certified and reference values for 25(OH)D(2), 25(OH)D(3), and 3-epi-2

94 loped a radionuclide methodology and derived reference values for a comprehensive gastrointestinal tr

95 had the lowest percentages of agreement with reference values for A. nidulans (60 to 80%).

96 burden of respiratory disease, no spirometry reference values for African children are available.

97 were validated and then selected to provide reference values for an international comparison of the

98 s the first large study that provides normal reference values for cardiac structure.

99 Spirometric reference values for Caucasians, African-Americans, and

100 noids were elevated above most nonintervened reference values for children.

101 rement of endotoxins, and there is a lack of reference values for endotoxin concentrations to aid in

102 The reported relationships can be used as reference values for evaluating clinical programs or for

103 ous infusion of vehicle) were used to obtain reference values for histological and immunohistochemica

104 ovide an initial assessment of healthy donor reference values for induced cytokines and chemokines an

105 This study provides reference values for LA 3DE volumes and function from a

106 Our study sought to (1) identify reference values for left atrial (LA) volumes and phasic

107 We sought to establish reference values for left ventricular ejection fraction

108 Dietary reference values for micronutrients vary considerably am

109 and 27 mm in women as sex-specific normative reference values for mPA and 0.9 for ratio PA.

110 ge- and sex-specific distribution and normal reference values for mPA and ratio PA by CT in an asympt

111 ific cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) reference values for normative left ventricular (LV) ana

112 ts (e.g. REEs) were analysed in order to get reference values for nutritional preparation.

113 ur study were to estimate pesticide exposure reference values for NYC and identify demographic and be

114 study aims to provide representative, normal reference values for PAAT in children of all ages.

115 Reference values for patients age 65 to 84 years reporte

116 Reference values for percentage body fat (%BF) were obta

117 objective of this study was to define normal reference values for RA area by echocardiography in a la

118 nter study was designed to (1) establish the reference values for RV volumes and EF using transthorac

119 this study was designed to establish (1) the reference values for RVLS by 2-dimensional speckle-track

120 est study providing sex- and method-specific reference values for RVLS.

121 ts of this study support the use of GLI-2012 reference values for schoolchildren in sub-Saharan Afric

122 Reference values for serum periostin levels in adults wi

123 Reference values for some nutrients in broad bean powder

124 of antiinflammatory medications, and lack of reference values for spirometric measures of lung functi

125 hether the Global Lung Initiative (GLI-2012) reference values for spirometry are appropriate for chil

126 RATIONALE: Accurate reference values for spirometry are important because th

127 e have also provided age- and sex-stratified reference values for strain and SR based on a large-scal

128 The reference values for TBW, ECW, and ICW were defined by u

129 icit when preterm infants were compared with reference values for term infants.

130 t into walking balance control and important reference values for the emergence of balance impairment

131 This SRM has certified and reference values for the following 25-hydroxyvitamin D [

132 or EBC collection, are required to establish reference values for the interpretation of EBC markers i

133 Cross-sectional reference values for the VI and TOD increased with matur

134 here are no published age- and sex-dependent reference values for these relationships that were appro

135 We conclude that our study provides reference values for this age group and demonstrates tha

136 sal Southeast-Asian women was lower than the reference values for White women.

137 91 +/- 0.089) all compared well with the FZA reference value from the compartmental model (0.30 +/- 0

138 degrees (C3) and 133 degrees (C2), taking a reference value from vibrational studies of 175 degrees

139 ults with four complementary approaches: (i) reference values from a young control group aged between

140 their severity (multiplication of the median reference values from patients and physicians).

141 , SiO2, MgO, Mn, and Al2O3 are compared with reference values from the steel works laboratory for sol

142 ughts, feelings/attitudes, competencies, and reference values (goals and standards).

143 ior/posterior GM method and have established reference values (>or=33%).

144 A radionuclide methodology and reference values have been developed for a single gastro

145 Nutrient reference values have significant public health and poli

146 d DLP in 2013 were at or close to identified reference values; however, additional optimization is re

147 The aim of this study was to determine the reference values (i.e. cut-off values) for absolute sign

148 tolic blood pressure (SBP) within 10% of the reference value (ie, patient's resting SBP) or standard

149 sis provides new recommendations for dietary reference values, ie, an EAR (median) and RDA (97.5th pe

150 e, minerals), their contribution for Dietary Reference Values in Italian population, and the antioxid

151 After generating reference values in normal controls, QGE(LMNA) was perfo

152 Purpose To estimate cancer population-based reference values in the United States for eight PROMIS (

153 pplying a correction factor of 0.88 to white reference values is considered reasonable when testing A

154 tolerable Upper Level (UL) -and not a single reference value like the previous RDAs, they could be us

155 Reference values (lower limits of normality) were as fol

156 the elevation of plasma gastrin (1031 pg/ml; reference value <108) and chromogranin A (337 U/L; refer

157 nce value <108) and chromogranin A (337 U/L; reference value <36).

158 Results Several reference values (means) for patients with cancer were w

159 However, published reference values mostly refer to historical cohorts usin

160 of patients compared to age- and sex-matched reference values; nerve fiber density and branching were

161 e ORs of not meeting the Australian Nutrient Reference Values (NRVs) were calculated by logistic regr

162 ximum deviation of the average response from reference values obtained by a glass electrode was 0.2pH

163 ied values for the CRM TORT-2 as well as the reference values obtained with ICP-OES for the brass sam

164 ses RRs increased for temperatures above the reference value of 10 degrees C.

