ライフサイエンスコーパス: referral

1 d tolerability (acute mental health services referral).

2 undergo appropriate evaluation and surgical referral.

3 cision-making for hearing aid fitting and CI referral.

4 bjects required acute mental health services referral.

5 nced pelvic organ prolapse, that may require referral.

6 reater odds of DR requiring an ophthalmology referral.

7 of early disease and the need for specialist referral.

8 that include dual-antigen RDTs to avoid over referral.

9 trongly associated with DR and ophthalmology referral.

10 g DR, identifying relevant cases for medical referral.

11 w transplant referral or racial disparity in referral.

12 was 50%, a prognostic bench mark for hospice referral.

13 .3%) had DR with a need for an ophthalmology referral.

14 iSTAL criteria tool to encourage earlier PCT referrals.

15 n with minor cervical lesions generates many referrals.

16 n with minor cervical lesions generates many referrals.

17 fective than the current practice of 12-week referrals.

18 Search terms used included: 1) refer; 2) referral; 3) periodontal; and 4) periodontist.

19 Of 1,005 referrals, 687 participants (68.4%) fulfilled epidemiolo

20 2 to October 2014, carried out in a tertiary referral academic center.

21 al-level variation in cardiac rehabilitation referral after PCI, coronary artery bypass surgery, and

22 litation referral should focus on increasing referral after PCI, especially in low referral hospitals

23 We aimed to assess colposcopy referral and CIN2+ detection rates for HPV-screened vers

24 The main outcomes were colposcopy referral and detected CIN2+ rates at baseline screening,

25 For the LBC-screened group, the overall referral and detected CIN2+ rates were 27/995 (2.7% [95%

26 A diagnostic change between referral and expert review occurred in 19.7% of patients

27 Changes in diagnosis between referral and expert review were classified as major or m

28 In conclusion, this intervention increased referral and improved equity in kidney transplant referr

29 pattern of hospice use suggests that earlier referral and improved retention may benefit this populat

30 research is necessary to understand hospice referral and palliative care needs of advanced HF patien

31 f predicting survival are barriers to timely referral and receipt of palliative care.

32 ations for quality improvement, criteria for referral and reimbursement, and surgical education.

33 r colleagues, within the context of existing referral and support practices.

34 ) had DR without a need for an ophthalmology referral, and 155 patients (9.3%) had DR with a need for

35 d between the CriSTAL score, palliative care referral, and in-hospital mortality in patients who rece

36 thalmology referral, percentage of completed referrals, and patient characteristics associated with v

37 studies comparing screening rates, specialty referrals, and patient outcomes in trained vs untrained

38 ith antibiotics prescribed on day 0, primary referrals, and severe adverse events by day 30 (secondar

39 linking to care and initiating ART following referral; and overall proportions of HIV-infected indivi

40 The screening examination uses a sequential referral approach and assesses presenting visual acuity

41 The presence and timing of PCT referral as well as patient survival status to hospital

42 Cardiac rehabilitation referral at discharge was less prevalent after PCI than

43 on for the outcome of cardiac rehabilitation referral at discharge, clustered by hospital.

44 dication, findings and scan time, sources of referral, body region scanned, type, dose, related adver

45 ere more likely to report negative impact on referrals by maternity leave [odds ratio (OR) 1.78, 95%

46 ent use by 13% to 22%, and treatment of self-referrals by PCP cooperatives in emergency care access p

47 treated at a federally funded tertiary care referral cancer center in Trujillo, Peru, from February

48 Mayo Clinic serves as quaternary referral care center for hospitals in the region within

49 ve, noncomparative case series at a tertiary referral center (Ocular Oncology Service of Wills Eye Ho

50 007, and December 31, 2013, at a dermatology referral center at a single institution.

