ライフサイエンスコーパス: refractive

1 ld promise for overcoming the limitations of refractive and conventional diffractive optics.

2 lly replace or complement their conventional refractive and diffractive counterparts, leading to furt

3 To investigate refractive and visual acuity outcomes, patient satisfact

4 Keratometric, refractive, and aberrometric measurements were compared

5 t spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refractive astigmatism (RA), and topographic astigmatism

6 The absolute residual refractive astigmatism was 1.0 and 0.75 Diopters, respec

7 ities affecting visual acuity (n = 7), while refractive astigmatism was within 4 diopter (D) in all b

8 fort, visual acuity (VA), surgically induced refractive change (SIRC), complications, and pterygium r

9 The mean refractive change was 8.97 D (95% CI, 7.25-10.68 D) at a

10 ommon adverse events in both groups were eye refractive changes (three [11%] of 28 patients in the co

11 und, to investigate the relationship between refractive changes and different baseline factors, inclu

12 Experimental demonstrations of dynamic refractive control are complemented by theoretical analy

13 y that many children will require additional refractive correction given the high variability of refr

14 PKs had significantly higher postoperative refractive correction than DSAEKs, with no significant i

15 4.55 diopters [D] to -2.69 D; P = .017), but refractive cylinder remained stable (from -2.83 to -2.61

16 ination, anisometropia, myopic and hyperopic refractive error (>/= 3 dioptres), astigmatism, birth we

17 llion]), the leading causes were uncorrected refractive error (116.3 million [49.4 million to 202.1 m

18 ading causes of vision loss were uncorrected refractive error (60.8%), cataract (20.1%), and diabetic

19 ading causes of vision loss were uncorrected refractive error (61.3%), cataract (13.2%), and age-rela

20 [3.4 million to 28.7 million]), uncorrected refractive error (7.4 million [2.4 million to 14.8 milli

21 control group comprised 125 persons without refractive error (79 girls and 46 boys).

22 R(2): IOPg 2.30%, IOPcc 2.26%), followed by refractive error (IOPg 0.60%, IOPcc 1.04%).

23 heral rivalry-type diplopia), 1 (4%) optical/refractive error (monocular diplopia), 2 (8%) mixed reti

24 A (OR = 0.84 per week; p = 0.001), hyperopic refractive error (OR = 4.22; p = 0.002) and astigmatism

25 y of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and refractive error (RE) after immediate sequential (ISBCS)

26 Uncorrected refractive error (RE) is a leading cause of visual impai

27 ue to cataract (reversible with surgery) and refractive error (reversible with spectacle correction)

28 deling confirmed both traits were heritable (refractive error 85%, intelligence 47%) and the genetic

29 ed information on potential risk factors for refractive error across the life course, but ophthalmic

30 ere cataract (19.7%), corneal scars (15.7%), refractive error and amblyopia (12.1%), optic atrophy (6

31 Cataract corneal opacities, refractive error and amblyopia, globe damage due to trau

32 ading causes of vision loss were uncorrected refractive error and cataract, which are readily treatab

33 = 0.01); independent of the effects of age, refractive error and disc area (p < 0.05).

34 The phenotypic correlation between refractive error and intelligence was -0.116 (p < 0.01)

35 previous genome-wide association studies of refractive error and intelligence.

36 ults have identified 39 loci associated with refractive error and myopia.

37 Vision screening for refractive error and related eye diseases may prevent a

38 ere used to estimate the association between refractive error and the prevalence of glaucoma overall

39 tists present with significant proportion of refractive error and visual symptoms, especially among f

40 Most systematic reviews of interventions for refractive error are low methodological quality.

41 ay also have treatable strabismus or optical/refractive error as the primary barrier to single vision

42 had an MRSE within +/-1.00 D of their target refractive error at 5 years and 67.3% (n = 278/413) were

43 edi and associates may achieve an acceptable refractive error at 7 years of age.

44 The mean refractive error at age 5 years was -2.53 D (95% CI, -4.

45 The median refractive error at the age 5 years visit of the treated

46 d a significantly (p < 0.001) lower trend of refractive error change during the follow-up periods.

