戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ific and clinical position of cardiovascular regenerative therapy.
2 ell type for potential use in cardiovascular regenerative therapy.
3 s should be done before they can be used for regenerative therapy.
4 ing human cardiac development as well as for regenerative therapy.
5 rug discovery, disease modeling, and cardiac regenerative therapy.
6 l stem cells hold promise for cardiovascular regenerative therapy.
7 is may enhance cardiac-progenitor cell-based regenerative therapy.
8 ssociated with GCA and no previous report of regenerative therapy.
9 polysaccharide-mediated bone resorption) and regenerative therapy.
10 onarily conserved and could be exploited for regenerative therapy.
11  1 and 2 mobility, will respond favorably to regenerative therapy.
12 s provide an excellent pool of molecules for regenerative therapy.
13 control the clinical outcomes of periodontal regenerative therapy.
14 ally provide a limitless source of cells for regenerative therapy.
15 s may be significant in clinical outcomes of regenerative therapy.
16 ould provide a promising source of cells for regenerative therapy.
17 istic effect of EMPs and BPBM in periodontal regenerative therapy.
18  for significant clinical improvements after regenerative therapy.
19 and are therefore not a promising target for regenerative therapy.
20 edures is an important aspect of periodontal regenerative therapy.
21 ow this occurs is highly relevant to cardiac regenerative therapy.
22 defects may be successfully treated with non-regenerative therapy.
23  promising approach to expand stem cells for regenerative therapy.
24 stering the path to novel approaches in bone-regenerative therapy.
25 -HS may expand KIT+ progenitors in vitro for regenerative therapy.
26 challenges of this new technology for future regenerative therapy.
27 er injury and discuss their implications for regenerative therapy.
28 o provide a novel route for cardiac cellular regenerative therapy.
29 rogenitor cells are an attractive target for regenerative therapy.
30  this promising new technology into a proven regenerative therapy.
31 hat has dramatic implications for cell-based regenerative therapies.
32 eld potential new targets and strategies for regenerative therapies.
33  cells in mammals and developing novel renal regenerative therapies.
34 ssues and the potential effectiveness of new regenerative therapies.
35 ypes and hence have tremendous potential for regenerative therapies.
36 nd aid in the development of stem cell-based regenerative therapies.
37 tracer reporter probes for tracking cellular regenerative therapies.
38 ices to promote vascularization for directed regenerative therapies.
39 al elements when designing human tissues for regenerative therapies.
40  INFUSE bone grafts for periodontal and oral regenerative therapies.
41 tor cells with the potential for safe use in regenerative therapies.
42 nal stem cells can be activated for possible regenerative therapies.
43 iation that makes them potential targets for regenerative therapies.
44  of targeted strategies that expand HSCs for regenerative therapies.
45 erable for assessing efficacy of periodontal regenerative therapies.
46 ontained versus non-contained, using various regenerative therapies.
47 of factors involved in designing predictable regenerative therapies.
48 ort superiority or equivalency between the 2 regenerative therapies.
49  bioactive agents is important for improving regenerative therapies.
50 estoration of beta-cells is a major goal for regenerative therapies.
51 ap, hemisection, tunneling or extraction, to regenerative therapies.
52 ion of functional vision through optic nerve regenerative therapies.
53  may improve the efficacy of stem-cell-based regenerative therapies.
54 ls (HSCs) are essential for many life-saving regenerative therapies.
55 nitely, making them an attractive source for regenerative therapies.
56  defects may be treated predictably with non-regenerative therapies.
57 ate MSC population for designing predictable regenerative therapies.
58 monitor the fate and action of cells used in regenerative therapies.
59 drug toxicology tests, and advance potential regenerative therapies.
60 ns critical for the development of potential regenerative therapies.
61 ration, and therefore they could be used for regenerative therapies.
62 novel perspective for reinterpreting cardiac regenerative therapies.
63 c cell types for basic laboratory studies or regenerative therapies.
64 ent stem cells will form the basis of future regenerative therapies.
65 cal use could be considered for craniofacial regenerative therapies.
66 ssary for the design of improved periodontal regenerative therapies.
67 ecular materials a great platform to develop regenerative therapies.
68 ces for improving stem cell fate in clinical regenerative therapies.
69 xtensively used to enhance tissue repair and regenerative therapies.
70 scovery of stem cell therapeutics to support regenerative therapies.
71  the heart spurred enthusiasm for cell-based regenerative therapies.
72 this ability may provide insights into human regenerative therapies.
73 ures and have implications for other bladder regenerative therapies.
74 us for exploring mechanobiology paradigms in regenerative therapies.
