ライフサイエンスコーパス: refuse

1 imarily due to PFCAs </=C8 (2.48 nmol/kg dry refuse).

2 observed in live reactors (9.53 nmol/kg dry refuse).

3 t (4 progressed, 1 had bleomycin toxicity, 6 refused).

4 s to selective postoperative ERCP (1 patient refused).

5 as increased by the presence of 5% by weight refuse.

6 ls, producing approximately 140 mL CH4/dry g refuse.

7 ed patients were approached to take part; 23 refused.

8 fe to be ended but the family and physicians refused.

9 heir examinations, as a function of sex, was refused.

10 ble to enter the study; 48 never rejected, 9 refused, 13 could not be biopsied, 16 received methylpre

11 similar in responders and nonresponders who refused (35% and 38%), and among responders, impressions

12 The most common reason for refusing 3HP was the clinic-based DOT requirement.

13 ment outcomes, side effects, and reasons for refusing 3HP were described.

14 on, but their applicability to transplant or refuse a kidney graft has probably been overestimated.

15 Twelve patients refused a biopsy because of their excellent evolution; t

16 r vaccine was acceptable, 19% of respondents refused a patient's request for vaccine.

17 s; 22 patients had resections, and 1 patient refused a resection.

18 r intolerant to intravesical BCG therapy and refusing a cystectomy were considered eligible for the t

19 l bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) therapy and refusing a cystectomy were considered eligible for the t

20 The repeated use of activity areas led to refuse accumulation and site formation.

21 nal pain therapy, see a pain specialist, and refuse additional medication because of fear of addictio

22 s, including recommending the sale of stock, refusing additional payment for talks, resigning from a

23 90-day mortality rates for patients who were refused admission and for those admitted.

24 e is excess mortality among patients who are refused admission to intensive-care units.

25 ppropriately referred for intensive care but refused admission to their first-choice intensive-care u

26 who were not critically ill and whose family refused admission.

27 480 patients were admitted and 165 were refused admission.

28 and attention to a participant's freedom to refuse all serve to reduce the possibility of compensati

29 , although none used an advance directive to refuse all treatment.

30 ia caused by gastrointestinal hemorrhage who refused all blood products on religious grounds.

31 ocated between ABMT and CT while 41 patients refused allocation.

32 ts ineligible for (no donor or older age) or refusing allogeneic SCT, 1 patient relapsed after one ye

33 The patient refused an oral provocation challenge.

34 However, when a patient refuses an abdominoperineal resection (APR), is there an

35 spite use of analgesics, and one patient had refused analgesics.

36 ation 18 months later, 819 (15.0%) partially refused and 229 (4.2%) completely denied consent.

37 usehold members took part in the survey (10% refused and 9% were absent).

38 ately accepted and 1354 (53%) were initially refused and eventually accepted for another child.

39 immediately accepted and 53% were initially refused and eventually accepted for another child.

40 subjects, 1,514 (83%) joined the study, 182 refused, and 119 could not be contacted.

41 milies (20%) agreed to participate, 80 (41%) refused, and 75 (39%) could not be contacted.

42 hs or were unavailable to be interviewed, 4% refused, and 80% were eligible and participated.

43 eath before antibiotic redosing, and patient refusing antibiotics.

44 may be especially important for patients who refuse antipsychotic drugs or as a supplemental approach

45 Patients who refused antipsychotic medication were identified, and da

46 e Court has held that competent patients may refuse any and all treatments, including those that sust

47 There were 1,679 persons who refused any participation.

48 (83%), 16 selected a stool test (15%) and 3 refused any test (3%).

49 Thirteen eligible patients refused assigned treatment: seven on the observation arm

50 th randomization was excellent, with only 2% refusing assigned therapy.

51 138 were assigned to the control group (one refused baseline examination).

52 e antibody results were lost to follow-up or refused biopsy (only one EMA-positive patient refused bi

53 efused biopsy (only one EMA-positive patient refused biopsy), and 43 had normal duodenal mucosa.

54 onsequently, Jehovah's Witness patients, who refuse blood product transfusion, are usually excluded f

55 Clinical experiences with patients who refuse blood transfusions for religious reasons have pro

56 fourth is patients who cannot afford or who refuse BTX injections.

57 r system failure (treatment recommended, not refused but did not ensue).

58 re containing 95% red oak and 5% residential refuse by weight.

59 Pancreas allografts refused by a large number of centers may still be import

60 d criteria donor organs were those that were refused by all other local transplant centers.

61 rable donor characteristics, each kidney was refused by an average of 9.3 centers.

