ライフサイエンスコーパス: registry

1 om the Massachusetts General Hospital Stroke Registry).

2 Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry).

3 rlands, Belgium and United Kingdom, RECHARGE registry).

4 ge, race or ethnic group, calendar year, and registry).

5 gh 2011) with those from the Swedish Patient Registry.

6 e world with a nationally representative PCI registry.

7 xty-three ICUs in the Swedish Intensive Care Registry.

8 bjects were identified from a separate CCHMC registry.

9 od Institute-funded Pediatric Cardiomyopathy Registry.

10 rting to a prospectively maintained clinical registry.

11 collected retrospectively from a prospective registry.

12 cember 31, 2015, that are entered in the TVT Registry.

13 British Cardiovascular Intervention Society registry.

14 nt Register and Danish National Prescription Registry.

15 ctively added to a dedicated cardiac surgery registry.

16 cases were identified via the Finnish Cancer Registry.

17 lux surgery according to the Swedish Patient Registry.

18 entified through a regional population-based registry.

19 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry.

20 ing patient data linked to a national cancer registry.

21 n of patient size by using the CT Dose Index Registry.

22 s, of which 638 were not in our AERD patient registry.

23 alia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant registry.

24 the Dutch National Intensive Care Evaluation registry.

25 atus and therapy in the world's largest TAVR registry.

26 alia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry.

27 he participants to a population-based cancer registry.

28 uses a prospectively gathered clinical data registry.

29 trast volume as reported in the NCDR CathPCI Registry.

30 included in the Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry.

31 or kidney stones by querying a national dose registry.

32 participating in the National Oncologic PET Registry.

33 wide health databases and the National Death Registry.

34 inistrative databases and the Ontario Cancer registry.

35 Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence Registry.

36 o December 2014 in a prospective multicenter registry.

37 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries.

38 agnosed as having cancers reported to cancer registries.

39 Data were collected from 3 nationwide Danish registries.

40 ssessed from medical, criminal, and pharmacy registries.

41 ased, case-control study using Danish health registries.

42 ing developed to collect such resources into registries.

43 North American Association of Central Cancer Registries.

44 s, which are not included in national cancer registries.

45 n Childhood2000 (COPSAC2000) and in national registries.

46 ified through linkage with U.S. state cancer registries.

47 Patients with WDTC were identified from SEER registries.

48 k profile based on information from national registries.

49 Among the 1661 included in the registry, 1592 received a SAPIEN 3 valve and had assessm

50 US transplant registry linked with 17 cancer registries (1987-2014), we studied PCNSL and systemic no

51 had recruited twins from the Australian Twin Registry, 1992-93 (sample 1), 1996-2000 (sample 2), and

52 Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence registry (2008-2014) CHADS2 score of 0 or 1, we calculat

53 s were performed in 365 patients (96 initial registry, 269 continued access patients).

54 years; women, 1163 [46.8%]) included in the registry, 334 (13.4%) had CEAD IS and 2151 (86.6%) had n

55 o Anti-Platelet Regimens in Stented Patients Registry), 4222 patients who underwent percutaneous coro

56 tic Aneurysms and Cardiovascular Conditions) Registry (53% male; mean age 31 [range: 1-86 years]).

57 in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure) registry, 6,286 had a stable heart rate, defined as </=2

58 Of 1112 female patients in the registry, 669 (60.2%) had undergone intracranial imaging

59 September 22, 2016, in the US Zika Pregnancy Registry, a collaboration between the CDC and state and

60 r Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation) registry, a prospective, nationwide, outpatient registry

61 Administrative Code, the New Mexico HPV Pap Registry, a statewide public health surveillance program

62 proach (TFA) in a large prospective European registry adopting the hybrid algorithm for CTO percutane

63 people in the New York City HIV surveillance registry alive as of 1 January 2013 and diagnosed with H

64 use of INTCAR (International Cardiac Arrest Registry), an 87-question data set representing 44 cente

65 on through linkage with corresponding cancer registries and calculated standardised incidence ratios

66 ay serve as a model for developing ATSs from registries and cohorts in oncology and other fields requ

67 94 and October 1995 in one of six SEER tumor registries and who completed a 15-year follow-up survey.

68 d data discovery and access with a track hub registry and a selection of new REST end points.

69 ate educational records with a birth defects registry and birth certificates.

