ライフサイエンスコーパス: regional anesthesia

1 e use of ultrasound to facilitate peripheral regional anesthesia.

2 have all resulted in the growing demand for regional anesthesia.

3 eem to be improved compared with general and regional anesthesia.

4 f standard harvest techniques and general or regional anesthesia.

5 (97%) were performed in awake patients using regional anesthesia.

6 s of well tolerated and effective paediatric regional anesthesia.

7 nimize the risk of infection associated with regional anesthesia.

8 of infectious complications associated with regional anesthesia.

9 aduating residents better in the practice of regional anesthesia.

10 Regional anesthesia, alone or combined with general anes

11 Pain management therapy, including regional anesthesia, along with multimodal analgesia may

12 xamining short and long-term consequences of regional anesthesia/analgesia along with identification

13 idural insertion, and replacement for failed regional anesthesia/analgesia along with preparation for

14 Of 56,729 patients, 15,904 (28%) received regional anesthesia and 40,825 (72%) received general an

15 Furthermore, regional anesthesia and adjuncts are useful in the pedia

16 lts have given new strength to arguments for regional anesthesia and analgesia and led to the increas

17 The potential benefits and risks of regional anesthesia and analgesia at home are pertinent

18 e strength of the available data, the use of regional anesthesia and analgesia does provide improveme

19 The debate continues on whether regional anesthesia and analgesia improve outcome or not

20 ations, limitations and practical aspects of regional anesthesia and analgesia in critically ill medi

21 published peer-reviewed literature involving regional anesthesia and analgesia in patients at home.

22 Regional anesthesia and analgesia in the critically ill

23 specifically designed to evaluate the use of regional anesthesia and analgesia in the intensive care

24 rally indicate that the perioperative use of regional anesthesia and analgesia may be associated with

25 been a considerable increase in interest in regional anesthesia and neural blockade.

26 Neuroscience and Pain Institute, and US Army Regional Anesthesia and Pain Management Initiative.

27 its use as described by American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine guidelines.

28 ines as published by the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, American Society

29 thorities, including the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, have published gu

30 ecommendations and literature on training in regional anesthesia and suggest an improved model to pre

31 as fibre-optic intubation, ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia and transthoracic echocardiography a

32 a dedicated team of mentors with training in regional anesthesia, and adequate clinical volume are a

33 sia performance and practical strategies for regional anesthesia application in chronic pain patients

34 e benefits and complications associated with regional anesthesia are assessed on the basis of a revie

35 Paediatric specific data for regional anesthesia are available to help guide optimal

36 articles describing the use of clonidine in regional anesthesia are discussed.

37 Infectious complications associated with regional anesthesia are exceedingly rare events.

38 umerous potential benefits and advantages of regional anesthesia are keys to its continued popularity

39 The established outcome effects of regional anesthesia are mostly due its ability to provid

40 Regional anesthesia as a sole agent for surgical anesthe

41 y ill, nerve blocks, regional analgesia, and regional anesthesia, as well as a search in the Cochrane

42 Regional anesthesia, as well as hypnotics and opioids, p

43 ajority of carotid lesions are treated using regional anesthesia, but general anesthesia is currently

44 Regional anesthesia can be safely utilized in patients w

45 Despite difficulties, regional anesthesia can be used successfully in obese pa

46 Regional anesthesia can be utilized in a variety of surg

47 trospective studies indicate that the use of regional anesthesia can reduce cancer recurrence after s

48 Regional anesthesia certainly takes a leading role in th

49 York State undergoing hip repair, the use of regional anesthesia compared with general anesthesia was

50 e applications and indications for pediatric regional anesthesia continue to increase.

51 As the demand for regional anesthesia continues to increase in the years t

52 The choice of local anesthetics in regional anesthesia depends on desired onset, intensity,

53 Regional anesthesia, despite its well known clinical ben

54 Regional anesthesia during general anesthesia has become

55 The use of regional anesthesia, either alone or as an adjunct to ge

56 Many of the negative aspects of regional anesthesia evolve from the reality that current

57 ry criteria to capitalize on the benefits of regional anesthesia for ambulatory surgery.

58 ice guidelines have advocated greater use of regional anesthesia for hip fracture surgery.

