ライフサイエンスコーパス: refractive error

1 nal misregistration vs strabismus vs optical/refractive error).

2 ment, axial length, and spherical equivalent refractive error.

3 K1, ARID2-SNAT1 and SLC14A2) associated with refractive error.

4 s prevalence being attributed to uncorrected refractive error.

5 long ALs were within +/-1 D of the predicted refractive error.

6 opic child using a simple, single measure of refractive error.

7 A total of 41 children had high refractive error.

8 visual impairment secondary to a correctable refractive error.

9 tter average best-corrected acuity and lower refractive error.

10 h as visual impairment, strabismus, or major refractive error.

11 significantly overrepresented in relation to refractive error.

12 o 17 years with no ocular abnormality except refractive error.

13 ng for age, optic disc diameter, gender, and refractive error.

14 eans of large genetic association studies of refractive error.

15 deling correlated to the preoperative myopic refractive error.

16 ted macular degeneration (AMD), glaucoma and refractive error.

17 58-12.96) were significantly associated with refractive error.

18 another patient owing to high postoperative refractive error.

19 to identify genes moderately associated with refractive error.

20 ue for each participant was used to classify refractive error.

21 ber elongation and produced myopic shifts in refractive error.

22 refractive error or amblyopia resulting from refractive error.

23 I, 3.7-10.8]) compared with children with no refractive error.

24 riables and age, height, ethnicity, sex, and refractive error.

25 also varied with height, sex, ethnicity, and refractive error.

26 acuity was not affected by the difference in refractive error.

27 s of eyes stratified by age and preoperative refractive error.

28 ickness in various regions of the muscle and refractive error.

29 on due to the fact that myopia is a negative refractive error.

30 al diameter, vertical cup-to-disc ratio, and refractive error.

31 8.2 million people had VI due to uncorrected refractive error.

32 and 16.4 million with VI due to uncorrected refractive error.

33 most frequently used options for correcting refractive errors.

34 udy were conjunctivitis, ocular injuries and refractive errors.

35 d they cannot support users with uncorrected refractive errors.

36 nctivitis (35%), then ocular trauma (11.8%), refractive error (11.4%) and trachoma (7.6%).

37 llion]), the leading causes were uncorrected refractive error (116.3 million [49.4 million to 202.1 m

38 act (39% and 33%, respectively), uncorrected refractive error (20% and 21%), and macular degeneration

39 identified 124 systematic reviews related to refractive error; 39 met our eligibility criteria, of wh

40 s found in 119 children, and the causes were refractive errors (47.1%), keratitis/corneal opacity (16

41 n (5% and 7%), and for MSVI were uncorrected refractive error (51% and 53%), cataract (26% and 18%),

42 hildhood-onset nyctalopia, myopia (mean [SD] refractive error, -6.71 [-4.22]), and nystagmus.

43 ading causes of vision loss were uncorrected refractive error (60.8%), cataract (20.1%), and diabetic

44 ading causes of vision loss were uncorrected refractive error (61.3%), cataract (13.2%), and age-rela

45 myopic astigmatism was the commonest type of refractive error (63.2%, 95% CI = 40.8, 80.9).

46 [3.4 million to 28.7 million]), uncorrected refractive error (7.4 million [2.4 million to 14.8 milli

47 control group comprised 125 persons without refractive error (79 girls and 46 boys).

48 deling confirmed both traits were heritable (refractive error 85%, intelligence 47%) and the genetic

49 With respect to refractive error, 90 eyes (73.8%) were highly myopic (>/

50 le retinal cell type and have a high risk of refractive errors, a study investigating the affected ce

51 ed information on potential risk factors for refractive error across the life course, but ophthalmic

52 IOL power calculation and highly predictable refractive error after cataract surgery combined with De

53 rious steps and methods in managing residual refractive error after laser in situ keratomileusis and

54 f 12 patients who underwent PRK for residual refractive error after primary LASIK.

55 The major causes of VI (i.e., cataract, refractive error, age-related macular degeneration, diab

56 epths, thicker lenses, and higher degrees of refractive errors (all P < .001) than those of the full-

57 previously reported markers and education on refractive error also was shown.

