ライフサイエンスコーパス: repeatability

1 and coefficients of variation for assessing repeatability.

2 log transformation, and asymmetric limits of repeatability.

3 1)), recoveries in the range of 50% and good repeatability.

4 all samples at a high level of precision and repeatability.

5 e to the ease of signal application and high repeatability.

6 practically quantitative recoveries and good repeatability.

7 The controls were scanned twice to assess repeatability.

8 nts (ICCs) were used to assess agreement and repeatability.

9 uptake or glucose correction did not improve repeatability.

10 e type and tumor localization did not affect repeatability.

11 timized with respect to signal magnitude and repeatability.

12 of repeated measures significantly improved repeatability.

13 nsor for more than 100 cycles with excellent repeatability.

14 95% limits of agreement, and coefficients of repeatability.

15 ncentrated 5000-fold, with good recovery and repeatability.

16 hile providing added resolution and improved repeatability.

17 meters including specificity, precision, and repeatability.

18 s, and wearable circuits with high yield and repeatability.

19 ; one condition was measured twice to assess repeatability.

20 quantization played a major role in feature repeatability.

21 hy donors is strongly recommended to improve repeatability.

22 x traits in maize have small effects and low repeatability.

23 Bland-Altman analysis was used to quantify repeatability.

24 ss was highly repeatable within individuals (repeatability, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.89) and moderatel

25 The lectin nanoelectrode showed a good repeatability (1.24% RSD) and reproducibility (4.24% RSD

26 ility (RSD in the 5-20% range) and inter-day repeatability (4 days; RSD never exceeded 12%).

27 Moreover, the biosensor showed good repeatability (4.3% RSD) and reproducibility (3.8% RSD).

28 merit obtained, e.g. recovery (72.4-106.5%), repeatability (8.8%), within-laboratory reproducibility

29 For evaluating the repeatability, a combinatorial approach was conducted to

30 PET repeatability accuracy in the controls was comparable to

31 Test-retest repeatability across the various manufacturer, field str

32 The level of repeatability also depended strongly on the quantization

33 st studies have been performed to assess SUV repeatability, although a comparison of reports is compl

34 ion values between 0.74 and 2.16% (n=10) for repeatability and 0.11-19.39% (n=5) for intermediate pre

35 d a high precision (in terms of CV: 5.3% for repeatability and 5.5% for intermediate precision).

36 ng-based, semiautomated method provides high repeatability and accuracy for estimating abdominal adip

37 Purpose To determine the repeatability and accuracy of a commercially available m

38 vision can greatly increase the efficiency, repeatability and accuracy of image review.

39 To assess the repeatability and agreement of keratometry and pachymetr

40 The method was assessed for accuracy, repeatability and detection and quantitation limits indi

41 geneous GO overlay with desirable stability, repeatability and durability.

42 on value of ~4.801x10(3)TCID50/mL, with good repeatability and excellent specificity.

43 Repeatability and heritability of choroidal thickness an

44 ness while ensuring both suitable analytical repeatability and improved the detection sensitivity.

45 ometry was also used to evaluate durability, repeatability and interference from other compounds.

46 25-1.00mugkg(-1)), recovery (80.13-100.04%), repeatability and intermediate precision (<10% RSD).

47 High levels of repeatability and intermediate precision (CV less than 0

48 ween 100% and 104%) and precision (RSD's for repeatability and intermediate precision between 0.57% a

49 The method showed excellent repeatability and intermediate precision expressed as co

50 The repeatability and intermediate precision varied between

51 The effect of DEN-gas on the repeatability and intermediate precision was also invest

52 vinegars, with values of 1.7%, and 2.3% for repeatability and intermediate precision, respectively.

53 Precision was studied in terms of repeatability and intermediate precision, with relative

54 nearity, specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, repeatability and intermediate precision.

