戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 re, a reduction in the value of a particular reinforcer).
2 as the rat ceases to respond for the omitted reinforcer.
3 rained to poke into a hole for a food-pellet reinforcer.
4 onsible for encoding features of the primary reinforcer.
5 by the delivery and removal of a conditioned reinforcer.
6 ces after devaluation of the associated food reinforcer.
7 vantage of being an objectively quantifiable reinforcer.
8 cohol-associated cue to act as a conditioned reinforcer.
9 effort allocation relative to an anticipated reinforcer.
10 g format transferred to an operant secondary reinforcer.
11 sociations between whisker stimulation and a reinforcer.
12 adjust their CRs to the current value of the reinforcer.
13 sponse for an alcohol-associated conditioned reinforcer.
14 lcohol-associated CS acting as a conditioned reinforcer.
15  the current value of the aversive, negative reinforcer.
16 timuli that were separately paired with that reinforcer.
17 ent incentive value of the aversive negative reinforcer.
18 e monkeys in which CP 55 940 functioned as a reinforcer.
19 pitch of that syllable to avoid the aversive reinforcer.
20 ects on reward learning using a natural food reinforcer.
21 nitially homogenously represent value of the reinforcer.
22 lf-stimulation (ICSS) serves as the positive reinforcer.
23 sentation of a reward-associated conditioned reinforcer.
24 ved pairings of a noise stimulus with a food reinforcer.
25 riginal and new cues is paired with the same reinforcer.
26 rent cohort by using vegetable pieces as the reinforcer.
27 h consummatory and appetitive responding for reinforcers.
28 ted selectively with highly salient positive reinforcers.
29 scriminate the types and magnitudes of fluid reinforcers.
30  reinforcers, such as money, than by primary reinforcers.
31 hat link cues to the incentive properties of reinforcers.
32 n drug-associated cues acting as conditioned reinforcers.
33  along with reduced responsivity to positive reinforcers.
34 ehavior can do so by acting as incentives or reinforcers.
35 aluation involving its transfer to secondary reinforcers.
36 r the control of drug-associated conditioned reinforcers.
37 cocaine as opposed to palatable conventional reinforcers.
38 sented contingently, that is, as conditioned reinforcers.
39 terior VTA in the rewarding effects of other reinforcers.
40 asure how hard an animal would work for food reinforcers.
41  to the incentive-motivation to acquire food reinforcers.
42 wn to subserve behaviors governed by natural reinforcers.
43 ed the efficiency by which subjects obtained reinforcers.
44 tive during operant responding for different reinforcers.
45 ich responding was maintained by conditioned reinforcers.
46 ated cues and hyposensitivity to alternative reinforcers.
47  of contemporary life that involve secondary reinforcers.
48  control subjects correlated highly for both reinforcers.
49 cies conditioned with salt or electric shock reinforcers [4-7], learned avoidances of odors paired wi
50 tive association between sensory stimuli and reinforcers accompanies adult experience-dependent corti
51 se experiments show that CSE is an effective reinforcer acting via nicotinic receptors.
52  learning involved, the authors devalued the reinforcer after training by inducing a taste aversion t
53 tioned place paradigm using amphetamine as a reinforcer and in an operant conditioning paradigm using
54 " reinforcers (food and water), or a natural reinforcer and intravenous self-administration of cocain
55 mine levels is believed to act as a positive reinforcer and to mediate some of the acute responses to
56 f, and potentially in conflict with, primary reinforcers and as such may play a fundamental role in c
57 as maintained by drug-associated conditioned reinforcers and assessed using a second-order schedule o
58 1 signaling in motivation for highly salient reinforcers and may represent a unique opportunity to de
59 d ("surprising") outcomes are more effective reinforcers and produce a greater dopamine response than
60 inction sessions during which the respective reinforcers and S(D) were withheld.
61 re we address whether the OT encodes natural reinforcers and serves as a substrate for motivational i
62 ediate the behavioral effects of conditioned reinforcers and their losses.