58 rmination of the proportion of children with refractive errors, amblyopia, and/or strabismus.

59 Visual acuity, refractive error, ambylopia, and treatment history were

60 provide further insights into variations in refractive errors among different racial groups and have

61 l symptoms and the association of those with refractive errors among Thangka artists.

62 nding about the interactions among hyperopic refractive error and accommodative and binocular functio

63 ere cataract (19.7%), corneal scars (15.7%), refractive error and amblyopia (12.1%), optic atrophy (6

64 eatment for reduced visual acuity only (pure refractive error and amblyopia); 13% (50) had non surgic

65 Cataract corneal opacities, refractive error and amblyopia, globe damage due to trau

66 12 for population-based studies with data on refractive error and AMD assessed from retinal photograp

67 In multivariate analysis, myopic refractive error and astigmatism were significantly asso

68 There is a greater change in both spherical refractive error and axial length in younger children wh

69 lues as well as their correlations with age, refractive error and axial length.

70 (OCT) and to perform correlations with age, refractive error and axial length.

71 ading causes of vision loss were uncorrected refractive error and cataract, which are readily treatab

72 = 0.01); independent of the effects of age, refractive error and disc area (p < 0.05).

73 These data suggest that vision screening for refractive error and early eye disease may reduce or pre

74 dult height were tested for association with refractive error and eye size.

75 The phenotypic correlation between refractive error and intelligence was -0.116 (p < 0.01)

76 previous genome-wide association studies of refractive error and intelligence.

77 was to assess the prevalence of uncorrected refractive error and its associated factors among school

78 However, a causative link between peripheral refractive error and myopia progression could not be est

79 ults have identified 39 loci associated with refractive error and myopia.

80 assess the association of these 2 loci with refractive error and ocular biometric measures in an ind

81 Cycloplegic refractive error and ocular components measurements (axi

82 e was an inverse relationship between myopic refractive error and ocular sun exposure, with more than

83 Vision screening for refractive error and related eye diseases may prevent a

84 r angle measurements and ACV, ACD, spherical refractive error and sex, emerging the ACV as the main d

85 further investigate the association between refractive error and the likelihood of having diabetic r

86 ere used to estimate the association between refractive error and the prevalence of glaucoma overall

87 tists present with significant proportion of refractive error and visual symptoms, especially among f

88 mprised of 112 participants with significant refractive errors and 130 absolutely emmetropic particip

89 diagnosis and early treatment of uncorrected refractive errors and amblyopia.

90 hthalmic examination including assessment of refractive errors and best-corrected visual acuity, biom

91 ive treatments are available for uncorrected refractive errors and cataracts.

92 l acuity, source and type of injury, type of refractive errors and diagnosis were collected and analy

93 e displays can be tailored to correct common refractive errors and provide natural focus cues by dyna

94 Prevalence of refractive errors and school-based differences were anal

95 se cases (69%) arose from simple uncorrected refractive error, and 43000 (25%) from bilateral amblyop

96 ity (VA), the time course of VA improvement, refractive error, and family history were assessed.

97 lence with increasing age, increasing myopic refractive error, and increasing axial length (all P < .

98 or women with visual impairment, uncorrected refractive error, and normal vision were 24.5%, 56.0%, a

99 for men with visual impairment, uncorrected refractive error, and normal vision were 58.7%, 66.5%, a

100 ion included evaluation of ocular alignment, refractive error, and ocular structures in children aged

101 portant to account for age, body mass index, refractive error, and sex when using GCC thickness as a

102 gery), and clinical measures (visual acuity, refractive error, and slitlamp and posterior segment eye

103 We found no specific refractive error, and visual acuity varied widely from n

104 Examinations of visual acuity, refractive errors, and optical components and measuremen

105 including amblyopia, strabismus, significant refractive errors, and unexplained reduced VA.