59 most stimulating developments in the area of regional anesthesia for outpatients revolve around the u

60 agent for surgical anesthesia and the use of regional anesthesia for pain in nonsurgical pain patient

61 children particularly the use of intravenous regional anesthesia for sympathetic blockade for complex

62 rtain benefits from the use of clonidine for regional anesthesia, further investigations are necessar

63 Regional anesthesia has experienced a tremendous renaiss

64 Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia has increased the comfort level for

65 Regional anesthesia has numerous benefits for upper extr

66 tant practical and clinical implications for regional anesthesia implementation by anesthesiologists

67 es of local anesthetics in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia improves safety but should be weighe

68 echnology and available literature regarding regional anesthesia in infants and children undergoing h

69 The following is a review of regional anesthesia in obesity, with special considerati

70 Decisions to perform regional anesthesia in patients under anticoagulation sh

71 ent developments in the literature regarding regional anesthesia in the outpatient setting, and allow

72 dings do not support a mortality benefit for regional anesthesia in this setting.

73 Different routes for the administration of regional anesthesia, including intravenous, intrathecal

74 Regional anesthesia is a preferable anesthetic option fo

75 Regional anesthesia is an increasing but still underutil

76 The use of regional anesthesia is becoming increasingly popular for

77 ition, the subspecialty of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia is being further pioneered via both

78 Regional anesthesia is commonly used to provide intraope

79 s requires a more conservative approach when regional anesthesia is considered.

80 Regional anesthesia is controversial in patients with pr

81 Sedation of patients either with or without regional anesthesia is discussed to ascertain sedation r

82 Regional anesthesia is preferred to endotracheal intubat

83 The debate continues as to whether regional anesthesia is safer than general anesthesia.

84 ell established that the current teaching of regional anesthesia is suboptimal.

85 Excellent pain relief with regional anesthesia is well demonstrated in children.

86 The paediatric regional anesthesia literature lags behind literature av

87 With increases in use of regional anesthesia, local anesthetic systemic toxicity

88 Improvements in analgesic efficacy with regional anesthesia may attenuate pathophysiological sur

89 s a growing body of evidence suggesting that regional anesthesia may be superior to opioids for impro

90 a strong conclusion on whether or not using regional anesthesia might benefit the patient to decreas

91 urrent developments regarding the effects of regional anesthesia on perioperative outcome.

92 gery results from a judicious combination of regional anesthesia, opioids, and low doses of NMBAs.

93 re general (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.23-1.37) and regional anesthesia (OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.43-1.63), with

94 Several databases of paediatric regional anesthesia (over 46,000 regional anesthetics) d

95 The use of regional anesthesia particularly with ultrasound guidanc

96 The specifics of regional anesthesia performance and practical strategies

97 l features and physician selection of either Regional Anesthesia (peribulbar or retrobulbar block) wi

98 Regional anesthesia plays an important role in day case

99 In addition to quality analgesia, regional anesthesia provides a variety of benefits in th

100 Regional anesthesia provides well tolerated and effectiv

101 arch from 1966 to 2006 with the search terms regional anesthesia, regional analgesia, critically ill

102 The addition of clonidine to intravenous regional anesthesia resulted in prolongation of the tour

103 A structured regional anesthesia rotation, a dedicated team of mentor

104 inical starting point for the development of regional anesthesia skills.

105 757 matched patients (5.4%) who lived near a regional anesthesia-specialized hospital died vs 629 of

106 s article reviews the recent developments in regional anesthesia techniques and the modifications nec

107 ion of their condition(s) following surgery, regional anesthesia techniques for these patients is onl

108 nvestigate the rational for incorporation of regional anesthesia techniques into a multimodal approac

109 The use of regional anesthesia techniques is increasing in populari

110 publications suggest additional ways to add regional anesthesia techniques to outpatient surgical pr

111 This review highlights regional anesthesia techniques with focus on outpatient

112 TKA, 59.4%); Canadian patients received more regional anesthesia (THA, 78.7%; TKA, 81.0%).

113 of ultrasonography and its increasing use in regional anesthesia, there has been a renewed interest i

114 pain, the controversy on how and when to use regional anesthesia to avoid chronic pain persists.

115 Supplementary analyses also showed regional anesthesia to be associated with shorter length

116 Recent advances in the application of regional anesthesia to the care of patients undergoing s

117 Routine regional anesthesia use, multimodal postoperative nausea

118 In the near-far match, regional anesthesia was associated with a 0.6-day shorte

119 Historically, the practice of paediatric regional anesthesia was based largely on information fro

120 ional textbooks related to critical care and regional anesthesia were searched for practice recommend

121 t recent publications compares the safety of regional anesthesia with that of general anesthesia.

122 n are a challenge for anesthesiologists when regional anesthesia would be a beneficial component of t