75 epresents an important step toward potential regenerative therapies.
76 wth potential is of broad interest for tooth regenerative therapies.
77  greatly aid in the development of effective regenerative therapies.
78 ation, basic developmental studies or future regenerative therapies.
79 d highlights pathways for the development of regenerative therapies.
80  repair and is therefore a primary target of regenerative therapies.
81 st that BTC could be a good candidate to aid regenerative therapies.
82 , which supports the relevance of exploring 'regenerative' therapies.
83 harmacodynamic implications in the design of regenerative therapies aimed at increasing beta-cell rep
84             Within the preceding 3 months of regenerative therapy, all patients received full mouth o
85 orizontal probing depth when compared to the regenerative therapy alone.
86 or the widely anticipated next generation of regenerative therapies and as such are pioneering the st
87 s for the treatment of furcation defects via regenerative therapies and the conduction of future stud
88 a conscious approach to the development of a regenerative therapy and, by deciphering the thread conn
89 with 3 major applications: disease modeling, regenerative therapy, and drug discovery.
90 subgingival microbiota was examined prior to regenerative therapy, and the membrane microbiota was ex
91 ls (hESCs) is the foremost critical step for regenerative therapy applications.
92                                              Regenerative therapies are limited by unfavorable enviro
93 inoglycans (GAGs) offer exciting options for regenerative therapies as they allow for the electrostat
94 eview of all pertinent literature discussing regenerative therapy at the time of tooth extraction or
95 cells (hDPSCs) are attractive candidates for regenerative therapy because they can be easily expanded
96 ell-derived progenitors offers potential for regenerative therapies but is often limited by developme
97 ure-induced injury may help to advance brain regenerative therapies by using either transplanted or e
98                                       First, regenerative therapy by open debridement with a bioabsor
99        Today's challenges facing periodontal regenerative therapy continue to stimulate important res
100 mising tool for human developmental biology, regenerative therapies, disease modeling, and drug disco
101 lls (hiPSCs) are a robust source for cardiac regenerative therapy due to their potential to support a
102 ical Wnt signaling as a potential target for regenerative therapies for APAP-induced acute liver fail
103                           The development of regenerative therapies for cartilage injury has been gre
104  of stem cell markers and application toward regenerative therapies for diabetes.
105 rative potential of the heart and to develop regenerative therapies for heart disease.
106 f replicated in humans, this may allow novel regenerative therapies for heart diseases.
107 mation that is crucial to the development of regenerative therapies for human tissues and organs.
108                       The development of new regenerative therapies for multiple sclerosis is hindere
109 e potential to provide a source of cells for regenerative therapies for specific skin diseases.
110 n is central to the efforts to develop novel regenerative therapies for type 1 diabetes.
111  pose challenges to devising the appropriate regenerative therapy for a deaf patient.
112  senescent hCPCs will improve the outcome of regenerative therapy for a substantial patient populatio
113 therefore, they may not be effective as bone-regenerative therapy for critical-size defects.
114      To improve the efficacy and outcomes of regenerative therapy for furcation defects, the use of p
115 provide a significant step toward cell-based regenerative therapy for hypothyroidism.
116 rane for guided tissue regeneration (GTR) as regenerative therapy for intrabony defects in humans and
117 hment gain, and defect fill when employed as regenerative therapy for intraosseous lesions in humans.
118 racterize NP cells for developing cell-based regenerative therapy for IVD regeneration.
119                     Favorable outcomes after regenerative therapy for maxillary Class III furcation d
120 e conclusions regarding the effectiveness of regenerative therapy for the treatment of furcation defe
121 neration after the application of a combined regenerative therapy for the treatment of maxillary faci
122 ed since the first successful application of regenerative therapy for treatment of periodontal diseas
123                          Although cell-based regenerative therapies hold promise, cellular reprogramm
124 em/progenitor cells hold great potential for regenerative therapies; however, the mechanisms regulati
125               In the field of cardiovascular regenerative therapy, imaging cell fate after transplant
126 n myelin development and their potential for regenerative therapies in multiple sclerosis and dysmyel
127  autologous, patient-specific stem cells for regenerative therapies in the clinic.
128 s to be a useful and beneficial material for regenerative therapy in Class II furcation type periodon
129  long-term (2 to 5 year) clinical results of regenerative therapy in clinical private practice using
130 echnical factors may have on the outcomes of regenerative therapy in furcation defects.