165 percent of the samples exceeded the guidance reference value of 4mg/kg of morphine set by BfR in Germ

166 h an energy resolution down to 133 eV at the reference value of 5.9 keV.

167 Reference values of analyte concentrations by high perfo

168 The normal reference values of atrial dimensions, volumes, and empt

169 The reference values of Cole et al equivalent to a BMI of 25

170 The reference values of Cole et al gave lower estimates than

171 ork provide a basis for the establishment of reference values of element mass fractions in CRM SWCNT-

172 tro and incubated for 5-30 minutes to obtain reference values of gammaH2AX focus yield.

173 dified partial least squares regression with reference values of HPLC.

174 We examined the reference values of left atrium and left ventricle (LV)

175 ive bone marrow mass under the assumption of reference values of marrow volume fraction and bone marr

176 Reference values of motion and thickening for 20 myocard

177 The reference values of Must et al gave much higher prevalen

178 Importantly, the study provides reference values of normal LA volume index.

179 pose of this study was to establish standard reference values of normal LVMT with cardiac magnetic re

180 We assessed retrospectively the reference values of pelvic dimensions by 3D CT performed

181 chemistry methods were used for quantifying reference values of protein, oil, and 18 amino acids.

182 between 94 and 97%, and agreements with the reference values of RM were better than 94%.

183 cale the resulting TMS absorbed fractions by reference values of site-specific marrow cellularity.

184 The findings of this study present the reference values of the main planes of the true pelvis b

185 We conclude that reference values of total body composition for young fem

186 We conclude that reference values of total body composition for young hea

187 into account when developing ethnic-specific reference values or designing studies to optimize lung h

188 se this approach is independent of the group reference values or the underlying clinical context, it

189 ere defined as >15% difference compared with reference values or their unavailability for any technic

190 BIS values were highly correlated with the reference values (r(2) = 0.94-0.97, P < 0.0001), but dif

191 rates than there was between the 2D and the reference values (r=.94, y=1.0x-0.16, difference=0.02 L/

192 mean diameter and curvature correlated with reference values (r2 = .99), and mean fractional errors

193 of > 2 seconds above the upper limit of the reference value received an intramuscular injection of v

194 ficance beyond volume measures; however, the reference values remain largely unknown.

195 l toxicity values-specifically, chronic oral reference values (RfVs) for noncancer effects, and oral

196 m two orthogonal planes correlated well with reference values (RSV: r = 0.99, mean difference = 0.02

197 Reference values (RVs) are recommended by the American A

198 ror of 0.4+/-0.1 degrees C compared with the reference value set in a thermostatic bath.

199 replicates and the low variation compared to reference values show that this system can accurately de

200 The ICRP reference values showed a deviation comparable to the ef

201 provide a resource for establishing CTDIvol reference values specific to performing CT in PET/CT who

202 is that because the DRIs are comprised of 4 reference values -the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR

203 e risk factors, with elective surgery as the reference value, the 3 groups had significantly distinct

204 e mean National Centre for Health Statistics reference values, the presence of bilateral pitting oede

205 the importance of defining reliable nutrient reference values, there is a need for an explicit, objec

206 Control and Prevention lowered the blood Pb reference value to 5 mug/dL.

207 methods were then used for the assignment of reference values to a mushroom powder Certified Referenc

208 e studies are required to provide diagnostic reference values to allow discrimination of normal from

209 lipidomics community is in need of benchmark reference values to assess the validity of various lipid

210 of reference materials and the provision of reference values to clinical measurements and clinical t

211 xperimental (and random phase approximation) reference values to those of a family of nonempirical se

212 ry technicians; testing posture; appropriate reference values to use for Asians in North America; and

213 Consequently, predicting risk from toxicity reference values traditionally generated with monotonic

214 is study provides gender-specific normal CMR reference values, uniquely derived from a population-bas

215 s, potentially due to a lack of standardized reference values upon which hydraulic strategies can be

216 btained using ASV are in good agreement with reference values using cold vapor atomic absorption for

217 ethod to support the development of nutrient reference values using vitamin A as an example.

218 form of KRAS, and the alpha-actin gene (as a reference value) using quantitative, allele-specific, re

219 nd the bias between experimental results and reference values was better than 0.0033 and 0.0007 per t

220 n the investigational reading conditions and reference values was good with fluconazole and voriconaz

221 y intake was estimated and a comparison with reference values was indicated.

222 Using ASE 2015 defined reference values, we categorized 7%, 21%, 57%, and 17% o

223 above the control of the upper limit of the reference value were given three successive dosages of r

224 Reference values were determined for esophageal transit

225 Reference values were determined on the basis of a 95% c

226 Reference values were estimated using quantile regressio

227 Cross-sectional reference values were generated for fat mass (FM), fat-f

228 The %GE reference values were greater for the anterior/posterior

229 Reference values were highest (ie, showed greatest sympt

230 Alkaline phosphatase control reference values were not significantly different from t

231 Reference values were obtained from 1230 persons from th

232 Normal reference values were obtained using 131 healthy control

233 Cancer reference values were poorer among those with advanced d

234 etric MICs, as well their compatibility with reference values, were excellent with the four triazoles

235 ach grade of complication, defined as median reference values, were obtained from 472 participants, w

236 95% of MR-based GFRs were within 30% of the reference values, whereas only 40% and 60% of Cockcroft-

237 least volumetric difference from MR imaging reference values with delay times greater than 3 seconds

238 All but one standard agreed with the reference value within the stated uncertainty.

239 eviews into the process of updating nutrient reference values would provide a comprehensive and disti