55 n 0.4, thus demonstrating high intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility for all

56 ty, approaches limits imposed by measurement repeatability and is higher than achieved with a single

57 nts ranged from 0.3 to 5129mg/kg with a mean repeatability and mean intermediate precision of 4% each

58 variate PLS approach demonstrated acceptable repeatability and method stability (RMSECV=4.79ppm; RMSE

59 Repeatability and precision showed <9% relative standard

60 e trade-offs, but their consequences for the repeatability and predictability of evolution are unclea

61 ed that the proposed assays presented a good repeatability and reproducibility (<7% RSD) and mean rec

62 The method showed satisfactory repeatability and reproducibility (CV<6%).

63 er, they can be easily replaced showing good repeatability and reproducibility (RSD lower than 6% in

64 tection limit of 0.33 mug L(-1), outstanding repeatability and reproducibility (RSD(intraday) of 5.6%

65 were between 84 and 110%, within laboratory repeatability and reproducibility - in the range of 3.29

66 accuracy with a coefficient of variation for repeatability and reproducibility below 6% for AA and be

67 Based on the repeatability and reproducibility measurements, the calc

68 Intra-laboratory repeatability and reproducibility percentages were 2.95%

69 rties for detection of DENV with outstanding repeatability and reproducibility performances.

70 tion recoveries between 80 and 91%, and good repeatability and reproducibility values.

71 Excellent repeatability and reproducibility were also achieved.

72 Repeatability and reproducibility were also assessed in

73 Coefficients of repeatability and reproducibility were less than 0.4, th

74 ses showed that the new method presents high repeatability and reproducibility with both intra and in

75 e present study was to assess the precision (repeatability and reproducibility) of a new optical biom

76 preclinical imaging; however, the precision (repeatability and reproducibility) of OT has yet to be d

77 The precision (repeatability and reproducibility) of the OA-2000 was ex

78 Precision measured in terms of repeatability and reproducibility, expressed as percenta

79 le method that yields results of appropriate repeatability and reproducibility.

80 y was assessed with statistical estimates of repeatability and reproducibility.

81 tection ever reported with better stability, repeatability and response time.

82 ), limit of quantification (LOQ), stability, repeatability and selectivity.

83 Our sensors show excellent repeatability and stability, over a period of several we

84 The results showed sufficient repeatability and thus emphasized the applicability of n

85 Good selectivity/specificity, recovery, repeatability and within-laboratory reproducibility, LOD

86 concentration levels, calculating trueness, repeatability and within-laboratory reproducibility, spe

87 of detection and quantification, precision (repeatability) and accuracy (recovery).

88 ive standard deviation (RSD%) for intra-day (repeatability) and inter-day (reproducibility) at 25 and

89 d to evaluate degeneration, diurnal changes, repeatability, and age effects, respectively.

90 ficiency as well as the accuracy, precision, repeatability, and linearity of the method were assessed

91 M.; S/N = 3), long-term stability, excellent repeatability, and reproducibility.

92 HSP70 immunosensor acquired good stability, repeatability, and reproducibility.

93 s/CQDs nanohybrid with high reproducibility, repeatability, and stability has a favorable capability

94 th reference to a background region improved repeatability, and the most stable parameter was the tum

95 etection (LoD) ( approximately 35 mug/m(3)), repeatability ( approximately 94%), desorption efficienc

96 st one template, minor improvements in assay repeatability are also shown.

97 ms that can detect imperfections and improve repeatability are desired.

98 0000muL(-1)) with only 10muL sample and high repeatability as low as 10% in CoV (Coefficient of Varia

99 e describe the testing procedure and present repeatability as well as agreement of the score with acc

100 d on the number of detected compounds, LODs, repeatability as well as simplicity.

101 Spring departure timing exhibited high repeatability at the upper end of migration timing repea

102 There were no significant differences in repeatability between data obtained 60 and 90 min after

103 There was a significant difference in repeatability between studies-a difference that did not

104 all levels and there was very good technical repeatability between the morning and afternoon imaging

105 ed temporal clustering of feeding, with high repeatability both within and between years (r range: 0.