62 reevaluation and transplantation of kidneys refused by other centers after evaluation with PP.

63 es of recipients receiving hearts previously refused by other institutions for quality with the outco

64 valuated the outcome of recipients or donors refused by other transplant centers and transplanted by

65 e eventual dominant and could be accepted or refused by the eventual subordinate.

66 We took kidneys that were refused by UNOS centers on the basis of biopsy results,

67 ina underwent PTCA; 82 (62%) of 131 had been refused CABG.

68 e, referral centers may have an incentive to refuse care for patients who could benefit from being tr

69 The options were to refuse chemotherapy or to accept for a threshold chance

70 this approach as an overdue encouragement to refuse cognitively rich interpretations as far as cognit

71 106 of the 109 subjects who refused colonoscopy accepted an alternative non-invasive

72 Subjects who refused colonoscopy were offered a choice of non-invasiv

73 97% of subjects refusing colonoscopy accepted a non-invasive screening t

74 e stool or blood based screening tests after refusing colonoscopy.

75 ata from polio vaccination activities in OPV-refusing communities in the Igabi and Zaria local govern

76 reaching chronically missed children in OPV-refusing communities.

77 suspected multifocal carcinoma and those who refused completion ALND.

78 age of participants in epidemiologic studies refuse consent for DNA studies, and the majority are con

79 the 5,494 participants at entry, 897 (16.3%) refused consent for some items and 247 (4.5%) completely

80 had no undiagnosed child, and one household refused consent.

81 with other sources is not random, and women refusing consent often do not participate in publicly av

82 als denoted the magnitude of association for refusing consent.

83 4-hour period, and who did not respond to or refused conventional radiation treatment or chemotherapy

84 cyclophosphamide therapy and one patient who refused cyclophosphamide as initial therapy for diffuse

85 emains a viable option for some patients who refuse cystectomy.

86 nts with epilepsy when treatment fails or is refused despite recurrent seizures.

87 planted organs was less than 10%; pancreases refused due to "trauma", "age", or "resuscitation" were

88 organs were transplanted without ever being refused due to ICU stay in donors who stayed 8 days or m

89 an refusal varied substantially: organs were refused due to length of ICU stay even if donors stayed

90 low cost, highly efficacious vaccine can be refused, even when the rational decision model predicts

91 Those who refused fellow eye surgery had lower fellow eye IOP and

92 eye that was eligible for surgery, 30 (19%) refused fellow eye surgery.

93 Eligible patients who refused fellow eye trabeculectomy did not differ signifi

94 ths after 3 months occurred in the group who refused follow-up.

95 ts in hospice care who voluntarily choose to refuse food and fluids are elderly, no longer find meani

96 Among pancreases refused for "diabetes" or "malignancy" at least once, th

97 Pediatric donor hearts are regularly refused for donor quality with limited evidence as to wh

98 rts, suggesting that donor hearts previously refused for quality are not necessarily unsuitable for t

99 Most liver offers (68%) were refused for reasons related to donor quality.

100 s from donors who would have previously been refused for transplantation.

101 ies had 2 attempts at thrombin injection and refused further attempts.

102 perienced progression or did not tolerate or refused further chemotherapy were allowed to cross over

103 60 patients were lost to follow-up(LTFU) or refused further treatment (RFT) before the 6-week evalua

104 ng the admitted group and 75 (46%) among the refused group.

105 er risk of all-cause mortality and those who refused had a higher risk of all-cause mortality.

106 Compared with participants, those who refused had a higher risk of death (for men, hazard rati

107 ved a primarily offered heart; 52 received a refused heart.

108 ong-term mortality for recipients of quality-refused hearts are no different than recipients of prima

109 atric cohort examining outcomes with quality-refused hearts shows that in-hospital morbidity and long

110 nters would not transplant an individual who refuses HIV testing.

111 ed with HCWs offering and children/guardians refusing HIV testing were investigated using multivariab

112 ere infection in young infants whose parents refused hospital admission are as efficacious as the sta

113 (except fast breathing alone), whose parents refused hospital admission, to one of the three treatmen

114 italization is that prospective patients who refuse hospitalization at the time it is offered are lik

115 rder of life-threatening severity frequently refuse hospitalization.

116 onds was nonsignificantly higher in patients refused ICU admission only because of a full unit compar

117 the 355 included patients, 105 (29.6%) were refused ICU treatment.

