コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 including dilated fundoscopy and cycloplegic refraction.
2 = 20/30, improving to >20/30 with subjective refraction.
3 l acuities (UNVA), keratometry, and manifest refraction.
4 metric astigmatism, and spherical equivalent refraction.
5 arized light provides anisotropic indices of refraction.
6 corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and refraction.
7 education are associated with a more myopic refraction.
8 uence of these differences on the calculated refraction.
9 he mild/no ROP group showed little change in refraction.
10 was used as a quantitative measure of ocular refraction.
11 6 diopter shift between predicted and actual refraction.
12 eratomileusis (LASIK) with residual error of refraction.
13 as >/=+2.00 D right eye spherical equivalent refraction.
14 ity was associated with a 0.0004 more myopic refraction.
15 sting, stereoacuity testing, and cycloplegic refraction.
16 en the expected and the actual postoperative refraction.
17 capable of realizing near-perfect anomalous refraction.
18 y (UDVA) 20/200 not correcting with manifest refraction.
19 e in the less than 1.0-D range of the target refraction.
20 he geometric constraint due to the plasmonic refraction.
21 ontrolling for relatedness, age, gender, and refraction.
22 he observation of both positive and negative refraction.
23 t eyes), and the effects of age, gender, and refraction.
24 e refraction, and attempted predicted target refraction.
25 thickness also varied with age, gender, and refraction.
26 tions were compared with preoperative target refractions.
27 hod of undercorrection, and serial follow-up refractions.
31 ated with a 0.003 diopter (D) more hyperopic refraction 1 month postoperatively, and an increase in 1
32 of the SRK/T formula in predicting a target refraction +/-1.0D in short and long eyes using ultrasou
33 bined with the Haigis formula set for target refraction -1.00 D produces acceptable results aiming fo
35 eyes were within +/- 0.50 D of the predicted refraction, 85.7% were within +/- 1.00 D, and 100% withi
36 to describe the optical beam propagation and refraction across the interface of two metal-dielectric
41 in C for the correction of residual error of refraction after LASIK using the Pulzar 213 nm solid-sta
42 derwent a comprehensive eye examination with refraction, aided and unaided visual acuity (VA) at 6 m
44 miconductor junction are expected to undergo refraction, analogous to light rays across an optical bo
45 hod is capable of measuring the attenuation, refraction and (ultra-small-angle) X-ray scattering, doe
46 a Hartmann-Shack sensor to measure the eye's refraction and aberrations for a 4-mm pupil diameter.
47 a, onchocerciasis, vitamin A deficiency, and refraction and accommodation disorders were underreprese
48 is discussed, since it is based on negative refraction and can be extended to matter waves utilizing
49 roperties of metamaterials, such as negative refraction and diffraction-free propagation, with device
50 ens, which is characterized by transparency, refraction and elasticity, is composed of a bulk mass of
51 ll study participants underwent standardized refraction and fundus photography, and SiMES and SINDI s
53 ed distance visual acuity (CDVA), subjective refraction and intraocular pressure (IOP) were recorded.
54 Sellmeier-equation (GSE) description of air refraction and its dispersion that remains highly accura
56 A new control mechanism employing two-beam refraction and one solenoid valve was developed and foun
59 ensive eye examination including cycloplegic refraction and sensorimotor testing within 6 months of t
60 ene replication study of association between refraction and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) wi
62 between the magnitude of preoperative myopic refraction and the central epithelial thickness at 1, 3,
63 erlinz and Georgiadis, the apparent index of refraction and the thickness of a waveguide can be measu
64 hould be monitored with periodic cycloplegic refractions and provided with early optical correction.
65 efractive error was determined by subjective refraction, and AL was determined by noncontact partial
66 hnique, pre- and 1-month post-LASIK manifest refraction, and ambient temperature and humidity during
67 egment examination, objective and subjective refraction, and assessment of heterophoria, vergence and
68 ifference between the achieved postoperative refraction, and attempted predicted target refraction.
75 t spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refraction, and endothelial cell loss (assessed 6, 12, 2
77 cGowan's characteristic volume, excess molar refraction, and hydrogen acidity and basicity, respectiv
78 ts, endothelial cell density, biomicroscopy, refraction, and intraoperative and postoperative complic
80 orneal power (CP), noncycloplegic subjective refraction, and lens nuclear opalescence (NOP) grading.
81 schools with regard to age, gender, baseline refraction, and myopia prevalence (47.75% vs. 49.16%).