70 atient data from the California Tuberculosis Registry and calculated traffic volumes and traffic dens

71 ejection fraction and summarizes the current registry and clinical trial data applicable to this freq

72 ge whole-genome sequencing data bank, cancer registry and colorectal tumour bank we determine the pre

73 a registry was linked to the statewide death registry and Comprehensive Hospital Abstract Reporting S

74 in excellent agreement with the orientation, registry and dimensions of the epitaxial layers.

75 ined from the Collaborative Transplant Study registry and included European patients without pretrans

76 ada, was assembled using a provincial cancer registry and linked to population-based health-care data

77 Tumor registry and other electronic health records provided in

78 tionally, we used nationwide hospital/clinic registry and prescription data to examine the risk of an

79 METHODS AND R3F (French FFR Registry) and POST-IT (Portuguese Study on the Evaluatio

80 thousands of online databases (repositories, registries, and knowledgebases).

81 ial volume, age, sex, follow-up years in the registry, and cardiovascular factor (interaction, P = 0.

82 inked primary care, hospitalization, disease registry, and mortality data in England.

83 th Insurance Claims Data, the National Death Registry, and the bundled-payment enrollment file.

84 f bibliographic databases and clinical trial registries as of March 14, 2014 and hand searching were

85 berta Perinatal Stroke Project, a provincial registry, ascertained NHS cases using exhaustive diagnos

86 Disease Control and Prevention surveillance registry assessed trends in prophylaxis use and its impa

87 ermediate surgical risk were enrolled in the registry at 51 sites in the United States and Canada.

88 nts with EoE were recruited from an existing registry at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Cente

89 This registry-based cohort study used data from Danish nation

90 In the registry-based cohort, 3.7% (n = 62,728) were born to mo

91 I: 1.06-2.33; P = 0.03) after accounting for registry-based risk factors, including delayed graft fun

92 This was a registry-based study, and the study sample was obtained

93 Nationwide, registry-based, prospective cohort study of patients adm

94 onors with ITP recorded in the UK Transplant Registry between 2000 and 2015 were reviewed.

95 ients from the United States ALF Study Group registry between January 1998 and December 2016.

96 We identified CRC from the Ontario Cancer Registry between the index date and December 31, 2014.

97 registry to the subsequent continued access registry, both at 30 days (8.2% vs. 0.7%, respectively;

98 ing with ST were prospectively enrolled in a registry by using a centralized telephone registration s

99 s indicate that linkage with multiple cancer registries can be a sensitive method for ascertaining in

100 potential, using data from state-level land registries (CAR) in Para and Mato Grosso that were precu

101 S AND Using the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI registry, we assessed the incidence of

102 nts followed in the Canadian Cystic Fibrosis Registry (CCFR) and U.S. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Pati

103 and U.S. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry (CFFPR) between 1990 and 2013.

104 g data from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry collected between July 1, 2009, and March 31, 2

105 with the International Association of Cancer Registries, collected data on all malignancies and non-m

106 d States Immune Deficiency Network (USIDNET) registry compared with age-adjusted cancer incidence in

107 lower rate of ppFEV1 decline than in matched registry controls.

108 the earliest of either death, end of cancer-registry coverage, or Dec 31, 2012.

109 6 years or older, registered on the national registry CRISTAL for first single-organ heart transplant

110 After linking birth records and cancer registry data from California, we conducted a population

111 However, registry data suggest that many patients with DCM and an

112 n 1, 1998, and Dec 31, 2012, and used cancer registry data to identify incident cases of lung cancer.

113 UK Transplant Registry data were collected on deceased donor kidneys i

114 Materials and Methods California Cancer Registry data were used to estimate population-based can

115 of nonpregnancy-associated listeriosis using registry data.

116 sets can be used by researchers with cancer registry data.

117 2012 using statewide population-based cancer registry data.

118 ts Program releases research files of cancer registry data.

119 relations, all of which are contested by the registry data.

120 Prospectively collected multi-institutional registry data.

121 surveillance, and research that uses cancer registry data.

122 The Netherlands Cancer Registry database (2005-2013) identified all patients wh

123 Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry database.

124 METHODS AND From Swedish national registry databases, we used a corelative design with ful

125 racorporeal Life Support Organization's data registry during 2001-2013 were used for derivation (70%)

126 Registry enrollment began in 2008, and data were abstrac

127 In the Indiana University FIRM registry, FIRM-guided ablation produced high single-proc

128 ortality after linkage to national mortality registries for a median of 7.2 years.