118 Overall, 29.6% of the patients were refused ICU treatment.

119 erage for abiotic reactors (2.83 nmol/kg dry refuse), indicating biological processes were primarily

120 ed to the intensive care unit and survive if refused intensive care unit admission.

121 attributable mortality in patients who were refused intensive care, particularly for emergency cases

122 mia (AML) who were not candidates for or who refused intensive chemotherapy.

123 atients, 373 resumed anticoagulation and 109 refused it.

124 ther delivery of a service to people who are refusing it and are not legally bound to accept it can b

125 Once a liver offer has been refused locally and regionally, it is offered nationally

126 A similar proportion would have refused mechanical ventilation with greater mechanical v

127 e who struggle with psychotic disorder often refuse offers of help, including housing, extended by me

128 Caregivers refuse OPV largely because of poor polio risk perception

129 whom medical therapy has failed or those who refuse or are poorly compliant with medical therapy.

130 Black patients were more likely to refuse or bear a contraindication to surgery even when c

131 y of these concerned parents are choosing to refuse or delay childhood vaccines, placing their childr

132 nt for schizophrenia; however, many patients refuse or discontinue their pharmacological treatment.

133 ght to determine what proportion of patients refused or had a contraindication to recommended lung ca

134 d, although PN was provided when EN had been refused or was poorly tolerated.

135 ertiary care cancer hospital in patients who refused or who were not candidates for surgery.

136 ents with clinically staged T2N0 tumours who refuse, or are not candidates for, transabdominal resect

137 Most centers refuse organs that come from donors who are hepatitis B

138 Only 19% refused osteoporosis care.

139 Of 512 nonparticipants, 130 (25.4%) refused owing to claustrophobia; 93 (18.2%), owing to ti

140 Less than 1% of patients refused palliative chemotherapy.

141 who were offered trials were more likely to refuse participation than younger patients.

142 known about the characteristics of those who refuse participation.

143 research sites, eligible patients most often refused participation because they were either unwilling

144 d telephone interviews with SLE patients who refused participation in the trial and the focus groups

145 enrolled, black patients and their families refused participation more often than white patients.

146 After excluding 17 patients who secondarily refused participation or had met an exclusion criterion,

147 Fifteen patients who refused participation or were nonadherent served as a co

148 No patients refused participation or withdrew.

149 .5% of smokers offered the study (2687/4102) refused participation prior to randomization.

150 362 subjects; 279 met inclusion criteria, 3 refused participation, and 276 were randomized.

151 A total of 166 eligible patients refused participation.

152 Only 12 women refused participation.

153 Twenty-nine individuals refused participation.

154 tes duration, HbA(1c), AER, and sex to those refusing participation.

155 nvincing patients to forgo treatments (33%), refusing patient requests for nonbeneficial treatment (2

156 ed on 28-day mortality rates of admitted and refused patients.

157 en freshly killed workers (dead for <1 h) to refuse piles before significant decomposition has a chan

158 s (HIV)-infected zidovudine (ZDV)-intolerant/refusing pregnant women and of single-dose d4T in their

159 acteria on untreated OWR samples, but not on refuse pretreated with phospholipid.

160 One patient refused primary stent placement and chose venoplasty alo

161 Because most eligible patients refused random assignment, the trial was changed in 2001

162 Thirty (65%) families refused referrals to support and counseling groups.

163 f respondents supported enabling Medicare to refuse reimbursement for more expensive treatment if les

164 an efficacious alternative for patients who refuse repeated exposure to past trauma.

165 , but reasoned that parents have no right to refuse resuscitation of extremely premature infants prio

166 with people of their choosing, and rights to refuse sex.

167 t participants used the advance directive to refuse some medications and to express preferences for a

168 ), suggesting that transplant centers may be refusing some kidneys on the basis of donor-recipient si

169 nd weight loss occurred in a DL1 patient who refused supportive feeding.

170 s may help reduce the number of patients who refuse surgery after comprehensive workup.

171 have surgery recommended, and more likely to refuse surgery.

172 lesions were potentially resectable and who refused surgery (n = 19) were included.

173 med a benign insulinoma, whereas one patient refused surgery despite a positive (68)Ga-DOTA-exendin-4

174 nts had surgery, or the parents or guardians refused surgery.

175 One patient refused surgery.

176 Eleven patients had surgical resection; 1 refused surgery.

177 dergone previous cholecystectomy; 4 patients refused surgery.

178 cluded due to comorbidities; 4.2% (403/9559) refused surgery; 9.1% (869/9559) were excluded due to ag

179 n of blacks not receiving surgery as well as refusing surgery was greater than that among whites.