63        We trained mice to nose poke for food reinforcers and then stimulated this region using CaMKII
64 e choice and toward choice of an alternative reinforcer) and 20 h/day cocaine access (to allow high-c
65 onses: those whose form is determined by the reinforcer, and those whose form is determined by charac
66 t training contingencies, single or multiple reinforcers, and associative or motivational devaluation
67 reinforcers, the undervaluing of alternative reinforcers, and deficits in inhibitory control for drug
68 ess to exert high levels of effort to obtain reinforcers, and have important implications for underst
69 d differentially by CSs and that conditioned reinforcers are especially important for maintaining pro
70            However, because expectations and reinforcers are typically manipulated together, the role
71 rack, update, and modulate the salience of a reinforcer as a function of context and expectation and
72 s to provide the affective value of specific reinforcers as accessed by associated conditioned stimul
73 s sensitive to the relative value of sucrose reinforcers, as assessed by a behavioral contrast paradi
74        Thus, CCP is mediated by the stimulus-reinforcer association; when the reinforcer is devalued,
75 lified further when the numbers of substrate-reinforcer associations are increased.
76 ards and punishers, and in learning stimulus-reinforcer associations.
77                                  Two nonfood reinforcers [Baby Einstein-Baby MacDonald shows (study 1
78 cesses that motivate animals to work for any reinforcer, be it a natural reward or a drug.
79 ith multiple instrumental responses and food reinforcers but before devaluation of one reinforcer by
80                                Devaluing the reinforcer by inducing sensory-specific satiety altered
81 od reinforcers but before devaluation of one reinforcer by selective satiation.
82  correlated with the palatability of sucrose reinforcers; changes in neural activity in this class co
83 reviously associated with or without (S+/S-) reinforcer (cocaine/sucrose) availability while undergoi
84  patterned discharges across the two natural reinforcer conditions.
85  firing patterns across the drug and natural reinforcer conditions.
86 to increases in conditioning to the original reinforcer, consistent with the Pearce-Hall (1980) and o
87 king due to direct conditioning by the added reinforcer, consistent with the Rescorla-Wagner (1972) m
88 ral processing immediately before and during reinforcer consumption: inhibitions related to initiatio
89 ffects on mood and cognition that are strong reinforcers contributing to addiction.
90  prevalence, it is not known how conditioned reinforcers control human or other animal behaviour.
91 responding for a food-associated conditioned reinforcer (CR), nor was d-amphetamine potentiation of C
92 r reward-related stimuli [termed conditioned reinforcers (CR)].
93 ntiate responding for appetitive conditioned reinforcers (CRfs), also regulate avoidance responding f
94 mental action (lever press) was required for reinforcer delivery.
95 the control over drug seeking by conditioned reinforcers depends on D3 receptor-dependent dopamine tr
96  that lesions of the BLA will interfere with reinforcer devaluation after appetitive Pavlovian or ins
97 ibution of rat BLA to specific components of reinforcer devaluation and are the first to show impairm
98  we assessed the effects of sensory-specific reinforcer devaluation as a way to probe each monkey's u
99 othesis that BLA is critical for conditioned reinforcer devaluation during the period when the primar
100 xcitotoxic lesions of the amygdala attenuate reinforcer devaluation effects in monkeys and rats.
101 removals showed a significant attenuation of reinforcer devaluation effects on each of two separate a
102 teracts with the amygdala and PFo to mediate reinforcer devaluation effects.
103  excitotoxic amygdala damage interfered with reinforcer devaluation effects.
104 tion and are the first to show impairment in reinforcer devaluation following transient inactivation
105 ficant detrimental effects of BLA lesions on reinforcer devaluation in a Pavlovian autoshaping proced
106                               Here we used a reinforcer devaluation paradigm to investigate the contr
107                         Here, we have used a reinforcer devaluation paradigm to test this hypothesis.
108 daptive behavior using reversal learning and reinforcer devaluation paradigms.
109 l as unoperated controls were tested using a reinforcer devaluation procedure.
110 duce their conditioned responding after such reinforcer devaluation procedures, animals with BLA lesi
111                                           In reinforcer devaluation procedures, conditioned respondin
112 istinct from that of BLA for the conditioned reinforcer devaluation process in monkeys.
113 lso tested the amygdalectomized monkeys on a reinforcer devaluation task and compared their performan
114 nown to be sensitive to amygdala damage, the reinforcer devaluation task.
115 d shell during training and performance of a reinforcer devaluation task.
116 with BLA damage show impaired performance in reinforcer devaluation tasks, in which the value of the
117 -directed behavior, including performance on reinforcer devaluation tasks.