106 Most systematic reviews of interventions for refractive error are low methodological quality.

107 Amblyopia, strabismus, and refractive errors are common in young children.

108 Eyeballs having these refractive errors are known to exhibit abnormal eye shap

109 Uncorrected refractive errors are the most common cause of visual im

110 ay also have treatable strabismus or optical/refractive error as the primary barrier to single vision

111 visual impairment and strabismus, but not on refractive errors, as a whole.

112 the refraction measurement, 4430 adults with refractive error assessment in at least 1 eye contribute

113 gth was the most likely trait underlying the refractive error association at the 15q14 locus for SNPs

114 cantly with cup-to-disc ratio, axial length, refractive error, astigmatism, and posterior corneal ele

115 hich included age, sex, race, visual acuity, refractive error, astigmatism, cataract status, glaucoma

116 and 10 years was negatively associated with refractive error at 11 and 15 years (P<0.001), but expla

117 Initial peripheral J45 astigmatic refractive error at 20 degrees and 30 degrees in the nas

118 he change in spherical equivalent peripheral refractive error at 30 degrees nasal retina over time wa

119 had an MRSE within +/-1.00 D of their target refractive error at 5 years and 67.3% (n = 278/413) were

120 edi and associates may achieve an acceptable refractive error at 7 years of age.

121 The mean refractive error at age 5 years was -2.53 D (95% CI, -4.

122 s from birth to age 10 years were related to refractive error at ages 11 and 15 years, and eye size a

123 8) and 2.3% (P = 6.9E-21) of the variance in refractive error at ages 7 and 15, respectively, support

124 in multivariate models: spherical equivalent refractive error at baseline, parental myopia, axial len

125 Our results confirm the association with refractive error at the 15q14 locus but do not support t

126 The median refractive error at the age 5 years visit of the treated

127 The mean postoperative refractive error at the final examination was -0.4 +/- 0

128 Biometric data included values for refractive error, axial length (AL), corneal curvature,

129 Refractive error, axial length, and BCVA correlated sign

130 Measurement of refractive error, axial length, and complete ophthalmic

131 They were masked to the refractive error, axial length, and OCT findings.

132 constant exotropia) and spherical equivalent refractive error between -6.00 diopters (D) and +1.00 D.

133 ifference in visual acuity and mean absolute refractive error between laser and conventional cataract

134 cuity impairment associated with uncorrected refractive error, cataracts, and age-related macular deg

135 f early vision impairment due to uncorrected refractive error, cataracts, and age-related macular deg

136 impaired visual acuity, such as uncorrected refractive error, cataracts, and dry or wet AMD.

137 odds ratios of visual impairment for various refractive error categories and determined causes by usi

138 al impairment ranged from virtually 0 in all refractive error categories at 55 years of age to 9.5% (

139 or causes of visual impairment for the other refractive error categories were AMD and cataract.

140 When adjusted for age and refractive error, central choroidal thickness may not be

141 d a significantly (p < 0.001) lower trend of refractive error change during the follow-up periods.

142 ive Longitudinal Evaluation of Ethnicity and Refractive Error (CLEERE) Study was an observational coh

143 ive Longitudinal Evaluation of Ethnicity and Refractive Error (CLEERE) Study with both progression da

144 Cataract and uncorrected refractive error combined contributed to 55% of blindnes

145 ar contraindications to LRS include unstable refractive error, corneal ectatic disorders, a history o

146 The outcome measures included visual acuity, refractive error, corneal topography and axial length.

147 s decrease was proportional to the amount of refractive error corrected.

148 post operation, while the combined effect of refractive error correction and optical diameter appeare

149 bilateral disease, and all wore soft CLs for refractive error correction.

150 Refractive errors, defined as myopia less than -3 diopte

151 eye shape remodeling across the globe during refractive-error development.

152 7.6, P = .03) at baseline, but not with age, refractive error, diagnosis of typical AMD or PCV, numbe

153 nd to be associated with increased change of refractive error during follow-up years.

154 nd to be associated with increased change of refractive error during follow-up years.

155 VA with an identifiable cause is related to refractive error--either uncorrected refractive error or

156 Genetic variants for intelligence and refractive error explain some of the reciprocal variance

157 Refractive error, expressed as spherical equivalent (SE)

158 ere adjusted to correct 50% of the first-eye refractive error (FERE).