180 SBRT, 95% were medically inoperable, with 5% refusing surgery.

181 Patients who refused surgical treatment received standard medical car

182 th one exception: physicians were willing to refuse surrogate requests for resuscitation of patients

183 hdraw life support, and that physicians will refuse surrogate requests in certain circumstances.

184 litely explain the absurdity of referral and refuse the test in the most absurd cases.

185 Three patients subsequently refused the donation as the potential donor was a child.

186 The fish refused the food after repeatedly touching it with their

187 e, 16 psychologically unsuitable, 7 patients refused the offer of transplantation, and an additional

188 evere for volume reduction surgery and three refused the operation.

189 id not answer the telephone and subjects who refused the telephone interview (P < 0.0001).

190 nly ten had disciplinary actions specific to refusing the overtime.

191 f these, 248 agreed to be in the trial and 9 refused; the remainder died or relocated.

192 ents and enucleation in 1 patient; 1 patient refused therapy.

193 Eleven patients refused therapy.

194 milies' financial burden would cause them to refuse this potentially life-saving intervention.

195 l heterocycle in primary amine acylation, it refused this replacement in the corresponding donor subs

196 ave chosen mechanical ventilation would have refused this therapy had their families' financial burde

197 ed CPR, despite advance directive statements refusing this treatment.

198 ion of susceptible children whose caregivers refuse to accept oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) contribut

199 ead because of another issue: their families refuse to allow donation to proceed.

200 Authors must be free to refuse to consent, without it affecting their chances fo

201 which positively judges miscreants when they refuse to help other miscreants, the other which does no

202 ebate about whether health professionals may refuse to provide treatments to which they object on mor

203 hich treatments the patient would choose, or refuse to receive if they were diagnosed with an acute,

204 ants had the opportunity to either accept or refuse to replicate the same effort for varying amounts

205 Individuals usually punish free riders but refuse to sanction those who cooperate but do not punish

206 the outset might lead even more patients to refuse to seek care.

207 ence interval: 1.6, 2.3) were more likely to refuse to share data.

208 d that health care professionals may legally refuse to treat a patient because of concern that the pa

209 d obesity at least 2 years after surgery but refuse to undergo further surgery or claim to be satisfi

210 Teachers often refused to acknowledge a medical problem.

211 After the federal government refused to allow (and courts blocked) the exclusion of P

212 egistry, and the 327 who were acceptable but refused to be randomized constitute the patient-choice r

213 2505 children refused to continue the trial and 3219 children were los

214 se at or before 8 weeks of treatment and one refused to continue treatment.

215 met weaning or intubation criteria, died, or refused to continue.

216 surgically; the parents of the remaining two refused to do so.

217 o a population of children whose parents had refused to have them vaccinated because of safety concer

218 onfined mostly to children whose parents had refused to have them vaccinated, primarily out of concer

219 tric transplants (11 patients), patients who refused to participate (3 patients), and those who died

220 We compared persons who refused to participate (n = 2,911), persons who did not

221 atric comorbidity were randomized; 1 patient refused to participate after treatment assignment to NTP

222 Of these, 111 patients refused to participate and 18 patients did not experienc

223 The remainder included 15% who refused to participate and 24% who were unable to partic

224 A total of 75 patients were unable or refused to participate and were excluded; the remaining

225 Monkeys refused to participate if they witnessed a conspecific o

226 Respondents reported that physicians who refused to participate in abuses faced consequences incl

227 Only 115 patients (18%) refused to participate in the postremission phase of thi

228 Only 24 households refused to participate in the study.

229 xcluded from the study, and 6.0% (24 of 401) refused to participate in the study.

230 d on the proportion of subjects who actively refused to participate in the study.

231 Two patients refused to participate in this study.

232 71 (24%) refused to participate or could not speak English.

233 length of stay was less than 2 days, and 14 refused to participate.

234 Ninety-seven (40%) of 244 eligible patients refused to participate.

235 Of 39 children originally in our study, 6 refused to participate.

236 hom 279 met the inclusion criteria and three refused to participate; thus 276 participants were rando

237 es requested a recommendation, the physician refused to provide one.

238 refractive surgery, and 134 participants who refused to remove their contact lenses for the refractio

239 Nearly all households refused to resume water use activities after flushing be

240 liers, including the American Red Cross, who refused to sell hospitals nonleukoreduced blood.

241 their university research; and that they had refused to share research results of biomaterials with c

242 t addressed this issue with anyone, and many refused to take a survey on the topic.