106 STS measures demonstrated poor repeatability, but the average of repeated measures sign

107 Repeatability, calculated as relative standard deviation

108 -subject coefficient of variation (wCV), and repeatability coefficient (r) were recorded.

109 meta-analysis to generate an estimate of the repeatability coefficient (RC) for magnetic resonance (M

110 The repeatability coefficient did not significantly differ b

111 Results The repeatability coefficient for pulmonary PWV was 0.96.

112 The repeatability coefficient of PCAN was 0.49%.

113 Intrareader variability was low (repeatability coefficient ranged from 1.50 mm(2) to 1.83

114 robust to increased noise on a voxel-level (repeatability coefficient, 16% vs. >26%).

115 had larger variability than larger volumes (repeatability coefficient, 45% vs. 29%; P = 0.048).

116 es were found in robustness between methods (repeatability coefficient, 80%-84%).

117 riation, critical percentage difference, and repeatability coefficient.

118 iography showed good within-session baseline repeatability (coefficient of variation, 0.8%-5.2%; intr

119 rics of the averaged PERCIST target lesions (repeatability coefficients < 10%).

120 by Bland-Altman plots and calculation of 95% repeatability coefficients (RCs) of the log-transformed

121 Repeatability coefficients (RCs) were calculated from th

122 In the case of SUVmax, the repeatability coefficients for SUV, SUVAUC, and SUVTBR w

123 The repeatability coefficients of PTF and TBF in liver lesio

124 The repeatability coefficients of various semiquantitative (

125 ility was assessed using Bland-Altman plots, repeatability coefficients, and intraclass correlation c

126 lent linearity (R(2) >/= 0.9921), acceptable repeatability (coefficients of variance </=15.6%), and s

127 ity (R(2) >/= 0.90) for 75.3% and acceptable repeatability (coefficients of variance </=30%) for 84.5

128 , including spatial resolution, accuracy and repeatability, compare imaging data generated with our d

129 successive tomography measurements and lower repeatability compared with healthy eyes.

130 between the 2 devices, with a coefficient of repeatability (COR) of 0.044 (P = .05).

131 The coefficient of repeatability (CR) of the central macular subfield was 3

132 elation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of repeatability (CR).

133 lows: linearity (r0.99), recovery (75-108%), repeatability (CV 1.60-15.9%), reproducibility (CV 2.60-

134 provides a high recovery (70.8-99.2%), good repeatability (CV<10.4%), high linearity (r>0.9915) and

135 provides a high recovery (70.8-99.2%), good repeatability (CV<10.4%), high linearity (r>0.9915) and

136 Repeatability data consisted of an (18)F-FDG PET/CT stud

137 Coefficients of repeatability did not differ significantly by anatomic l

138 evene test was used to determine whether ADC repeatability differed between studies.

139 evene test was used to determine whether ADC repeatability differed between these groups.

140 The enhanced repeatability fosters the use of DEN-gas sheathless CE-E

141 Precision, expressed as repeatability, has been evaluated by analysing six repli

142 th common and novel measures for test-retest repeatability, however, the quick CSF delivers more prec

143 fined target lesions were included (n = 34), repeatability improved for all uptake values.

144 DC is a robust imaging metric with excellent repeatability in extracranial soft tissues across a wide

145 e factors with the greatest impact on signal repeatability in phantoms were rotational position and u

146 ave a significant influence on the elevation repeatability in the early stages of the follow up perio

147 od exhibits low limits of detection and good repeatability in the tested 0.1-15.0% enrichment range.

148 The intra-day and inter-day assay repeatability, in the analysis of real samples was less

149 the method, linearity, recovery, precision (repeatability), intermediate precision, limit of detecti

150 fied criteria testing accuracy, specificity, repeatability, intermediate precision, and linearity.