129 Data from the National Adult Cardiac Surgery registry for all cardiac surgical procedures performed b

130 tests included the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) battery (Word L

131 transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (taTME) registry for benign and malignant rectal pathology.

132 d 9,749 patients from the ORBIT-AF (Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrill

133 Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry for enrollment.

134 ocedures were also registered in the Swedish registry for gallstone surgery and ERCP (GallRiks) and c

135 score incorporating 5 variables (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support c

136 ssociated with RVAD use included interagency registry for mechanically assisted circulatory support p

137 merican-Asian Pheochromocytoma-Paraganglioma Registry for prevalence of SDHA, TMEM127, MAX, and SDHAF

138 on Outcomes Network)-Get With The Guidelines Registry for quarterly Mission: Lifeline reports.

139 rosthesis and were examined in a prospective registry for short-term and 30-day outcomes.

140 linking data from the Swedish Medical Birth Registry (for births from 1992 through 2011) with those

141 Is were extracted from the French nationwide registries French Registry of Acute ST-Elevation or Non-

142 were identified through linkage with cancer registries from enrollment (2005-2007) to 2011.

143 primary care/hospital records, and national registries from the United States, Norway, Denmark, Swed

144 ey transplants recorded by the UK Transplant Registry from 2000 to 2012, it was concluded that the su

145 Deaths were obtained from a vital event registry from British Columbia, Canada.

146 tion's Get With the Guidelines-Resuscitation registry from January 1, 2000, to December 12, 2012.

147 nrolled in the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry from January 1, 2011, through June 30, 2013.

148 We analyzed data from the IRIS Registry, from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014, to

149 meta-analysis of progression in TRACK-HD and REGISTRY gave a genome-wide significant signal (p=1.12 x

150 d in 2014 to 2015 and identified by two SEER registries (Georgia and Los Angeles) were surveyed about

151 In the SEER 18 registry grouping (2000-2012), the highest incidence rat

152 Large international registries have characterized the epidemiology, cause, a

153 large-scale randomized trials and all-comer registries have shown excellent clinical results.

154 ALPPS centers of the International ALPPS Registry having performed >/=10 cases over a period of >

155 ge cohort of patients with MFS in the GenTAC registry, health-related QOL was below the population no

156 io <1.7) or not on anticoagulation from 1289 registry hospitals between October 2012 and March 2015.

157 sessed by using data from the Swedish Cancer Registry; however, one-third of patients with meningioma

158 iaries from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry ICD Registry undergoing first-time secondary pr

159 m the POST-IT and R3F Integrated Multicenter Registries - Implementation of FFR in Routine Practice).

160 hods We used linked data from HIV and cancer registries in nine US areas (1996 to 2012).

161 ed 1.7 million children from Danish national registries in the 35-year period 1977-2012.

162 ated using data from population-based cancer registries in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Re

163 Prevention of thromboembolic events-European Registry in Atrial Fibrillation).

164 KPD LDKTs facilitated by the National Kidney Registry in the United States from 2008 to 2015, compare

165 er study in patients from the Spanish Hepa-C registry investigated the effectiveness and safety of in

166 The Treatment-Resistant Depression Registry investigated whether adjunctive vagus nerve sti

167 rison of survival estimates between national registries is challenging because of inherent difference

168 Outcome and Cost EffectiveneSS of the S-ICD) registry is collecting outcomes in 985 patients during a

169 A prospective registry is needed to track the long-term risks of syste

170 The primary goal of the EFFORTLESS registry is to determine the safety of the S-ICD by eval

171 t Survivors with Preserved Ejection Fraction Registry) is a large registry of cardiac arrest survivor

172 ational Standard Randomised Controlled Trial registry (ISRCTN07742377), and is now closed to patient

173 as established from clinical assessments and registry linkages.

174 on the presence of IHD) was assessed through registry linkages.

175 na using data from the North Carolina Cancer Registry linked to administrative claims from Medicare,

176 horacic Surgeons/Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry linked to Medicare claims data, we identified p

177 Using data from the US transplant registry linked with 17 cancer registries (1987-2014), w

178 Linkage with these registries may be a cost-effective method of follow-up f

179 Patients and Methods Using Texas Cancer Registry-Medicare data, we assessed patients with ovaria

180 o March 2009 using the CF Foundation Patient Registry merged with Centers for Disease Control and Pre

181 As a result, the TVT registry model should be considered an alternative to th

182 The TVT registry model was found to have moderate discrimination

183 2 p=2.15 x 10(-9)) and to a lesser extent in REGISTRY (MSH3 p=9.36 x 10(-4)DHFR p=8.45 x 10(-4)MTRNR2

184 iser Permanente Northern California Diabetes Registry (n = 434,806 person-years; 2007-2010).

