ライフサイエンスコーパス: research ethics

1 ocol judgments on complex issues of clinical research ethics.

2 s of QI methods, with concurrent advances in research ethics.

3 e author to any information related to human research ethics.

4 proved by the institutional review board for research ethics.

5 t juncture in the genesis of modern clinical research ethics.

6 y aligned with an industry-based approach to research ethics.

7 autonomy in the context of the evolution of research ethics.

8 vior), intensive care unit leadership style, research ethics, allocation of resources, triage, and ot

9 t, informatics, statistical methodology, and research ethics and policy, and these are collectively h

10 In this article, we review sovereignty, research ethics, and data-sharing considerations when do

11 demies report articulates a path forward for research, ethics, and governance of clinical application

12 Institutional review board research ethics approval was granted to use anonymized c

13 The study had local research ethics approval.

14 A regional committee for medical research ethics approved the study, and informed volunte

15 ent, and the Norwegian committee for medical research ethics approved the study.

16 Three generations in the evolution of human research ethics are identified: 1) Hippocrates to Nuremb

17 s on observational research, and psychiatric research ethics as applied to special populations such a

18 The Office of Human Research Ethics at the University of North Carolina and

19 sual clinical care, is an important topic in research ethics because it may impede informed consent.

20 his study protocol was approved by the local research ethics board and by Health Canada.

21 dy was approved by the University of Toronto Research Ethics Board and did not require informed conse

22 t to a protocol that was approved by a local research ethics board and Health Canada and was complian

23 Study was local research ethics board and Health Canada approved and HIP

24 tive observational study was approved by the research ethics board and included 55 consecutive patien

25 Research ethics board approval was not necessary because

26 Research ethics board approval was not necessary because

27 Materials and Methods Research ethics board approval was obtained and all pati

28 Institutional research ethics board approval was obtained for this ret

29 Materials and Methods The clinical research ethics board approved chart review, and the req

30 The institutional research ethics board approved this study and waived inf

31 Informed consent was waived after the research ethics board approved this study.

32 Approval was obtained from the institutional research ethics board, and informed consent from patient

33 ational study was obtained from the hospital research ethics board, and the need to obtain informed c

34 niversity of Western Ontario Health Sciences Research Ethics Board, London, Ontario, Canada), and wri

35 Materials and Methods In this institutional research ethics board-approved prospective study, health

36 In this institutional research ethics board-approved prospective study, with p

37 clinical trial approved by the institutional research ethics board.

38 The study was approved by the local research ethics board.

39 The study was approved by the research ethics board.

40 oved by Western University's Health Sciences Research Ethics Board.

41 dy was approved by the University of Toronto Research Ethics Board; informed consent was not required

42 ry distress syndrome, and with approval from research ethics boards, we collected a minimal dataset o

43 nal political and human rights contexts into research ethics codes or ethics reviews.

44 ics approval was granted by South Manchester Research Ethics Committe.

45 ned from the University of Zambia Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (011-04-12).

46 The study was approved by the research ethics committee and informed consent was obtai

47 This study was approved by the Cantonal Research Ethics Committee and informed written consent w

48 hods This study was approved by the national research ethics committee and was performed with informe

49 oval from the Newcastle and North Tyneside 2 Research Ethics Committee and with written consent.

50 MATERIALS AND Approval from the local research ethics committee and written informed consent w

51 Local research ethics committee approval and informed consent

52 Local research ethics committee approval and informed consent

53 Research ethics committee approval and informed consent

54 Research ethics committee approval and patient written i

55 Research ethics committee approval and patient written i

56 Research ethics committee approval and patient written i

57 study, performed between 2006 and 2016 with research ethics committee approval and written informed

58 Research ethics committee approval and written informed

59 The study was performed with local research ethics committee approval and written informed

60 Research ethics committee approval was granted to record

61 Research ethics committee approval was obtained for this

62 Local research ethics committee approval was obtained with wri

63 Local research ethics committee approval was obtained; informe

64 D Informed consent and multicenter and local research ethics committee approval were obtained.

65 )He and (129)Xe were performed with National Research Ethics Committee approval, with informed consen

66 itution study was HIPAA-compliant with local research ethics committee approval.

67 only 9% accessed the detail presented on the Research Ethics Committee approved participant informati

68 The institutional research ethics committee approved the study, and parent

69 The local research ethics committee approved the study, and writte

70 ients provided signed consent, and the local research ethics committee approved the study.

71 The local research ethics committee approved this study, and the s

72 The local research ethics committee approved this study, and writt

73 proval was granted by the Faculty of Science Research Ethics Committee at the University of Bristol.

74 iew board exemption was granted by the local research ethics committee for this retrospective study.

75 K National Health Service Central Office for Research Ethics Committee guidelines; informed patient c

76 The research ethics committee waived the requirement for inf

77 As a result, a research ethics committee was established at three hospi

78 After approval from the Human Research Ethics Committee was obtained, we recruited pot

79 at a time, if clinically appropriate, (5) a Research Ethics Committee with specific transplantation

80 Methods The study was approved by the local research ethics committee, and all participants gave wri

81 The study was approved by the Royal Free Research Ethics Committee, and all subjects gave full wr

82 This study was approved by the hospital research ethics committee, and informed written consent

83 ials and Methods The study was approved by a research ethics committee, and participants gave written

84 The study was approved by the national research ethics committee, and written patient consent w

85 as approved by the Griffith University Human Research Ethics Committee, the Stanford University Panel

86 The study was approved by the University's research ethics committee, which conforms to the declara

87 al was obtained by the Southern Health Human Research Ethics Committee, which waived the requirement

88 case-control study was approved by the local research ethics committee.

89 This study was approved by the local research ethics committee.

90 sent and the study was approved by the local research ethics committee.

91 with due ethical approval of the Nottingham Research Ethics Committee.

92 view Board, and the Australian Defense Human Research Ethics Committee.

93 ospective analysis was approved by the local research ethics committee.

94 The study protocol was approved by the local research ethics committee.

95 care, and should be overseen by a functional research ethics committee.

96 lfilled before it would be appropriate for a research ethics committee/institutional review board to

97 al ethical approval was granted by the local research ethics committee; all participants gave written

98 proval, and monitoring of clinical trials by research ethics committees (RECs).

99 based on archived protocols approved by six research ethics committees between 13 January 2000 and 2

100 ms and guidelines for further development of research ethics committees in El Salvador.

101 The study was approved by the human research ethics committees of the participating hospital

102 l participants, patients, sponsors, funders, research ethics committees or institutional review board

103 Finally, journals, funders, sponsors, research ethics committees, regulators, and legislators

104 that research projects have been examined by research ethics committees.

105 oved by the Regional Committee on Biomedical Research Ethics, Denmark.

106 The Human Research Ethics Group, administered by the Center for Bi

107 the human rights movement and the sphere of research ethics have overlapping principles and goals, t

108 e 2 most prominent medical whistleblowers in research ethics of the 20th century.

109 t Virginia Commonwealth University involving research ethics raises important and complex issues in s

110 investigators and that between patients and research ethics review boards are both damaged.

111 Every element of a research ethics review--the balance of risks and benefit

112 AND This study was approved by the National Research Ethics Service Committee North West-Lancaster (

113 thods The study was approved by the National Research Ethics Service Committee; written informed cons

114 Given the advances in research ethics, substantially grounded in the Nuremberg

115 Despite several codes of research ethics, the issuance of comprehensive rules reg

116 tional ethical committee for animal care and research ethics was obtained.