118 erentially about outcome-specific cues after reinforcer devaluation that are related to behavioral pe
119 f predictive reward value in humans, we used reinforcer devaluation while measuring neural activity w
120 e outcome is predicted by affective signals (reinforcer devaluation) or by visual signals conveying r
121 x unoperated controls for their responses to reinforcer devaluation, a task that assesses the monkeys
122 od-specific satiety, Pavlovian conditioning, reinforcer devaluation, and simultaneous visual discrimi
123 -DREADDs increased behavioral sensitivity to reinforcer devaluation, whereas Bdnf knockdown blocked s
124  processes--for example, fear extinction and reinforcer devaluation--that involve updating representa
125 ected outcome values to guide behavior after reinforcer devaluation.
126 bust shifts in object choices in response to reinforcer devaluation.
127 as neural mediators of adaptive responses to reinforcer devaluation.
128 d) is sufficient to impair the expression of reinforcer devaluation.
129 impair the sensitivity of that responding to reinforcer devaluation.
130 he neural circuitry mediating the effects of reinforcer devaluation.
131                   Amygdala ablation disrupts reinforcer "devaluation" in monkeys.
132  decreased pressing on the test day when the reinforcer earned during training was the sated flavor (
133 havioral economic model was used to quantify reinforcer effectiveness with food pellets obtained as a
134 d performance on reversal tasks and enhanced reinforcer efficacy.
135 ratio performance, reflecting a reduction in reinforcer efficacy.
136 ood, cocaine or a direct dopamine agonist as reinforcers, fixed ratio and progressive ratio schedules
137 valuation during the period when the primary reinforcer (food) is being devalued (by feeding it to sa
138 d ratio (FR)1, FR1] for either two "natural" reinforcers (food and water), or a natural reinforcer an
139 ns between objects and two different primary reinforcers (foods) were presented with choices of objec
140 signal classifier to serve successfully as a reinforcer for an adaptive controller performing a virtu
141 sured by examining its ability to serve as a reinforcer for second-order conditioning of a tone when
142 hrough observation) behavior that leads to a reinforcer for which they are unmotivated at the time of
143                                          The reinforcers for drug-negative samples were plastic chips
144 ed to variations in processing of either the reinforcer, for example, the Rescorla-Wagner (1972) mode
145                        Positive and negative reinforcers guide our behaviors as we interact with othe
146  same effects occurred with saccharin as the reinforcer in olfactory conditioning.
147 s suggests that increased motivation for the reinforcer in PWS-IC mice may underlie their enhanced le
148 di-n-propyl-2-aminotetralin (7-OH-DPAT) is a reinforcer in rhesus monkeys trained to self-administer
149  by the finding that cocaine functioned as a reinforcer in subordinate but not dominant monkeys.
150 ight/tone stimulus to serve as a conditioned reinforcer in the acquisition of a new instrumental resp
151 ther the animal earned or lost a conditioned reinforcer in the current or previous trial.
152 overy time to consume water after a negative reinforcer in the modified Vogel conflict test.
153          Thus, morphine served as a positive reinforcer in the wild-type and heterozygous mice but fa
154 CP 55 940 (0.001-3.0 mug/kg) functioned as a reinforcer in three monkeys, whereas THC (0.01-10 mug/kg
155 en THC SA was reexamined, it functioned as a reinforcer in three monkeys.
156 schedule of reinforcement; THC functioned as reinforcer in two monkeys.
157  agonist remifentanil functioned as positive reinforcers in both genotypes.
158 thetical monetary rewards are widely used as reinforcers in risk taking and decision making studies.
159 umental transfer, PIT), serve as conditioned reinforcers in the establishment of new learning, and be
160  to the formation and use of expectancies of reinforcers in the guidance of goal-directed behavior.