151 Between sprayers, repeatability is 16%, 9%, 23%, and 34% for high, medium,

152 Conclusion MR imaging repeatability is better for global texture parameters th

153 Absolute intensity repeatability is compared for five lab-built sprayers us

154 the range of 70-120% with within-laboratory repeatability less than 20% for the overall working rang

155 (18)F-NaF PET demonstrates repeatability levels useful for clinically quantifying t

156 Method accuracy, repeatability, linearity and specificity were investigat

157 and repeatability lower than 3%.

158 ecovery between 85% and 115%) and precision (repeatability <15% RSD).

159 k purity), instrumental precision (<6.4%CV), repeatability (<6.3%CV) and intermediate precision (<9.9

160 Recoveries ranged from 92.3 to 114.8% with repeatability lying between 0.9 and 15.1% and reproducib

161 Repeatability measurements of defined regions (ROIs) of

162 erval and higher confidence interval for all repeatability measurements), was compared before and aft

163 mean value, relative measurement error, and repeatability (MEr-R).

164 le data, addressing issues such as different repeatability metrics, relative units, log transformatio

165 provided the separation power, accuracy, and repeatability needed for quantitative analysis of the ad

166 tep in VD calculation significantly improved repeatability, normal population variation, and correlat

167 The repeatabilities of our sputtered fibers and the commerci

168 of these quantitative data, we evaluated the repeatability of (18)F-FLT PET as part of a multicenter

169 This study aimed to evaluate the repeatability of (18)F-NaF PET-derived SUV imaging metri

170 y of 0.959 and high precision of 0.907, high repeatability of 0.95 when compared to a gold-standard o

171 hat by using a method of process monitoring, repeatability of a build could be monitored specifically

172 onstrained by the data, we obtain time-lapse repeatability of about 2% in the model domain-a threshol

173 with this device to assess the intrasession repeatability of ACD, CCT, PCT at different nasal and te

174 The repeatability of ADC estimates from small, medium, and l

175 To evaluate the intrasession repeatability of anterior chamber depth (ACD), central (

176 Purpose To assess the repeatability of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) es

177 Evaluate agreement and repeatability of axial length (AL), corneal curvature, a

178 The accuracy, reproducibility, and repeatability of base calling were >99.9%.

179 The stability, reproducibility, and repeatability of BiO-SPE were also investigated.

180 Within-session repeatability of CAP was good, with a coefficient of var

181 The intrasession repeatability of choroidal thickness at 5 measured horiz

182 nt cooperative tasks are intercorrelated and repeatability of cooperative behavior is similar to that

183 To assess repeatability of corneal tomography in successive measur

184 ll individual misalignment components on the repeatability of corneal topography maps.

185 This first report on the repeatability of D-DNP highlights the compatibility of t

186 fe' birch allergen products indicated better repeatability of ELISA-B.

187 The repeatability of Eth and AA detection in various foods (

188 its implications for the predictability and repeatability of evolution.

189 A reproducibility test demonstrated high repeatability of fresh yolk measurements, but significan

190 Purpose To assess the day-to-day repeatability of global and local-regional magnetic reso

191 to 103% with relative standard deviations of repeatability of less than 5%.

192 urpose To prospectively assess agreement and repeatability of magnetic resonance (MR) elastography li

193 Purpose To determine the repeatability of magnetic resonance (MR) elastography-de

194 With the repeatability of measurements being known, the significa

195 days, depending the on study) to assess the repeatability of median and mean ADC estimates.