47 Cataract and uncorrected refractive error combined contributed to 55% of blindnes

48 post operation, while the combined effect of refractive error correction and optical diameter appeare

49 nd to be associated with increased change of refractive error during follow-up years.

50 nd to be associated with increased change of refractive error during follow-up years.

51 Genetic variants for intelligence and refractive error explain some of the reciprocal variance

52 The majority of participants (65.1%) among refractive error group (REG) were above the age of 30 ye

53 s and SNP x education interaction effects on refractive error in 40,036 adults from 25 studies of Eur

54 reatment of amblyopia, its risk factors, and refractive error in children aged 6 months to 5 years to

55 ing the affected cell type, causal gene, and refractive error in IRDs may provide insight herein.

56 for amblyopia risk factors or nonamblyogenic refractive error in most studies of test accuracy and we

57 the number of people affected by uncorrected refractive error is anticipated to rise to 127.7 million

58 rk, especially among people with uncorrected refractive error is considered a potential source of vis

59 The refractive error is measured using a Shack-Hartmann wave

60 Using a phoropter to measure the refractive error is one of the most commonly used method

61 Refractive error is the main cause of visual impairment

62 Thirty-six subjects whose baseline age and refractive error matched with those in the orthokeratolo

63 raphic optical elements to perform automatic refractive error measurement and provide a diagnostic pr

64 Prediction error was defined as refractive error minus emmetropia.

65 High myopia was defined as myopic refractive error of </=6.0 diopters in the right eye.

66 ation with an initial targeted postoperative refractive error of either +8 diopters (D) (infants 28 t

67 luences the progression rate of the manifest refractive error of myopic children in a longer follow-u

68 c examination in such cases to determine the refractive error phenotype is challenging and costly.

69 Items from the National Eye Institute (NEI) Refractive Error Quality of Life Instrument (NEI-RQL-42)

70 ning, choroidal and retinal folds, hyperopic refractive error shifts, and nerve fiber layer infarcts.

71 ion to 31.6 million), because of uncorrected refractive error to 8.0 million (2.5 million to 16.3 mil

72 intelligence explained 0.99% (p = 0.008) of refractive error variance.

73 h participant, the eye with the worse myopic refractive error was included in this analysis.

74 etween genetic variants at these 39 loci and refractive error was investigated in 5200 children asses

75 ms to be superior to DSEK and to induce less refractive error with similar surgical risks and EC loss

76 which was defined as the presence of myopic refractive error worse than -6.0 diopters with the prese

77 nal misregistration vs strabismus vs optical/refractive error).

78 hildhood-onset nyctalopia, myopia (mean [SD] refractive error, -6.71 [-4.22]), and nystagmus.

79 se cases (69%) arose from simple uncorrected refractive error, and 43000 (25%) from bilateral amblyop

80 portant to account for age, body mass index, refractive error, and sex when using GCC thickness as a

81 gery), and clinical measures (visual acuity, refractive error, and slitlamp and posterior segment eye

82 Biometric data included values for refractive error, axial length (AL), corneal curvature,

83 cuity impairment associated with uncorrected refractive error, cataracts, and age-related macular deg

84 f early vision impairment due to uncorrected refractive error, cataracts, and age-related macular deg

85 nd major eye diseases (cataract, uncorrected refractive error, glaucoma, age-related macular degenera

86 %) had normal distance vision or uncorrected refractive error, less than half (46.1%) used near-visio

87 d demographics, history of cataract surgery, refractive error, number of glaucoma medications, family

88 After adjusting for age and refractive error, the mean (SD) difference in the superf

89 al diameter, vertical cup-to-disc ratio, and refractive error.

90 ment, axial length, and spherical equivalent refractive error.

91 8.2 million people had VI due to uncorrected refractive error.

92 and 16.4 million with VI due to uncorrected refractive error.

93 ted macular degeneration (AMD), glaucoma and refractive error.

94 on due to the fact that myopia is a negative refractive error.

95 identified 124 systematic reviews related to refractive error; 39 met our eligibility criteria, of wh

96 eye shape remodeling across the globe during refractive-error development.