51 s of 63 patients who presented to a tertiary referral center between 2006 and 2015 with culture-posit

52 crobiota transplantation (FMT) at a tertiary referral center between 2011 and 2014 to determine risk

53 ive data on 682,704 patients from a tertiary referral center between 2011 and 2015, and identified hy

54 <21 years) who were evaluated at a tertiary referral center between November 1, 1975, and July 1, 20

55 eyes) who were treated at a single tertiary referral center during a 10-year period.

56 hotodamaged skin was conducted in a tertiary referral center for dermatology between January 1, 2009,

57 the clinical database of a large quaternary referral center for genomic medicine in the Northwest of

58 des Figueira Institute, a Ministry of Health referral center for high-risk pregnancies and infectious

59 etween March 2002 and May 2015 in a tertiary referral center for multiple sclerosis, in collaboration

60 nal cohort study was conducted at a tertiary referral center for neurological diseases in Rio de Jane

61 and/or eye abnormalities, from a US tertiary referral center for neurological diseases using multiple

62 1, 2012, to July 30, 2015, in an outpatient referral center for patients with neurodegenerative dise

63 collection and explorations made in a single referral center for sickle cell disease in 2016.

64 d database of VGAM cases managed at a single referral center from 2000 to 2014.

65 gical oncology) at an academic tertiary care referral center from January 1, 1978, to December 31, 20

66 eatic surgery at a university-based tertiary referral center from July 1, 2013, through June 30, 2015

67 r trial was conducted in a neonatal tertiary referral center in Germany.

68 This is a case report from an academic referral center in Miami, Florida, of a woman in her 60s

69 the diagnostic criteria for NS in a tertiary referral center in Paris, France, from January 1, 1990,

70 t results from patients attending a tertiary referral center in the UK.

71 dy, 2 analyses were performed at an academic referral center in the upper Midwest.

72 Italian tertiary referral center medical-surgical ICU.

73 keratoplasty recipients at a single tertiary referral center over 20 years.

74 ty of Pennsylvania Health System, a tertiary referral center serving a population with a high proport

75 ters on the basis of results from a tertiary referral center specializing in complex filter retrieval

76 lyzed at a tertiary academic ocular oncology referral center using a customized bioinformatic pipelin

77 Patients undergoing ERC at our tertiary referral center were retrospectively included.

78 ping surgical procedures at a large tertiary-referral center where overlapping surgery is performed.

79 y at the Radboudumc (tertiary ophthalmologic referral center) and the European Genetic Database for p

80 Massachusetts General Hospital (tertiary referral center) and two affiliated community hospitals.

81 mentia Cohort (longitudinal cohort, tertiary referral center) were studied.

82 ferred to Oslo University Hospital (tertiary referral center).

83 ve cohort study performed at a tertiary care referral center, 50 African American patients 60 years o

84 al transfers from less resourced ICUs to the referral center, a trend that is not readily explained b

85 hns Health Center, a tertiary-level melanoma referral center, included 1623 patients with melanoma di

86 These data, from an ocular tertiary referral center, suggest that conjunctival tumors in chi

87 -certified dermatologist at a large tertiary referral center, where ENFD testing became a routine par

88 ist Photobiology Unit of a tertiary academic referral center.

89 cranial and spinal operations in a tertiary referral center.

90 e, retrospective case series at a University Referral Center.

91 lity treatments in a national retinoblastoma referral center.

92 ase series at a single institution, tertiary referral center.

93 The study was performed in a tertiary referral center.

94 0 to December 31, 2012 at a large university referral center.

95 ectional study at a single academic tertiary referral center.

96 h MRI metrics was conducted at a tertiary MS referral center.

97 primary open angle glaucoma in our tertiary referral center.

98 2011, through April 22, 2016, at an academic referral center.

99 ween 2013 and 2015 at a single tertiary care referral center.

100 ic phenotypes at a university-based tertiary referral center.

101 ed for at Vanderbilt University, an academic referral center.