161 nist quinelorane both functioned as positive reinforcers in wild-type mice but not in D1 receptor mut
162 reover, by manipulating UCS aversiveness via reinforcer inflation, we showed that a CS+ retains acces
163 ined how the use of this palatable food as a reinforcer influences learning in PWS-IC mice performing
164 gs increased the number of choice trials and reinforcer intake, but effects on choice behavior did no
165       In second-order fear conditioning, the reinforcer is a fear-eliciting conditioned stimulus rath
166                 However, if the value of the reinforcer is altered when the compound is presented, th
167 he stimulus-reinforcer association; when the reinforcer is devalued, the preference is also abolished
168 delaying gratification when a higher quality reinforcer is present and that tool experience can influ
169 uation tasks, in which the value of the food reinforcer is reduced by satiation or food-toxin pairing
170 sponse-contingent cocaine-paired conditioned reinforcers, is markedly attenuated by infusion of the d
171 comes can come to act as substitutes for the reinforcer itself.
172                                      Natural reinforcers, like food and sex, activate this pathway, t
173 in motivational state (food deprivation) and reinforcer magnitude (food presentation) on c-Fos immuno
174 inatorial function of motivational state and reinforcer magnitude.
175                                  Conditioned reinforcers maintain behavior over protracted periods of
176  suggests that strengthening the alternative reinforcers may have a protective effect against childho
177 reinforcer suggesting that AIE did not alter reinforcer motivation.
178  show that anandamide serves as an effective reinforcer of drug-taking behavior when self-administere
179        Intravenous 2-AG was a very effective reinforcer of drug-taking behavior, maintaining higher n
180 ing anandamide analog, similarly serves as a reinforcer of drug-taking behavior.
181 roles in tobacco and marijuana dependence as reinforcers of drug-seeking and drug-taking behavior.
182 y reduce excessive drive to consume positive reinforcers of high salience.
183          According to the Pearce-Hall model, reinforcer omission on compound trials should enhance th
184 ate the impact of revaluation of an aversive reinforcer on avoidance behavior using pharmacological a
185 scrimination, the surprising omission of the reinforcer on compound trials would enhance the associab
186 cell bodies could serve as a direct positive reinforcer on intracranial self-photostimulation assays.
187 te neurons or terminals serves as a positive reinforcer on operant behavioural assays.
188  However, the effect of removing conditioned reinforcers on choices has not been explored in animals,
189 ssary for maintaining the value of secondary reinforcers, once they have been learned.
190 encies (Pavlovian or operant), the number of reinforcers (one vs. two), and the order of experiments
191 array of eight boxes, each containing a food reinforcer; one box may be opened per trial, with trials
192  disrupting operant responding for a nondrug reinforcer or motor activity.
193 rmation about the current incentive value of reinforcers or the use of that information to guide beha
194 did not affect motivation to work for a food reinforcer, or food preferences, per se.
195 vior, the representation of the value of the reinforcer, or the capacity to use reward associated cue
196 ecreased likelihood to select an alternative reinforcer over aggression, heightened relapse vulnerabi
197 mined MC responses following alternated odor-reinforcer pairings.
198 matory behaviors and excitations that encode reinforcer palatability.
199 dominantly inhibitions, was not sensitive to reinforcer palatability; rather, these inhibitions were
200 used no devaluation impairment in a multiple-reinforcer Pavlovian devaluation task.
201                          Monkeys received 30 reinforcers per session, and metabolic mapping was condu
202                          Monkeys received 30 reinforcers per session, and metabolic mapping was condu
203 + rats also exhibited more approaches to the reinforcer receptacle at nonreinforcement times.
204 l traits predict the disinterest for natural reinforcers remains unknown.
205  in response to pharmacological and monetary reinforcers, respectively.
206 d seeking in rats and that these effects are reinforcer selective and not due to adverse malaise symp
207 learning task in which an auditory secondary reinforcer signals which of 2 stimuli will be reinforced
208 rtheless, the gain and loss of a conditioned reinforcer significantly increased and decreased, respec
209 at this DBS effect was both anatomically and reinforcer specific.
210 VP infusions showed both neuroanatomical and reinforcer specificity because no effects were seen in s
211 onsistent with a galanin-induced decrease in reinforcer strength.
212 gh which neutral stimuli, once paired with a reinforcer such as a drug, have the capacity to motivate
213 mbic system mediates procurement of positive reinforcers such as food and sex; however, drugs of abus
214 ward site for the mediation of unconditioned reinforcers such as food.
215  states produced by presentation of negative reinforcers, such as electric shock, and the omission of
216 tensively with regions responding to primary reinforcers, such as food.
217 shock, and the omission of expected positive reinforcers, such as food.