82 ogical examination, including visual acuity, refraction, and ocular motility tests; anterior and post
85 VA; Snellen's charts), Orbscan, retinoscopy, refraction, and slit-lamp biomicroscopy were performed.
87 a battery of tests; visual acuity, objective refraction, anterior and posterior segments examination
88 spital which included log MAR visual acuity, refraction, applanation tonometry and a dilated fundus e
89 that is, the difference between the expected refraction (as calculated by the software) and the actua
91 (D), whereas the mean postoperative manifest refraction astigmatic error (vertexed to the corneal sur
100 of SXCMT-determined concentrations; 2) X-ray refraction at the grain/water interface artificially dep
101 , IOP (using noncontact tonometry), manifest refraction, average keratometry, age, gender, and postop
102 qAF and age, sex, race/ethnicity, eye color, refraction/axial length, and smoking status were evaluat
103 he differences between the expected residual refraction based on ray tracing and that predicted with
104 the following tests: automated and manifest refraction, best corrected visual acuity, central cornea
105 surements obtained: subjective and objective refraction, best-corrected visual acuity, accommodation,
106 ologic disorders; visual acuity of >/=20/25; refraction between -6 diopters (D) to 6 D, and IOP of 6
108 The highest mean difference in the residual refraction between the target IOL measured by ray tracin
111 ar dielectric magnifying lens using negative refraction by degenerate four-wave mixing in a plano-con
112 mparing the intended and final postoperative refractions calculated with the original manufacturer's
119 improved accuracy of predicted postoperative refraction compared with the manufacturer's IOL constant
120 ed visual acuity (BCVA), sphere and cylinder refraction, corneal topography, Scheimpflug tomography,
121 ce visual acuity (UDVA), subjective manifest refraction, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), cyc
122 sts for diagnosed disorders, $4.9 billion in refraction correction, $0.5 billion in medical costs for
124 and full suture removal can reduce manifest refraction cylinder to predictably low levels with corre
125 ion [logMAR]), manifest spherical equivalent refraction (D), central corneal thickness (CCT, micromet
126 immediately after surgery, and postoperative refraction data were available within 1 month after surg
131 arity, the measured nonlinear absorption and refraction demonstrate more than two orders of magnitude
132 t can experience either positive or negative refraction depending on input power, as it can alter the
133 w and ophthalmologic examinations, including refraction, determination of uncorrected and best-correc
135 d if they did not have a preoperative target refraction documented or if they did not have a recorded
136 ms of PP-LFERs that include the excess molar refraction (E) sometimes led to substantial errors (>1 l
139 es and different baseline factors, including refraction error, wearing age and lens replacement frequ
140 in 1D and 3D are stated that imply negative refraction for a generic incoming quantum wave packet.
141 nts older than 18 years of age with a stable refraction for at least 1 year who were good candidates
142 re used to calculate predicted postoperative refraction for eyes that received primary IOL implantati
143 uivalent and postgestational age at the last refraction for IVB-treated eyes were -2.4 diopters (D) a
146 g best-corrected visual acuity and objective refraction, fundus photography, visual field perimetry,
147 , 4166 attended an eye examination including refraction, gave a blood sample, and were interviewed by
150 es were poor in 22.4% of eyes (postoperative refraction >/=1 diopter of target), and were statistical
151 desirable properties such as high indices of refraction, high nonlinearities, and large windows of tr
152 e more likely to have a significant shift in refraction (hyperopia: odds ratio [OR], 3.4 [95% CI, 1.2
153 D, +/-1.00 D, and +/-2.00 D of the predicted refraction in 55.5%, 83.3%, and 100% of cases, respectiv
154 nt (MRSE) was within +/-0.50 D of the target refraction in 55.88% and within +/-1.0 D in 85.30% of th
156 Main Outcomes and Measures: Visual acuity, refraction in cycloplegia, and manifest strabismus were
157 llected to calculate spherical equivalent of refraction in diopters (D) and further classified into 4
158 eem to affect population variation in ocular refraction in environmental conditions less favorable fo
159 der polarizability, which leads to nonlinear refraction in macroscopic systems, have important benefi
161 vides good long-term safety and stability of refraction in patients with high myopia compared with si
162 presbyopic symptoms and correct far distance refraction in the same treatment, offering spectacle-fre
164 ceptable results aiming for -0.50 D final SE refractions in former RK patients undergoing routine cat
166 performance liquid chromatography coupled to refraction index, diode array and fluorescence detector,
168 scattering theory it is shown that negative refraction indices are feasible for matter waves passing
169 scurations (TVO) along with CDVA, subjective refraction IOP, anterior segment biomicroscopy, goniosco
171 ent value with non-cycloplegic PlusOptix A09 refraction is closer to that with cycloplegic autorefrac
173 effect, which can be called inverse magneto-refraction, is allowed in a material of any symmetry.
174 rrected near visual acuity (UCNVA), manifest refraction, KA and mean keratometry (KM), corneal aberro
175 ted distance visual acuity (BCDVA), manifest refraction, keratometry, adverse events, spectacle use,
177 ilateral myopic SMILE and 30 age-, sex-, and refraction-matched patients scheduled for bilateral myop
178 A and preoperative mean spherical equivalent refraction, mean astigmatism, and postoperative CCT were
180 fused to remove their contact lenses for the refraction measurement, 4430 adults with refractive erro
182 tive progression data and initial peripheral refraction measurements were available in 113 participan
183 thickness [CCT], intraocular pressure [IOP], refraction, medications), as well as medical, surgical,
184 mination at 1 and 3 months included manifest refraction; monocular and binocular uncorrected (UCVA) a
185 perative to postoperative change in manifest refraction (MRx) using the t test with generalized estim
186 eal diameter and clarity, optic disc status, refraction, need for anti-glaucoma therapy, and occurren
189 thresholds, based on a change in calculated refraction of +/-0.25 diopter, increased this number to
190 had a diagnosis of nanophthalmos, with mean refraction of +11.8 D and mean axial length of 17.6 mm.