97 referred Practice Pattern(R) guideline (PPP) Refractive Errors & Refractive Surgery is unknown.

98 eliable systematic reviews to assist the AAO Refractive Errors & Refractive Surgery PPP.

99 ty of interventions included in the 2012 PPP Refractive Errors & Refractive Surgery.

100 epths, thicker lenses, and higher degrees of refractive errors (all P < .001) than those of the full-

101 l symptoms and the association of those with refractive errors among Thangka artists.

102 mprised of 112 participants with significant refractive errors and 130 absolutely emmetropic particip

103 e displays can be tailored to correct common refractive errors and provide natural focus cues by dyna

104 Prevalence of refractive errors and school-based differences were anal

105 Eyeballs having these refractive errors are known to exhibit abnormal eye shap

106 Uncorrected refractive errors are the most common cause of visual im

107 Myopia and astigmatism, two common refractive errors frequently co-exist, are affecting vis

108 (rd6) mice suggests hyperopia and associated refractive errors may be amenable to AAV gene therapy.

109 le retinal cell type and have a high risk of refractive errors, a study investigating the affected ce

110 visual impairment and strabismus, but not on refractive errors, as a whole.

111 pediatric eye care facilities for cataract, refractive errors, glaucoma and rehabilitative services

112 Refractive errors, in particular myopia, are common in I

113 For refractive errors, the association with GA remained afte

114 d they cannot support users with uncorrected refractive errors.

115 Significant visual and refractive improvements were found 12 months after T-ion

116 oil), peroxide value (8.2meq/kg of oil) and refractive index (1.4735) were comparable to those of so

117 gle light scattering (MALS) and differential refractive index (dRI) detection.

118 retrieve the pure imaginary component of the refractive index (i.e., the chemically specific informat

119 e globally constant values of dust imaginary refractive index (IRI), a parameter describing the dust

120 High-resolution real-time 3-D refractive index (RI) measurements and dynamic 2-D phase

121 th a thickness of 49.2nm, the sensitivity in refractive index (RI) of dLPG was increased to 2538nm/RI

122 assess their sensitivities to variations of refractive index (RI) of the adjacent sample dielectric

123 ounds by using a universal detector based on refractive index (RI) sensing with backscattering interf

124 s used to study the optical transmission and refractive index (RI) sensitivity.

125 te cell types at the single-cell level using refractive index (RI) tomography and machine learning.

126 The shortcoming of most refractive index (RI)-based label-free methods such as B

127 escence intensities is the undetermined cell refractive index (RI).

128 whereby the real and imaginary parts of the refractive index across a photonic structure are deliber

129 rabolic relationship between lens radius and refractive index allows spherical lenses to avoid spheri

130 (varepsilon,mu), enabling us to engineer the refractive index almost at will, to confine light to the

131 Meanwhile, the refractive index also changes appreciably.

132 The THz refractive index and absorption coefficient of paraffin-

133 The frequency dependence of refractive index and absorption coefficient of the LBO c

134 al properties were then analyzed in terms of refractive index and absorption coefficient, and compare

135 Due to its high refractive index and low absorption coefficient, gallium

136 leads to the formation of layers with higher refractive index and slightly higher extinction coeffici

137 oupling between the changes of the effective refractive index and the modal gain is described by the

138 The analysis extends to present the complex refractive index and the normal-incidence reflectivity.

139 ed a fishnet metamaterial to have a negative refractive index at 780 nm.

140 can yield strong variations in the effective refractive index by the virtue of internal homogenizatio

141 ladding for optical phase measurement due to refractive index changes in biochemical detection.

142 Similar figures of merit for detecting bulk refractive index changes, however, have proven more chal

143 The imaginary refractive index component k450 reached a maximum value

144 function of changes of lattice constants and refractive index contrast are illustrated.

