ライフサイエンスコーパス: relative growth

1 ated with body weight in terms of phenotypic relative growth.

2 wn about the effect of genomic imprinting on relative growth.

3 mically induced colonic cancers may confer a relative growth advantage during colonic malignant trans

4 ell growth and that Atg1 mutant cells have a relative growth advantage under conditions of reduced TO

5 cent labeling and exogenous variation of the relative growth and conversion rates.

6 time measurement of precise and simultaneous relative growth and protein synthesis rates of multiplex

7 New experiments reveal that the relative growth between cell surface area and volume are

8 ous and isotropic forces that arise from the relative growth between the gut tube and the anchoring d

9 aps of various growth descriptors, including relative growth, directionality, and anisotropy.

10 ley proposed an appealingly simple model of "relative growth"-in which an organ and the whole body gr

11 At cooler sites, the relative growth increase was greater than at warmer site

12 Changes in relative growth indicated variation in host capacity to

13 ne combination, this extended to an enhanced relative growth inhibition of a heterologous parasite li

14 Relative growth is often used as a phenotypic measure to

15 These results are synthesized into a relative-growth model that applies to questions ranging

16 tte smoking with the rate of progression and relative growth of GA.

17 ive trait nucleotides (QTNs) associated with relative growth of individual tissues and organs to body

18 timate genome-wide imprinting effects on the relative growth of multiple tissues and organs to body w

19 nificant phytotoxicity was observed based on relative growth of plants and stress enzyme activities.

20 late osmolytes, we observed some increase in relative growth of proline-overaccumulating cells in mil

21 her, only two imprinted QTNs responsible for relative growth of spleen and liver were verified by gen

22 y on the measurable geometry, elasticity and relative growth of the tissues.

23 on depend in large measure on changes in the relative growth of the various parts of the body.

24 Relative growth of transport verses endocrine zones of t

25 lings of the four species as the quotient of relative growth rate (RGR) and photosynthesis per unit t

26 Precipitation redistribution reduced relative growth rate (RGR) of trees grown with grass.

27 Relative growth rate (RGR), leaf water potential (psi w)

28 nt growth using a size-corrected estimate of relative growth rate (RGR).

29 There is no requirement that relative growth rate be frequency dependent.

30 each cell lineage reaches this same maximum relative growth rate but at different times.

31 manner and that an allele's arithmetic mean relative growth rate is greater than one when rare and t

32 han one when rare and that its harmonic mean relative growth rate is less than one when common.

33 iation appear to be not linked to changes in relative growth rate of cells compared to their neighbor

34 hat allows us to measure the size, shape and relative growth rate of each of the crystal faces that a

35 ished in empirical studies, namely, that the relative growth rate of grasses is much higher compared

36 The relative growth rate of HDPCs of modified groups were hi

37 The latter was compared with the relative growth rate to estimate the rate of protein deg

38 The relative growth rate was estimated from sequential deter

39 te functional trait spectra with theories of relative growth rate, and metabolic scaling.

40 ored trait, which may influence variation in relative growth rate, appears to vary directionally acro

41 Building on foundational work on relative growth rate, recent work on functional trait sp

42 nal traits interact to regulate variation in relative growth rate, the allometric growth normalizatio

43 th equation, we estimated asymptotic growth, relative growth rate, the timing of inflection point and

44 wever, at 5 degrees C, NahG plants displayed relative growth rates about one-third greater than Col-0

45 s zeolite crystal shape modifiers to enhance relative growth rates along the desirable out-of-plane d

46 nt pollen tubes displayed normal morphology, relative growth rates for the most rapidly growing tubes

47 We detected increased local relative growth rates in the formation of the precentral

48 The relative growth rates of different biological organs (al

49 MMinte assesses the relative growth rates of interacting pairs of organisms

50 d by microbial immigration, elimination, and relative growth rates of its members.

51 We sought to measure the relative growth rates of T cells and tumor cells in a mo

52 Rather, size scaling is determined by the relative growth rates of the vacuole and the cell, thus

53 protein systems, but also in vivo, where the relative growth rates of yeast may be predicted from the

54 sampling periods, and measurable declines in relative growth rates were observed at concentrations be

55 The aim was to determine: (1) the relative growth response of these species, (2) potential

56 r these growing ribbons and find that as the relative growth strain is increased, a long flat lamina

57 This occurs by allowing relative growth to be measured along a temperature gradi

58 By measuring the relative growth velocity of domains during ripening, we

59 s (sex [P = .02] and age [P = .02]), whereas relative growth was associated with 1 polymorphism (CFB-

60 mparison areas demonstrated that the largest relative growth was in immune dysregulation/inflammation

61 determined by elimination, immigration, and relative growth within its communities.

62 GA progression (both rate of progression and relative growth) within a Spanish population.