185 ear cancer survivors, using the state cancer registry (n = 5,455) and the general population (n = 16,

186 METHODS AND Using data from the Uganda RHD Registry (n=1504), we identified the proportion of patie

187 ECTS are present in the North American SUDEP Registry (NASR).

188 participating in the National Oncologic PET Registry (NOPR).

189 was prospectively registered with the ISRCTN registry, number 65314790.

190 However, registries of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests demonstrat

191 tal aspects of the adsorption, including the registries of the adsorption complexes, adsorption energ

192 Multicenter, nonrandomized registry of 1661 patients at intermediate or high surgic

193 heart rate (80 versus 72), had higher Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk score (129 versus

194 from the French nationwide registries French Registry of Acute ST-Elevation or Non-ST-Elevation Myoca

195 We also analyzed data from a national registry of ambulance transports and investigated whethe

196 (Registry of Aortic Valve Bioprostheses Established by Ca

197 erved Ejection Fraction Registry) is a large registry of cardiac arrest survivors where initial asses

198 rotors and focal sources in a large academic registry of consecutive patients undergoing source mappi

199 for CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (Registry of CrossBoss and Hybrid Procedures in France, t

200 The national registry of GenTAC (Genetically Triggered Thoracic Aorti

201 10 were identified from the Dutch nationwide registry of histopathology and cytopathology (PALGA) and

202 e data were extracted from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway.

203 A prospectively maintained registry of patients evaluated for pancreatic cysts was

204 From a prospective registry of patients referred for coronary angiography,

205 This study used a prospectively gathered registry of patients with AIS to select patients admitte

206 dent cohort obtained from a population-based registry of patients with ALS.

207 need for a longitudinal multicenter, global registry of patients with HFpEF to map its natural histo

208 istry, a prospective, nationwide, outpatient registry of patients with incident and prevalent AF.

209 ng biobricks from synthetic biology database Registry of Standard Biological Parts, six combinations

210 nt contribution to the adsorption energy and registry of the layers.

211 Jan 1, 2007, and Dec 31, 2014, from the case registry of the South London and Maudsley Trust (London,

212 We integrated national Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data (1987-2015) with

213 Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data from June 2013 to

214 0 to 2015 were analyzed using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data set.

215 We used Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data to compare patien

216 Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients report cards of US org

217 Data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients were linked to IMS pha

218 Methods We retrieved data from SEER 13 registries on 36,337 patients age 0 to 19 years diagnose

219 ge of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry on patients commercially treated with transcath

220 METHODS AND In the OPEN CTO registry (Outcomes, Patient health status, and Efficienc

221 ional analysis of Get With The Guidelines-HF registry participants who were admitted for decompensate

222 vascularization through the Dutch population registry, patient phone calls, general practitioners, an

223 (Pediatric Cardiomyopathy Registry [PCMR]; NCT00005391).

224 and BK from the Singapore Cornea Transplant Registry performed from 1991 to 2011.

225 s.gov, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception to December 2016, confe

226 Validation in the IABP-SHOCK II registry population showed good discrimination with an a

227 lity and length of stay after adjustment for registry-predicted risk, case-mix, and surgeon using mix

228 From the TMVR multicenter registry, procedural and clinical outcomes of mitral ViV

229 From the pure native AR TAVR multicenter registry, procedural and clinical outcomes were assessed

230 The TRACK-HD and REGISTRY progression measures were correlated with each

231 Nationwide registries provided individually updated information abo

232 Participants were observed via cancer registries, questionnaires, and notification by centers.

233 ), and with age at onset (TRACK-HD, r=0.315; REGISTRY, r=0.234).