145 a transmissive metasurface decreases as the refractive index contrast between the substrate and clad

146 The small size (30-100 nm) along with low refractive index contrast of exosomes makes direct chara

147 Here we present refractive index data for human whole blood and several

148 -pressure liquid chromatography coupled with refractive index detection; the content in other macroco

149 C) equipped with static light scattering and refractive index detectors and by Fourier Transform Infr

150 The refractive index difference between GaN and GaNAs alloys

151 a giant birefringence was observed, and the refractive index difference between the axis X and Z gra

152 ate for detecting tiny variations in surface refractive index due to the addition of nano-particles s

153 ased inversion of column effective imaginary refractive index in the range 305-368 nm, we quantified

154 e from the measurement of the profile of its refractive index in the vicinity of molecular resonances

155 However, lack of refractive index information for commonly encountered bi

156 Aberrations introduced by refractive index inhomogeneity in the sample distort the

157 amplified Rayleigh scattering on sub-micron refractive index inhomogenities randomly distributed ove

158 This change in refractive index is reversible with a recovery time of a

159 terials consist of periodic scatterers whose refractive index is significantly larger than that of th

160 ted to the mouse femur containing a gradient refractive index lens.

161 in tissue from multiple animal models using refractive index matched and mismatched microscope objec

162 as a non-toxic medium supplement that allows refractive index matching in live specimens and thus sub

163 of charged silica nanoparticles dispersed in refractive index matching monomers in poly(dimethylsilox

164 height that function optically as a gradient refractive index material [6, 8, 9].

165 ithography (NIL), combining a printable high-refractive index material and colloidal CdSe/CdS quantum

166 ization if it is illuminated from the higher refractive index material.

167 crospheres embedded in gelatin, both are low refractive index materials and inexpensive.

168 have attracted widespread attention as high refractive index materials, electroactuated redox-active

169 effects by reducing surface area using high refractive index materials, this method tailors the chem

170 erent ways: embedded inside a printable high-refractive index matrix to form an active printable hybr

171 of an impedance matched acoustic double zero refractive index metamaterial induced by a Dirac-like co

172 3D realization with all-dielectric gradient refractive index metamaterials.

173 ng tunability of the performance in gradient refractive index metamaterials.

174 itional problem of optical aberration due to refractive index mismatch between the fluid and the devi

175 In light microscopy, refractive index mismatches between media and sample cau

176 ogy.Optical non-reciprocity achieved through refractive index modulation can have its challenges and

177 2pi nonlinear phase shift with less than 2% refractive index modulation.

178 gth dispersion of TPA and the Kerr nonlinear refractive index n2.

179 We observe a change in the real part of the refractive index of 0.72 +/- 0.025, corresponding to 170

180 The specific gravity, viscosity and refractive index of CSO at ambient temperature were 0.93

181 The complex refractive index of few-layer graphene, n - ik, was extr

182 In addition, the low refractive index of organic materials prevents the use o

183 ed misorientation leads to a decrease in the refractive index of the crystal line from the center mov

184 y selecting a chip material that matches the refractive index of the desired fluid.

185 MGNT with streptavidin altered the effective refractive index of the layer, the angle of reflectance

186 By matching the refractive index of the objective lens immersion liquid

187 We reveal that changes in the refractive index of the polymer film with temperature ha

188 ly the microcavity detects the change in the refractive index of the polymer resulted from the deform

189 Typical standard deviations in size and refractive index of the sampling droplet over a period o

190 The pre-distorted refractive index profile can effectively reduce the mode

191 spectrum and an adjustable, stress-tuneable refractive index ranging from 1.43 down to nearly the fr

192 domain THz signal (PCA-tdTHz) and absorption-refractive index relation of THz spectrum identified mye

193 Reducing the maximum value of the refractive index required by the cloaks is very importan

194 Subwavelength, high-refractive index semiconductor nanostructures support op

195 nt Q-factors as high as approximately 40 and refractive index sensing of the surrounding medium as hi

196 eposited gold layer, which exhibit high bulk refractive index sensitivities and are capable of discri

197 TiOx coated LSPR and LPG sensors with refractive index sensitivity of close to 30 and 3400nm/R

198 nic mode limited on UV-green wavelength, low refractive index sensitivity, as well as heavy-shape-dep

199 as well as exceptionally sensitive power and refractive index sensors.