102 tudy included patients from 25 ophthalmology referral centers diagnosed with TB uveitis and treated w

103 ategies was conducted in 3 European tertiary referral centers for HCM from July 2013 to December 2016

104 study, 2 groups of patients from 2 tertiary referral centers for melanoma (Sydney Melanoma Diagnosti

105 ts 6 years and older at baseline at tertiary referral centers in Europe, the United States, and the U

106 r older and had a visit for HS at 1 of the 2 referral centers in the past 2 years (from January 1, 20

107 l trends in cases were derived from national referral centers in the period 2004-2014.

108 doscopic examination for BE at tertiary care referral centers in the United States and Europe.

109 ctive cohort study was conducted at tertiary referral centers in the United States and Europe.

110 ectional survey study of 154 patients from 2 referral centers in the United States and in Denmark was

111 logists, and geneticists from retinoblastoma referral centers located in various geographic regions w

112 In a single-blind study performed at 2 referral centers we assigned 148 patients with severe no

113 between January 2011 and September 2016 in 3 referral centers were included.

114 This study involved 5 tertiary referral centers with a specialized adult congenital hea

115 nosed with PEVAC were identified at 4 retina referral centers worldwide and underwent complete ophtha

116 try of patients with BAV treated at tertiary referral centers, 2118 patients with BAV were evaluated.

117 at receives data from teaching hospitals and referral centers, as well as several pneumology, dermato

118 to compare results and value of care between referral centers, to perform health technology assessmen

119 quiescent CNV were analyzed in 2 high-volume referral centers.

120 imated incidence of 0.0025 to 0.014 in large referral centers.

121 stroke at an academic hospital and tertiary referral centre between March 2010 and March 2014.

122 um of Pulmonary Hypertension Identified at a Referral Centre) pulmonary hypertension registry.

123 information for 2566 patients at 21 tertiary referral centres (two in Egypt, nine in Nigeria, four in

124 et forms, were collected in 17 neuromuscular referral centres in Europe and USA.

125 enrolled in this consecutive cohort from two referral centres in Hungary.

126 drenalectomy, consecutively included from 12 referral centres in nine countries.

127 finition of correct management as at least a referral, chest X-ray or sputum test, 41% (111 of 274) S

128 n with perforated appendicitis at a tertiary referral children's hospital were treated using an evide

129 up at the Imperial Memory Centre, a tertiary referral clinic in the UK National Health Service.

130 Two university-based referral clinics: 1 in England, 1 in the United States.

131 d greater odds of requiring an ophthalmology referral compared with white and/or younger patients.

132 No difference in days to final referral diagnosis according to randomization group coul

133 We enrolled 33 patients with a referral diagnosis of Ohtahara syndrome or early myoclon

134 The final referral diagnosis was adjudicated by the physician, whe

135 s of age) who attended Berhan Aiyni National Referral Eye Hospital in five years period from January

136 sion loss in children attending the national referral eye hospital with the only pediatric ophthalmol

137 d stenosis intervention, and substance abuse referral for alcohol.

138 dications to consider additional studies and referral for allogeneic stem cell transplantation are al

139 early echocardiographic diagnosis, and swift referral for cardiac surgery might impact outcome dramat

140 e age of diagnosis, hearing aid fitting, and referral for cochlear implant (CI) assessment for each o

141 is, medication prescribed for depression, or referral for counseling, and as untreated if none of the

142 Instead, referral for heart transplantation may offer their best

143 ticipants received post-test counselling and referral for HIV care.

144 on (PSBI) in neonates and young infants when referral for hospital treatment is not feasible include

145 s, allowing appropriate management and early referral for lung transplantation.

146 ral and improved equity in kidney transplant referral for patients on dialysis in Georgia; long-term

147 es in the severity of periodontal disease on referral for specialist care between 1980 and 2000 acros

148 ed resources are needed to support immediate referrals for ARV treatment for all MSM newly diagnosed

149 y of periodontal disease, and Type V defined referrals for needs other than periodontal disease (e.g.

150 mber 30, 2015, by clinical geneticists after referral from general and subspecialist pediatricians.

