ライフサイエンスコーパス: resective

1 With the poor results of resective and fenestration procedures for polycystic liv

2 The ultimate goal of both resective and regenerative periodontal procedures is the

3 Half of patients who have resective brain surgery for drug-resistant epilepsy have

4 In the 18 patients who underwent resective brain surgery, neuroimaging results were compa

5 udited seizure outcome of 693 adults who had resective epilepsy surgery between 1990 and 2010 and use

6 Resective epilepsy surgery can be beneficial, particular

7 n and seizure outcome of patients undergoing resective epilepsy surgery for this condition.

8 ions of patients, who had undergone a second resective epilepsy surgery from 1989 to 2009.

9 Reoperation after failed resective epilepsy surgery led to approximately 70% long

10 For carefully selected individuals, resective epilepsy surgery may offer the best hope for a

11 lated quality of life (HRQOL) improves after resective epilepsy surgery, but data are limited to shor

12 ents, 9 (38%) had an excellent outcome after resective epilepsy surgery.

13 lp minimize damage to eloquent cortex during resective epilepsy surgery.

14 ve multicenter study, 396 patients underwent resective epilepsy surgery.

15 ether the administration of infliximab after resective intestinal surgery for Crohn's disease reduces

16 e lack of an evidence basis for 'aggressive' resective management continues to pose dilemmas for surg

17 rapy, ketogenic diet, hypothermia, emergency resective neurosurgery and multiple subpial transection,

18 gnificant cause of morbidity, the effects of resective neurosurgery and their relation to tumour path

19 Resective neurosurgery carries the risk of postoperative

20 reoperatively and before discharge following resective neurosurgery.

21 A resective or debulking surgical approach was described i

22 nt open-flap debridement and did not undergo resective or regenerative periodontal therapy.

23 ectiveness of dental lasers as an adjunct to resective or regenerative surgical periodontal therapy.

24 Healthy subjects who needed resective periodontal surgery participated in the study.

25 Osseous resective procedures predictably produce minimal clinica

26 Among cases managed surgically, resective procedures were performed in 89% of cases, whe

27 fer valuable information for use in planning resective surgeries in patients with brain lesions, as w

28 Although 9 of 24 patients undergoing resective surgery (38%) had excellent outcomes, only 9 o

29 asia quotients and language quotients before resective surgery all had normal quotients postoperative

30 considered, looking at changes in classical resective surgery and new methodology being introduced i

31 studies, support the efficacy and safety of resective surgery and, more recently, non-resective surg

32 Dysphasia and its response to resective surgery are related to the tumour neuropatholo

33 rom a development cohort of patients who had resective surgery at the Cleveland Clinic (Cleveland, OH

34 Resective surgery did not prevent the recurrence of seiz

35 Resective surgery for left-sided intracranial tumours si

36 eview of 143 patients with MCD who underwent resective surgery for medically refractory epilepsy.

37 0 and 2010 with 8,091 adult patients who had resective surgery for supratentorial infiltrative glioma

38 Extending outcome analysis beyond the resective surgery group to the entire group of patients

39 Reported rates for non-resective surgery have been less impressive in terms of

40 These new drugs along with earlier resective surgery have led to a better outcome for many

41 Resective surgery is a safe and effective treatment of d

42 Resective surgery is at best regarded as a practice opti

43 In the case of drug resistant epilepsy resective surgery is often considered.

44 epilepsy is commonly pharmacoresistant, and resective surgery is often contraindicated by proximity

45 We report the immediate effects of resective surgery on language functions in a heterogeneo

46 ients with newly intractable disabling MTLE, resective surgery plus AED treatment resulted in a lower

47 good, but the problem of brain shift during resective surgery remains problematical and is a cogent

48 Failure to treat unicentric disease by resective surgery resulted in a significant mortality (1

49 dministration of infliximab after intestinal resective surgery was effective at preventing endoscopic

50 idualized therapy, including drug treatment, resective surgery, adverse-event management, and nutriti

51 al findings, surgical approach, outcome from resective surgery, and implications for pathophysiology.

52 urgical techniques reviewed included osseous resective surgery, flap curettage, distal wedge procedur

53 syndrome, allow patients to be assessed for resective surgery.

54 erative scores, 57% remained dysphasic after resective surgery.

55 refractory to drugs should be evaluated for resective surgery.

56 he 18 infants were considered candidates for resective surgery.

57 ripples (Rs), fast ripples (FRs), and VHFOs; resective surgery; and at least 1 year of postoperative

58 of resective surgery and, more recently, non-resective surgical interventions for the treatment of dr

59 periods, a possibility that is eliminated by resective surgical treatment approaches.

60 approach to the use of both regenerative and resective therapies will enhance the clinical results ac

61 iodontal therapy should be considered before resective therapy or extraction; 2) The application of a

62 ease (MCD), nature of the surgical approach (resective vs diagnostic), and outcome (disease-free surv