218 be more powerfully influenced by conditioned reinforcers, such as money, than by primary reinforcers.
219 lever-pressed for alcohol versus the nondrug reinforcer sucrose.
220 rences in progressive ratio response for the reinforcer suggesting that AIE did not alter reinforcer
221 ng a motivated reward-seeking state, or as a reinforcer, supporting continued instrumental responding
222 stimuli conditioned to a potent conventional reinforcer, sweetened condensed milk (SCM).
223 ith greater vigor when cocaine served as the reinforcer than did Lewis rats; for food, this relation
224     Nicotine is less effective as a positive reinforcer than other drugs of abuse in non-dependent an
225              This means that relief may be a reinforcer that elicits conditioned appetitive behavior,
226 choices were guided by an auditory secondary reinforcer that had been previously associated with food
227                           Food is a powerful reinforcer that motivates people to eat.
228 ve devaluation of natural or socially-valued reinforcers that are unable to divert addicts from seeki
229   But whereas this can be useful for primary reinforcers that can impact survival, it can also underl
230 ignals, including responses to other primary reinforcers that govern nicotine dependence in smokers.
231  of nonresponse-contingent deliveries of the reinforcer (that theoretically reduced the role of gener
232 ses, which result in the overvaluing of drug reinforcers, the undervaluing of alternative reinforcers
233 ng based on the value of a given reward, or "reinforcer." The medial orbitofrontal cortex (mOFC), a s
234 behavioural assessment of the ability of the reinforcer to activate amygdala neurons in the presence
235 rared spectroscopy (NIRS), can be applied as reinforcers to an adaptable artificial learning agent in
236               The ability to use conditioned reinforcers to guide our behaviour is normally beneficia
237 S+) no longer predicts delivery of a salient reinforcer (unconditioned stimulus, UCS).
238 sensitive to the omission of the conditioned reinforcer, unlike that of control animals, for which re
239 rogressively harder to obtain a food reward (reinforcer) until they stopped clicking (ie, the breakpo
240 atability of the three different formulas of reinforcers used.
241 ppropriate registration of the change in the reinforcer value but not for the subsequent expression o
242 ithout effect on postconditioning changes in reinforcer value if initial learning is only about the s
243 maintaining or using sensory associations of reinforcer value when multiple outcomes must be coded bu
244 or mice to sustain stable representations of reinforcer value.
245  the breakpoint), which was a measure of the reinforcer value.
246 istering or updating cues to reflect updated reinforcer values, but not for guiding choices once the
247 high effort options leading to highly valued reinforcers vs low effort/low reward options, and such t
248                     A manipulation where the reinforcer was devalued impaired wild-type performance b
249 reased discounting; preference for the large reinforcer was enhanced 30-45% at the most uncertain pro
250 n the occurrence of unblocking when the food reinforcer was increased in quantity at the time of intr
251 he active lever during signaled periods when reinforcer was not available; in contrast, tPA-/- mice d
252 evalued) compared with the test day when the reinforcer was not the sated flavor (nondevalued), demon
253  saline injections during the weeks when the reinforcer was plain gelatin.
254                         The delivery of each reinforcer was signaled by different auditory stimuli.
255  effects of gaining and losing a conditioned reinforcer, we trained rhesus monkeys for a matching pen
256  between two odors associated with different reinforcers, we examined MC responses following alternat
257            Here we found that, when multiple reinforcers were used, posttraining BLA lesions disrupte
258 tion problems based on an auditory secondary reinforcer, were given lesions of the rhinal cortex or t
259 n of increased instrumental responding for a reinforcer when in the presence of Pavlovian conditioned
260 ike agonist quinelorane served as a positive reinforcer when substituted for cocaine.
261  of stimulus valence when cocaine is used as reinforcer, whereas early visual cortex is involved in r
262 postconditioning changes in the value of the reinforcer, whereas rats with CN lesions, like normal ra
263 l responses in pursuit of beer and chocolate reinforcers while their EEG reactivity to beer, chocolat
264 nstatement and responding with a conditioned reinforcer, while having no effect on cocaine-induced re
265 cquiring affective properties of the primary reinforcer with which it is associated.
266  task, devaluation caused rats to reject the reinforcer, yet they continued to accurately win-shift,

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top