151 quired in an outpatient clinic and concern a referral from the primary care physician to the national

152 Results were compared with in-person referrals from May to December 2013 from the same clinic

153 One large academic referral hospital and two community hospitals.

154 onditions over a 7-week period in a tertiary referral hospital in rural Cameroon.

155 ng to the emergency department at a 1500-bed referral hospital in Zambia between October 22, 2012, an

156 el, health centre, first-level hospital, and referral hospital).

157 fifty-four (42.3%) patients presented to the referral hospital.

158 e screened consecutively at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital.

159 sion analyses, adjusting for diagnosis year, referral, hospital volume, age, sex, malignancy history,

160 the case definition were admitted to the two referral hospitals in Muzaffarpur, of whom 122 (31%) die

161 nfirmed malaria who presented to two primary referral hospitals serving the adjacent districts of Kud

162 ng and communication systems of two tertiary referral hospitals were searched to identify patients wh

163 35 centres (a mix of secondary and tertiary referral hospitals) in the UK.

164 At national referral hospitals, cases decreased during 2007-2009 but

165 2000-2014 and temporal trends at 2 national referral hospitals.

166 easing referral after PCI, especially in low referral hospitals.

167 azard of completing the WU within 2 years of referral (HR 0.83; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.7

168 triage test after hrHPV testing, with direct referral if the woman is positive for HPV 16/18.

169 The rate of PC referral in ESLD increased from 0.97% in 2006 to 7.1% in

170 betes and identify factors for ophthalmology referral in the North Carolina Diabetic Retinopathy Tele

171 to investigate the timing of palliative care referrals in patients receiving rapid response team serv

172 ervational, cross-sectional case series at a referral institutional practice in Los Angeles, Californ

173 When referral is not possible, careful daily monitoring shoul

174 hing in primary care settings where hospital referral is often unfeasible.

175 ipants) CD4 cell counts done at one of three referral laboratories serving the study catchment area.

176 HIV disease staging with referral laboratory-based CD4 cell count testing is a ke

177 fundoscopic findings) were gathered from the referral letters.

178 increased risk of MVL; and visual acuity at referral, local therapy, macular scarring, retinal detac

179 pedic, rheumatologic, and other subspecialty referrals may be considered when indicated, but most of

180 rated dermato-oncologic clinic in a tertiary referral medical center with purpuric skin lesions after

181 Contemporary approaches to training, referral, mentoring, surgical planning, and other suppor

182 a platform strategy for developing specimen referral networks based on 2 models: centralized and dec

183 Concurrently, the apparent strength of the referral networks connecting community-level workers and

184 Systemic referral networks from the community-level Barangay Heal

185 developing countries, strengthening specimen referral networks is critical.

186 alized and decentralized laboratory specimen referral networks.

187 approached regarding organ donation because referral occurred after initiation of withdrawal of life

188 l melanoma treated and followed in a Spanish referral ocular oncology unit.

189 ective and timely assessment, diagnosis, and referral of acutely sick children attending out-of-hours

190 as the primary outcome, and disparity in the referral of black and white patients as a secondary outc

191 Pediatricians should consider early referral of children with undiagnosed syndromes to clini

192 Referral of eyes with DR to an ophthalmologist for furth

193 omized controlled trial of nurse-coordinated referral of patients and their partners to 3 widely avai

194 of a multicomponent intervention to increase referral of patients on dialysis for transplant evaluati

195 ement to advocate for expert consultation or referral of patients to centers with expertise in these

196 Referral of patients to interdisciplinary palliative car

197 n credited with increased identification and referral of patients with presumptive tuberculosis, whic

198 mary care, and rehabilitation services, with referral on the basis of the complexity of symptoms and

199 netic testing will benefit from establishing referral or consultative networks with experienced clini

200 od Illness guidelines to consider additional referral or daily monitoring criteria for children with

201 alysis facilities with either low transplant referral or racial disparity in referral.