196 The average repeatability of our state-of-the-art D-DNP NMR equipmen

197 We assessed the repeatability of PCAN and its correlations with VA.

198 The repeatability of PET and low-dose CT features should be

199 Conclusion: The test-retest repeatability of shape and heterogeneity features in PET

200 The test-retest repeatability of shape and heterogeneity features in PET

201 Iterative Closest Point (ICP) algorithm, the repeatability of successive corneal elevation measuremen

202 The repeatability of SUVAUC was comparable to that of standa

203 es were obtained for SUVpeak and SUVmean The repeatability of SUVAUC was comparable to that of SUVmax

204 The repeatability of SUVmax, SUVmean, and SUVtotal for (18)F

205 The repeatability of the BCI device measurements was assesse

206 s could not be completely suppressed and the repeatability of the EIS measurements was limited.

207 time, 2.5h for the whole process, with good repeatability of the electrode's preparation.

208 Here we examine the repeatability of the evolution of TTX resistance in an u

209 s of detection (0.010-0.058 mug/L), and good repeatability of the extractions (relative standard devi

210 and 0.9958, depending on analytes), and good repeatability of the extractions (relative standard devi

211 Repeatability of the fitted parameters and changes under

212 meability glycoprotein (P-gp) and assess the repeatability of the inhaled (99m)Tc-sestamibi clearance

213 Here, we exploit the repeatability of the recorded trapping efficiency, offer

214 factor which yielded better sensitivity and repeatability of the sensor response.

215 repeated in five participants to assess the repeatability of the technique by using a Bland Altman a

216 response assessment, an understanding of the repeatability of the technique is required.

217 s apart and provide basic information on the repeatability of the technique.

218 UVs: SUV, SUVAUC, and SUVTBR The test-retest repeatability of these metrics, as well as metabolic tum

219 een developed to improve the reliability and repeatability of this evaluation.

220 Our results confirmed a good repeatability of ultra-high resolution FTICR-MS, both in

221 study was to comprehensively investigate the repeatability of various quantitative whole-body (18)F-F

222 The purpose of this study was to assess the repeatability of various semiquantitative (18)F-fluorome

223 nary dynamics that determine the entropy, or repeatability, of mutational paths.

224 the adsorbed protein of about 20% and a good repeatability on antigen/antibody distribution on the su

225 tructures that enables good registration and repeatability on folding.

226 atrix effect, LOQ, specificity, trueness and repeatability precision were attained.

227 up level, and that the randomized Elo-rating repeatability provides researchers with a standardized m

228 del parameters (actuator backlash, and stage repeatability 'r') from computed pairwise translations a

229 % to 109%, and coefficients of variation for repeatability ranged from 4% to 11%.

230 CV for repeatability ranged from 4.0% to 51.0%, while the CV fo

231 Repeatability ranges from 1 to 224% for individual spray

232 Repeatability relative standard deviations (RSDr) for MM

233 ability at the upper end of migration timing repeatability reported in literature.

234 bio-hybrid computing circuitry feature high repeatability, reproducibility and comparably low propag

235 ts, the detection and quantification limits, repeatability, reproducibility and recovery.

236 Finally, we tested reusability, repeatability, reproducibility, and robustness of column

237 Complementarily, we assessed the repeatability, reproducibility, recovery, and linearity

238 measurements showed high intra- and interday repeatability (RSD < 1%), and they were not affected by

239 ompatible with raw human urine and excellent repeatability (RSD </= 3.9%), linearity (r(2) >/= 0.9989

240 An excellent precision was confirmed by repeatability (RSD (%)=0.30) and intermediate precision

241 covery (89-110%) and satisfactory precision: repeatability (RSD 14.9%) and within-laboratory reproduc

242 nearity range towards 2,4-D (1-100ppb), good repeatability (RSD 6%), stability and a LOD (0.3ppb) low

243 Intraday quantification repeatability (RSD in peak height) was 3.2% (n = 5).

244 A separation repeatability (RSD in retention time) of 1.4% (n = 5) wa

245 Precision was calculated as intra-day repeatability (RSD in the 5-20% range) and inter-day rep

246 The repeatability (RSD%) for a fiber (n = 3) was less than 1

247 Repeatability (RSD</=2.80%), intermediate precision (RSD

248 oped methods showed high reproducibility and repeatability (RSD<5%).