191 +/- 3 years with a mean spherical equivalent refraction of -1.08 +/- 2.62 diopters (D) and mean astig
197 Through this lens (or pseudo hemisphere), refraction of light is removed and the light across the
198 tion highlights that low gestational age and refraction of the eye are independent risk factors for s
202 (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.02-1.61), and hyperopic refraction (OR, 1.17 per 1-diopter increase in spherical
203 erminus spectacles (-2.50 D over cycloplegic refraction) or observation (non-overminus spectacles if
204 ive outcomes of SE, deviation from predicted refraction, or spectacle cylinder at 1 month or at 1 yea
211 retinal arteriolar equivalent adjusting for refraction, photograph focus, age, systolic blood pressu
212 laser shots only: laser pulse reflection and refraction, photon racing in two media, and faster-than-
213 l functions such as anomalous reflection and refraction, polarization filtering, and wavefront modula
214 refraction after cataract surgery as target refraction, predicted IOL power for each method was calc
215 ter than the other formulas in postoperative refraction prediction (P < 0.01) for both IOL types.
216 absolute error, and mean arithmetic error in refraction prediction, that is, the difference between t
218 optoelectronic properties and high index of refraction, provide a platform for all-dielectric metama
219 underwent LASIK using an excimer laser with refraction ranging from -1.00 to -7.25 diopters (mean -3
221 .7+/-3.1 years, average spherical equivalent refraction (SE) was -0.02+/-1.77(-4.25 to +5.00) diopter
222 , duration of symptoms, spherical equivalent refraction (SE), internal limiting membrane peeling, tam
223 neal topography (Medmont E300) and objective refraction (Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001 autorefractor) we
224 rrected visual acuity, cycloplegic objective refraction, slit lamp as well as fundus examinations.
225 d distance visual acuity (CDVA), cycloplegic refraction, slitlamp biomicroscopy, and keratometry (K).
227 (MAE), mean square error (MSE), and manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) results of surgeo
228 acuity (CNVA), keratometry (K), and manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) were evaluated pr
229 , uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), and Scheimpflug
230 ace, preoperative and postoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), preoperative and
231 easured were pre- and postoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), uncorrected (UDV
234 of 0.07 +/- 0.11 logMAR and a mean manifest refraction spherical equivalent of -0.06 +/- 0.56 D were
235 [logMAR]) and with variance in the manifest refraction spherical equivalent within +/-0.5 diopter (D
236 cted distance visual acuity (UDVA), manifest refraction spherical equivalent, endothelial cell count,
237 AR units), sphere and cylinder on subjective refraction, spherical equivalent, minimum simulated kera
240 %) were corrected to within +/-1.0 D of goal refraction; the other 5 (12%) were corrected to within 1
244 ks behaved similar to optical wave including refraction, total internal reflection and evanescent wav
246 ionally, Autorefraction (Topcon), subjective refraction, uncorrected and distance-corrected visual ac
249 e examination at 3 months including manifest refraction; uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and distanc
252 tcome measures included spherical equivalent refraction, visual fields, electroretinography B-wave am
256 Mean (SD) preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -19.36 (6.7) diopters and at the end of f
259 erence between cycloplegic and PlusOptix A09 refraction was 68.8 %, higher with myopia than hyperopia
260 within 0.5 D of error from preoperative aim refraction was higher in the PCS group (LCS 72.2% vs. PC
262 sion screening at the 6/9 level in each eye; refraction was indicated; acuity improved with correctio
263 e undergoing general anesthesia, cycloplegic refraction was measured using streak retinoscopy during
264 Best-corrected VA by means of subjective refraction was measured with a logarithm of the minimum
274 ed via three distinct phenomena of anomalous refraction, wave splitting and conversion of propagation
279 nterior/posterior corneal curvature (K); and refraction were measured preoperatively and at week 1 an
281 iation analyses of mean spherical equivalent refraction were performed on 30 markers using linear reg
284 eyes whereas in wavefront-optimized eyes the refractions were -0.41 +/- 0.38 diopters at 12 months.
285 The mean preoperative spherical equivalent refractions were -7.48 +/- 5.00 diopters and -8.66 +/- 4
289 Data including testability and estimated refractions were entered into a Research Electronic Data
293 se results are attributed to radically sharp refraction where the optical path length approaches infi
294 ish families showed an association of ocular refraction with markers proximal to matrix metalloprotei
295 etric phase gratings, which can detect X-ray refraction with subnanoradian sensitivity, and at the sa
297 The error in diopters (D) of the predicted refraction with the manufacturer's and optimized IOL con
298 a; 39%, 61%, and 89% of the eyes had a final refraction within 0.5 D, 1.0 D, and 2.0 D of target, res
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。