159 x (for NTG), systolic blood pressure, myopic refractive error (for NTG), and Raynaud's phenomenon.

160 Myopia and astigmatism, two common refractive errors frequently co-exist, are affecting vis

161 Epidemiologic features, refractive error, fundus examination, fluorescein angiog

162 nd major eye diseases (cataract, uncorrected refractive error, glaucoma, age-related macular degenera

163 pediatric eye care facilities for cataract, refractive errors, glaucoma and rehabilitative services

164 as an axial length less than 20.0 mm and/or refractive error greater than +7.00.

165 The majority of participants (65.1%) among refractive error group (REG) were above the age of 30 ye

166 Ninety eyes of 73 highly myopic patients (refractive error >/=-6 diopters) with CNV in 1 or both e

167 ination, anisometropia, myopic and hyperopic refractive error (>/= 3 dioptres), astigmatism, birth we

168 Of all refractive errors, high myopia has the most severe visua

169 After adjustment for age and refractive error, however, there was no significant diff

170 betic retinopathy, trachoma, and uncorrected refractive error in 1990-2010 by age, geographical regio

171 in the remaining 5 patients were significant refractive error in 3 patients and strabismus in 2 patie

172 s and SNP x education interaction effects on refractive error in 40,036 adults from 25 studies of Eur

173 Hyperopia was the most common refractive error in both Asian and NHW children.

174 chromosomes 15q25 and 15q14 associated with refractive error in Caucasian populations.

175 reatment of amblyopia, its risk factors, and refractive error in children aged 6 months to 5 years to

176 Correlations among CT with age, refractive error in diopters, and visual acuity in logar

177 ing the affected cell type, causal gene, and refractive error in IRDs may provide insight herein.

178 for amblyopia risk factors or nonamblyogenic refractive error in most studies of test accuracy and we

179 or mechanisms involved in the development of refractive error in populations of European origin.

180 The mean refractive error in spherical equivalent was -9.03 +/- 5

181 indings provide evidence that development of refractive error in the general population is related to

182 trabismus was found in 17.4% (68 of 390) and refractive errors in 29.7% (115 of 387) of the EPT child

183 findings corresponded with poor VA and high refractive errors in group 1 patients.

184 Significant refractive errors (in 37 [41%] patients) were the most c

185 Refractive errors, in particular myopia, are common in I

186 Visual acuity, refractive error, intraocular pressure, slit lamp examin

187 R(2): IOPg 2.30%, IOPcc 2.26%), followed by refractive error (IOPg 0.60%, IOPcc 1.04%).

188 Residual refractive error is a known complication after both lase

189 the number of people affected by uncorrected refractive error is anticipated to rise to 127.7 million

190 Refractive error is associated with AMD, although a temp

191 rk, especially among people with uncorrected refractive error is considered a potential source of vis

192 The refractive error is measured using a Shack-Hartmann wave

193 Uncorrected Refractive Error is one of the leading cause amblyopia t

194 Using a phoropter to measure the refractive error is one of the most commonly used method

195 Refractive error is the main cause of visual impairment

196 The burden of uncorrected refractive errors is high among primary schools children

197 ase opportunities for integrated research on refractive error leading to development of novel prevent

198 %) had normal distance vision or uncorrected refractive error, less than half (46.1%) used near-visio

199 Thirty-six subjects whose baseline age and refractive error matched with those in the orthokeratolo

200 (rd6) mice suggests hyperopia and associated refractive errors may be amenable to AAV gene therapy.

201 raphic optical elements to perform automatic refractive error measurement and provide a diagnostic pr

202 Prediction error was defined as refractive error minus emmetropia.

203 heral rivalry-type diplopia), 1 (4%) optical/refractive error (monocular diplopia), 2 (8%) mixed reti

204 creased presenting VA attributable to simple refractive error (myopia >/= 0.5 diopters [D]; hyperopia

205 0.0001) and greater magnitude of significant refractive errors (myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism, and a

206 s of these children were examined, including refractive errors, need for optical correction, and diag

207 Forty-one eyes of 21 patients with low refractive error, no visual impairment, and no known ret

208 d demographics, history of cataract surgery, refractive error, number of glaucoma medications, family

209 and chronic disease status, both uncorrected refractive error (odds ratio [OR], 1.36; 95% CI, 1.15-1.

