戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ated with body weight in terms of phenotypic relative growth.
2 wn about the effect of genomic imprinting on relative growth.
3                           However, models of relative growth accounting for global measures revealed
4 mically induced colonic cancers may confer a relative growth advantage during colonic malignant trans
5 differentiation of adjacent stem cells and a relative growth advantage to Apc-deficient telomere dysf
6 ell growth and that Atg1 mutant cells have a relative growth advantage under conditions of reduced TO
7 cent labeling and exogenous variation of the relative growth and conversion rates.
8 time measurement of precise and simultaneous relative growth and protein synthesis rates of multiplex
9              New experiments reveal that the relative growth between cell surface area and volume are
10 ous and isotropic forces that arise from the relative growth between the gut tube and the anchoring d
11 aps of various growth descriptors, including relative growth, directionality, and anisotropy.
12 evelop a theoretical model to understand the relative growth energetics of the alpha and 2H phases of
13                                          The relative growth in new dementia cases was especially pro
14 ley proposed an appealingly simple model of "relative growth"-in which an organ and the whole body gr
15                         At cooler sites, the relative growth increase was greater than at warmer site
16                                   Changes in relative growth indicated variation in host capacity to
17 ne combination, this extended to an enhanced relative growth inhibition of a heterologous parasite li
18                                              Relative growth is often used as a phenotypic measure to
19         These results are synthesized into a relative-growth model that applies to questions ranging
20 tte smoking with the rate of progression and relative growth of GA.
21 ive trait nucleotides (QTNs) associated with relative growth of individual tissues and organs to body
22 timate genome-wide imprinting effects on the relative growth of multiple tissues and organs to body w
23 nificant phytotoxicity was observed based on relative growth of plants and stress enzyme activities.
24 late osmolytes, we observed some increase in relative growth of proline-overaccumulating cells in mil
25 her, only two imprinted QTNs responsible for relative growth of spleen and liver were verified by gen
26  and in carnivorous plants, by modifying the relative growth of the lower and upper sides of the leaf
27 y on the measurable geometry, elasticity and relative growth of the tissues.
28 on depend in large measure on changes in the relative growth of the various parts of the body.
29                                              Relative growth of transport verses endocrine zones of t
30 carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P), relative growth rate (G), and nutrient productivity scal
31 lings of the four species as the quotient of relative growth rate (RGR) and photosynthesis per unit t
32         Precipitation redistribution reduced relative growth rate (RGR) of trees grown with grass.
33 d whole-plant water-use efficiency (WUE) and relative growth rate (RGR) under well-watered conditions
34                                              Relative growth rate (RGR), leaf water potential (psi w)
35 nt growth using a size-corrected estimate of relative growth rate (RGR).
36                 There is no requirement that relative growth rate be frequency dependent.
37  each cell lineage reaches this same maximum relative growth rate but at different times.
38 offs across and within species between plant relative growth rate in high resource conditions (RGR) v
39                     At the population level, relative growth rate is a sensitive metric of fitness, l
40  manner and that an allele's arithmetic mean relative growth rate is greater than one when rare and t
41 han one when rare and that its harmonic mean relative growth rate is less than one when common.
42 iation appear to be not linked to changes in relative growth rate of cells compared to their neighbor
43 hat allows us to measure the size, shape and relative growth rate of each of the crystal faces that a
44 ished in empirical studies, namely, that the relative growth rate of grasses is much higher compared
45                                          The relative growth rate of HDPCs of modified groups were hi
46 efense) pathways occurs at a decrease of the relative growth rate of potato leaf, due to the costs in
47             The latter was compared with the relative growth rate to estimate the rate of protein deg
48                                          The relative growth rate was estimated from sequential deter
49                                              Relative growth rate was statistically independent of th
50 examine natural selection, we used survival, relative growth rate, and flowering as fitness indices.
51 te functional trait spectra with theories of relative growth rate, and metabolic scaling.
52 ored trait, which may influence variation in relative growth rate, appears to vary directionally acro
53  enhanced leaf area index, crop growth rate, relative growth rate, net assimilation rate, and grain a
54             Building on foundational work on relative growth rate, recent work on functional trait sp
55 nal traits interact to regulate variation in relative growth rate, the allometric growth normalizatio
56 th equation, we estimated asymptotic growth, relative growth rate, the timing of inflection point and
57 n, which cells coordinate by adjusting their relative growth rate.
58 r mutations significantly enhanced bacterial relative growth rate.
59 wever, at 5 degrees C, NahG plants displayed relative growth rates about one-third greater than Col-0
60 s zeolite crystal shape modifiers to enhance relative growth rates along the desirable out-of-plane d
61 continuous presence of M. schumanni improved relative growth rates and leaf shearing resistance of Du
62 enerally stimulated growth, such that higher relative growth rates early in development placed seedli
63  measurements of long-term mean, maximum and relative growth rates for 176 trees from the world's lon
64 nt pollen tubes displayed normal morphology, relative growth rates for the most rapidly growing tubes
65                  We detected increased local relative growth rates in the formation of the precentral
66                                          The relative growth rates of different biological organs (al
67                          MMinte assesses the relative growth rates of interacting pairs of organisms
68 d by microbial immigration, elimination, and relative growth rates of its members.
69 er is a powerful model in which to study the relative growth rates of subcellular structures.
70                     We sought to measure the relative growth rates of T cells and tumor cells in a mo
71    Rather, size scaling is determined by the relative growth rates of the vacuole and the cell, thus
72 protein systems, but also in vivo, where the relative growth rates of yeast may be predicted from the
73           Together, changes in abundance and relative growth rates suggest different limiting factors
74 itulate experimentally observed decreases in relative growth rates under treatment as well as changes
75 sampling periods, and measurable declines in relative growth rates were observed at concentrations be
76  fixers peaked in the late summer when their relative growth rates were slowest.
77                  Tree size and age determine relative growth rates, bud abortion, and the water statu
78 essary to interpret correctly their observed relative growth rates.
79 s, demonstrating quantitative measurement of relative growth rates.
80 uggest that continued coexistence depends on relative growth rates: coexistence is maintained if the
81            The aim was to determine: (1) the relative growth response of these species, (2) potential
82 r these growing ribbons and find that as the relative growth strain is increased, a long flat lamina
83                      This occurs by allowing relative growth to be measured along a temperature gradi
84                             By measuring the relative growth velocity of domains during ripening, we
85 s (sex [P = .02] and age [P = .02]), whereas relative growth was associated with 1 polymorphism (CFB-
86 mparison areas demonstrated that the largest relative growth was in immune dysregulation/inflammation
87  determined by elimination, immigration, and relative growth within its communities.
88 GA progression (both rate of progression and relative growth) within a Spanish population.