200 lectron effective mass leading to a positive refractive index shift (Deltan > 1.5) that is an order o

201 oncentration producing a near-unity negative refractive index shift.

202 possibility to produce within glass a graded refractive index single crystal (GRISC) optically active

203 nic crystals are etched into single mode low refractive index SiON film on both SiO2/Si and borosilic

204 emistry and physics required to equalize the refractive index throughout a sample which prevents the

205 control phase locally, or by modulating the refractive index to exploit rapid phase changes with the

206 We demonstrate continuous and steady-state refractive index tuning at mid-infrared wavelengths usin

207 Here the authors demonstrate refractive index tuning at mid-infrared wavelengths usin

208 tivity modes with a maximum of 30,000 nm per refractive index unit (RIU) and a record figure of merit

209 de high-intensity sensitivities (20,000% per refractive index unit), with an element size of 12.5micr

210 for quantitative phase imaging that relates refractive index variance to disorder strength, a parame

211 ray interferometry can non-invasively detect refractive index variations inside an object(1-10).

212 on resonance wavelength shifts originated by refractive index variations of the aptamer chain in pres

213 e sound speed (inversely proportional to the refractive index) in air is among the slowest.

214 imit of detection is 2 x 10(-6) RIU for bulk refractive index, 1 pg/mm(2) for surface-adsorbed mass,

215 , tocopherol content, FTIR spectra, density, refractive index, acidity, peroxide value (PV), p-anisid

216 ntaining both a metamaterial with a negative refractive index, and a positive phase shifter.

217 asurements of the initial stability in size, refractive index, and composition of the sampling drople

218 anges in intrinsic properties, such as size, refractive index, and morphology, for correlation with a

219 ical gain, but also induces variation of the refractive index, as governed by the Kramers-Kronig rela

220 f their physicochemical attributes (density, refractive index, bitterness and ethanol content).

221 with very high bitterness) presented higher refractive index, bitterness, ethanol and phenolics cont

222 -order defocus, an artefact of a non-uniform refractive index, extending light-sheet microscopy to pa

223 cleared tissue is a spatially heterogeneous refractive index, leading to light scattering and first-

224 shift in response to changes in surrounding refractive index, leading to many applications in label-

225 sely packed transparent hydrogel with a high refractive index, making it an ideal system for studying

226 ntrinsic properties, including their complex refractive index, size, and geometry, has been used to m

227 ong others, the (microscopic) viscosity, the refractive index, the dielectric constant, and the ionic

228 ple, the well-known dielectric property, the refractive index, which usually has a value greater than

229 tructure and the frequency-dependent complex refractive index.

230 - 0.025, corresponding to 170% of the linear refractive index.

231 d mechanisms of enhancement of the nonlinear refractive index.

232 th biomacromolecules to change the effective refractive index.

233 t dependence on induced perturbations in the refractive index.

234 ges in the crystalline structure of the high-refractive-index component.

235 ed of a light scatterer, a viscometer, and a refractive-index detector.

236 nal approaches to explore the role of a high-refractive-index dielectric TiO2 grating with deep subwa

237 ound-channel, 3D helical micromixer in a low-refractive-index polymer.

238 as strongly directional behaviour, negative refractive indexes and topologically protected wave moti

239 The refractive indices are generally dominated by the water

240 yield, low reabsorption, and relatively low refractive indices for waveguide matching.

241 a generalised method for extracting complex refractive indices of aqueous solutions in the mid-infra

242 Due to the huge differences between refractive indices of the released gas and the surroundi

243 ricated hydrogel is highly transparent, with refractive indices ranging from 1.42 to 1.45 in the spec

244 gle measurements and, thereby, the effective refractive indices the transverse magnetic (TM) and tran

245 absorbance, UV/vis, and IR spectra, complex refractive indices, (1)H and (13)C NMR spectra, thermogr

246 t the sample, e.g., the thickness with known refractive indices, dry mass of live cells during their

247 udo-random alternating layers with different refractive indices.

248 mising opportunities for fluid-based dynamic refractive micro-scale compound lenses.