249 Esters were extracted with high repeatability (% RSD for hexyl butanoate and butyl butan

250 Linearity (r(2)) and repeatability (%RSD of migration time, peak height, and

251 ), limit of quantification (LOQ), precision (repeatability) (RSD%) and accuracy (recovery).

252 (10 min), good retention time and peak area repeatability, (RSD% 0.80 and 8.68, respectively) as wel

253 The relative standard deviation for repeatability (RSDr) ranged from 4.1 to 10.3%, while the

254 showed equivalent results for linear range, repeatability, sensitivity and constant of affinity.

255 Inter-observer repeatability should be evaluated in future studies.

256 d matrix effect, accuracy, within-laboratory repeatability, specificity, LOQ, LOD, Q/q relative ion i

257 Absolute intensity repeatability, spectral composition, and classification

258 The repeatability (Sr) of STS measured with the HiScan was 0

259 mulations, phantom experiments, and clinical repeatability studies.

260 we have designed and completed a test-retest repeatability study for differential HDX-MS experiments

261 Repeatability tests returned mean variations of 3.2% and

262 Larger volumes of interest showed better repeatabilities than smaller regions.

263 le in uveitis patients, with coefficients of repeatability that are nearly comparable to those publis

264 The higher the repeatability, the greater the likelihood that one can d

265 Despite high repeatability, the observed between-year variation of sp

266 h a fast response, significant stability and repeatability, the proposed sensor holds practical imple

267 In terms of repeatability, there was no significant difference in me

268 The repeatability was 5.2% and the internal reproducibility

269 time of the sensor was within 60 s, and the repeatability was 6.5% (RSD).

270 Repeatability was a strong function of SNR; a 50% increa

271 Repeatability was also high, demonstrated by triplicate

272 Repeatability was assessed by Bland-Altman plots and cal

273 Repeatability was assessed for 46 texture features, and

274 th SUVmax, SUVmean, and SUVtotal Test-retest repeatability was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis,

275 Repeatability was assessed using within-subject standard

276 Interstudy repeatability was assessed with intraclass correlation.

277 Results Repeatability was better for global parameters than for

278 Repeatability was excellent; RSD values from 0.1 to 4.4%

279 The best repeatability was found using the SUV metrics of the ave

280 Intragrader repeatability was generally greater than intergrader val

281 th Pentacam HR and Galilei, although overall repeatability was high for all instruments.

282 Intragrader repeatability was high for both definite fungus (kappa:

283 Results: Repeatability was highly variable among features.

284 Repeatability was highly variable among features.

285 Repeatability was poorest for the following high-order g

286 Repeatability was significantly different between small,

287 Acceptable repeatabilities were obtained for peak area (%RSD <3.1%

288 tudy, excellent selectivity, peak shape, and repeatability were achieved by combining achiral and chi

289 and hepatic PDFF intra- and interexamination repeatability were assessed by using intraclass correlat

290 Intragrader and intergrader repeatability were assessed using the intraclass correla

291 Reproducibility and repeatability were assessed using the intraclass correla

292 ducibility (CAP and PDFF) and within-session repeatability were assessed with linear regression analy

293 ned as well as their corresponding long-term repeatability were compared.

294 and LOQ, precision (RSD values for inter-day repeatability were found between 3.49 and 6.12%), and tr

295 ication, precision (RSD values for inter-day repeatability were found between 4.2 and 7.3% considerin

296 Similar levels of repeatability were seen for both methods.

297 -1), providing higher accuracy and intra-day repeatability with a mean percentage error of 18.7% and

298 The experiments had good repeatability with RMSCV < 15% and ICC > 60%.

299 inverse difference moment demonstrated good repeatability, with narrow limits of agreement and wCVs

300 had a small but not negligible influence on repeatability, with the best performance obtained using