210 High myopia was defined as myopic refractive error of </=6.0 diopters in the right eye.

211 a mean age of 8.71 +/- 1.51 years and a mean refractive error of +0.41 +/- 1.29 diopters.

212 nsecutive patients with spherical equivalent refractive error of at least 6 diopters (D) were evaluat

213 ive error was 3.12 1.87 diopters (D) and the refractive error of each participant was corrected with

214 ation with an initial targeted postoperative refractive error of either +8 diopters (D) (infants 28 t

215 Thirty-two highly myopic eyes (with a refractive error of more than -6.00 diopters [D]), which

216 luences the progression rate of the manifest refractive error of myopic children in a longer follow-u

217 taphyloma was 25.14 +/- 0.77 mm and the mean refractive error of the affected eyes was -4.28 +/- 2.65

218 years was significantly associated with the refractive error of the less ametropic eye at 12 to 15 y

219 Myopia, or near-sightedness, is an ocular refractive error of unfocused image quality in front of

220 ed an effect of ethnicity, axial length, and refractive error on BMO-based parameters.

221 ated to refractive error--either uncorrected refractive error or amblyopia resulting from refractive

222 th corneal curvature (P = 0.03) but not with refractive error or AXL.

223 A (OR = 0.84 per week; p = 0.001), hyperopic refractive error (OR = 4.22; p = 0.002) and astigmatism

224 t play an important role in the final BSCVA, refractive error, or accuracy of IOP measurement.

225 strate dramatically less change in spherical refractive error over a fixed period of time than their

226 sses were associated with age (P < .001) and refractive error (P < .001), but not other variables tes

227 rrelated negatively with age (P = 0.032) and refractive error (P = 0.011).

228 037) after adjusting for age (P = 0.001) and refractive error (P = 0.06).

229 .1), after adjusting for age (P < 0.001) and refractive error (P = 0.20).

230 d magnitude of absolute spherical equivalent refractive error (P<0.001).

231 ostoperative outcomes include visual acuity, refractive error, patient-reported visual function, and

232 c examination in such cases to determine the refractive error phenotype is challenging and costly.

233 Items from the National Eye Institute (NEI) Refractive Error Quality of Life Instrument (NEI-RQL-42)

234 scales: the National Eye Institute's (NEI's) Refractive Error Quality of Life Instrument's Clarity of

235 tient satisfaction by National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life Instrument-42 (NEI RQL-

236 CL presence and thickness included hyperopic refractive error (R2 = 0.123; P = .045) and increased TC

237 Refractive errors ranged from -3.0 diopters (D) to 0.63

238 y of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and refractive error (RE) after immediate sequential (ISBCS)

239 Uncorrected refractive error (RE) is a leading cause of visual impai

240 Cases of refractive error (RE) were defined as subjects who met a

241 izing the burden of visual impairment due to refractive error (RE) worldwide is substantially higher.

242 referred Practice Pattern(R) guideline (PPP) Refractive Errors & Refractive Surgery is unknown.

243 eliable systematic reviews to assist the AAO Refractive Errors & Refractive Surgery PPP.

244 ty of interventions included in the 2012 PPP Refractive Errors & Refractive Surgery.

245 st sensitivity, higher-order aberrations, or refractive error-related quality of life following both

246 st sensitivity, higher-order aberrations, or refractive error-related quality of life.

247 rast sensitivity, wavefront aberrations, and refractive error-related quality-of-life questionnaire.