202 nostic accuracy without increasing specialty referrals or skin biopsies.

203 so require diagnostic work-up or specialist referral, or both.

204 ed no significant differences in dermatology referrals overall and those for presumptive skin cancer

205 hospital rare cancer group sharing the same referral pattern.

206 ining and screening by PCPs with dermatology referral patterns and rates of skin biopsies.

207 nd catheter-based interventions, unbiased by referral patterns.

208 trospective case series at a single tertiary referral pediatric vitreoretinal practice.

209 in rates of screening, rate of ophthalmology referral, percentage of completed referrals, and patient

210 Colonoscopy-controlled referral population from several centers.

211 the diagnostic utility of WES in a selected referral population of adults with CKD.

212 In this referral population with selected advanced cancers, univ

213 gle Boston, Massachusetts, academic tertiary referral practice for this retrospective cohort study.

214 patients with glaucoma treated in a glaucoma referral practice.

215 sectional study from a tertiary-care retinal referral practice.

216 and 7 system-level interventions (automated referral, precolonoscopy telephone calls, patient regist

217 Comprehensive understanding of the referral process and factors associated with it will ass

218 f this systematic review, NCFs affecting the referral process are practice-, GD-, patient-, and perio

219 Factors that could be targeted to improve referral processes include geographic location, undergra

220 ual patient characteristic for PCI (hospital referral range 3%-97%; median odds ratio, 5.94; 95% conf

221 n cytology-screened women, the difference in referral rate between cytology- and HPV-screened women w

222 % CI 0.8%-1.6%]) (p = 0.09 for difference in referral rate in LBC versus all HPV-screened women; p =

223 ated with a transient increase in colposcopy referral rates in the first round of HPV screening, poss

224 this study, although the point estimates for referral rates in women in each HPV-screened group were

225 and readmissions (2007-2011) to the hospital referral region (HRR) level.

226 ntly (0.9%-84.6%) across the 306 US hospital referral regions (median = 33%, interquartile range = 17

227 Hospital referral regions demonstrated a 2.9-fold variation in ri

228 on nationally and across individual hospital referral regions.

229 n, costly, and varied widely across hospital referral regions.

230 On multivariate analysis, visual acuity at referral, retinal pigment epithelial atrophy, and macula

231 stimulate earlier Palliative Care Team (PCT) referral served as an underlying goal, and investigation

232 Tertiary referral severe respiratory failure center, university t

233 through regional collaboratives or selective referral should be considered.

234 Efforts to improve cardiac rehabilitation referral should focus on increasing referral after PCI,

235 The study indicates a need for earlier PCT referral, showcases the potential to identify high risk

236 ed phase 2 study, we enrolled patients at 36 referral sites in North America, Europe, and southeast A

237 Proportion of dermatology referrals, subsequent skin biopsies, and PCP diagnostic

238 onjunction with a standardized international referral system for legitimate travel for transplantatio

239 maternity care in large hospitals, effective referral systems for women medically or socially at high

240 Continued strengthening of referral systems from HEWs and health posts are needed t

241 In Haiti, decentralized specimen referral systems resulted in a 182% increase in patients

242 by county, and the distinct need for better referral systems.

243 to improve quality of care in facilities and referral systems.

244 ion (test group) at a single-center tertiary referral teaching hospital.

245 (TPP#1) and for a community-based triage or referral test (TPP#2) have been published by the WHO.

246 world's largest collections of clinical WES referral tests (N=6517, Baylor Miraca Genetics Laborator

247 ng the procedure was a stronger predictor of referral than any individual patient characteristic for

248 ificantly fewer postintervention dermatology referrals that lacked specific diagnoses (25 [1.0%] vs 1

249 The assessment was based only on referrals, therefore a total share of these examinations

250 h coronary artery disease, nurse-coordinated referral to a comprehensive set of community-based, wide

251 ideal management for both cases a priori as referral to a health-care provider without dispensing an

252 Referral to a nephrologist should be considered if chron

253 lture for pre-migration screening and active referral to a tuberculosis clinic improved identificatio

254 Evidence exist that primary care referral to an open-group behavioural programme is an ef

255 We aimed to establish whether 52-week referral to an open-group weight-management programme wo

256 Linkage to addiction treatment was referral to an opioid treatment programme for methadone.

257 to manage late effects either directly or by referral to appropriate specialists.