243 397 patients approached for followed up, 133 refused to take part in this study and 19 could not be i

244 The only recurrence was in a patient who refused to undergo abdominoperineal resection after a pa

245 n patients who were either ineligible for or refused to undergo abdominoperineal resection.

246 The patient refused to undergo excision of the nevus until we made e

247 After randomization, 7 participants (10%) refused to undergo their allocated intervention (3 RYGB,

248 23 mandibles and 4 maxillas) in patients who refused to wear a denture or were told of the possibilit

249 ision maker during an ICU family meeting who refuses to follow an advance directive that clearly decl

250 equired by the patient's insurance coverage, refuses to prescribe brand-name drugs when generic alter

251 EMTALA) was passed to prevent hospitals from refusing to care for an indigent patient in an emergency

252 They are then criticized for refusing to define religion and for relying on problemat

253 dea of the latter is that helping someone or refusing to do so has an impact on one's reputation with

254 ern for fairness: they punished extortion by refusing to fully cooperate, thereby reducing their own,

255 ar number (60%) endorsed sometimes or always refusing to operate on a patient with preferences to lim

256 wed as to their reasons for participating or refusing to participate in a trial.

257 in the trial during the same hospital stay, refusing to participate, or having do-not-resuscitate or

258 ially from public involvement in trials, but refusing to reciprocate by making information from indus

259 some HMOs could subvert these objectives by refusing to release unfavorable data.

260 Refusing to see high-risk patients and 'bouncing' (somet

261 Refusing to share information with other sources is not

262 Variables associated with refusing to share results were conducting research simil

263 production requested by public visitors and refusing to supply requested documents in an electronic

264 ere compared between groups that received or refused trabeculectomy in their fellow eye.

265 with abnormal TCD velocities whose families refused transfusions became less than 200 cm/s.

266 atients, and most states allow surrogates to refuse treatment on behalf of incompetent patients.

267 nication, great confusion about the right to refuse treatment, and profound inequity in U.S. health c

268 spect for personal autonomy and the right to refuse treatment.

269 7 patients assigned to the dinutuximab group refused treatment after randomisation; the most common g

270 Two patients were never treated (one patient refused treatment and one had insufficient tumor for bio

271 Two patients refused treatment and, hence, were excluded from our stu

272 Of these, 30 patients refused treatment but were retained in the study as a no

273 Of the 86 patients randomized, 3 refused treatment in the long-acting injectable risperid

274 Patients who refused treatment were found to have significantly highe

275 ed with the compliant patients, patients who refused treatment were more likely to be assaultive, wer

276 , on average 2.8 days, and all patients, who refused treatment were treated.

277 in 24 patients (17 patients progressed, two refused treatment, and five had nonhepatic toxicities).

278 iscretion to promptly treat all patients who refused treatment.

279 2 (18%) chose other treatment, and 109 (22%) refused treatment.

280 o reduce the percentage of nodes at risk for refusing treatment in MDA to below 25%.

281 ulic hybrid diesel engines during real-world refuse truck operation.

282 twenty-two natural gas fueled transit buses, refuse trucks, and over-the-road (OTR) tractors.

283 For Class 8 tractor-trailers and refuse trucks, none of the natural gas pathways provide

284 s, support was withdrawn because the parents refused univentricular palliation and the valvar anomali

285 in family connectedness and self-efficacy to refuse unwanted sex, and reductions in the perceived imp

286 dy among households in which the vaccine was refused, using semistructured questionnaires.

287 strategies of communication with persons who refuse vaccination, is necessary to prevent future outbr

288 The proportion of cases refusing vaccination decreased from 37-72% in 2008 to 21

289 Reasons for actively refusing vaccination included concerns about side effect

290 mutant strains of the bacterium, and parents refusing vaccination of their children.

291 as been linked to a dangerous trend: parents refusing vaccinations for their children.

292 increased risk for measles among people who refuse vaccines and among fully vaccinated individuals.

293 heir provider relationship with patients who refuse vaccines, the American Academy of Pediatrics Comm

294 giving partial consent, the most common item refused was access to DNA by private companies (baseline

295 measured in live reactors (16.7 nmol/kg dry refuse) was greater than the average for abiotic reactor

296 Persons who refused were more likely to be older and female.

297 contact potential participants who initially refuse, whereas others expend considerable effort to rec

298 Exothermic pyrolysis of refuse, which is hypothesized to be initiated due to a l

299 ypical hyperplasia in 72 patients, 5 of whom refused WLEBB.

300 that led to 19 benign breast biopsies, eight refused work-up, and three experienced a false-negative