131                            CAL-V achieved by regenerative therapy in IBDs may have retained stability
132                       3) Evidence supporting regenerative therapy in maxillary Class III furcation de
133 ogenitor cells (CPCs) is being evaluated for regenerative therapy in older patients with ischaemic he
134 ery small incisions indicated for performing regenerative therapy in periodontal defects.
135 ry small incisions, indicated for performing regenerative therapy in periodontal defects.
136 on and might be a pharmacological target for regenerative therapy in the CNS.
137                                 The study of regenerative therapy in the periodontal intrabony defect
138                         Neuro-protective and regenerative therapies, including the immunophilin ligan
139                        The success of tissue regenerative therapies is contingent on functional and m
140                      The goal of periodontal regenerative therapies is to reconstruct periodontal tis
141                              Stem cell-based regenerative therapy is a promising treatment for head a
142 he available evidence, it was concluded that regenerative therapy is a viable option to achieve predi
143  still needed to determine whether stem cell regenerative therapy is an effective treatment strategy
144   In order to design predictable periodontal regenerative therapies, it is important to understand th
145                In Class I furcation defects, regenerative therapy may be beneficial in certain clinic
146             4) In Class I furcation defects, regenerative therapy may be beneficial in certain clinic
147       The therapeutic success of periodontal regenerative therapy may be compromised by our limited u
148 l-mediated healing processes have made these regenerative therapies more clinically viable and will c
149 niche factors that are promising targets for regenerative therapies of corneal injuries.
150 /progenitors have considerable potential for regenerative therapies of liver, bile duct, and pancreat
151  thus be a valuable alternative for cellular regenerative therapies of neurological diseases.
152  and potentially providing a cell source for regenerative therapies of the kidney.
153           Factors influencing the outcome of regenerative therapy of Class II furcations are incomple
154  outcomes of a microsurgical approach in the regenerative therapy of deep intrabony defects.
155  Systemic DOXY, 200 mg/day for 7 days, after regenerative therapy of infrabony defects did not result
156         This aim of this study is to compare regenerative therapy of infrabony defects with and witho
157 e manner-which are ultimately useful for the regenerative therapy of periodontal tissues.
158   Early management of intrabony defects with regenerative therapies offers the greatest potential for
159  The clinical selection and application of a regenerative therapy or combination of therapies for per
160 r neurodegenerative disorders in the form of regenerative therapy or transplantation.
161 urgical reentry as a technique for assessing regenerative therapy outcomes.
162              The use of adult stem cells for regenerative therapy poses the challenging task of getti
163 d rational efforts to develop cell-based and regenerative therapies require knowledge of the molecula
164 , as this is a crucial step toward advancing regenerative therapy research for many intractable disor
165                                              Regenerative therapy resulted in significant attachment
166 domized controlled clinical trials comparing regenerative therapy (seven DBM, 22 BRG, and 26 GTR) to
167                                        Ideal regenerative therapies should be minimally invasive, and
168 igenesis and, thus, their implementation for regenerative therapy should be carefully considered in p
169                               Although these regenerative therapies support improvements in mean clin
170 oratory research such as gene, stem cell, or regenerative therapies targeting congenital or acquired
171                                              Regenerative therapies targeting PTEN may therefore supp
172 ignificant efforts have been directed toward regenerative therapies that may facilitate neuronal repa
173                                              Regenerative therapies that use allogeneic cells are lik
174                               Unlike current regenerative therapies that use single regenerative fact
175 lls provides a valuable strategy for cardiac regenerative therapy that avoids the need for preparing
176 hip or sham chip placement one week prior to regenerative therapy that included graft placement and s
177 treatment to other more traditional forms of regenerative therapy to determine its comparative effica
178 o describe the progress in cardiac stem cell regenerative therapy using adult stem cells and to highl
179 caused by periodontitis are often treated by regenerative therapy using autografts and/or allografts.
180 ient received surgical therapy consisting of regenerative therapy using bioactive glass compared to o
181 hment levels of intrabony defects treated by regenerative therapy using DFDBA.
182 Within the limitations of the present study, regenerative therapy using either EMD + DBBM or CM + DBB
183 mplant placement with or without concomitant regenerative therapy was carried out.
184 he outcome and predictability of periodontal regenerative therapies, we have focused on determining t
185 em cells are fundamental units for achieving regenerative therapies, which leads naturally to a theor
186 al changes in rat models following localized regenerative therapies, which may not be detected by con
187 ake collagen membranes attractive for use in regenerative therapy will be addressed.
188                   The expansion of cells for regenerative therapy will require the genetic dissection
189           They are an alternative source for regenerative therapies with a potential role in the trea
190 immune regulation of tumor growth as well as regenerative therapies with embryonal stem cells.

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top