258 brief behavioral therapy (BBT) and assisted referral to care (ARC) studied 185 youths (aged 8.0-16.9

259 rs in place beyond 7 months may benefit from referral to centers with expertise in advanced filter re

260 illance area using standardised criteria for referral to clinicians in Basse and Bansang.

261 r HIV testing, then we recommend considering referral to complete the evaluation.

262 ociation between ethnicity and the time from referral to completion of KT evaluation or receipt of a

263 s should understand the importance of prompt referral to diagnostic-specific early intervention to op

264 support the guideline's concept of reference referral to experienced mitral surgeons to improve outco

265 re malaria necessitates prompt detection and referral to facilities with adequate resources.

266 d child mortality, physical performance, and referral to health-care professionals.

267 sion improves clinical outcome compared with referral to outpatient community mental health care.

268 with benefits superior to those of assisted referral to outpatient mental health care.

269 variate logistic regression model predicting referral to PC was created.

270 iate analysis, factors associated with lower referral to PC were Hispanic race (odds ratio [OR], 0.77

271 d centres and where there is room for doubt, referral to such a centre is probably wise.

272 y, surgery, systemic anticancer therapy, and referral to supportive care and pain management-be appli

273 quate evaluation of hypercalcemia, and under-referral to surgeons.

274 TION: For adults with overweight or obesity, referral to this open-group behavioural weight-loss prog

275 tory of MH disorders or NA and the time from referral to WU completion or KT were examined using Cox

276 The ARC families received personalized referrals to mental health care and check-in calls to su

277 suggests further work on converting eligible referrals to organ donation and exploring methods of con

278 erature is available on NCFs associated with referrals to periodontal specialists.

279 to identify NCFs found to be associated with referrals to periodontal specialists.

280 They had not received PS 3 mo before referral.To avoid the need for PS, the minimum absorptiv

281 This illusion is known as thermal referral (TR).

282 ber of treatment sessions, and percentage of referrals treated were positively associated with outcom

283 omparative study was conducted at a tertiary referral university hospital between May 27, 2016, and J

284 he greatest loss of potential due to delayed referral until at the time of or after planned withdrawa

285 as implemented from 2011-2016 in a UK Equine Referral Veterinary Hospital and identified 81 methicill

286 patients (60.0%) completed an ophthalmology referral visit within the study period.

287 Secondary analysis of eyes with referral-warranted (RW) ROP (stage 3 ROP, zone I ROP, pl

288 ity of the telemedicine system for detecting referral-warranted ROP (RW-ROP) were calculated with and

289 weighted kappa (Kw ) for stage, zone, plus, referral-warranted ROP (RW-ROP, defined as presence of s

290 The median time between initial injury and referral was 3.72 years.

291 Cardiac rehabilitation referral was reported in 48% (34 047/71 556) of PCI pati

292 Median age at referral was similar for men (22.5 years; interquartile

293 trongest predictor of cardiac rehabilitation referral was the hospital performing the procedure.

294 Delays in hearing aid fitting and CI referral were categorized as being due to the audiologis

295 The most common reasons for referral were ungradable fundus image (39.3% of those re

296 Data on provider referrals were not collected.

297 prehensive care should include subspecialist referrals when needed.

298 simulations suggest that a system of managed referral with gatekeeping at the level of village clinic

299 come of SCD or aborted SCD among consecutive referrals with dilated cardiomyopathy and an LVEF >/=40%

300 re than 75% linked to care within 6 weeks of referral, with almost 90% of those youths engaged in sub