ライフサイエンスコーパス: resistive index

1 iabetes, low chronic vascular score, and low resistive index.

2 tility index (VPI), the venous equivalent of resistive index.

3 biopsy results, was associated with a higher resistive index (0.87 +/- 0.12 vs. 0.78 +/- 0.14 [P=0.05

4 Hepatic arterial resistive index also increases after a meal, but interob

5 iation for a single measurement was 0.08 for resistive index and 39 msec for systolic acceleration ti

6 Renal Doppler was used to measure resistive index and esophageal Doppler to monitor aortic

7 ng-II, TLR4 deficient mice had reduced renal resistive index and increased renal cortical blood flow

8 n, nine sonographers measured hepatic artery resistive index and systolic acceleration time in five h

9 study should be ultrasound, using change in resistive index and transvaginal ultrasound.

10 aorta ultrasound revealed a reduction in the resistive index and wall-to-lumen ratio.

11 Increase in the mean resistive index at 15 minutes was 12% in the proper hepa

12 renal-allograft recipients, we measured the resistive index at baseline, at the time of protocol-spe

13 ortal venous blood flow and hepatic arterial resistive index before and 30 minutes after a liquid mea

14 raphic examinations were performed to obtain resistive indexes before and during fontanelle compressi

15 The difference in resistive index between the two groups was not significa

16 (P < .001)--and to increase hepatic arterial resistive index by 0.089 (P < .001)--a change in sonogra

17 of intramural arterial signal recorded, and resistive index calculated.

18 Graft flow volume and resistive index change did not correlate with stenosis.

19 Stroke volume showed no correlations with resistive index changes after fluid challenge in the ove

20 Stroke volume did not correlate with resistive index changes after fluid challenge in the sub

21 terial pressure and bilateral peak velocity, resistive index, coronal vascular cross-sectional area,

22 Although the arterial resistive index did not differentiate between rejection

23 correlation was found between the change in resistive index during compression and elevated intracra

24 id removal and correlated with the change in resistive index during compression of the anterior fonta

25 The mean resistive indexes for the right epididymal head, body, a

26 A resistive index greater than 0.8 was associated with a h

27 OLT recipients developed DAA (defined by HA resistive index [HARI] <0.5) and received oral SVDs.

28 There was also a significant resistive index increase from 0.69 +/- 0.12 to 0.79 +/-

29 m 209.2 to 331.9 mL/min and hepatic arterial resistive index increased from 0.70 to 0.77 and from 0.6

30 entage of nocturnal fall in SBP and elevated resistive index independently correlated with GFR.

31 ction, high chronic vascular score, and high resistive index irrespective of allograft fibrosis.

32 The intrarenal resistive index is routinely measured in many renal-tran

33 A resistive index less than 0.60 indicated inflammation.

34 Resistive index measurement before and after fluid chall

35 A total of 1124 renal-allograft resistive-index measurements were included in the analys

36 differ significantly between patients with a resistive index of at least 0.80 and those with a resist

37 Allograft recipients with a resistive index of at least 0.80 had higher mortality th

38 Several new imaging indices like resistive index of capsular artery, presumed circle area

39 An intrarenal arterial resistive index of less than 0.6 was associated with hig

40 tive index of at least 0.80 and those with a resistive index of less than 0.80 at 3, 12, and 24 month

41 0.80 had higher mortality than those with a resistive index of less than 0.80 at 3, 12, and 24 month

42 intranodular vascularity, pulsatility index, resistive index, or peak-systolic velocity, was associat

43 Statistically significant elevation of the resistive index (P < .01) of the hepatic arteries was ob

44 tration rate (P < 0.001), and improved renal resistive index (P < 0.001) and kidney microcirculation.

45 ge was the strongest determinant of a higher resistive index (P<0.001).

46 -allograft status, although the value of the resistive index remains unclear.

47 rmonic imaging was performed, and interlobar resistive index (RI) and renal blood flow were determine

48 city (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), or resistive index (RI) at 24 hours.

49 e-corrected peak systolic velocity (PSV) and resistive index (RI) values were compared between patien

50 averaged maximum mean velocity (V(mean)) and resistive index (RI) were calculated in the middle cereb

51 xpanded criteria donor (ECD) definition, and resistive index (RI) were developed for pretransplant ev

52 ity, portal vein flow volume, hepatic artery resistive index (RI), hepatic artery pulsatility index (

53 ere renal length, relative echogenicity, and resistive index (RI).

54 city (EDV), peak systolic velocity (PSV) and resistive index (RI).

55 rmance of the standard IHA and MHA criteria (resistive index [RI] < 0.5 and classic parvus tardus wav

56 The resistive index, routinely measured at predefined time p

57 For resistive index, the estimated variance components were

58 ced by fluid challenge do not translate into resistive index variations in patients without acute kid

59 Mean resistive index was greater for lymphatic malformation t

60 t protocol-specified biopsy time points, the resistive index was not associated with renal-allograft

61 Maximum change in resistive index was significantly higher (P < .001) in i

62 Mean resistive index was significantly lower in neonates with

63 Renal resistive index was unchanged after fluid challenge in b

64 cal epinephrine; however, Pourcelot's ratio (resistive index) was not significantly different compare

65 healthy subjects, the pulsatility index and resistive index were estimated from mean frequency shift

66 Pulsatility index and resistive index were mapped with color Doppler ultrasoun

67 Portal blood flow and renal and splenic resistive indexes were calculated through echographic me

68 Vessel density, peak flow velocities, and resistive indexes were compared.

69 Resistive indexes were determined for the hepatic arteri

70 eration time, waveform morphology grade, and resistive index) were compared before and after interven

71 Baseline resistive index without fontanelle compression was not c