234 atrial fibrillation in this large outpatient registry received care that differed in some respect fro

235 Materials and Methods The Cancer Registry Regulation approved this retrospective study.

236 e of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry's outpatient Practice Innovation and Clinical E

237 detected by linkage with the 23 state cancer registries (sensitivity of 89%, 95% confidence interval

238 ere asthma multicenter studies and available registries showed data consistency across European and A

239 e government claims that a new national land registry (SICAR), introduced under the revised law, coul

240 In the absence of a formal national clinical registry since regulatory approval in March 2015, we obt

241 The National Cardiovascular Data Registry Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College o

242 lishment of primary immunodeficiency disease registries, stem cell transplantation facilities, and ne

243 This national registry study demonstrates for the first time poorer wa

244 This population-based registry study, devised by the International Agency for

245 In a national, multicenter registry study, hospitalized patients who were diagnosed

246 In the health registry study, moderate-severe AD patients had increase

247 , used data from the Danish National Patient Registry that were cross-checked with the Danish Breast

248 f MINOCA patients recorded in the SWEDEHEART registry (the Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Dev

249 Using medical registries, the authors identified children (<18 years o

250 d simulations using clinical data from 2 KPD registries-the Alliance for Paired Donation, which runs

251 MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and trial registries through June 2016; references; and experts, w

252 MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and trial registries through October 2015, references, and experts

253 cohort was linked to the Netherlands Cancer Registry, through March 31, 2015; participant characteri

254 rt study, we linked nationwide Danish health registries to identify all patients with a first hospita

255 We used the California Cancer Registry to calculate age-adjusted incidence rates for o

256 re cross-referenced with the National Cancer Registry to determine incidence of PTLD.

257 We established a prospective registry to determine the risks associated with MRI at a

258 e data from the Pediatric Contact Dermatitis Registry to elucidate the associations and sensitization

259 attempted using data from the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) from January 1, 201

260 treatment were linked to the Ontario Cancer Registry to identify all patients with colon cancer who

261 sis using the Veterans Affairs Clinical Case Registry to identify HIV/HCV GT1-coinfected veterans ini

262 the Extracorporeal Life Support Organisation registry to identify risk factors for poor outcomes in a

263 , active surveillance of a national clinical registry to monitor the safety of an implantable vascula

264 Mortality fell from the initial registry to the subsequent continued access registry, bo

265 (18)F-FDG PET in patients in the Dutch GIST registry treated with neoadjuvant imatinib.

266 he National Cardiovascular Data Registry ICD Registry undergoing first-time secondary prevention ICD

267 were followed in the Danish National Patient Registry until first hospitalization, death, or the end

268 This cohort study of a large national data registry used a cohort of renal transplant recipients fr

269 n cohort and 0.66 (0.61-0.71) in the BernPCI registry validation cohort.

270 Among 2520 registry visits, 1221 were excluded for transfer from an

271 ohort study using the Victorian State Trauma Registry (VSTR) was undertaken.

272 in the PARTNER 1 trial and continued access registries was conducted in 25 centers in the United Sta

273 ctive cohort constructed from a state trauma registry was linked to the statewide death registry and

274 The United Network of Organ Sharing registry was reviewed for adult living donor kidney tran

275 ge of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry was used to characterize the anesthesia choice

276 Using data from Danish registries, we followed 21,152 patients diagnosed with s

277 Methods Using Danish registries, we identified adults diagnosed with aggressi

278 METHODS AND In a 10-site US PCI registry, we assessed angina before and at 1, 6, and 12

279 ational Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI registry, we assessed the incidence of AKI among Medicar

280 alia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, we examined the association between DGF, graft

281 t Association Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Registry, we examined the outcomes of use of thrombolyti

282 of data from a population-based colonoscopy registry, we found index large SP or index STSA with no

283 ow-up evaluation through the National Cancer Registry, we identified 168 interval colorectal cancers

284 From the same registry, we identified a population with essential hype

285 From the PodoNet Registry, we obtained longitudinal clinical information

286 From the United Kingdom TTP registry, we undertook a prospective study investigating

287 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries were included.

288 he multi-institutional Research Patient Data Registry were used.

289 st NOTES registry worldwide-the German NOTES registry-were analyzed with respect to demographic data,

290 collected data from the US Cancer Statistics registry, which covers 97% of the population, and calcul

291 he Extracorporeal Life Support International Registry who received extracorporeal life support for ca

292 uding environmental exposures in prospective registries will likely provide further insight into the

293 n populations covered by high-quality cancer registries with complete data for 2001-10.

294 Data from the Norwegian Renal Registry with all renal transplanted men alive between J

295 Prospective clinical registry with data collected from September 2014 to Marc

296 om the Get With the Guidelines Heart Failure registry with Medicare data.

297 mbined data from the Veterans Affairs Cancer Registry with the Surgical Quality Improvement Program t

298 Further development of both patients' registries worldwide and innovative drugs is still neede

299 The first 217 data sets of the largest NOTES registry worldwide-the German NOTES registry-were analyz

300 Clinical trial registry: yes, www.trialregister.nl, trial number: NTR53