249 1) into the median preoptic nucleus of fever-refractive mPGES-1 knock-out mice, resulted in a tempera

250 outcomes (1 article), or both structural and refractive or visual outcomes (5 articles).

251 ticles), retinal structure (2 articles), and refractive outcome (1 article).

252 t of peripheral retinal vessels (1 article), refractive outcomes (1 article), or both structural and

253 MCS in terms of patient-important visual and refractive outcomes and overall complications.

254 eye growth and myopic shift continue to make refractive outcomes challenging for IOL implantation dur

255 emoval of deep stroma can improve visual and refractive outcomes of DALK, while minimizing the rate o

256 er and better recovery of BSCVA with similar refractive outcomes, endothelial cell loss, and incidenc

257 For primary visual and refractive outcomes, no statistically significant differ

258 ive correction given the high variability of refractive outcomes.

259 nd or optical biometry, formula employed and refractive outcomes.

260 MFS patients achieves satisfying visual and refractive outcomes.

261 Visual and refractive performance, patient satisfaction, and specta

262 rneal astigmatism derived from total corneal refractive power (CATCRP), a ray-tracing method, with th

263 terior corneal astigmatism and total corneal refractive power (TCRP) astigmatism (CAant, CApost, CATC

264 layered endothelium and providing 2/3 of the refractive power of the eye.

265 The lens provides refractive power to the eye and is capable of altering o

266 alters shape to increase or decrease ocular refractive power; this is mediated by the ciliary muscle

267 mphasis on uncomplicated surgery rather than refractive precision, and accommodating IOLs all becomin

268 IOL rotational stability and refractive predictability in patients with a previous vi

269 should consider the effect of cycloplegia on refractive prediction errors and IOL power calculations

270 point the effect of cycloplegia, we recorded refractive predictions in pre- and postdilation conditio

271 ffered in prepresbyopic eyes (P = .042), and refractive predictions with the Holladay 2 and Haigis fo

272 nd presbyopia, expansion of lens surgery for refractive purposes with postsurgical adjustment and unp

273 Refractive results and the theoretical elastic modulus c

274 To evaluate refractive results and the theoretical elastic response

275 surgery, lens opacity, ocular hypertension, refractive safety, predictability, and stability.

276 s, SERS-active metal nanoparticles, and high-refractive semiconductor nanoparticles.

277 Refractive sphere improved in all patients (from -4.55 d

278 tion with iris-claw IOLs to achieve the best refractive status in cases of late in-the-bag IOL comple

279 However, the long-term refractive status of these children is largely unknown.

280 se of this study is to analyze the long-term refractive status of these children.

281 iagnosis of any diabetic retinopathy and the refractive status.

282 al nerve damage produced by aging, diabetes, refractive surgeries, and viral or bacterial infections

283 tients with positive family history prior to refractive surgeries.

284 The American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the American Society of R

285 ith progressive keratoconus or ectasia after refractive surgery (n = 510).

286 We report the results of refractive surgery in a series of these children treated

287 resentation of keratoconus and ectasia after refractive surgery in the 2 treatment arms.

288 ttern(R) guideline (PPP) Refractive Errors & Refractive Surgery is unknown.

289 eviews to assist the AAO Refractive Errors & Refractive Surgery PPP.

290 a diagnosis of glaucoma suspect or glaucoma, refractive surgery, or presence of corneal abnormalities

291 the treatment of corneal ectasia after laser refractive surgery.

292 included in the 2012 PPP Refractive Errors & Refractive Surgery.

293 subjects with corneal ectasia after previous refractive surgery.

294 the IOL power calculation to avoid hyperopic refractive surprises.

295 lity of the exosporium that has proven to be refractive to existing methods to deconstruct the intact

296 icacious in neuropathic pain states that are refractive to opioid analgesics.

297 studies show that K-Ras-dependent cells are refractive to PKCdelta-driven apoptosis.

298 nervous system in infants and children, are refractive to therapy.

299 At the 1-year, 2-year, and 4-year follow-up refractive values remained relatively stable in comparis

300 th measurements of residual aberrations of a refractive X-ray lens using ptychography to manufacture