248 Visual refractive errors (REs) are complex genetic traits with

249 ue to cataract (reversible with surgery) and refractive error (reversible with spectacle correction)

250 eoperative values, mean spherical equivalent refractive error (SEQ) increased by +0.78 diopter (D) (P

251 The mean preoperative spherical equivalent refractive error (SEQ) was -5.13 D (range, -2.75 to -8.0

252 Change in spherical equivalent refractive error (SER) and ocular components were calcul

253 ning, choroidal and retinal folds, hyperopic refractive error shifts, and nerve fiber layer infarcts.

254 Prevalence of significant refractive errors, specifically hyperopia, astigmatism,

255 o determine cycloplegic spherical equivalent refractive error (SPHEQ).

256 Prevalence of myopic refractive error (spherical equivalent less than -0.50 d

257 tion tests were performed at both loci using refractive error (spherical equivalent), axial length, c

258 d benefits of the procedure, including lower refractive error, structural globe integrity, and faster

259 Astigmatism is a common refractive error that affects a significant portion of t

260 After adjusting for age and refractive error, the mean (SD) difference in the superf

261 For refractive errors, the association with GA remained afte

262 ents without symptomatic cataracts, but with refractive errors, the PresbyMAX will decrease the presb

263 ion to 31.6 million), because of uncorrected refractive error to 8.0 million (2.5 million to 16.3 mil

264 therapy, and analyze the effect of age, sex, refractive errors, type of amblyopia, and adherence to g

265 significant advantages in terms of residual refractive error, uncorrected distance acuity and contra

266 orrected visual acuity excluding uncorrected refractive errors (URE) as a visual impairment cause.

267 logMAR after refractive correction and unmet refractive error (UREN), individuals who had visual impa

268 intelligence explained 0.99% (p = 0.008) of refractive error variance.

269 The main outcome measures were refractive error, visual acuity, corneal topographic ker

270 symptoms, visual functioning, visual acuity, refractive error, visual field, diabetic retinopathy, ag

271 on visual acuity was -0.075 (0.087), and the refractive error was -0.071 (+1.91) diopters (D).

272 ubfoveal choroidal thickness with the myopic refractive error was -10.45 mum per diopter.

273 Mean refractive error was -13.9 +/- 5.2 diopters.

274 Spherical equivalent refractive error was -2.82 +/- 1.65 D and -0.26 +/- 0.25

275 tile range [IQR], 42-62 years), and the mean refractive error was -8.7 D (IQR, -6.1 to -11 D).

276 The mean spherical equivalent refractive error was 3.12 1.87 diopters (D) and the refr

277 Overall prevalence of refractive error was 43 (10.2%).

278 Refractive error was assessed by noncycloplegic autorefr

279 Refractive error was assessed, without cycloplegia, in b

280 A less hyperopic/more myopic baseline refractive error was consistently associated with risk o

281 Refractive error was determined by subjective refraction

282 A statistically significant association for refractive error was evident for SNPs at the 15q14 locus

283 h participant, the eye with the worse myopic refractive error was included in this analysis.

284 In this young adult population, myopic refractive error was inversely associated with objective

285 etween genetic variants at these 39 loci and refractive error was investigated in 5200 children asses

286 ollow-up at 11.4 +/- 2.3 months after birth, refractive error was less myopic in the study group than

287 Peripheral refractive error was measured using an open field autore

288 The refractive error was measured using cycloplegic autorefr

289 Amblyopia related to refractive error was the most common cause, and was 10 t

290 Spherical equivalent refractive error was the single best predictive factor t

291 survival, best-corrected visual acuity, and refractive error were analyzed for 3 consecutive time pe

292 BCVA, ECD, and refractive error were compared using linear mixed models

293 roidal thickness and axial length and myopic refractive error were obtained (r = -0.649, P < 0.001, a

294 Visual acuity, manifest strabismus, and refractive errors were evaluated.

295 Strabismus and significant refractive errors were risk factors for unilateral ambly

296 Refractive errors were significantly correlated with sev

297 Refractive errors were the most common cause of visual i

298 ms to be superior to DSEK and to induce less refractive error with similar surgical risks and EC loss

299 cy with which the WF-guided group attained a refractive error within +/- 0.25 diopters of emmetropia

300 which was defined as the presence of myopic refractive error worse than -6.0 diopters with the prese